Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Maple Manor Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to serve food at palatable temperatures on two survey days. A resident complained about cold food, and observations showed food temperatures below the facility's standard of 140°F. A three-bean vegetable dish was served at 72.5°F, and other meals were also below the required temperature. An administrative staff member confirmed the expectation for food to be served at acceptable temperatures.
The facility failed to adhere to its food storage policy, resulting in multiple food items in the main kitchen being found without labels or open dates. This included items in the walk-in refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage. An administrative staff member confirmed the expectation for proper labeling and dating, which was not followed.
The facility failed to maintain the dignity and personal hygiene of two residents. A resident's urinary catheter leg bag was repeatedly observed uncovered, contrary to facility policy. Another resident was frequently seen with an unshaven face, soiled shirt, and food debris, despite staff interactions. An administrative nurse confirmed these deficiencies, highlighting a lack of adherence to care standards.
The facility failed to follow professional standards in diabetes management for two residents. One resident's elevated blood glucose levels were not reported to the provider as required, and another resident received insulin without proper pen priming and administration time. These actions were confirmed by administrative staff.
A resident with weakness and dementia was not provided adequate supervision during a transfer, as CNAs inconsistently used one or two staff members despite care plan instructions. Observations showed a CNA assisting the resident with one staff member, even when the resident was shaky. Interviews revealed confusion among CNAs about the required assistance, and an administrative nurse noted that a nurse should assess the need for additional staff.
A resident with dementia requiring assistance with toileting was not adequately supported, leading to saturated and leaking incontinent products. Observations and record reviews showed multiple instances where staff failed to assist the resident every three hours as expected, with gaps of up to 12 hours. An administrative staff member confirmed the expectation for toileting assistance every 2-3 hours, which was not met.
Deficiency in Serving Food at Palatable Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve foods at palatable temperatures on two of the three days of the survey, specifically on July 8 and 9, 2024. According to the facility's policy, hot food items should be served at a temperature of at least 140 degrees Fahrenheit to ensure good flavor and prevent foodborne illnesses. However, observations during the survey revealed that food temperatures were below this standard. On July 8, a resident expressed dissatisfaction, stating that the food was always cold. During the noon meal observation on the same day, a three-bean vegetable dish was served at 72.5 degrees Fahrenheit. On July 9, during the evening meal, the temperatures of macaroni and cheese, mashed potatoes, and green peas were recorded at 132, 139, and 95 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. An administrative staff member acknowledged that the expectation was for food to be served at acceptable temperatures.
Deficiency in Food Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in its main kitchen, as observed during a survey. The facility's policy requires that opened or prepared foods be placed in enclosed containers, dated, and labeled. However, during an inspection of the walk-in refrigerator, several food items were found without identifying labels or open dates. These included containers of taco sauce, a brick of cream cheese, bowls of desserts, a bag of sliced strawberries, bags of shredded cheese, and a jar of peach preserves. Additionally, a tray of fruits contained a spoiled orange, and a tray of fruit juice containers was found sitting in spilled juice with dark, sticky spots. Further inspection of the walk-in freezer revealed bags of frozen potato tots, french fries, and omelet patties without labels or open dates. The dry storage area contained open bags of pudding mix and croutons without open dates. An administrative staff member confirmed that the expectation was for staff to label and date food items when opened and to discard any food items that were not identifiable. This lack of adherence to food storage policies has the potential to affect food quality and safety.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity and Personal Hygiene
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care that promotes dignity and enhances the quality of life for two residents requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #8's urinary catheter leg bag was observed exposed and uncovered on multiple occasions, despite the facility's policy requiring such bags to be covered to maintain the resident's dignity. This was confirmed by an administrative nurse who stated that staff are expected to cover the catheter leg bags at all times. Resident #14 was frequently observed with an unshaven face, a soiled shirt, and food debris on his face, indicating a lack of personal hygiene care. Despite multiple interactions with staff, the resident's shirt was not changed, and his face was not adequately cleaned. An administrative nurse confirmed that Resident #14 often had a soiled shirt or dirty face and that staff were expected to address these issues. The facility's failure to maintain the residents' personal hygiene and dignity was evident through these repeated observations.
Failure to Follow Professional Standards in Diabetes Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice in two separate instances involving residents with diabetes. In the first instance, a resident with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus had a physician's order to notify the provider if blood glucose levels exceeded 400 mg/dL or fell below 70 mg/dL. Despite recorded blood glucose levels of 445 mg/dL and 436 mg/dL on two separate occasions, the facility did not document any notification to the resident's provider about these elevated levels. An administrative nurse confirmed that the staff failed to notify the provider, which could have placed the resident at risk for delayed treatment and adverse health events. In the second instance, the facility did not follow its policy for insulin administration. During an observation, a medication aide prepared an insulin pen for a resident without priming it, which is necessary to remove air bubbles and ensure accurate dosing. The aide also failed to wait the required length of time after administering the insulin before removing the needle. An administrative staff member confirmed that the staff did not follow the established procedure for insulin administration, potentially leading to the resident receiving an inaccurate dose.
Inadequate Supervision During Resident Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents during a gait belt transfer for a resident diagnosed with weakness and dementia. The resident's care plan indicated that transfers should be assisted by one or two staff members, depending on the resident's condition. A physical therapy note also recommended using two staff members if the resident appeared shaky. However, during an observation, a CNA assisted the resident with a transfer using only one staff member, despite the resident showing signs of shakiness and unsteadiness. Interviews with CNAs revealed inconsistencies in the understanding and implementation of the transfer assistance required for the resident. One CNA stated they always used one assist because they were instructed to do so, while another CNA mentioned using two staff members only sometimes, depending on the resident's condition. An administrative nurse indicated that the decision for the number of staff required for a transfer should be assessed by a nurse, highlighting a lack of proper supervision and delegation in the facility.
Inadequate Toileting Assistance for Resident with Dementia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate toileting assistance for a resident diagnosed with dementia, who required staff assistance with toileting. The care plan indicated that the resident needed assistance from one staff member for toilet use. However, observations revealed that the resident was not assisted in a timely manner, resulting in the resident's incontinent product becoming saturated and leaking urine through their clothing. This was observed on two separate occasions, highlighting a pattern of inadequate toileting assistance. A review of the resident's toileting record from June 9th to July 9th, 2024, showed 56 instances where staff did not assist the resident with toileting every three hours as expected. The log indicated gaps ranging from 3.5 to 12 hours between toileting assistance. An administrative staff member confirmed that the expectation was for staff to assist residents with toileting every 2-3 hours, which was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the citations issued around you in the last 12 months — including the immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Langdon
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pembilier Nursing Center | 23.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Wedgewood Manor | 34.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Good Samaritan Society - Park River | 38.5 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Maple Manor Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.