Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mill Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility did not ensure that monthly consultant pharmacist recommendations were addressed and maintained in the medical records for two residents, including recommendations related to medication reassessment, lab monitoring, and pain medication sequencing. Nursing staff and the DON reported lapses in the process, especially during a pharmacy transition, resulting in unaddressed recommendations and missing documentation.
Surveyors found that the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator was not maintained in a sanitary condition, with rusted shelving, powdery substances, black buildup near stored produce, and debris and spillage under shelving containing raw meat and poultry. These findings were confirmed by the FSD and were not in compliance with professional standards or facility policy.
Surveyors identified that two residents did not receive care in accordance with professional standards. One resident using a continuous glucose monitoring device for diabetes management lacked physician orders for device use and replacement, while another resident with chronic skin issues did not have required weekly skin check documentation, despite physician orders and care plan requirements. Nursing staff and the DON confirmed these omissions during interviews.
Two residents did not receive care in accordance with physician orders and professional standards. One resident experienced delays in wound care due to late implementation of a wound physician's recommendations, with no documentation that the attending physician was notified or declined the orders. Another resident's transfer to the ER was delayed by at least nine hours after a physician's order was misinterpreted, and abnormal urinalysis results were not reported to the physician in a timely manner. These deficiencies involved lapses in communication, order transcription, and timely follow-through by nursing staff.
A resident did not receive appropriate care for existing pressure ulcers, and the facility failed to implement effective measures to prevent new ulcers from developing. Surveyors found that necessary interventions, assessments, and monitoring were not consistently provided, leading to the occurrence and worsening of pressure ulcers.
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food handling, with staff not using hair restraints, practicing proper hand hygiene, or monitoring food temperatures. Observations revealed dietary staff preparing food without hairnets or beard guards, handling food without changing gloves, and failing to record temperatures, which could lead to contamination.
The facility failed to address repeated grievances from residents regarding food services and call light wait times. Despite forming a Food Committee, issues such as lack of daily soup, incorrect meal trays, and long call light wait times persisted. The facility's grievance process was ineffective, with repeated complaints and no documented resolutions.
The facility failed to monitor a resident's midline catheter site for infection as ordered, due to an error in entering the order into the MAR. Additionally, another resident was incorrectly diagnosed with schizophrenia upon admission, despite having a history of dementia with paranoia. These deficiencies were identified through record reviews and staff interviews.
The facility failed to securely store and properly label medications, including insulin pens and vials, as required by professional standards. A treatment cart was repeatedly found unlocked and unattended, and insulin pens were improperly labeled and stored. Staff acknowledged these deficiencies, which were observed during a survey.
The facility did not follow posted menus, leading to discrepancies in meals served, such as serving French toast instead of French toast casserole and omitting egg rolls. Dietary staff were unaware of menu items, and there was a lack of communication about changes to residents and staff. Residents expressed frustration with the inconsistency, and the Registered Dietitian and Administrator emphasized the need for communication to ensure nutritional needs are met.
The facility failed to serve food and drink at palatable and appetizing temperatures, as confirmed by test trays and resident feedback. Residents reported cold food, warm milk, and a lack of flavor. Test trays showed food items like fish, rice, and eggs served below appetizing temperatures. The FSD attributed issues to delays and improper tray transport, while the RD noted ongoing temperature concerns. The administrator was aware and had purchased an additional meal truck, but deficiencies persisted.
A nurse administered insulin to a resident in a hallway, exposing the resident's abdomen in front of others, violating privacy policies. The nurse did not realize the privacy breach, and the Unit Manager confirmed that insulin should be administered in private.
A resident, dependent on staff for personal hygiene, did not receive proper nail care as per facility policy, leading to long, brown-tinted nails. Despite the resident's requests for a manicure, staff failed to trim the nails, resulting in the resident attempting to break them manually. Interviews revealed that nail care was supposed to occur on shower days, but this was not done, leading to the deficiency.
