Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Community Nursing Home Of Anaconda during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A contracted agency staff member worked at the facility for over a year without receiving an annual performance review. Facility staff confirmed that performance reviews were not conducted for agency staff, and the agency did not provide such evaluations. The staff member also did not receive annual education based on performance reviews.
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for four residents, resulting in unmet activity needs. A resident was observed facing a wall in her wheelchair, while another expressed a desire for more activities and outings. Staff interviews revealed that care plans were generic and not tailored to individual needs, with the activity director not contributing to the plans.
The facility failed to provide adequate activities for residents, with several participating in very few activities over a month. Observations showed residents were often left in their rooms or watching TV programs they did not enjoy. Staff interviews revealed care plans were generic and not tailored to individual interests, with poor documentation of resident engagement. The activity program was acknowledged as weak, needing improvement and more comprehensive care plans.
A resident's dignity was compromised when a staff member wheeled them to the shower room with their lower body exposed. Although the upper body was covered with a bath poncho, the facility's usual practice of ensuring full coverage with an extra blanket was not followed. Staff acknowledged the importance of maintaining resident privacy, aligning with the facility's policy on treating residents with respect and dignity.
A facility failed to consistently consult wound care services and document wound details for a resident with a Stage II pressure ulcer, resulting in prolonged healing. Despite daily care attempts, the wound's status fluctuated without significant progress, and wound care services were consulted only twice over several months. The resident's EHR showed inconsistent documentation of the wound's stage and measurements, failing to meet the facility's quality of care standards.
Failure to Complete Annual Performance Review for Agency Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct annual performance reviews for an agency staff member who had been contracted for over 12 months. Interviews with facility staff revealed that performance reviews were not performed for agency staff, and the agency itself did not provide such evaluations. Staff confirmed that the contracted staff member had been working at the facility since the COVID period, and no documentation of a performance review was available upon request. Additionally, the agency staff member reported not receiving annual education based on performance reviews, as these were not conducted.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plans for Resident Activities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that addressed the activity preferences and physical abilities of four residents. Resident #15 was observed sitting in her wheelchair facing a wall, with limited engagement in activities. Despite her care plan indicating the need for simple, structured activities, there was no evidence of such activities being provided. Resident #14, who is dependent on staff for all care areas, was noted to have an outdated activity assessment and limited participation in group activities, contrary to her preference for independent activities. Resident #4 was observed sleeping in the activities room while other residents engaged in card games, indicating a lack of personalized activity planning. Resident #10 expressed a desire for more activities and outings, but her care plan did not reflect her preferences for bingo, puzzles, and arts and crafts. Staff interviews revealed that care plans were generic and not tailored to individual resident needs, with the activity director not contributing to the care plans. This lack of comprehensive and individualized care planning led to unmet activity needs for the residents involved.
Inadequate Resident Activities and Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate group and individual activities to meet the interests and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of four residents. Resident #15, who is mostly nonverbal, was observed sitting in her room facing the wall and participated in only 7 activities over 28 days. Resident #14, who enjoys animals and medical shows, was observed watching cartoons she did not like and participated in only 4 activities over the same period. Resident #4 was observed sleeping in his room and in the activities room, participating in only 6 activities. Resident #10 expressed a desire for more activities and outings, having participated in only 5 activities. Interviews with staff revealed that care plans were generic and not specific to residents' interests. Staff admitted to not documenting one-on-one visits or when residents refused activities. The activity director did not contribute to care plans, and the overall activity program was acknowledged as weak, with a need for more comprehensive care plans and activities tailored to residents' needs, including those with dementia. The facility was working on improving the program and bringing back volunteers post-COVID.
Resident Dignity Compromised During Shower Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide dignity for a resident during a transfer to the shower room. During an observation, a staff member was seen wheeling a resident in a bath chair with the resident's lower body exposed and visible underneath the shower chair, while the upper body was covered by a bath poncho. Interviews with staff members revealed that the usual practice was to ensure residents were covered before being moved out of their rooms, with an extra blanket used if necessary. Staff members acknowledged the importance of maintaining resident privacy and expressed discomfort at the thought of being uncovered in a similar situation. The facility's policy on Resident Rights emphasizes treating each resident with respect and dignity, promoting their quality of life, and protecting their rights.
Inconsistent Wound Care Consultation and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently consult wound care services and adequately document the wound measurements, severity, and characteristics for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This deficiency resulted in the resident's Stage II pressure ulcer remaining unhealed for four months, with little improvement or intervention. The wound initially appeared approximately a year ago, and despite daily wound care attempts by staff, the wound's status fluctuated without significant progress. Staff interviews revealed that wound care services were consulted only twice over several months, and there was no consistent follow-up or updated wound care orders unless the wound status changed. The resident's electronic health record (EHR) showed inconsistent documentation of the wound's stage and measurements over several months. The wound assessments lacked consistent staging and detailed measurements, with some entries missing crucial information. The facility's document titled 'Quality of Care' indicated that residents with pressure ulcers should receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new ulcers, but this standard was not met in the case of the resident's left buttock wound.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 11 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Anaconda
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy At Deer Lodge | 21.4 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Copper Ridge Health And Rehabilitation Center | 23.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Continental Care And Rehabilitation | 24 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Southwest Montana Veterans Home | 24 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Crest Nursing Home | 24 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Community Nursing Home Of Anaconda.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.