Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Camellia Estates during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A long-term care facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident at high risk for MDROs and did not adhere to hand hygiene protocols during care for multiple residents. Staff did not use gowns during wound care for a resident requiring EBP, and several instances of improper glove use and lack of hand hygiene were observed during care for other residents, increasing the risk of infection.
A resident with specific dietary needs due to medical conditions was not provided meals aligning with his high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet as instructed by his doctor. Despite expressing concerns to the Dietary Manager, the resident continued to receive meals high in carbohydrates, which did not match his dietary preferences or the Registered Dietitian's recommendations. The facility acknowledged the inconsistency in meal provision.
The facility failed to label and date open food items in the kitchen, as observed during a survey. Several items, including rainbow sprinkles, food color, lemon juice, buttermilk, seasoning salt, and imitation vanilla, were found open without labels indicating their shelf life. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the requirement for staff to date open items and stated that she has conducted training on this practice.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident at high risk for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). During an observation of sacral wound care for Resident #3, neither the Registered Nurse (RN) nor the Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) donned gowns as required by EBP guidelines. The RN confirmed the lack of gown use and was unaware of the necessity for EBP, while the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) responsible for infection prevention was also unaware of the specific requirements for residents with catheters, PEG tubes, and chronic wounds. The Director of Nursing (DON) later confirmed that Resident #3 required EBP, which had not been instituted, despite previous in-service training on the guidelines. The facility also failed to adhere to hand hygiene protocols during care for several residents. For Resident #11, an LPN did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene during PEG tube site care, acknowledging the potential risk of infection. Similarly, during perineal care for Resident #68, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not perform hand hygiene after touching various surfaces before providing care. The CNA admitted to not considering hand hygiene upon entering the room, which could lead to cross-contamination. Further observations revealed additional lapses in hand hygiene. During perineal care for Resident #70, the CNA touched a container with soiled gloves and did not perform hand hygiene before changing gloves. For Resident #216, an LPN did not change gloves during suprapubic catheter care, handling both the soiled dressing and the catheter site with the same gloves. The LPN acknowledged this breach in protocol, and the Infection Preventionist confirmed the expectation for staff to change gloves and perform hand hygiene to prevent increased infection rates.
Failure to Honor Resident's Dietary Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that dietary staff supported the nutritional well-being of a resident while respecting his right to make choices about his diet. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including Fusion of Cervical Spine, Essential Hypertension, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, expressed concerns about being served meals that did not align with his doctor's instructions for a high-protein and low-carbohydrate diet. Despite having communicated his dietary preferences to the Dietary Manager, the resident continued to receive meals high in carbohydrates, which he believed could negatively impact his health. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident was served meals inconsistent with his dietary needs, such as pancakes, eggs, and grits for breakfast, and hamburgers with French fries and banana pudding for lunch. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the inconsistency and attributed it to staff not understanding high-protein diets. The Administrator confirmed the facility's failure to honor the resident's food preferences, despite the goal to meet all residents' preferences. The Registered Dietitian's assessment recommended increased protein portions and liquid protein supplements, which were not consistently provided as per the resident's tray card indicating a Consistent Carbohydrate Diet/No Added Salt High Protein diet order.
Failure to Label and Date Open Food Items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety. During an initial tour of the kitchen, several food items were observed to be open without being labeled with open dates. These items included a six-pound container of rainbow sprinkles, a 16-ounce container of red shade pure food color, a 48-ounce container of Real Lemon 100% juice, a half-gallon of buttermilk labeled Wholesome, a clear container of seasoning salt without a date or item description, and a 32-ounce container of imitation vanilla flavor. All these items were open and lacked the required labeling to indicate their shelf life. The Dietary Manager confirmed that staff are required to date all open items in the kitchen to indicate their shelf life and prevent potential outbreaks. She acknowledged that it is her responsibility to ensure staff adhere to this practice and mentioned that she has conducted in-service training on the importance of dating open items. Despite these measures, the deficiency was noted during the survey, indicating a lapse in adherence to the facility's food storage labeling policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 54 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mccomb
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mccomb Community Care Center | 0.2 mi | — | 1 | 1 |
| Courtyard Health And Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | — | 2 | 2 |
| Liberty Community Living Ctr | 19.8 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Diversicare Of Tylertown | 21 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Billdora Senior Care | 21.9 mi | — | 4 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Camellia Estates.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.