Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arcola during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors identified deficient food handling practices, including unlabeled and undated food items, wet nesting of dishes, and improper storage in a facility's kitchen and nourishment room. Observations included unlabeled lemonade, wet saucers, and improperly dated food items, contrary to facility policy. A soiled steam table was also noted, with the DON confirming it was out of service.
The facility failed to maintain preventative maintenance on the Gateway Unit, as observed during a survey. Issues included a closet door off its hinges, a loose handrail with missing screws, marred handrails, a tattered wheelchair, and a sofa chair with torn armrests. The Director of Maintenance was unaware of these issues, indicating a lack of routine maintenance checks.
The facility failed to update care plans for several residents after changes in their medical treatment, such as discontinuation of medications like Lovenox and Seroquel. Additionally, residents were not consistently invited to care plan meetings, with some being excluded despite being capable of participating. These issues highlight deficiencies in communication and documentation within the facility.
A resident in an LTC facility was allegedly abused by a GNA during care. The resident, who was combative, scratched the GNA, leading to the GNA allegedly hitting the resident's hand. The incident was reported late, and inconsistencies were found in the reporting process among staff members.
A facility failed to report an alleged abuse incident immediately to the Administrator and state agency. A resident, needing assistance after a bowel movement, allegedly grabbed a GNA's hand, causing injury. Another GNA claimed the first GNA hit the resident's hand. The incident was reported to a charge nurse but not escalated until weeks later.
The facility failed to provide accurate contact information for the State regulatory agency, OHCQ, on two postings in the corridors. A surveyor found incorrect phone numbers, an outdated office address, and an incorrect website. The Nursing Home Administrator was unaware of these inaccuracies until informed by the surveyor.
The facility did not have the most recent survey results available for review. Surveyors found that the binder labeled 'CURRENT FACILITY SURVEY' only contained results from February 2019, missing results from surveys conducted in January 2021 and January 2024. The DON confirmed the oversight and later updated the binder with the missing results.
The facility failed to obtain advance directives for three residents during an annual survey. Medical records lacked documentation, and staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the process of obtaining and following up on advance directives. Staff mentioned that directives are collected at entry if available, but there is no consistent follow-up after admission.
A facility staff member failed to protect a resident's health information by leaving a medication cart laptop open in a hallway, allowing access to the resident's medical records without a secure password. The staff member did not recall leaving the laptop open, and the surveyor found that resident information was accessible despite a screen indicating it was hidden.
A facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of a resident's transfer to the hospital, as required. The resident was transferred, but the facility lacked documentation to confirm notification. The DON acknowledged the Social Services Department's responsibility for this task, but attempts to retrieve documentation were unsuccessful. The Ombudsman confirmed no notification was received.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including Dementia and Hypertension, received Lovenox injections for DVT prophylaxis after a hip fracture. The MDS assessment failed to document the drug classification for these anticoagulant injections, as identified during a surveyor's review and confirmed by the MDS Coordinator.
The facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for three residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific medical needs. One resident lacked a pain management plan despite having active orders for pain medication. Another resident was on a blood thinner without a corresponding care plan. A third resident, with a history of falls and requiring maximal assistance, did not have a care plan addressing fall risk and safety.
The facility failed to reposition two residents at risk for pressure ulcers according to their care plans and physician orders. One resident reported only being repositioned upon request, and records showed missed repositioning on multiple nights. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in following the standard practice of repositioning every two hours or as needed.
A resident with vision impairment did not receive timely eye care due to the facility's failure to arrange an ophthalmologist appointment. Despite the resident's ability to communicate needs and a documented order for consultation, the appointment was delayed for four months, as confirmed by the Unit Manager.
A resident's call light with exposed wires was observed on two occasions, indicating a failure to report and address the hazard. Staff acknowledged the issue, but there was a lapse in the reporting process, as nurses should have identified and logged the faulty call light.
A facility failed to track and respond to a pharmacy's recommendation for a resident with chronic conditions. The pharmacy suggested a dosage reduction of Diphenhydramine, but the medical staff did not review or act on this until 28 days later, after surveyor intervention. The DON acknowledged the oversight, and a response was documented only after the surveyor's involvement.