A resident, admitted in August 2023 and cognitively intact, experienced hearing difficulties and requested an audiology appointment in March 2024. Despite expressing the need for hearing aids and being treated for ear wax removal in January 2024, no audiology appointment was arranged in the following four months, as confirmed by the Unit Manager.
A facility failed to ensure a physician documented a rationale for disagreeing with a pharmacist's recommendation regarding antipsychotic medication for a resident with dementia. The resident was receiving Quetiapine Fumarate without a supporting diagnosis, and the physician did not provide a rationale for continuing the medication despite the pharmacist's recommendation for a dose reduction or discontinuation.
A resident was administered an antipsychotic medication without a documented specific condition justifying its use, contrary to facility policy. Despite a pharmacy consultant's recommendation to provide an appropriate indication or consider a dose reduction, the physician disagreed without providing a rationale. Interviews revealed the resident had no behaviors warranting psychiatric services, and the ADON acknowledged the lack of a supporting diagnosis for the medication.
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two residents by not updating the electronic medical records to reflect changes in their Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST). One resident's code status was not updated from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate, and another resident's directives against hospitalization and artificial interventions were not reflected in the records. The Unit Manager acknowledged the discrepancies during an interview.
The facility failed to honor the meal preferences of two residents, as indicated on their meal tickets. One resident continued to receive rice despite disliking it and often did not receive preferred items like chocolate milk and ice cream. Another resident's preference for a hot dog or grilled cheese was frequently not met, requiring additional requests. The facility's system for managing meal preferences was acknowledged as ineffective by the administrator.
Failure to Address and Document Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations made by the consultant pharmacist were addressed in a timely manner and maintained as part of the permanent medical record for two residents. For one resident with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and major depressive disorder, the consultant pharmacist's recommendations from April and May were not found in the medical record and were not acted upon. These recommendations included reassessing the necessity of Meclizine, an anticholinergic medication, and ordering an A1c lab every three months for diabetes management. The medical record did not show that the physician addressed these recommendations, and the last A1c lab was collected several months prior to the review. For another resident with a history of artificial knee joint, morbid obesity, anxiety, and depression, the consultant pharmacist's recommendations from April and May were also missing from the medical record and were not addressed. The recommendations included sequencing multiple as-needed pain medications and ordering specific labs for monitoring antipsychotic and other medication use. The medical record did not indicate that these recommendations were reviewed, implemented, or declined by the provider. Interviews with nursing staff and the DON revealed that there was confusion and a lack of clear process regarding the handling of pharmacy recommendations, particularly during a transition to a new pharmacy provider. Unit Managers were responsible for ensuring recommendations were reviewed and completed, but lapses occurred, and recommendations were not always received or documented. The DON acknowledged that pharmacy recommendations should have been addressed and maintained in the medical record, but this was not consistently done.
Unsanitary Conditions in Main Kitchen Walk-In Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator in a sanitary and safe condition, as required by professional standards and the facility's own policies. Specifically, the walk-in refrigerator had shelving with several areas of rust and extensive patchy areas of a raised yellow, powdery substance. There was also black powdery buildup on the refrigerator wall near raw onions stored in a mesh bag. Additionally, debris and spillage, including brown and black colored substances, were found underneath shelving that contained raw meat and/or poultry. The perimeter and corners of the floor had debris and black buildup. These conditions were confirmed during an interview with the Food Service Director, who acknowledged that the walk-in refrigerator should be kept clean and sanitary. The observations were made on two separate occasions, and the findings were consistent with violations of both the FDA Food Code and the facility's own sanitization policy, which require food to be stored in clean, dry locations and equipment to be cleaned at a frequency necessary to prevent the accumulation of soil residues.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Glucose Monitoring and Skin Checks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents. For one resident with type 2 diabetes, there were no physician's orders in place for the use of a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device, specifically the Freestyle Libre 2. Although the resident was using the CGM to monitor blood glucose and nurses were utilizing the device to guide insulin administration, the medical record lacked orders for the application, removal, and replacement of the sensor every 14 days, as well as for the use of the device to obtain blood glucose readings. Interviews with nursing staff, the nurse practitioner, and the Director of Nursing confirmed the absence of these required orders, despite the resident's ongoing use of the device for diabetes management. Another resident with chronic peripheral venous insufficiency and a history of impaired skin integrity did not have weekly skin check documentation as ordered by the physician. The care plan for this resident included monitoring for skin complications and documenting findings, but the last recorded weekly skin check was six weeks prior to the survey. Although the resident's legs were reportedly observed by staff during routine care, there was no documentation in the electronic health record to confirm that weekly skin checks were performed as required. These deficiencies were identified through observation, interviews, and record review, demonstrating that the facility did not consistently follow physician's orders or ensure complete and accurate documentation of care provided to residents with complex medical needs.
