Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at The Oaks Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to notify the physician when a resident's blood glucose levels exceeded the prescribed threshold and did not document an unwitnessed fall of another resident. Despite clear policies, the physician and responsible party were not informed, and there was no documentation of the incidents, as confirmed by the DON.
The facility failed to follow puree diet recipes, affecting nine residents. The dietary staff used incorrect ingredients and did not measure portion sizes, compromising the nutritional adequacy of meals. The dietary manager confirmed these deviations from the facility's policy.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a surgical wound and PICC line, as required by their infection control policy. Observations revealed the absence of EBP signage and inconsistent use of PPE by staff during high-contact activities. Interviews confirmed that staff were not following EBP protocols, and the necessary precautions were only implemented after the deficiency was identified.
Failure to Notify Physician and Document Incidents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to professional standards of quality care by not notifying the physician when a resident's blood glucose levels exceeded the threshold set by the physician's orders. Resident #102, who has a history of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia and other significant health conditions, had multiple instances where blood glucose levels were recorded above 451 mg/dL. Despite the clear directive in the medication administration record to notify the physician when levels exceeded this threshold, there was no documentation indicating that the physician was informed on these occasions. This oversight was confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON) during an interview. Additionally, the facility did not follow its policy for reporting and documenting incidents when Resident #97 experienced an unwitnessed fall. Resident #97, who is at risk for falls due to various health issues, fell from her wheelchair while outside the facility. Although the resident reported the fall and stated that several nurses assisted her afterward, there was no documentation of the incident in her clinical record. Furthermore, the physician and the resident's responsible party were not notified, as required by the facility's policy. The lack of documentation and failure to notify the physician and responsible party in both cases highlight a significant lapse in the facility's adherence to its own policies and procedures. These deficiencies were identified through interviews and record reviews conducted by the surveyors, and the DON acknowledged the failures in both instances.
Failure to Follow Puree Diet Recipes
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that menus were followed to meet the nutritional needs of residents requiring a puree diet. During an observation, it was noted that the dietary staff did not adhere to the recipes for pureed meals, specifically for pot roast and cabbage. The dietary staff member used ingredients not specified in the recipes, such as bread and water, and failed to use the required food thickener. Additionally, portion sizes were not measured according to the recipes, which could affect the nutritional adequacy of the meals provided to the residents. The dietary manager confirmed that the dietary staff did not follow the puree recipes and did not measure portion sizes as required. The facility's policy on the preparation and service of pureed diets was not adhered to, as the staff member did not follow the provided recipes or use the necessary food thickener. This deficiency affected all nine residents who were on a puree diet, potentially compromising their nutritional intake.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for Resident #109, who was one of the 30 sampled residents. The deficiency was identified through observation, record review, and interviews. Resident #109 had a surgical wound and a PICC line, which required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as per the facility's policy. However, the facility did not implement these precautions, as there was no EBP signage on or near the resident's room, and staff did not consistently use gowns and gloves during high-contact activities. Resident #109's clinical records indicated a history of orthopedic aftercare, osteomyelitis, and a surgical wound, necessitating specific infection control measures. Despite these needs, the resident's care plan and physician's orders did not include EBP, which are crucial for preventing cross-contamination, especially given the presence of a PICC line and a wound vac. Observations on multiple occasions revealed the absence of EBP signage and the lack of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) use by staff during resident care activities. Interviews with staff and the resident confirmed the lack of adherence to EBP. A CNA mentioned that EBP was indicated by an orange sign on the resident's door, which was not present until later. The resident reported that CNAs did not wear gowns during transfers or toileting hygiene, and tubing from the wound vac was disconnected during these activities. An LPN confirmed placing the EBP sign on the resident's door only after the deficiency was noted, indicating a delay in implementing necessary precautions.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 88 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Pineville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Tioga Community Care Center | 2.6 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Legacy Nursing At St. Christina | 3.7 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
| Matthews Memorial Health Care Center | 4 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Lexington House | 6.3 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for The Oaks Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.