A resident with a history of chronic conditions requested a dental appointment for broken teeth, but the facility failed to arrange it despite an active order and MDS assessment indicating the need for prompt treatment. The resident experienced mild pain while eating, and no dental visits were arranged, leading to a deficiency noted during an annual survey.
The facility exhibited multiple infection control deficiencies, including improper storage of personal items in the laundry area, unsecured medical records, and lapses in hand hygiene during medication administration. A resident's room under droplet precautions was found with an overflowing trash can and medical items improperly placed. Additionally, handrails were sticky due to sanitizing solution residue.
The facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for several residents. Discrepancies included incorrect PICC line measurements, incomplete behavior monitoring, missing initials on enteral feeding records, and conflicting bathing documentation. Additionally, a Notification of Change and Bed Hold authorization were incomplete.
Deficient Food Handling Practices Observed
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure sanitary and safe food handling practices, which could potentially affect all residents. During an initial kitchen tour, surveyors observed unlabeled and undated containers of leftover lemonade in a refrigerator. Additionally, wet nesting of saucers was noted, which can lead to bacterial growth. In the kitchen's ice machine room, a soiled paper towel and a tumbler with an unidentified liquid were found. Sticky floors were observed in a room storing chemicals and kitchen equipment, with no signs indicating which equipment was out of service. Bags of cake mix lacked expiration dates, and ice buildup was found in the walk-in freezer, with no maintenance records verifying recent service. Further observations in the Potomac Unit's nourishment room revealed improperly labeled and dated food items, including an opened cranberry apple juice bottle, a zip lock bag with a withered vegetable, and a container with cooked food dated beyond the facility's policy for food storage. A soiled mobile steam table in the dining room contained various debris and was confirmed by the DON to be out of service. The facility's policy required labeling and dating of food, with daily monitoring for storage duration, but these practices were not consistently followed.
Deficiency in Preventative Maintenance on Gateway Unit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a process for preventative maintenance of various items within the Gateway Unit, as observed during a recertification survey. Specifically, the surveyor noted that a closet door was off its hinges and propped up, with another door missing a handle and a drawer with a loose handle. Additionally, a handrail in the short hallway was loose with missing screws, and all handrails on the unit were marred and scratched. An empty manual wheelchair was found with tattered back support, seat, and armrests, exposing the padding material. Furthermore, a large single-seat sofa chair in the residents' dining area had torn armrests, also exposing the padding underneath. The Director of Maintenance was interviewed and stated that he was unaware of these issues but would investigate them. These observations indicate a lack of routine maintenance checks and repairs, leading to the deterioration of essential equipment and furniture used by residents and staff.
Care Plan Deficiencies and Resident Exclusion in Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise care plans for several residents after changes in their medical treatment. Resident #65 continued to have an active care plan for Lovenox even after the medication was discontinued. Similarly, Resident #36's care plan for Vancomycin remained active despite the medication being stopped. Resident #143's care plan was not updated to reflect the discontinuation of one-on-one monitoring, which was no longer necessary according to psychiatric evaluations. Additionally, Resident #57's care plan included Seroquel, although the medication had been discontinued by the physician. The facility also failed to invite residents to their care plan meetings. Resident #63 reported not receiving invitations to care plan meetings, and there was no documentation of an invitation for a December 2023 meeting. The Social Services Director confirmed the absence of the invitation letter. Resident #38 was not included in care plan meetings, which were conducted telephonically with the surrogate, despite the resident being capable of making decisions about their care. The exclusion was due to the surrogate's limited availability, and the resident was not informed about changes in their discharge plan. These deficiencies highlight a lack of proper communication and documentation regarding care plan updates and resident involvement in care planning. The facility did not ensure that care plans were revised in a timely manner following changes in medication or treatment, nor did it consistently involve residents in discussions about their care, leading to potential gaps in care and resident dissatisfaction.