Failure to Implement Physician Orders and Timely Communication of Lab Results
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and residents' choices for two residents. For one resident with a history of a displaced femur fracture, diabetes, and moderate cognitive impairment, the facility did not implement the wound physician's recommendations for a skin tear in a timely manner. The wound care orders recommended by the consultant were not entered into the medical record or implemented for several days after being made, resulting in gaps in wound treatment. There was also no documentation that the attending physician was notified of the consultant's recommendations or that the physician declined to implement them. For another resident with severe sepsis, acute kidney failure, and an indwelling catheter, the facility failed to accurately transcribe and act on a physician's order to send the resident to the emergency room for evaluation. The order, which was faxed back to the facility, was misinterpreted by one nurse as an order to repeat labs in the morning, resulting in a delay of at least nine hours before the resident was transferred to the hospital. The original lab slip with the physician's written instructions was not included in the medical record, and there was confusion among nursing staff regarding the correct interpretation of the order. Additionally, the facility did not report abnormal urinalysis results to the physician in a timely manner for the same resident. The urinalysis, which showed significant bacterial growth, was reported to the facility but not communicated to the physician or documented as such in the medical record. The DON confirmed that there was no notification to the physician or documentation of the abnormal results, and the physician's office did not have a copy of the lab results or fax. These failures demonstrate lapses in communication, order transcription, and timely implementation of physician recommendations.
Failure to Provide and Prevent Pressure Ulcer Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate care for pressure ulcers and did not implement effective measures to prevent the development of new ulcers. This deficiency was identified through surveyor observations and documentation review, which indicated that residents were not consistently receiving the necessary interventions to manage existing pressure ulcers or to prevent new ones from forming. The lack of proper assessment, monitoring, and timely intervention contributed to the occurrence and worsening of pressure ulcers among residents.
Deficiencies in Food Safety and Sanitation Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food storage, preparation, and service, as observed during a survey. Dietary staff did not adhere to the facility's policy on hair restraints, with staff members preparing food without restraining their hair or beard, which could lead to contamination. Interviews with the Food Service Director and the Administrator confirmed that hairnets and beard guards are part of the required uniform to prevent hair from contacting food, yet these measures were not consistently followed. Additionally, the facility did not ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use among dietary staff, leading to potential cross-contamination. Staff were observed handling various food items without changing gloves or using serving utensils. Furthermore, the facility failed to monitor and record food temperatures adequately, with significant gaps in temperature logs for both refrigeration and steam tables. This lack of monitoring could compromise food safety, as confirmed by the Food Service Director, who expressed concern over the missing temperature records.
