Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Medilodge Of Sterling during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility was found to have several deficiencies in food storage and kitchen sanitation, including undated and expired food items, improper dish drying practices, and issues with the drainage system lacking an air gap. These deficiencies were observed during a kitchen tour, highlighting a failure to adhere to safe food handling practices and proper maintenance.
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection control program, leading to deficiencies in hand hygiene audits, linen handling, and PPE use. Discrepancies in tracking resident infections and a lack of involvement in the water management plan were noted. Observations revealed staff not adhering to infection prevention protocols, such as carrying clean linens uncovered and assisting a resident with a urinary catheter without PPE.
A facility failed to provide palatable and appealing food, leading to dissatisfaction among residents. A resident with multiple health issues reported the food as cold and unappetizing, while a resident council highlighted issues like lack of food choices, small portions, and repetitive menus. Observations confirmed unappealing food items and strict meal request cut-off times, contributing to widespread resident dissatisfaction.
The facility failed to accurately document code status for two residents, leading to potential discrepancies in their medical treatment preferences. One resident's DNR consent was signed despite a prior determination of incapacity, and another resident had conflicting code status documentation. The errors were acknowledged by staff but not resolved.
A resident with cognitive impairment and multiple diagnoses received double the recommended dosage of Detrol LA due to the facility's failure to ensure timely review and action on pharmacy recommendations. Despite pharmacy oversight, the attending physician continued the excessive dosage without providing a rationale, contrary to facility policy.
A facility failed to properly administer and store medications for two residents, leading to potential decreased efficacy and side effects. A nurse did not wait the required time between administering two inhalers and failed to offer mouth rinsing. Another nurse did not perform a safety test before administering insulin, contrary to guidelines.
A resident with a history of mental health issues was transferred to the hospital for evaluation due to aggressive behavior but was not allowed to return to the facility after being cleared for discharge. The facility cited safety concerns and completed an involuntary discharge without providing the resident an opportunity to appeal, resulting in the resident staying in the emergency department for six days. The facility's actions and lack of proper documentation led to a deficiency.
Deficiencies in Food Storage and Kitchen Sanitation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly manage food storage and sanitation in the kitchen, leading to several deficiencies. During a tour of the kitchen, it was observed that a Kitchen Aid stand mixer was uncovered and had chunks of dried food substances on it. The floor was dirty with a buildup of unknown substances and dirt, and there was a palpable film of grease on the stove/oven hood. Cobwebs and dust were also visible in various areas of the oven/stove hood. Additionally, several food items, including apple cider vinegar, thickened lemon water, apple butter, and milk, were found to be either undated or expired, indicating a lack of proper labeling and disposal practices. In the dry storage area, an open container of mustard and vanilla were found with past use-by dates, and a box of bananas had a black substance with one banana's peel split open. These findings suggest that the facility did not adhere to safe food handling practices, as outlined in their policy. Furthermore, in the dishwashing and drying area, cups with visible water and moisture were stacked on top of each other, which is not acceptable for clean dishes. This indicates a failure to thoroughly dry dishes before stacking, increasing the risk of contamination. The facility also had issues with the drainage system in the kitchen. Under the three-compartment sink, the drain cover was pushed to the side, and a PVC pipe was positioned directly in the drain hole without an air gap, which is necessary to prevent cross-contamination. The drainage pipe was identified as being from the ice machine, and it was noted that the pipe was sagging and had been improperly secured. Maintenance staff were unable to provide a clear explanation for these issues, indicating a lack of oversight and maintenance in the kitchen area.
Inadequate Infection Control Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection control program, which resulted in several deficiencies. During an interview and record review with the Infection Control (IC) Registered Nurse (RN) and the Director of Nursing (DON), it was revealed that the facility did not conduct regular hand hygiene audits across all shifts, particularly the midnight shift. Additionally, there were no official audits for the laundry facilities to ensure linens were processed, stored, and handled properly to prevent contamination. The IC RN admitted that staff had not consistently used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when required, such as when providing care to residents with enhanced barrier precautions. The facility's outcome surveillance data for January 2024 showed discrepancies in tracking resident infections. The number of infections on the line listing did not match the mapping tool, and carry-over infections from December 2023 were not included. The IC RN acknowledged that they were not tracking signs and symptoms of potential infections for residents not receiving treatment, which could lead to the spread of infections. Furthermore, the IC RN and DON were unaware of positive Legionella water testing results, and no follow-up actions were taken to address the issue, indicating a lack of involvement in the water management plan. Observations of staff practices further highlighted deficiencies in infection control. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was seen carrying clean linens uncovered, allowing them to touch their uniform, which could lead to contamination. In another instance, two CNAs assisted a resident with a urinary catheter without wearing the appropriate PPE, despite the resident being in an enhanced barrier room. These actions demonstrate a failure to adhere to infection prevention protocols, increasing the risk of spreading infections among residents.
