Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Trinity Trace Community Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff failed to consistently use required Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) PPE, such as gowns and gloves, during high-contact care activities for two residents with a history of VRE colonization. Additionally, appropriate hand hygiene was not performed during and after incontinence care, with a staff member handling clean items and equipment without changing gloves or sanitizing hands. These actions were contrary to facility policy and posted instructions, as confirmed by staff and DON interviews.
A resident experienced an unwitnessed fall, which was not accurately coded in the MDS assessment. Despite the resident's self-report of the fall, the MDS indicated no falls had occurred. Interviews with the LPN and RN responsible for the MDS confirmed the oversight, and the DON acknowledged the error.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents, resulting in incorrect coding of a diuretic medication and discharge destination. Staff responsible for the assessments confirmed the errors, which were also acknowledged by the DON.
The facility failed to ensure insulin pens were primed before administration, as required by both facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines. This was observed in three residents receiving insulin via Insulin Aspart FlexPens. LPNs administering the insulin were unaware of the priming requirement, indicating a lack of training or awareness. The DON and QI staff confirmed the necessity of priming, highlighting a procedural gap.
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and documentation of medications. In Med Room a, the medication refrigerator's temperature was not consistently documented. Additionally, expired Artificial Tear eye drops were found on Med Cart c, which were still available for use despite being expired. The DON confirmed that expired medications should not be administered.
A resident was discharged from an LTC facility after an emergency transfer to a hospital due to abusive behaviors. However, the facility failed to provide the required physician documentation justifying the discharge. Interviews with hospital staff and facility personnel confirmed the absence of necessary documentation, despite the resident's behavior being cited as a safety risk.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Hand Hygiene During Resident Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically regarding the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and hand hygiene during incontinence care for residents with a history of colonization with Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE). Observations revealed that staff did not consistently wear required personal protective equipment (PPE), such as gowns and gloves, during high-contact care activities for residents on EBP. In two separate instances, staff members provided incontinence care and repositioned residents without donning gowns, despite clear signage and available PPE at the residents' doors. Interviews with the staff confirmed a lack of understanding or awareness of the EBP requirements. Additionally, the facility did not ensure proper hand hygiene practices during and after resident care. One staff member was observed changing a resident's soiled brief and performing perineal care, then proceeding to handle clean items, linens, and equipment without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. The same staff member also failed to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and before and after retrieving and using a mechanical lift for the resident. These actions were in direct violation of the facility's hand hygiene policy, which requires handwashing or use of hand sanitizer before and after resident contact, after glove removal, and after contact with bodily fluids. The residents involved had documented histories of VRE colonization and were under physician orders and care plans specifying the need for EBP. Facility policies and posted instructions clearly outlined the requirements for PPE use and hand hygiene, yet these were not followed during observed care activities. Interviews with the Director of Nursing and staff confirmed the expectations for PPE and hand hygiene, as well as the failure to adhere to these protocols during the incidents.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Resident Fall
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident who experienced a fall. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, had an unwitnessed fall on November 26, 2024, which was self-reported to the staff the following day. Despite this incident, the Quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of December 3, 2024, incorrectly indicated that there were no falls since the previous assessment, leading to a failure in accurately coding the resident's fall history. Interviews with facility staff, including the LPN responsible for completing the MDS assessments and the RN who reviewed and signed off on them, confirmed the oversight. Both staff members acknowledged that the resident's fall should have been documented in the MDS assessment. The Director of Nursing also reviewed the resident's clinical record and confirmed the coding error, acknowledging that the fall should have been recorded in the MDS assessment.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS assessments for two residents, leading to discrepancies in their medical records. For one resident, the Quarterly MDS assessment did not reflect the use of a prescribed diuretic, Furosemide, which had been ordered by the physician and administered twice daily since May. This oversight was confirmed by the staff responsible for the MDS assessment, who acknowledged that the medication should have been coded in the MDS. Another resident's Discharge MDS inaccurately recorded the discharge destination as a short-term general hospital, whereas the resident was actually discharged to an assisted living facility. This error was also verified by the staff responsible for the MDS assessments, who confirmed the incorrect coding. Both discrepancies were acknowledged by the Director of Nursing, who confirmed the errors in the MDS coding for both residents.
Failure to Prime Insulin Pens Before Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensured the proper dispensing and administering of insulin, as evidenced by the lack of priming of insulin pens before administration. This deficiency was observed in three residents who were receiving insulin via Insulin Aspart FlexPens. The facility's policy and the manufacturer's guidelines both require that the insulin pens be primed with 2 units of insulin before each injection to ensure proper dosing and to avoid injecting air. However, the Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) responsible for administering the insulin to these residents did not follow this procedure. During observations, it was noted that the LPNs did not perform the necessary air shot to prime the insulin pens before administering the insulin doses to the residents. Interviews with the LPNs revealed that they were unaware of the requirement to prime the insulin pens, indicating a lack of training or awareness of the facility's policy and the manufacturer's instructions. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Quality Improvement (QI) staff confirmed the requirement for priming the insulin pens, highlighting a gap in the implementation of pharmaceutical procedures within the facility.
Deficiencies in Medication Storage and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and documentation of drugs and biologicals, as observed during a survey. In Med Room a, the medication refrigerator's temperature was not consistently documented, with records missing for several days in September 2024. This documentation was supposed to be maintained daily by the night shift nurses, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing (S1DON) during an interview. The lack of consistent temperature monitoring could potentially affect the efficacy and safety of the medications stored in the refrigerator. Additionally, expired medications were found on Med Cart c, specifically a box of Artificial Tear eye drops with an expiration date of March 2024, which was still available for use despite being opened in August 2024. The Licensed Practical Nurse (S2LPN) confirmed the expiration date and acknowledged that the eye drops should have been discarded. The Director of Nursing was informed of these findings and confirmed that expired medications should not be administered to residents.
Lack of Documentation for Resident Discharge
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's discharge was properly documented with the required physician's justification. A resident was admitted to the facility and later transferred to a local hospital due to an emergency. The facility discharged the resident after this transfer, citing abusive behaviors as the reason. However, there was no documentation in the medical record from the physician justifying the discharge, which is a requirement. Interviews with the emergency room physician and triage nurse at the local hospital confirmed that the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) communicated that the resident could not return due to her abusive behavior and threats from her family members. The DON and the facility's administrator both confirmed the lack of documentation justifying the discharge. The medical director also acknowledged that he did not document the reason for the discharge, despite the resident's behaviors being cited as a risk to the safety of other residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 35 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Covington
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pontchartrain Health Care Center | 1.2 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Heritage Manor Of Mandeville | 2.1 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Christwood | 4.8 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Forest Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Lacombe Nursing Centre | 10.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Trinity Trace Community Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.