Facility Fails to Resolve Resident Grievances
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address and resolve grievances and concerns raised by the Resident Council from December 2023 through July 2024. The Resident Council repeatedly voiced issues regarding food services, including the lack of daily soup offerings, incorrect items on meal trays, late meal deliveries, and snacks not being provided as promised. Despite the establishment of a Food Committee in December 2023 to address these concerns, the facility did not implement effective solutions, and the same issues persisted over several months. Additionally, residents expressed concerns about long call light wait times, sometimes exceeding an hour, which were not adequately addressed by the facility. The residents requested to be involved in call light audits, but these audits were not shared with them, and the issues remained unresolved. The facility's grievance handling process was ineffective, as evidenced by the repeated nature of the complaints and the lack of documented resolutions. Interviews with the facility's Administrator and Food Service Manager revealed that the Food Committee meetings were not held as planned and were ineffective in resolving the residents' concerns. The Administrator acknowledged that the system for addressing grievances needed improvement, as the same issues were being reported repeatedly without resolution. The Food Service Manager admitted to delays in meeting with the Dietitian to make necessary menu changes, contributing to the ongoing dissatisfaction among residents.
Deficiencies in Monitoring and Diagnosis for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice for two residents, resulting in deficiencies in care. For one resident, the facility did not monitor the midline catheter insertion site for signs of infection or infiltration every shift as ordered by the physician. The order for monitoring was not entered into the Medication Administration Record (MAR) until several days after the resident's admission, leading to a lack of documentation and monitoring during that period. Interviews with nursing staff revealed that the order was initially transposed incorrectly and did not populate to the MAR, which was later corrected. For another resident, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment upon admission, leading to an incorrect diagnosis of schizophrenia. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance, but the primary physician added schizophrenia to the list of active diagnoses based on a review of hospital discharge paperwork. The physician later acknowledged that the diagnosis of schizophrenia was incorrect and should not have been included, as the resident's correct diagnosis was dementia with paranoia. The medical record did not support a history of schizophrenia prior to the resident's admission to the facility. These deficiencies highlight lapses in the facility's processes for monitoring medical orders and ensuring accurate diagnoses. The failure to monitor the midline catheter site as ordered and the incorrect addition of a schizophrenia diagnosis both reflect a lack of adherence to professional standards and proper documentation practices. These issues were identified through record reviews, interviews, and policy reviews conducted by surveyors.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with accepted professional principles. Specifically, the treatment cart on the Cookside Unit was observed multiple times to be unlocked and unattended in the hallway, contrary to the facility's policy that requires medication storage areas to be locked unless under direct supervision. This was confirmed by interviews with the Unit Manager and the Assistant Director of Nurses, who both acknowledged that the cart should have been locked and stored in the clean utility room when not in use. Additionally, the facility did not adhere to proper labeling and storage practices for medications, particularly insulin pens and vials. During an inspection of the Birchside Medication Cart, one insulin pen lacked a pharmacy label and proper date markings, which was acknowledged by the nurse as a violation of the facility's policy. Similarly, the Arborside Medication Cart contained insulin pens stored improperly in a Styrofoam cup, with some pens missing caps and others lacking proper labeling and date markings. This was further confirmed by interviews with nursing staff and unit managers, who recognized the need for proper labeling and storage. The facility's failure to comply with its own medication storage policies was evident in the observations and interviews conducted by the surveyor. The lack of proper labeling and secure storage of medications, particularly insulin, posed a risk to resident safety and was not in line with the Department of Health guidelines. The staff acknowledged these deficiencies and the need for corrective actions to ensure compliance with professional standards.
Failure to Follow Posted Menus and Communicate Changes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the posted menus were followed, leading to discrepancies in the meals served to residents. On multiple occasions, the meals provided did not match the menu, such as serving French toast instead of French toast casserole, omitting egg rolls from a lunch menu, and serving plain toast and scrambled eggs instead of cinnamon toast and sausage. Dietary staff were unaware of the menu items and did not communicate changes to the residents or other staff members. The Food Service Director acknowledged that some items were unavailable from the vendor but did not inform residents or the Registered Dietitian of these changes. Residents expressed frustration with the inconsistency between the menu and the meals served, with one resident noting that they could not rely on the menu for accuracy. The lack of communication regarding menu changes was also highlighted by the Activities Assistant and the Activity Director, who stated that they were not informed of any changes, leading to resident dissatisfaction. The Registered Dietitian and the Administrator emphasized the need for communication to ensure that meals meet the nutritional needs of the residents.
