Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Delmar Gardens Of Chesterfield during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple chronic conditions was discharged without a complete discharge summary as required by facility policy. Although some discharge planning and documentation occurred, the electronic medical record did not include a comprehensive summary from all departments, omitting key information such as a recapitulation of the stay and a final summary of the resident's status at discharge.
Two residents at high risk for pressure ulcers did not receive care in accordance with facility protocols, resulting in the development of a new Stage II ulcer for one and inadequate management of an existing Stage IV ulcer for another. Both residents experienced prolonged periods without repositioning or timely incontinence care, and wound care practices were not consistently followed, including improper dressing application and failure to keep the wound area clean.
Failure to Complete Required Discharge Summary for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a complete discharge summary was prepared for a resident at the time of a planned discharge. According to the facility's discharge and transfer policy, a discharge summary must be completed for all residents being discharged home or transferred to another facility. This summary should include a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status at discharge, a list of medications, follow-up appointments, and other pertinent information to ensure continuity of care. However, record review revealed that for one resident, this process was not fully followed. The resident in question had multiple diagnoses, including vascular disease, heart failure, a left shoulder cuff tear, long-term use of diuretics and anticoagulants, and a history of stroke. The resident's care plan indicated a goal of returning home with family support, and various care conferences and social service notes documented ongoing discharge planning, including referrals to assisted living facilities and coordination with the family. Despite these efforts, the medical record lacked a comprehensive discharge summary from all departments, as required by policy. Progress notes and the physician's discharge summary provided some information about the resident's medications and discharge orders, but did not include a full recapitulation of the resident's stay or a detailed final summary of the resident's status at discharge. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the electronic medical record should contain a discharge summary from all departments, including details on medications, home health arrangements, and follow-up appointments, but this was not present for the resident in question.
Failure to Prevent and Properly Manage Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow its own wound care and pressure ulcer prevention protocols for two residents at high risk for pressure ulcers. One resident, who was incontinent, immobile, and receiving hospice care, developed a new Stage II pressure ulcer on the right buttock. Despite care plan interventions requiring frequent incontinence checks, prompt perineal care, and regular repositioning, observations showed the resident remained seated on their buttocks in a wheelchair for extended periods without repositioning or incontinence care. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was not repositioned or checked for incontinence at least every two hours as required, and the lack of these interventions was acknowledged as a contributing factor to the development of the new pressure ulcer. Another resident, who was cognitively intact but dependent on staff for mobility and personal care, had an existing Stage IV pressure ulcer on the sacrum. The care plan required frequent repositioning, keeping the resident clean and dry, and proper wound care. However, observations revealed the resident was left lying flat on their back for prolonged periods, with no positioning devices used to offload pressure from the wound area. The resident was also found with a heavily soiled brief and dirty absorbent pads, and perineal care was not performed as frequently as required. Wound care was administered, but the dressing was not always properly secured, and fecal matter was found on and around the wound dressing, increasing the risk of infection and delayed healing. Staff interviews, including those with CNAs, LPNs, the wound nurse, and the DON, consistently indicated an expectation for residents at risk for pressure ulcers to be repositioned and checked for incontinence at least every two hours. Despite these expectations and facility policy, direct care observations and staff admissions demonstrated that these standards were not met for the two residents in question, resulting in the development of a new pressure ulcer for one resident and inadequate care for an existing Stage IV ulcer in another.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 575 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 9 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Chesterfield
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garden View Care Center Of Chesterfield | 0.8 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Friendship Village Chesterfield | 1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Westchester House, The | 1.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Mason Pointe Care Center | 1.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Delmar Gardens West | 1.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Delmar Gardens Of Chesterfield.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.