Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Aspire Senior Living New Florence during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Facility staff did not ensure an RN was present for at least eight consecutive hours per day as required, with staffing records showing multiple days where no RN was assigned. Interviews with the Staffing Coordinator, interim DON, and administrator confirmed awareness of the requirement but cited limited RN availability and scheduling issues as reasons for the deficiency.
Facility staff did not post or maintain required daily nurse staffing information, including staff hours and census, as mandated by policy. Observations and record reviews confirmed the absence of posted data and missing records for several months. Interviews revealed that key staff were unaware of their responsibilities regarding staffing information.
Facility staff failed to document wound treatments for a resident, leading to an infection, and did not perform neurological assessments after the resident experienced a fall. These deficiencies were identified during a review of records and interviews, affecting one resident out of three sampled in a facility with a census of 51.
The facility failed to properly screen four staff members for TB and did not adhere to hand hygiene protocols in the dietary department. Observations showed lapses in handwashing techniques and glove changes, contrary to facility policy. The administrator was unaware of the incomplete TB tests and attributed the oversight to staffing changes.
The facility failed to maintain accurate accounting for resident funds and did not provide quarterly bank statements from March to July 2024. The issue arose due to a transition in staff, affecting 25 residents. The Corporate AR and BOM were responsible for these tasks, but the accounts were not reconciled monthly, and statements were sent late.
Facility staff failed to refund personal funds to six discharged residents, with balances held in the facility's operating account. The facility lacked a Business Office Manager since February, and the corporate team was responsible for managing accounts. The administrator was unaware of the outstanding balances, and the Corporate Accounts Receivable acknowledged the oversight, stating that monthly reviews were not conducted due to a transition in responsibilities.
The facility failed to complete required pre-employment screenings for six employees, including CBC, EDL, FCSR, and CNA registry checks. This oversight occurred due to a lack of specific policy instructions and a change in personnel responsible for these tasks, with the new HR person unaware of the incomplete screenings.
Facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for several residents, leading to deficiencies in care. A resident receiving hospice services did not have hospice care included in their plan. Another resident's care plan contained conflicting code status information. A resident with pressure ulcers lacked instructions for moon boots, and a resident with cognitive impairment and wandering behavior had multiple unmet care needs, including hospice services and weight monitoring.
Failure to Provide Required RN Coverage
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week, as required by both facility policy and federal regulations. Review of RN staffing assignments revealed that on multiple dates, including 06/11/25, 06/13/25, 06/22/25, 07/04/25, 07/07/25, 07/12/25, and 07/13/25, there was no RN present in the facility for the required duration. The facility census at the time was 46 residents. The facility's own assessment and policy documents confirmed the expectation to have at least one RN on duty for eight hours daily, but this standard was not met on the identified dates. Interviews with the Staffing Coordinator, interim DON, and administrator confirmed awareness of the requirement but revealed that staffing limitations contributed to the deficiency. The Staffing Coordinator stated that only one RN was available aside from the DON, and when the RN was scheduled off, attempts to have the DON cover the shifts were unsuccessful. The interim DON, who assumed the role on 07/14/25, was not aware of the missed RN coverage on the specified dates. The administrator, recently returned from vacation, was also unsure why the RN requirement was not met on those days.
Failure to Post and Maintain Required Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to post the required daily nurse staffing information, including the facility name, current date, resident census, total number of staff, and actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff per shift. Observations on multiple occasions confirmed that the nurse staffing information was not posted in a clear and readable format in a prominent place accessible to residents and visitors. Record review revealed that the facility did not maintain daily nurse staffing records for several months, specifically for May, June, and the first half of July. The facility's policy requires this information to be posted daily and retained for at least 18 months. Interviews with the interim DON, staffing coordinator, and administrator revealed a lack of awareness and understanding of the responsibility to post and maintain the required nurse staffing information. The staffing coordinator was not aware it was their responsibility, and the interim DON and administrator were unsure why the records had not been maintained since the new company took over. The facility census at the time was 46.1, and there was no indication that any residents were directly affected or harmed as a result of this deficiency.
Failure to Document Wound Care and Conduct Neurological Assessments
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to maintain professional standards of practice by not documenting wound treatments for a resident, whose wound subsequently became infected. Additionally, staff did not perform necessary neurological assessments for the same resident following a fall. These deficiencies were identified during a review of records and interviews, affecting one resident out of three sampled in a facility with a census of 51.