Failure to Prevent Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to prevent abuse of a resident, as evidenced by an incident involving a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) and a resident. During a routine care procedure, the resident, who had a bowel movement, became combative and scratched GNA #21, causing her hand to bleed. In response, GNA #21 allegedly hit the resident's hand. This incident was witnessed by GNA #38, who reported it to the charge nurse, Staff #39. However, the report was delayed, as Staff #39 no longer worked at the facility, and the incident was not reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) until several days later. Interviews conducted during the investigation revealed inconsistencies in the reporting process. GNA #38 reported the incident to multiple staff members, including Staff #27 and Staff #7, but it appears that the information was not effectively communicated to the appropriate authorities in a timely manner. Staff #27 assessed the resident but did not observe any injuries, and GNA #21 denied hitting the resident. The DON confirmed that staff are suspended when there is an allegation of abuse, but there was a lack of communication with the nursing agency regarding the suspension. The resident involved was unable to provide a statement due to cognitive deficits.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to report an alleged incident of abuse immediately to the Administrator and the state agency. This deficiency was identified during an investigation of a facility-reported incident involving a resident who required assistance from a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) after a bowel movement. During the incident, the resident grabbed the GNA's hand, causing injury. Another GNA alleged that the first GNA hit the resident's hand in response. The incident was reported to a charge nurse, but there was no evidence that it was further reported to the Administrator or the state agency until several weeks later.
Facility Fails to Provide Accurate State Agency Contact Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide accurate contact information for the State regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), on two postings located in the facility corridors. On June 17, 2024, a surveyor observed a sign with incorrect contact information, including a phone number that directed calls to a hospital facility surveyor instead of OHCQ. The following day, during an interview with a staff member, the surveyor found that the bulletin board near the Potomac floor also displayed outdated contact details, including an old office address and an incorrect website. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed and was unaware of the inaccuracies in the contact information. The NHA initially directed the surveyor to the same incorrect postings, confirming the facility's failure to update the information. The surveyor pointed out that the mailing address, phone number, and website for OHCQ were all incorrect, and the NHA acknowledged the need to update the board with the correct information.
Failure to Update Survey Results Binder
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to have the most recent survey results readily available for review, as required. Upon entering the facility, surveyors found a binder labeled 'CURRENT FACILITY SURVEY' near the receptionist's desk. However, upon review, the binder only contained survey results from a complaint survey conducted in February 2019. Further investigation through the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) system revealed that additional complaint surveys had been completed in January 2021 and January 2024, but their results were not included in the binder. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the absence of these results and later provided an updated binder with the missing survey results from January 2021 and January 2024.
Failure to Obtain Advance Directives for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to obtain advance directives for three residents during an annual survey. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of eight residents and found that three of them did not have any documents related to advance directives in their electronic records or hard charts. Interviews with staff members revealed inconsistencies in the process of obtaining advance directives. Staff #35 mentioned that advance directives are collected at the time of entry if available and then given to the Social Worker for follow-up within 72 hours. However, she also stated that advance directives do not necessarily have to be collected during admission, and there is no follow-up after admission. Staff #15 confirmed the absence of advance directives in the records of the three residents and explained that if a resident had an advance directive, it would typically be provided upon entry to the facility. Otherwise, it would be obtained directly from the resident, and they would be offered one if they did not have it. The lack of documentation and follow-up indicates a failure in the facility's process to ensure that residents' advance directives are properly obtained and recorded.
Failure to Protect Resident Health Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to maintain the privacy of a resident's protected health information during an annual survey. The surveyor observed a medication cart laptop left open in the hallway with a resident's medical information visible to anyone passing by. At the time of observation, no residents or facility staff were present in the hallway. During an interview, Staff #33 acknowledged the open laptop but claimed not to recall leaving it open, noting that a black screen was present. However, the surveyor demonstrated that the resident's record could be accessed by simply clicking the mouse without needing a secure password. Additionally, the surveyor observed Staff #33 walking away from the laptop with an open browser tab that displayed a message indicating the screen was hidden, yet resident information was still accessible from another open tab.
