Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Future Care Pineview during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident who had been deemed incapable of making medical decisions had a legal representative who submitted a written request for the resident’s medical record. Facility policy required written requests for PHI and mandated that access be provided within 48 business hours for current patients. The DON initially reported there was no current request on file, while the Director of Medical Records confirmed that a request had been received but that additional facility paperwork from the family was incomplete. The facility did not provide the requested record within the required timeframe, resulting in a failure to provide timely access to the resident’s medical record.
The facility failed to notify a resident’s representative when a resident, previously deemed incapable of making medical decisions, refused a podiatry consult after the podiatrist requested that nursing staff inform the representative, and the subsequent nursing note documenting the refusal did not show any notification. In a separate case, the facility’s own policy required staff to notify the physician and responsible family members of changes in condition and abnormal VS, including a pulse >100 bpm, yet when a resident with chronic respiratory failure, ventilator dependence, and multiple comorbidities developed new-onset tachycardia with a heart rate of 120 bpm, staff documented the abnormal pulse but did not document any notification to the physician or the resident’s representative.
A resident with hand contractures and on a Restorative Nursing Program did not have their care plan updated to reflect their contracture status or the use of hand splints, despite staff providing these interventions. Additionally, the care plan was not revised to include the resident's contact precautions for MDRO until after the precautions were already in place and observed by surveyors.
Failure to Provide Timely Access to Resident Medical Record
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a resident’s legal representative with timely access to the resident’s medical record after a written request. A complaint was received by the Office of Health Care Quality alleging that the facility did not provide a copy of the medical record when requested. Review of the resident’s clinical record showed the resident had been admitted on an earlier date and was deemed incapable of making all medical decisions by two physicians, with the resident’s mother identified by the DON as the legal representative. The facility’s Access to PHI policy requires that all requests for access or inspection be submitted in writing (or documented in writing by staff if made orally) and that the facility act on all requests within 48 business hours for current patients. During interviews, the DON initially stated that the resident’s representative could request and obtain copies of the medical record but must follow the facility’s process, and reported that there was no current medical record request on file for this resident. However, the Director of Medical Records later confirmed that the facility had, in fact, received a medical record request for this resident on a specific date, but that the family had not completed and returned additional facility paperwork. Despite the existing written request and the facility’s policy requiring action within 48 business hours, the record was not provided to the representative, leading to the cited deficiency.
Failure to Notify Physician and Representatives of Significant Changes in Condition
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to notify a resident’s representative in a timely manner after a significant change and failure to immediately notify a physician and representative when a resident developed tachycardia. One resident had been admitted with a determination by two physicians that the resident was incapable of making all medical decisions. A podiatry consult dated 08/28/2025 documented that the resident refused to be seen by the facility podiatrist, who informed the nursing unit manager and requested that nursing staff call the resident’s representative about the refusal. A nursing progress note later completed by the unit manager on 10/31/2025 documented that the resident refused care on 08/28/2025 by telling staff to stop and leave them alone, but there was no indication that the resident’s representative was notified at the time of the refusal. The corporate DON confirmed that the representative was not notified when the refusal occurred. The second deficiency involved another resident with chronic respiratory failure, a gastrostomy tube, ventilator dependence, seizure disorder, and multiple sclerosis, who was totally dependent on staff for all care. The facility’s policy on physician notification of a change in condition required nursing staff to report changes in condition to the physician and responsible family members and to notify the physician of abnormal vital signs, including a resting pulse rate greater than 100 beats per minute. A respiratory therapist’s note on 12/25/2025 documented that this resident’s heart rate was 120 beats per minute, irregular, and a new onset, and that the attending RN on day shift was notified of the tachycardia. The MAR showed that an LPN administered Metoprolol at 9:00 a.m. the same day and documented a blood pressure of 140/78 with a pulse of 120 beats per minute, but there was no documentation that the physician or the resident’s representative was notified of the abnormal heart rate, and the LPN could not recall being informed of or documenting the elevated pulse.
Failure to Timely Update Care Plan for Contractures and Infection Control
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised in a timely manner for a resident with specific clinical needs. The resident, who had contractures in both hands and was participating in the Restorative Nursing Program, was observed with hand contractures and the use of bilateral hand splints. However, the care plan did not initially include any problem, goal, or intervention addressing the contractures or the use of splints, despite staff providing these interventions. The care plan was only revised to include these details after the surveyor's observation, rather than at the time the needs were identified by staff. Additionally, the same resident was placed on contact precautions due to the presence of a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) as indicated by a rectal screen. Although a sign was posted on the resident's door and staff were aware of the contact precautions, the care plan did not reflect the resident's infection control status or appropriate interventions until after the surveyor's review. The care plan was not updated to address the resident's MDRO status and required precautions until well after the laboratory results were available and the precautions were implemented.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 767 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 12 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Clinton
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hidden Waters Rehabilitation And Wellness Center | 0.2 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Bradford Oaks | 1.2 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Forestville Rehabilitation And Wellness Center | 5.8 mi | — | 44 | 0 |
| Ft Washington Rehabilitation And Wellness Center | 6.1 mi | — | 35 | 0 |
| Serenity Rehabilitation And Health Center Llc | 7.1 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Future Care Pineview.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.