Deficiencies in TB Screening and Hand Hygiene Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to adhere to applicable laws and regulations regarding Tuberculosis (TB) screening for employees. Specifically, four staff members, including an LPN, a CNA, and two Dietary Aides, were not properly screened for TB as per the facility's policy. The policy required a Mantoux two-step test for all employees and volunteers working eight or more hours per month, with the first step to be completed before resident contact. However, the personnel files of these staff members showed that either the second step of the TB test was not completed or the first step was conducted after they had already started working, indicating a lapse in compliance with the screening protocol. Additionally, the facility staff did not consistently follow proper hand hygiene procedures, particularly in the dietary department. Observations revealed that dietary staff did not wash their hands for the required duration, used the same paper towels to turn off faucets and dry their hands, and failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes. These actions were contrary to the facility's Glove and Hand Washing Procedures policy, which mandates specific handwashing techniques and glove usage to prevent cross-contamination. Interviews with dietary staff and the Certified Dietary Manager confirmed a lack of adherence to these procedures, with staff admitting to not following the correct handwashing steps due to oversight or being in a hurry. The administrator acknowledged the deficiencies in both TB screening and hand hygiene practices. The responsibility for TB testing had been assigned to a new MDS nurse, who had not yet been instructed to complete the screenings. The administrator was unaware of the incomplete TB tests until the survey and attributed the oversight to the departure of the previous MDS nurse. Similarly, the administrator and Certified Dietary Manager confirmed that staff were trained on proper hand hygiene procedures upon hire, but the observed practices indicated a gap between training and implementation.
Deficiency in Resident Fund Management and Statement Distribution
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an accurate accounting system for resident funds and did not provide quarterly bank statements to residents from March 2024 to July 2024. The facility's policy requires that transactions be entered daily and resident statements be sent quarterly. However, the facility's bank statements lacked monthly reconciliation, and no quarterly statements were sent out in 2024. This issue affected 25 residents out of a census of 54. Interviews revealed that the facility's accounting records were not reconciled monthly, and residents did not receive their quarterly bank statements due to a transition in staff. The former Business Office Manager (BOM) retired in February 2024, and the Corporate Accounts Receivable (AR) and Corporate BOM were responsible for these tasks. The Corporate AR admitted that the accounts were not reconciled monthly due to the transition, and the Corporate BOM, who took over a month ago, sent the second quarter statements late. The first quarter statements' status was uncertain, as the current Corporate BOM was not responsible at that time.
Failure to Refund Discharged Residents' Personal Funds
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff failed to provide refunds of personal funds to six residents who were discharged from the facility. The facility's policy requires that upon written request, the facility must hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the resident's personal funds. However, a review of the facility's Account Receivable Aging report showed that these residents had personal funds held in the facility's operating account, with balances ranging from $78.80 to $6922.04, despite being discharged. The facility census was 54. Interviews revealed that the facility had not had a Business Office Manager (BOM) since February, and the corporate team was responsible for bank reconciliations and Aging Reports. The administrator was unaware of the outstanding balances for discharged residents, as the corporate team assumed responsibility after the previous BOM retired. The Corporate Accounts Receivable (AR) acknowledged the oversight, stating that the AR report should be reviewed monthly for outstanding balances and credits, which had not been done due to the transition. The corporate AR is currently working on refunding the outstanding balances.
Failure to Complete Pre-Employment Screenings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete necessary pre-employment screenings for six out of ten sampled employees, which included a housekeeper, dietary aides, a licensed practical nurse, and certified nursing aides. The screenings that were not completed included the Criminal Background Check (CBC), Employee Disqualification List (EDL) verification, Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR), and Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) Registry verification. The facility's policy on recruitment and hiring, revised in March 2024, mandates that all pre-hire screenings be processed within one or two business days of receiving documentation from the hiring manager. However, the policy lacked specific instructions for checking the CNA registry, contributing to the oversight. The deficiency was further compounded by a change in personnel responsible for conducting these screenings. The former Business Office Manager, who was responsible for completing pre-employment screenings, retired in February, and the facility had not filled the position since. Consequently, the responsibility was transferred to the corporate HR department, which was managed by a new HR person who had only been with the company for one month. The administrator was unaware that the screenings had not been completed and could not provide an explanation for the oversight.
Deficiencies in Comprehensive Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for four residents, leading to deficiencies in care. Resident #5, who had cognitive impairment and was receiving hospice services, did not have hospice services included in their care plan despite having a physician's order for such services. This oversight was evident when hospice staff visited the resident, yet there was no direction in the care plan regarding hospice care. Resident #31's care plan contained conflicting information regarding their code status. Although the resident was assessed as cognitively intact and had a physician's order not to perform CPR, the care plan inaccurately documented the resident as both a full code and a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status. This inconsistency could lead to confusion among staff regarding the appropriate response in an emergency situation. Resident #44, who had severe cognitive impairment and pressure ulcers, was ordered to wear moon boots for pressure relief. However, the care plan did not include instructions for the use of moon boots, and observations showed the resident was frequently without them. Additionally, Resident #48, with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering, had multiple care needs, including hospice services, a wander guard, and monitoring for weight loss. Yet, the care plan lacked directions for these critical aspects of care, as evidenced by the resident's wandering behavior and significant weight loss over time.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 6 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near New Florence
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aspire Senior Living Jonesburg | 9.5 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Wellsville Health Care Center | 12.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Stonebridge Hermann | 15.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Warrenton Manor | 18.9 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| New Haven Care Center | 24.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Aspire Senior Living New Florence.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.