Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not provide a suitable and nourishing snack for residents when there was a 15-hour gap between dinner and breakfast. Although snacks and sandwiches were available, they were not consistently offered to all residents. The dietary manager, registered dietician, and other staff were unaware of the requirement for a substantial snack, which should include a protein and a carbohydrate. The facility's policy lacked specific meal times, and the responsibility to monitor adherence was not fulfilled.
The facility failed to consistently perform ROM exercises and ambulation for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their restorative therapy programs. One resident with hemiplegia had numerous missed ROM sessions, while another with rheumatoid arthritis reported infrequent ambulation despite a daily walking program. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in program execution and documentation, with the DON acknowledging the lack of routine checks unless concerns were reported.
A resident admitted with orders for physical and occupational therapy did not receive these services due to payor source concerns. The resident, who was nonverbal and dependent on staff, had specific therapy and PROM orders that were not entered into the EMR or initiated. Facility staff confirmed the orders were not executed, and no discontinuation orders were obtained.
Failure to Provide Substantial Snack Between Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a suitable and nourishing snack for residents when there were more than 14 hours between the evening and morning meals. The facility's meal schedule indicated dinner at 5:00 p.m. and breakfast at 8:00 a.m., resulting in a 15-hour gap. During observations, a wicker basket with snacks and a refrigerator with half sandwiches were noted, but it was unclear if these were offered to all residents. Interviews with dietary staff revealed that peanut butter sandwiches were available, but there was no consistent offering of a substantial snack to all residents. The dietary manager and registered dietician were unaware of the 15-hour gap and the requirement for a substantial snack, which should include a protein and a carbohydrate. The director of nursing and administrator acknowledged the gap but were not aware of the need for a substantial snack. The facility's Meal Times policy, dated 9/2012, stated that meals should meet standards with no more than 14 hours between dinner and breakfast, but the policy lacked specific meal times. The hospitality services manager was responsible for monitoring adherence to this schedule, but the deficiency indicates a lapse in this responsibility.
Deficiencies in Restorative Therapy Programs for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to perform range of motion (ROM) exercises and ambulation as ordered for two residents, leading to deficiencies in their restorative therapy programs. Resident R14, who had a history of stroke and hemiplegia, required maximal assistance for mobility and was on a ROM program for her left lower extremity. Despite the program being established and communicated to nursing staff, documentation revealed numerous instances where the ROM exercises were not performed or recorded, with staff marking 'not applicable' or leaving entries blank. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of awareness and accountability for ensuring the program was consistently executed. Resident R6, diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and requiring assistance for ambulation, was supposed to walk daily as part of their care plan. However, the resident reported only being able to ambulate once a week, and documentation showed frequent instances of missed opportunities for walking, with entries marked as 'not applicable' or left blank. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the execution of the walking program, with some staff attributing missed sessions to time constraints or the resident's mood. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of documentation and stated that completion of ROM and walking programs was expected but not routinely checked unless concerns were raised. The therapy director confirmed that communication forms were used to relay therapy programs to nursing staff, but the execution of these programs was inconsistent, potentially leading to increased weakness in residents. The facility's policy on restorative/maintenance therapy programs was requested but not provided, indicating a possible gap in procedural adherence.
Failure to Provide Ordered Therapy Services Due to Payor Source Concerns
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary physical and occupational therapy services for a resident who was admitted with specific therapy orders. The resident, who was nonverbal and had impairments in both upper and lower extremities, was dependent on staff for all care. Upon admission, the resident had orders for occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) evaluations and treatments, as well as a passive range of motion (PROM) program for the left ankle, knee, and hip. However, these orders were not entered into the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) and were not initiated due to concerns about the payor source. Interviews with facility staff, including the occupational therapist and the director of nursing (DON), confirmed that the therapy orders were not executed because of the payor source issue, and no orders were received to discontinue the therapy. The administrator expected that all new admission orders would be entered into the EMR and followed until new orders were obtained. Despite this expectation, the orders were not followed, and the facility's therapy policy was not provided upon request.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 104 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Plainview
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whitewater Health Services | 14.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Gundersen St Elizabeth's Care Center | 16.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Rochester Rehabilitation And Living Center | 16.6 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Samaritan Bethany Home On Eighth | 17 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Rochester Restorative Care Center | 17.2 mi | — | 36 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Green Prairie Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.