Deficiency in Food Service and Resident Satisfaction
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide palatable and appealing food that met the preferences of its residents, as evidenced by complaints from Resident #35 and a group of residents during a resident council meeting. Resident #35, who has a history of cerebral infarction with left-sided paralysis, epilepsy, depression, anxiety, and dysphagia, expressed dissatisfaction with the food, describing it as cold and unappetizing. The resident council echoed these sentiments, citing issues such as lack of food choices, small portion sizes, repetitive menus, and dissatisfaction with specific food items like confetti eggs. Additionally, residents reported not receiving menus in their rooms and having to adhere to strict time limits for selecting alternative meal options. Observations and interviews revealed further deficiencies in the facility's food service. A breakfast tray observation showed unappealing food items, including overly moist eggs and lukewarm coffee, with no salt or pepper provided. The Registered Dietician was unaware of the process for ordering from the alternative menu and acknowledged the residents' complaints about the taste and appearance of certain food items. A review of facility documents confirmed the existence of strict cut-off times for meal requests, with limited alternatives available if requests were made after these times. These findings indicate a failure to meet the nutritional and personal preferences of the residents, leading to widespread dissatisfaction.
Inaccurate Code Status Documentation for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately record and obtain code status documentation for two residents, leading to potential discrepancies in their medical treatment preferences. Resident #29, who was admitted with diagnoses including heart failure and dementia, was documented as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). However, the resident's DNR consent form was signed by the resident in 2023, despite a prior determination in 2021 that the resident was incapable of making medical decisions. This inconsistency was not addressed by the facility, as they accepted documentation from another facility without verifying its accuracy. Resident #35, admitted with conditions such as cerebral infarction and epilepsy, had conflicting documentation regarding their code status. The EMR indicated a full resuscitate status, while an advance directive form signed by the resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) and a registered nurse indicated both DNR and full code statuses. This discrepancy was acknowledged by the Social Services Designee, who recognized the error but did not provide a resolution. The Director of Nursing confirmed the concerns regarding the advance directive documentation and code status for both residents.
Failure to Address Pharmacy Recommendations for Medication Dosage
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and operationalize its policies and procedures to ensure the prompt review of pharmacy recommendations by the attending physician and documentation of rationale for lack of action. This deficiency was identified in the case of a resident who was receiving double the recommended dosage of Detrol LA, a medication used to treat overactive bladder. Despite pharmacy oversight, the resident continued to receive an excessive dosage, which increased the risk of adverse drug reactions and medication errors. The resident, who was moderately cognitively impaired and had diagnoses including congestive heart failure and anxiety, was receiving Detrol LA at a dosage exceeding the FDA-approved maximum. The pharmacy had recommended a dosage reduction on two occasions, but the attending physician initially chose to continue the same dosage without providing a rationale. The facility's policy required timely action on pharmacy reports, but the Director of Nursing was unable to explain the delay in addressing the pharmacy's recommendations, indicating a lack of adherence to the facility's procedures.
Medication Administration and Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper medication administration and storage for two residents, leading to potential decreased medication efficacy and side effects. During a medication administration task, a nurse administered Breo Ellipta and Spiriva inhalers to a resident without waiting the required one minute between puffs and did not offer the resident a chance to rinse their mouth afterward. This oversight was contrary to the facility's guidelines and pharmacy instructions, which specify a waiting time between inhalers and rinsing the mouth after using steroid inhalers. Additionally, another nurse did not perform the required safety test before administering Lantus insulin to a different resident. The nurse failed to prime the insulin pen by dialing it to 2 units before administering the full dose, as instructed by the Lantus pen guidelines. This resident had a medical history of diabetes, morbid obesity, and muscle weakness, and required assistance with activities of daily living. These deficiencies were identified through observation, interviews, and record reviews, highlighting lapses in following proper medication administration protocols.
Failure to Honor Resident's Right to Return After Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's right to return following hospitalization, resulting in a deficiency. A resident was transferred to the hospital for a mental health evaluation due to aggressive behaviors but was not allowed to return to the facility after being cleared for discharge. The facility did not provide the resident with an opportunity to appeal the involuntary discharge, leading to the resident remaining in the emergency department for six days. The resident, who had a history of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and other mental health conditions, was involved in an altercation with the former administrator, which led to their transfer to the emergency department. Despite being medically cleared and not requiring inpatient mental health treatment, the facility refused to readmit the resident, citing safety concerns due to previous altercations. The facility's corporate lawyers were involved, and an involuntary discharge was completed, but the discharge documentation was not properly served to the resident. Interviews with facility staff and community mental health representatives revealed that the facility had been working with the resident to find alternative placement but had not secured one at the time of the incident. The facility's actions, including the delivery of the discharge notice to the hospital and the lack of proper documentation, contributed to the deficiency. The facility's policy on transfers and discharges was not followed, as the resident was not provided with a bed hold notice or an opportunity to appeal the discharge.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 29 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Sterling
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mymichigan Skilled Nursing Facility | 8.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| The Villa At West Branch | 15.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| The Villa At Rose City | 22.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Gladwin Nursing And Rehabilitation Community | 24.1 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Gladwin Pines Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 24.7 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Medilodge Of Sterling.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.