Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Longwood Community Living Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of inappropriate sexual behaviors was not provided with increased supervision or monitoring, despite escalating incidents and medication changes. This lack of proactive measures led to an incident where the resident inappropriately touched another resident who was severely cognitively impaired and unable to protect herself. Staff interviews confirmed that no additional monitoring was implemented, and the deficiency was acknowledged by facility leadership.
A facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity by posting a picture on social media that showed the resident in an undignified state, with visible wetness on her clothing. The resident, who had moderate cognitive impairment and was diagnosed with COPD and Alzheimer's, was photographed during an activity. Both the Administrator and DON confirmed the violation of the resident's rights, acknowledging the failure to adhere to facility policies on dignity and respect.
A facility failed to accurately document a resident's code status as specified in their Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. The resident's document indicated 'Do not resuscitate after one (1) hour of trying,' but the facility's records showed a DNR status without these conditions. This inconsistency was confirmed by the Administrator, highlighting a failure to reflect the resident's end-of-life care wishes.
A resident in the facility was found with an overbed table that had exposed jagged edges due to the missing protective border. The resident, who had thin skin and moderate cognitive deficits, expressed concern about potential scratches or bruises. The DON confirmed the issue and acknowledged that it should have been addressed earlier, indicating a failure to maintain equipment safely as per facility policy.
Two residents with PTSD diagnoses did not have person-centered care plans addressing their condition. One resident, cognitively intact, lacked a PTSD care plan due to oversight, while another resident with moderate cognitive deficits also lacked a care plan, despite experiencing symptoms like nightmares and anxiety. Interviews confirmed the absence of necessary trauma-informed care plans.
A resident with a PTSD diagnosis did not receive a Trauma Informed Care Assessment as required by facility policy. Despite the resident's history of losing two children and exhibiting symptoms like nightmares and crying out in sleep, the Social Services staff was unaware of the PTSD diagnosis and failed to conduct the necessary assessment. The DON confirmed the oversight, noting the resident's upset over long-term stay and the family's dismissal of her nighttime disturbances.
Failure to Provide Adequate Supervision for Resident with Behavioral Disturbances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring for a resident with a history of behavioral disturbances, including inappropriate sexual behaviors. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and diagnosed with dementia, bipolar disorder, and Alzheimer's disease, exhibited escalating inappropriate behaviors over a documented period. Despite an increase in medication dosage and multiple psychiatric evaluations, there was no documentation or implementation of increased supervision or monitoring for this resident. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the resident's behaviors but revealed that no additional monitoring measures were put in place. An incident occurred in which the resident attempted to touch another resident, who was severely cognitively impaired and unable to protect herself, inappropriately. Staff intervened immediately during the incident, but records and interviews indicated that the facility had not taken proactive steps to prevent such events by increasing supervision. The Director of Nursing and other staff acknowledged the lack of documentation and implementation of increased monitoring, despite the resident's ongoing behavioral issues.
Violation of Resident Dignity Due to Inappropriate Social Media Post
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dignity of a resident by posting a picture on its social media account that portrayed the resident in an undignified manner. The picture showed the resident sitting in a wheelchair, holding a cup of ice cream, while dressed in a blue long-sleeved shirt and peach-colored pants. The resident appeared to be wet between her mid-thighs and on her right leg, with the wetness extending to her knees, indicating a lack of personal care. This incident was identified through observation of the social media post, staff and resident interviews, and a review of facility policies. The resident involved had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Alzheimer's Disease, and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During interviews, both the Administrator and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the picture violated the resident's rights and confirmed that the facility failed to ensure the resident's dignity was maintained before the picture was posted. The facility's policies on resident rights and dignity emphasize treating residents with respect and ensuring their well-being, which were not adhered to in this instance.
Inaccurate Code Status Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a resident's code status, which was inconsistent with the resident's Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. The resident, who was moderately impaired cognitively, had a Durable Power of Attorney document specifying 'Do not resuscitate after one (1) hour of trying' and 'No life support machine(s) in any town city, or state.' However, the facility's records, including the physician's orders and code status form, indicated a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status without the specified conditions. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator, who acknowledged that the facility's documentation did not reflect the resident's end-of-life care wishes as outlined in the Durable Power of Attorney. The resident, who was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dysphagia following cerebral infarction and chronic kidney disease, had a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The facility's policy on advance directives requires that such documents be maintained in the resident's medical record and that the attending physician be notified of any advance directives or changes. Despite this policy, the facility failed to accurately document the resident's specific wishes for end-of-life care, potentially leading to a situation where the resident's desired care was not provided.
Unsafe Overbed Table with Exposed Jagged Edges
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe environment for a resident, as evidenced by an overbed table with exposed jagged edges. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining equipment in a safe and operable manner, according to the facility's policy. However, during an observation and interview, it was found that the protective border was missing from all four sides of the overbed table, leaving rough, jagged areas exposed. The resident expressed concern that these edges could scratch or bruise her, especially since she had thin skin that could easily tear. The Director of Nursing confirmed the condition of the overbed table and acknowledged that it should have been noticed and replaced earlier. The resident involved had been admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated moderate cognitive deficits, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10. This deficiency highlights the facility's failure to adhere to its maintenance policy, potentially compromising the resident's safety and comfort.
Failure to Develop PTSD Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for two residents diagnosed with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Resident #11, who was admitted with a PTSD diagnosis among other conditions, did not have a care plan addressing her PTSD. Interviews with the resident, RN/MDS Coordinator, and the Director of Nurses confirmed the absence of a comprehensive care plan for PTSD, which was acknowledged as an oversight. The resident's cognitive status was intact, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15, yet the necessary trauma-informed care plan was not implemented. Similarly, Resident #37, who had a PTSD diagnosis added to her records, also lacked a care plan addressing her PTSD, including triggers or interventions. The resident, who experienced significant personal losses, reported symptoms such as nightmares and anxiety. Interviews with the RN/MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nurses confirmed the absence of a comprehensive care plan for PTSD, which should have been developed to address the resident's individualized needs. The resident's cognitive status showed moderate deficits with a BIMS score of 10, yet the trauma-informed care assessment was not completed.
Failure to Conduct Trauma Informed Care Assessment for Resident with PTSD
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a Trauma Informed Care Assessment for a resident diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The resident, who had a history of losing two children, was observed to have nightmares and cried out in her sleep. Despite these symptoms and a new PTSD diagnosis, the Social Services staff did not conduct the required assessment. The Social Services staff admitted to being unaware of the resident's PTSD diagnosis and acknowledged that an assessment should have been completed upon the new diagnosis. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the resident was admitted for therapy services and later informed by her family that she would remain in the facility long-term, which upset her. The DON also noted that the family had mentioned the resident's nighttime disturbances but did not consider them significant. A psychiatric Nurse Practitioner evaluated the resident and added the PTSD diagnosis, yet the Trauma Informed Care Assessment was overlooked. The facility's policy mandates such assessments for residents with trauma histories, but this was not adhered to in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 53 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Booneville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center | 0.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Nmmc Baldwyn Nursing Facility | 11.7 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Cornerstone Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 19.4 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Ms Care Center Of Alcorn County, Inc-snf | 19.5 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Tippah County Nursing Home | 22.4 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Longwood Community Living Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.