Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Truman Senior Living during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with type 2 diabetes was inaccurately coded in the MDS as receiving insulin injections, despite only being prescribed oral medications. The DON confirmed the error, and the MDS coordinator admitted to a misunderstanding, thinking Jardiance was an insulin injection. The facility's policy did not address MDS accuracy.
A facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and bipolar disorder. The care plan did not address the resident's failure to use the call light for assistance, despite being dependent on staff. Interviews revealed uncertainty about the timely implementation of care plan changes.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was left on a bedpan for hours due to staff oversight and communication breakdowns. The facility's electronic medical record system did not allow for proper documentation of repositioning tasks, contributing to the deficiency in care.
A nursing assistant was not deemed competent upon hire or annually thereafter to provide care to residents. Despite completing an online clinical assessment training, the facility did not provide specific competencies for the NA-C. The facility's policies required a department orientation plan and checklist to document training and competency evaluations, which were not followed.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Diabetes Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accurate coding of a resident's medication status in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. A resident with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was incorrectly coded as receiving insulin injections for seven days in their quarterly, admission, and significant change MDS assessments. However, the resident's physician orders and care plan indicated they were only on oral diabetic medications, specifically glimepiride and Jardiance, with no orders for insulin injections. During interviews, the Director of Nursing confirmed the resident was not on insulin, and the MDS coordinator admitted to mistakenly coding Jardiance as an insulin injection due to a misunderstanding. The facility's policy on maintaining MDS assessments did not address the accuracy of the MDS.
Failure to Implement Comprehensive Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident (R1) who was reviewed for care plan deficiencies. R1 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for care, and was incontinent with bowel and bladder. R1 also had a diagnosis of anxiety and manic depression and was on antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. The care plan for R1 identified verbal aggression related to bipolar disorder, with a goal of reducing episodes to one or fewer per week. However, the care plan did not address the resident's failure or refusal to use the call light for assistance, which was a significant oversight given R1's dependency on staff. Interviews with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the administrator revealed that changes to R1's care plan had been made recently, but there was uncertainty about whether these changes were implemented in a timely manner. The facility's policy on Comprehensive Care Plans required that residents' goals, preferences, and outcomes be assessed during admission and before discharge, with an interdisciplinary team preparing an individualized care plan reflecting the resident's needs, interventions, measurable objectives, and timeframes. The lack of timely updates and the omission of the call light usage in R1's care plan contributed to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
Failure to Reposition and Document Care for Cognitively Impaired Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete appropriate assessments and reposition a resident, leading to a deficiency in care. A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of anxiety and manic depression was left on a bedpan for several hours. The incident occurred when two nursing assistants placed the resident on a bedpan and forgot to return to remove it. The resident was found by staff after calling out for assistance, indicating a lapse in monitoring and care. Interviews with staff revealed significant communication breakdowns and documentation issues. Nursing assistants reported challenges in handover communication, with some staff not receiving proper updates on resident care needs. The facility's electronic medical record system, Point Click Care (PCC), was not set up to allow staff to document repositioning tasks every two hours as required by the resident's care plan. This lack of documentation capability contributed to the failure to ensure the resident was repositioned regularly. The facility's processes for ensuring continuity of care were inadequate, as evidenced by the lack of a structured handover communication system and the inability to document care interventions accurately. Staff interviews highlighted the absence of a reliable method for communicating resident updates and care needs, leading to the oversight in repositioning the resident and addressing her needs while on the bedpan.
Failure to Ensure Competency of Nursing Assistant
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a nursing assistant (NA-C) was deemed competent upon hire or annually thereafter to provide care to residents. The NA-C was hired on June 3, 2024, and worked multiple shifts throughout June, July, and August 2024. Although the NA-C completed a clinical assessment training through an online program on May 8, 2024, the facility did not provide specific competencies for the NA-C upon hire. An interview with the administrator and director of nursing confirmed that competency training should be provided to all employees to reflect current knowledge of the facility's resident-specific needs and services. The facility's January 2024 Orientation policy stated that a department orientation plan would be provided to reflect the skills and competencies of each employee before resident contact. Additionally, a department checklist was to be used to document training and competency evaluations during the employee's orientation until competency was demonstrated. The July 2024 Facility Assessment indicated that the facility would use an action plan to assess residents' needs to determine staffing services and provide training for staff according to the specific care area needs of the residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 15 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Truman
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center | 13.1 mi | — | 12 | 0 |
| Good Samaritan Society - St James | 14.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Living Meadows At Luther - Madelia | 14.9 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Seasons Healthcare | 15 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| St Lukes Lutheran Care Center | 21.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Truman Senior Living.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.