Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Folkestone during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to properly store, label, and date food items, and maintain cleanliness in the kitchen, affecting all residents, staff, and visitors consuming food. Unlabeled and uncovered food items were found, and kitchen fans were dirty. A dietary aide with facial hair did not wear a beard net, violating facility policy.
Medication errors were identified in a facility, with a TMA administering incorrect dosages of polyethylene glycol and brimonidine tartrate, and an RN failing to follow proper insulin administration procedures. These errors affected three residents, highlighting issues with adherence to physician orders and manufacturer guidelines.
A resident with multiple health conditions received an incorrect transcription of their anticoagulant medication order. The MAR directed staff to administer 2.5 tablets of apixaban 2.5 mg, while the medication label correctly instructed one tablet. The error was identified during a medication administration observation, and interviews revealed that the facility's second check process failed to catch the transcription mistake.
The facility failed to post accurate and timely nurse staffing information daily, including over weekends, affecting all residents and visitors. Discrepancies were found between posted information and actual staffing, with outdated postings and missing staff in training. The facility's policy required daily updates, but this was not consistently followed.
Food Storage and Cleanliness Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage, labeling, and dating of food items, as well as maintaining cleanliness in the kitchen, which could potentially affect all 29 residents, staff, and visitors consuming food from the main and fourth-floor kitchens. During a kitchen tour, it was observed that the walk-in refrigerator contained an unopened cooked corned beef package and ground beef packages that were not properly labeled or dated. Additionally, pastries were found uncovered in the walk-in freezer, and a plastic bag containing breaded fish lacked a label and date. The facility's executive chef acknowledged these issues and attempted to address them by labeling the fish. The facility also failed to maintain cleanliness in the kitchen, as evidenced by the presence of gray, fuzzy particles on the exhaust fan above the stove in the fourth-floor serving kitchen area. These particles were also found on a fan in the dishwashing room. The executive chef and other staff members admitted that the fans needed cleaning and that there was no set schedule for cleaning them. Furthermore, a dietary aide with facial hair was observed plating food without wearing a beard net, which is against the facility's policy for staff with facial hair. The facility's policies on food labeling, dating, and storage were not followed, as evidenced by the lack of proper labeling and dating of food items in the refrigerator and freezer. The facility's nutrition and culinary uniform policy also required staff to wear hair coverings and beard nets, which was not adhered to by the dietary aide. The facility's failure to follow these policies and maintain cleanliness in the kitchen could lead to cross-contamination and food safety issues.
Medication Administration Errors Identified
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and manufacturer guidelines, resulting in a medication error rate of 13.79%. For Resident R4, a trained medication assistant (TMA) incorrectly prepared polyethylene glycol 3350 by pouring 17 grams instead of the ordered 8.6 grams. This error was identified before administration, and the TMA corrected the dosage. R4 had a history of intestinal obstruction, and incorrect dosage could lead to excessive bowel movements and dehydration. Resident R17 received brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution incorrectly. The TMA administered one drop in both eyes instead of the prescribed one drop in the left eye only. The TMA acknowledged the error, noting that R17 had other eye drops for both eyes, which may have contributed to the mistake. The registered nurse (RN) confirmed that staff should follow orders precisely regarding the administration of eye drops. For Resident R15, the RN did not follow proper procedures for insulin administration. The RN failed to wipe the tip of the insulin pens with an alcohol swab before attaching the needle and did not perform the priming technique correctly. The RN dialed the insulin pens to two units but did not press the plunger before administering the required dosage. The facility's director of nursing (DON) confirmed the importance of following manufacturer instructions for insulin administration, including wiping the pen tip and performing a safety test to ensure accurate dosing.
Medication Transcription Error for Anticoagulant
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately transcribe a medication order and verify the medication administration record (MAR) against the medication label for a resident who was receiving an anticoagulant. The resident, who was cognitively intact, had multiple diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, kidney failure, and diabetes mellitus. During a medication administration observation, it was noted that the trained medication assistant (TMA) prepared and administered one 2.5 mg tablet of apixaban to the resident, as per the medication label. However, the MAR incorrectly directed staff to give 2.5 tablets of apixaban 2.5 mg, which was a transcription error. Interviews with the TMA and registered nurse (RN) revealed that the order was entered incorrectly, and a second check by nursing staff was supposed to prevent such errors. The clinical administrator confirmed that a medication variance report was completed, and the order was reviewed and corrected with the provider. The facility's policies on medication administration and order processing required staff to verify that the medication label matched the MAR and to perform a second check on orders, which was not effectively followed in this instance.
Inaccurate and Untimely Nurse Staffing Postings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the required nurse staffing data was posted daily before each shift, including over the weekend, and that the posted information was accurate. This deficiency had the potential to affect all 29 residents residing in the facility and any visitors who may wish to view the information. On multiple occasions, the posted nurse staffing information was outdated or incorrect. For instance, on 10/14/24, the posted information was dated 10/11/24, and the clinical administrator confirmed that the posting was not updated. Additionally, discrepancies were found between the facility staff postings and the daily rosters on several dates, indicating inconsistencies in the number of licensed and non-licensed staff reported. The care center administrator acknowledged that the facility staff postings were not always updated accurately, particularly over the weekends. The administrator confirmed that the postings did not always include staff in training or accurately reflect staff who were on leave. The staffing coordinator stated that the weekend schedules were printed in advance, and any changes were supposed to be updated by the nurses. However, this process was not consistently followed, leading to inaccuracies in the posted staffing information. The facility's Nurse Hours Posting Policy required that nursing staff data be posted daily at the beginning of each shift, reflecting the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff, but this policy was not adhered to consistently.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 824 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 24 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Wayzata
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hope Springs At Minnetonka | 3.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Allina Health Restorative Suites | 4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Mission Nursing Home | 5.4 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| The Estates At Excelsior Llc | 5.4 mi | — | 18 | 1 |
| Augustana Chapel View Care Center | 5.6 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Folkestone.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.