Deficiency in Food Temperature and Palatability
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that food and drink were served at palatable and appetizing temperatures, as evidenced by observations, test tray results, and resident interviews. During initial resident screening, residents expressed concerns about cold food, warm milk, and a lack of palatability. Test trays conducted on two separate occasions confirmed these issues, with food items such as baked fish, rice, spinach, and scrambled eggs being served at temperatures below what is considered hot or appetizing. Additionally, the milk was consistently served warm, and the toast was cold and soggy. These findings were corroborated by resident feedback during a Resident Group Meeting and individual interviews, where residents described the food as tasteless, too salty, or lacking flavor. The Food Service Director (FSD) acknowledged the issues, attributing them to delays in food truck arrivals and improper transportation of meal trays. The Registered Dietitian (RD) also noted that the food temperatures were not within the expected range and had previously communicated these concerns to the FSD through Test Tray Evaluation Forms. The forms documented ongoing issues with food temperatures, including instances where trays were not placed inside meal carts, leading to inadequate temperature retention. The facility administrator was aware of these concerns and had recently purchased an additional meal truck to address the issue, although the deficiency persisted.
Failure to Ensure Privacy During Insulin Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure privacy for a resident during medication administration, specifically an insulin injection. The incident involved a nurse who administered insulin to a resident in the hallway, where multiple residents and staff were present. The nurse drew up the insulin dose at the medication cart and called the resident to the hallway, where the resident lifted their shirt to expose their abdomen for the injection. This action was observed by a surveyor, indicating a lack of privacy for the resident. The facility's policy on medication administration procedures emphasizes the importance of providing privacy during medication administration. However, the nurse did not adhere to this policy, as confirmed during an interview where the nurse expressed a lack of understanding regarding the privacy breach. The Unit Manager acknowledged the mistake and stated that insulin should be administered in the resident's room to ensure privacy, which the nurse should have been aware of.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nail Care for a Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nail care for a resident, identified as Resident #115, who was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. The facility's policy on nail care, which includes daily cleaning and regular trimming to prevent infections and accidental scratching, was not followed. Resident #115, who was cognitively intact and at risk for skin impairments due to frail skin, was observed with long, brown-tinted fingernails. The resident expressed dissatisfaction with the length of their nails and reported having requested a manicure without success. The resident resorted to using a small wooden tool to clean under their nails and attempted to break them manually, resulting in jagged and broken nails. Interviews with facility staff revealed that nail care was typically performed on shower days, but this was not done for Resident #115, even though the resident did not leave the bed for showers. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) acknowledged the responsibility to cut the resident's nails but failed to do so over the weekend, leading to further nail breakage. The Unit Manager confirmed that the resident's nails should have been trimmed during shower days, regardless of whether the resident received a shower. This oversight in providing necessary ADL care resulted in the deficiency noted by the surveyors.
Failure to Arrange Audiology Appointment for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to arrange an audiology appointment for a resident who was experiencing hearing loss. The resident, admitted in August 2023, was cognitively intact as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment conducted in May 2024. During interactions with the surveyor and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), the resident expressed difficulty in hearing and mentioned the absence of hearing aids, which they hoped to receive soon. The resident had requested a hearing evaluation in March 2024, as documented in the Social Work progress notes, but no appointment had been arranged in the four months following the request. Interviews with the Unit Manager revealed that the resident had been treated for ear wax removal in January 2024 but had not been referred to an audiologist. The Unit Manager was unaware of any follow-up on the resident's request for a hearing evaluation. The lack of action in arranging the necessary audiology appointment for the resident's hearing difficulties constitutes the deficiency identified in the report.
