Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Thomas Upham House during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, with deficiencies in surveillance and testing procedures. Staff did not accurately document or analyze infection data, delaying COVID-19 testing for symptomatic residents. Additionally, improper use of PPE and incorrect mask-wearing compromised infection control efforts.
The facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for residents, as observed by surveyors. Residents were given clothing protectors without consent, meals were served off trays, and there was a lack of staff assistance during meals. Delays in meal service and the use of demeaning language further detracted from a dignified experience. The DON acknowledged these deficiencies, noting that meals should be served simultaneously and off trays.
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards in medication administration for two residents. One resident received wound care without a proper physician's order, and another had blood sugars checked and self-administered an inhaler without necessary orders. These actions highlight a lack of adherence to professional standards and facility policies.
The facility failed to secure treatment carts on the Second Floor Unit, leaving them unlocked and unattended, sometimes with a resident nearby. Interviews with staff confirmed that treatment carts should always be locked when not supervised by a nurse, and keys should not be left in the cart.
A facility failed to timely notify the NP about the unavailability of a prescribed treatment for a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident, with severe cognitive impairment, required Santyl for wound care, which was on back order. Nurse #2 delayed notifying the NP, and there was no documentation of this communication, leading to a deficiency.
A resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer did not receive the necessary medication, Santyl, due to it being out of stock at the primary pharmacy. Despite facility policies allowing for backup pharmacy use, the medication was not procured, delaying treatment. The Director of Nursing and staff were unaware of the medication's unavailability and the option to use a backup pharmacy.
A facility failed to monitor adverse consequences of anticoagulant medications for a resident with conditions like polycythemia vera and deep vein thrombosis. Despite receiving Eliquis, the resident's records lacked documentation of monitoring for side effects, contrary to facility policy. Interviews with staff confirmed the absence of a current order for monitoring and documentation, highlighting a deviation from required procedures.
Inadequate Infection Control and COVID-19 Testing Procedures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, as evidenced by several deficiencies in their surveillance and testing procedures. The infection preventionist (IP) and nursing staff did not accurately document and analyze surveillance data, leading to incomplete and inaccurate records of infections. This lack of proper documentation and analysis prevented the facility from identifying trends or potential outbreaks, as the surveillance sheets were not reviewed for accuracy or completion. Additionally, the facility did not track signs and symptoms of illnesses that did not meet the criteria for antibiotic treatment, which could have helped in early intervention and prevention of infections. The facility also failed to perform COVID-19 testing in accordance with established guidelines. For instance, a resident who exhibited symptoms of COVID-19 was not tested immediately, contrary to the facility's policy and CDC guidelines. This delay in testing potentially increased the risk of transmission within the facility. Furthermore, staff did not adhere to the manufacturer's instructions for the COVID-19 antigen self-test kits, resulting in tests being read too early or too late, which could lead to inaccurate results. Additionally, staff did not consistently use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when conducting tests, increasing the risk of exposure to the virus. Moreover, the facility did not enforce proper source control measures during a COVID-19 outbreak. Staff were observed not wearing masks correctly, with some having their masks below their noses or chins while in resident care areas. This non-compliance with mask-wearing protocols compromised the facility's efforts to control the spread of COVID-19. The facility's failure to implement and enforce these infection control measures highlights significant gaps in their infection prevention and control program, which could have serious implications for resident and staff safety.
Lack of Dignified Dining Experience for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for residents in two dining rooms, as observed by the surveyor. Residents were seen wearing clothing protectors without being asked for their preference, and meals were served directly off trays, which is contrary to the facility's policy for a homelike dining experience. Additionally, staff did not wash residents' hands before meal delivery, and there was a lack of staff presence to assist residents during meals, leading to delays in meal service and assistance. In the second-floor dining room, residents were observed receiving meals at different times, with some having to wait up to 17 minutes for assistance after their meal was placed. This delay in service was compounded by the absence of staff to assist or socialize with residents, as noted by Nurse #3, who was instructed only to monitor the dining room. The practice of serving meals at different times and not removing trays after meals further detracted from a dignified dining experience. On the first-floor unit, similar issues were observed, with staff placing clothing protectors on residents without asking and using demeaning language such as 'bib.' The Director of Nurses and Nurse #5 acknowledged these deficiencies, agreeing that meals should be served simultaneously and off trays for a more dignified and homelike experience. The report highlights the facility's failure to adhere to its mission statement and resident rights policies, resulting in a lack of dignity and respect for residents during meal times.