Failure to Notify Ombudsman of Resident Hospital Transfer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely notification to the Ombudsman regarding the transfer of a resident to the hospital. This deficiency was identified during a review of the medical records and interviews conducted by the surveyor. The resident in question was transferred to the hospital on January 30, 2024, but the facility did not have documentation to confirm that the Ombudsman was notified of this transfer. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the absence of such documentation and indicated that the responsibility for notifying the Ombudsman lay with the Social Services Department. During the investigation, the Director of Nursing attempted to retrieve the necessary documentation from the Ombudsman and the Social Services Department but was unsuccessful. The Ombudsman confirmed that they had not received any notification from the facility regarding the resident's transfer in January 2024. This lack of communication and documentation highlights a failure in the facility's process for notifying the Ombudsman about resident transfers, as required by regulations.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Anticoagulant Injections
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded for a resident during the recertification survey. The resident, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including Dementia, alcohol abuse, and Hypertension, sustained a fall resulting in a hip fracture and was hospitalized. Upon readmission, the resident received Lovenox injections for Deep Vein Thrombosis prophylaxis. However, the MDS assessment did not document the drug classification for the anticoagulant injections received during the assessment period. This omission was identified during a review of the resident's medical record and confirmed through an interview with the MDS Coordinator.
Deficiencies in Comprehensive Care Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to develop and initiate comprehensive person-centered care plans for three residents, leading to deficiencies in addressing their specific medical needs. Resident #65, who was admitted with multiple diagnoses including dementia and hypertension, sustained a fall resulting in a hip fracture. Despite having active physician's orders for pain management with Tramadol and Tylenol Extra Strength, there was no active care plan for pain management in the resident's medical record. Similarly, Resident #36, admitted with conditions such as hypertension and atrial fibrillation, was receiving Xarelto, a blood thinner, without a corresponding care plan to address the use of this medication. Additionally, Resident #80, who had a history of falls and required maximal assistance for daily living activities, did not have a care plan addressing fall risk and safety. This resident had previously fallen while attempting to use the bathroom independently, yet no care plan was developed to mitigate future fall risks. The lack of comprehensive care plans for these residents highlights a significant oversight in ensuring that their individual medical and safety needs were adequately addressed.
Failure to Reposition Residents at Risk for Pressure Ulcers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately turn and reposition residents at risk for pressure ulcers, as evidenced by the cases of two residents during an annual survey. Resident #26 reported that they were only repositioned upon request and not according to a schedule, despite being unable to reposition themselves. A review of Resident #26's records revealed that the care for turning and repositioning was not documented on 14 nights in June, with the resident being noted as requiring substantial or maximal assistance on several occasions. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of clarity and consistency in following the standard practice of repositioning residents every two hours or as needed. Similarly, Resident #158 was not turned and repositioned according to physician orders and the care plan. Staff interviews confirmed the task was not completed on the night shift, and there was insufficient documentation to support that the required care was provided. The deficiency highlights a failure in adhering to the care plans and physician orders, as well as a lack of proper documentation and execution of care tasks by the facility staff.
Delayed Vision Care for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to promptly arrange for an eye appointment for a resident with vision impairment, leading to a deficiency identified during an annual survey. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including vision impairment, expressed concerns about worsening eyesight and the lack of an eye appointment since admission. The resident was capable of making decisions about their care and had communicated their needs, yet no action was taken to address the vision impairment in a timely manner. The Medical Director had ordered a consultation with an ophthalmologist shortly after the resident's admission, and the resident's Minimum Data Set assessment documented significant vision impairment. Despite these indicators, the facility staff did not secure an eye appointment until four months later. The Unit Manager confirmed the delay in scheduling the eye examination, acknowledging that the referral process had only recently been completed, leaving the resident without necessary vision care for an extended period.
Exposed Call Light Wires Not Reported
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to ensure that residents were not exposed to hazards, as evidenced by the condition of a call light with exposed wires for one resident. During observations on two separate occasions, the surveyor noted that the call light for Resident #26 had exposed wires. Staff #5 acknowledged the issue and stated that anyone who notices a faulty call bell can report it, and she would log it in the maintenance book. However, during an interview, Staff #2 indicated that nurses should have identified the faulty call light and reported it in the maintenance log, suggesting a lapse in the reporting process.
