Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Fieser Nursing Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a left heel wound was not properly assessed and documented by facility staff, leading to a delay in identifying the worsening condition. Despite having orders for wound care, the facility failed to conduct timely assessments, resulting in the wound being diagnosed as osteomyelitis and gangrene at the hospital. Interviews revealed a lack of communication and coordination in wound care management between facility staff and hospice providers.
A resident with a history of pressure injuries was not provided with adequate care, leading to the development of stage III pressure ulcers. The facility staff failed to accurately assess and document the resident's condition, and new treatment orders from a wound care provider were not transcribed or completed. The resident, who was dependent on staff for care and had multiple risk factors, did not receive the necessary interventions to prevent further deterioration.
Failure to Accurately Assess and Document Wound Condition
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide services consistent with acceptable standards of practice for a resident when staff did not accurately assess and document the condition of a left heel wound. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for daily activities, was admitted with a wound to the left heel. Despite having orders for wound care and regular assessments, the facility staff did not complete a Braden assessment upon readmission and failed to document changes in the wound's condition over time. The resident's medical records showed inconsistencies in wound assessments and documentation. Initial assessments noted the wound as having no signs of infection, but later observations by hospice staff and hospital records indicated the presence of necrotic skin, malodor, and erythema. The facility's failure to conduct timely and accurate assessments led to a delay in identifying the worsening condition of the wound, which was later diagnosed as osteomyelitis and gangrene at the hospital. Interviews with facility staff and hospice providers revealed a lack of communication and coordination in wound care management. The hospice nurse and aides provided care twice a week, but facility staff were responsible for administering treatments on other days. However, there was a failure to report changes in the wound's condition to the hospice provider, physician, or family, resulting in the resident being sent to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment.
Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing for a resident. The staff did not accurately assess open areas on the resident's buttock and coccyx, which were later identified by a wound care provider as stage III pressure injuries. Despite receiving new treatment orders from the wound care provider, these orders were not transcribed to the resident's physician orders or completed as directed. This oversight was part of a broader failure to adhere to the facility's policies on pressure ulcer prevention and management. The resident involved had a history of pressure injuries and was readmitted to the facility with several diagnoses, including protein-calorie malnutrition and cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for mobility and care, used a wheelchair, and was incontinent of bowel with an indwelling urinary catheter. Despite these risk factors, there were no documented Braden assessments, and the resident's pressure ulcers were not consistently documented or treated according to the wound care provider's recommendations. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident's wounds were not properly managed, with staff failing to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition or the wound care provider's recommendations. The resident's care plan and treatment administration records did not reflect the necessary updates, leading to inadequate care. The facility's wound report also failed to list the resident, indicating a lack of proper tracking and documentation of the resident's condition.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 628 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fenton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Grove Wellness & Rehabilitation | 1.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Delmar Gardens Of Meramec Valley | 1.6 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Friendship Village Sunset Hills | 1.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Fountain Care At Sunset Hills | 2.2 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Delmar Gardens South | 3.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Fieser Nursing Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.