Failure to Adhere to Professional Standards in Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for two residents. For Resident #9, the facility did not ensure that wound care was consistent with professional standards. The resident, who had a stage 4 pressure ulcer, was receiving treatment without a proper physician's order. The wound consultant recommended a change in treatment to include Santyl, but this was administered without an order from the physician or nurse practitioner. Additionally, the Santyl was used from a discontinued treatment for another wound, and when it was depleted, the nurse did not document the unavailability or notify the physician promptly. For Resident #2, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for fingerstick blood sugars (FSBS) necessary for implementing the sliding scale insulin order. The resident, who had diabetes mellitus, had their glucose levels checked on multiple occasions without a physician's order. Furthermore, the resident was self-administering an albuterol inhaler without a current physician's order, as the previous order had been discontinued. The nurse confirmed the absence of orders for both the FSBS and the self-administration of the inhaler. These deficiencies highlight a lack of adherence to professional standards and facility policies regarding medication administration and documentation. The nursing staff administered treatments and medications without proper orders, failed to document verbal orders, and did not ensure that necessary prescriptions were in place for the residents' care. This resulted in unauthorized treatments and a lack of proper medical oversight for the residents involved.
Failure to Secure Treatment Carts
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the treatment carts on the Second Floor Unit were not consistently locked when not under the direct supervision of a licensed nurse. On multiple occasions, the treatment cart was observed to be either locked with the keys left in the lock or completely unlocked and unattended, with a resident sitting nearby. During interviews, Nurse #6 acknowledged that the treatment cart should not have been left unlocked and unattended, especially with a resident sitting next to it. Nurse #9 confirmed that treatment carts should never be left unattended and unlocked, regardless of the presence of a resident. The Director of Nursing reiterated that the expectation is for treatment carts to be locked at all times when unattended, and keys should not be left in the cart but should remain with the nurse.
Failure to Timely Notify NP of Unavailable Treatment for Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) in a timely manner about the unavailability of a prescribed treatment for a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis of a pressure ulcer on the right buttock, had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. A progress note from the facility's consultant wound NP recommended a treatment involving Santyl, which was unavailable from the pharmacy. Nurse #2 was aware of the unavailability but delayed notifying NP #1 for five days after the recommendation was made. Interviews revealed that neither the NP nor the Director of Nursing (DON) was initially aware of the Santyl being on back order. The consultant wound care NP also confirmed not being informed until much later. Although Nurse #2 eventually notified NP #1, there was no documentation in the medical record to support this communication. The lack of timely notification and documentation led to a deficiency in the facility's obligation to ensure proper care and treatment for the resident.
Failure to Obtain Necessary Medication for Resident's Pressure Ulcer
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services met the needs of a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The resident, who was admitted with a diagnosis of a pressure ulcer, had their condition worsen from a stage 3 to a stage 4 ulcer, as noted by the facility's consultant wound Nurse Practitioner (NP). The NP recommended a treatment change to include Santyl, a prescription medication for removing dead tissue from wounds. However, the facility did not obtain the Santyl from the pharmacy, as it was out of stock and on back order. Despite the facility's policy to act promptly in such situations by notifying the pharmacy and obtaining medication from a backup pharmacy, the Santyl was not procured. The facility's consultant pharmacy representative confirmed that the Santyl was out of stock but could be obtained from a backup pharmacy. The Director of Nursing and other staff were unaware of the medication's unavailability and the option to use a backup pharmacy, leading to a delay in the resident's treatment.
Failure to Monitor Anticoagulant Side Effects
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to monitor adverse consequences of anticoagulant medications for one resident, who was admitted with conditions including polycythemia vera, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and deep vein thrombosis. The resident was cognitively intact and received Eliquis as prescribed. However, upon review, it was found that the resident's medical record, including the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR), did not indicate monitoring for adverse consequences of the anticoagulant medication since admission. The resident was admitted with bruising, and the Interim Care Plan noted a risk for bleeding due to Eliquis, yet monitoring for signs and symptoms of bleeding was not documented. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and several nurses revealed that the facility's process required documentation of side effects of anticoagulant medications in the TAR. Despite this requirement, the resident did not have a current order to monitor for adverse consequences of Eliquis, and the monitoring was not documented. Nurses acknowledged the lack of documentation and the absence of a current order for monitoring adverse consequences, which was a deviation from the facility's policy on anticoagulation therapy management.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 801 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 10 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Medfield
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Healthcare At Harrington House | 4.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Charlwell House Health And Rehabilitation | 4.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Victoria Haven Nursing Facility | 5.1 mi | — | 27 | 0 |
| Medway Country Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitat | 5.5 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Norwood Healthcare | 5.6 mi | — | 20 | 2 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Thomas Upham House.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.