Failure to Track and Respond to Pharmacy Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to adequately track and respond to a pharmacy's monthly drug regimen review recommendation for a resident with multiple chronic conditions, including chronic heart failure, arthritis, diabetes, fibromyalgia, hypertension, chronic renal failure, obesity, and migraine. The pharmacy report, dated 5/15/24, identified an irregularity and recommended a dosage reduction of Diphenhydramine, which was not acted upon by the medical staff. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged the lack of a hard copy of the recommendation and the absence of a timely response from the medical staff. The deficiency was highlighted during an annual survey when it was discovered that the medical staff had not reviewed or acted upon the pharmacy's recommendation until 28 days later, following the surveyor's intervention. The DON later presented a response from a Nurse Practitioner, agreeing with the recommendations, but this was only documented after the surveyor's involvement. This delay in addressing the pharmacy's recommendation indicates a failure in the facility's process for tracking and responding to medication regimen reviews.
Failure to Provide Prompt Dental Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility staff failed to promptly provide or obtain dental services for a resident, leading to a deficiency identified during an annual survey. The resident, who had a medical history of hypotension, chronic heart failure, and asthma, had requested a dental appointment for broken teeth several months prior. Despite being able to make decisions about their care, the resident's request was not fulfilled. An active order for dental treatment was entered by the Medical Director on 3/3/24, and the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 3/12/24 identified the need for prompt dental treatment due to broken teeth. Observations during the survey revealed that the resident experienced mild pain while eating due to the broken tooth, and by 6/14/24, no dental visits had been arranged. The Unit Manager confirmed that the resident had not received any dental care since admission on 3/3/24, despite the MDS assessment highlighting the need for treatment. This inaction by the facility staff resulted in the deficiency noted in the survey report.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper infection prevention and control practices, as evidenced by several observations during the annual recertification survey. In the laundry department, surveyors observed personal items, such as an employee's purse, placed in a clean linen bin and on a clean laundry folding table. Additionally, an adjacent storage area connected to the clean laundry area contained unsecured medical records, clothes on the floor, and stacked mattresses, all of which were acknowledged by the Nursing Home Administrator as inappropriate infection control practices. Further deficiencies were noted in resident care areas. A room under droplet precautions for a resident with sepsis, hypertension, and acute respiratory failure was found with an overflowing trash can, a pressure-relieving boot on the floor, and a syringe on the window sill. Hand hygiene lapses were observed during medication administration, where staff entered rooms under Enhanced Barrier Precautions without sanitizing their hands. Additionally, handrails in the Gateway Unit were found to be sticky and grimy, attributed to residual sanitizing solutions, although they were later reported to be cleaned.
Inaccurate and Incomplete Medical Record Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with professional standards, as evidenced by incomplete and inaccurate documentation for several residents. For one resident with a PICC line, there was a significant discrepancy in the recorded arm circumference measurements, with the facility's documentation differing by 22 cm from the placement company's records. This discrepancy was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing (DON) as an error in documentation. Another resident's behavior monitoring records were incomplete, with several shifts lacking documentation of observed behaviors. The DON confirmed the missing documentation and stated that it was expected for both GNAs and nurses to monitor and document behaviors. Additionally, there were missing initials on the enteral orders for a resident receiving tube feedings, with no documentation in the progress notes explaining the absence of administration on specific dates. Further issues included inaccurate documentation of bathing preferences for a resident, where records conflicted between a shower and a bath. Additionally, a Notification of Change and Bed Hold authorization for another resident were incomplete, missing critical information such as hospital details and required signatures.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 1,058 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 13 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Silver Spring
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montcare At Wheaton | 1.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Turtle Creek Rehabilitation And Wellness Center | 1.9 mi | — | 9 | 1 |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare At Oakview | 1.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Springbrook | 2.2 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Regency Care Of Silver Spring, Llc | 2.3 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Autumn Lake Healthcare At Arcola.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.