Lack of Physician Documentation for Antipsychotic Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a physician documented a clinical rationale for disagreeing with a consultant pharmacist's recommendation regarding the use of an antipsychotic medication for a resident. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, was receiving Quetiapine Fumarate, an antipsychotic medication, without a supporting diagnosis for its use. The consultant pharmacist identified this irregularity and recommended providing an appropriate specific indication for the medication or considering a dose reduction with the goal of discontinuation. The physician disagreed with the pharmacist's recommendation but did not document a rationale for this disagreement in the medical record. Interviews with facility staff, including a nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), confirmed that the resident had no behaviors warranting the use of the antipsychotic medication and that the physician should have documented a rationale for the disagreement. The ADON acknowledged that the resident's diagnoses did not support the use of Quetiapine Fumarate, highlighting the deficiency in the facility's compliance with its own policies and procedures regarding medication review and documentation.
Failure to Justify Antipsychotic Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication. Specifically, the resident was administered an antipsychotic medication, Quetiapine Fumarate, without a documented specific condition justifying its use. The facility's policy requires that antipsychotic medications be prescribed only for specific conditions based on a comprehensive assessment. However, the medical record for the resident indicated a diagnosis of dementia without behaviors, which does not support the use of the antipsychotic medication. Despite a pharmacy consultant's recommendation to provide an appropriate indication or consider a dose reduction, the physician disagreed without providing a rationale. Interviews with facility staff, including a nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed that the resident had no behaviors warranting psychiatric services and was receiving the antipsychotic medication prior to admission. The ADON acknowledged that the resident's diagnoses did not support the use of Quetiapine Fumarate and that the physician should have provided an appropriate diagnosis. The resident was admitted to Short Term Rehab (STR) and was expected to return to their prior living situation, but the physician did not adjust or discontinue the medication despite the lack of supporting diagnosis.
Failure to Update Medical Records with MOLST Directives
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for two residents. For the first resident, who was admitted in September 2022, a new Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) was signed by the designated Health Care Proxy in October 2023, changing the code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate, Do Not Intubate. However, a review of the electronic medical record in July 2024 revealed that the code status still indicated Full Code, not reflecting the updated MOLST directives. During an interview, the Unit Manager acknowledged that the electronic medical record should have been updated to reflect the changes made in October 2023. Similarly, the second resident, admitted in August 2023, signed a new MOLST in March 2024, maintaining a Do Not Resuscitate status and adding directives against hospitalization, artificial nutrition, and artificial hydration. Yet, the electronic medical record reviewed in July 2024 showed orders for hospital transfer and indecision on artificial nutrition and hydration, failing to align with the MOLST directives. The Unit Manager confirmed that the electronic medical record should have been updated to reflect the March 2024 MOLST changes, indicating a lapse in maintaining accurate medical records.
Failure to Honor Resident Meal Preferences
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide two residents with meals that met their stated preferences, as required by their policy. Resident #7, who was cognitively intact, reported that the meals served did not align with the preferences listed on their meal ticket. Specifically, the resident disliked rice but continued to receive it, and often did not receive chocolate milk and ice cream as preferred. The Food Service Director confirmed that the meal tickets should reflect and honor these preferences, but was unsure why the resident's preferences were not met. Similarly, Resident #49's meal ticket indicated a preference for a hot dog or grilled cheese to be included daily, but these items were often missing from the tray. The resident's representative had to request these items separately. The facility's administrator acknowledged that the current system of reading and swapping items based on dislikes listed on meal tickets was not very effective, leading to these oversights.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 472 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 19 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fall River
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall River Jewish Home | 2.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Carvalho Grove Health And Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Kimwell Nursing And Rehabilitation | 3 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Clifton Rehabilitation Nursing Center | 3.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Somerset Ridge Center | 3.9 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mill Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.