Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Summit during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple complex conditions, including COPD, CVA with aphasia and hemiplegia, abnormal weight loss, and pressure ulcers, was care planned and had physician orders for continuous Fibersource tube feeding at 60 ml/hr. Progress notes documented a recommendation and new order to increase the tube feed to 60 ml/hr, but repeated observations over two days showed the feeding pump consistently set at 55 ml/hr. An LPN confirmed the tube feeding was infusing at 55 ml/hr despite the order for 60 ml/hr, demonstrating that the resident’s enteral feeding was not administered according to the physician’s orders.
A facility failed to adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with chronic wounds, as staff did not wear gowns during wound care despite clear instructions. An LPN and a CNA were observed performing wound care with only masks and gloves, misunderstanding the requirement for gown use, which led to a deficiency in infection control practices.
Failure to Administer Tube Feeding at Physician-Ordered Rate
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to administer tube feeding according to the physician’s ordered rate for a resident receiving enteral nutrition. The resident had multiple significant diagnoses, including COPD, cerebral infarction with aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, abnormal weight loss, and multiple pressure ulcers, and was dependent on staff for eating with a feeding tube in place. The resident’s comprehensive person-centered care plan and current physician orders dated 02/17/2026 specified Fibersource tube feeding at 60 ml/hr. Departmental progress notes documented a recommendation and a new order on 02/17/2026 to increase the tube feed to Fibersource at 60 ml/hr. Despite these orders, multiple observations on consecutive days showed the resident’s tube feeding infusing at 55 ml/hr via pump. On 02/23/2026 at 10:45 a.m. and 4:08 p.m., and again on 02/24/2026 at 8:25 a.m. and 12:25 p.m., the tube feeding rate remained at 55 ml/hr. During an interview on 02/24/2026 at 12:50 p.m., an LPN confirmed that the tube feeding was set at 55 ml/hr and acknowledged it should have been at 60 ml/hr per the physician’s order. This discrepancy between the ordered rate and the administered rate constituted the failure to ensure the resident’s tube feeding was provided as prescribed.
Failure to Adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and maintain proper infection control practices, specifically Enhanced Barrier Precautions, to prevent the spread of infectious communicable diseases. This deficiency was observed in the care of a resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to chronic wounds, including vascular and arterial ulcers. The facility's policy required the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities for residents with such conditions. However, during an observation, it was noted that the staff did not adhere to these precautions. An LPN was observed performing wound care on the resident's left foot while wearing only a mask and gloves, without the required gown. Additionally, a CNA entered the room to assist, also without wearing a gown, despite the signage on the resident's door indicating the necessity of gown use for wound care. The LPN later confirmed that she misunderstood the requirement, believing a gown was only necessary for stage 2 ulcers or worse, despite the clear instructions on the door. This oversight in following the Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy led to a failure in infection control practices.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 94 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Alexandria
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency House Of Alexandria | 1.1 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| Belle Grande Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 2.2 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Lexington House | 2.4 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Matthews Memorial Health Care Center | 2.5 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Legacy Nursing At St. Christina | 3.4 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Summit.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.