Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Eastridge Nursing & Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident experienced a fall in a facility van due to improper use of a wheelchair securement system by a staff member, who admitted to not following proper procedures. The incident, determined to be neglect, was not reported to the State Survey Agency within the required 2-hour timeframe, as the administrator was unaware of the reporting requirement for incidents occurring in facility transportation vehicles.
The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, with expired and unlabeled food items, food residue on surfaces, and a dietary worker not wearing a beard restraint. These deficiencies had the potential to affect 83 residents consuming meals from the facility's kitchen.
The facility failed to follow its policies for preparing and serving pureed and mechanically soft meals, impacting residents with swallowing difficulties. The cook used water instead of milk for pureed dinner rolls and did not follow recipes, while incorrect scoops were used for serving, leading to potential nutritional deficiencies.
A facility failed to refer a resident with Schizoaffective Disorder for a Level II PASARR evaluation. The resident was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including Schizoaffective Disorder, but the necessary evaluation was not submitted. The Social Services Director confirmed the oversight, acknowledging the failure to submit the required review for the resident's new diagnosis.
The facility failed to provide proper respiratory care for two residents. One resident's oxygen equipment was not stored in a sanitary manner, while another resident, requiring continuous oxygen therapy, was found without oxygen during lunch. Staff confirmed the deficiencies, acknowledging the failure to adhere to prescribed care protocols.
A resident with cognitive impairment experienced a fall resulting in a hematoma and was sent to the hospital. The facility failed to document this fall in the resident's care plan, as confirmed by interviews with an LPN and the DON, despite the facility's policy requiring all falls to be documented.
A facility failed to ensure a resident had a current hospice plan of care. The resident, with terminal Coronary Artery Disease, was admitted to hospice care, but their EHR lacked a hospice plan. The DON confirmed the absence of the plan, despite procedures to scan and check hospice documents weekly.
The facility failed to accurately code the MDS assessments for two residents receiving hospice care. One resident with end-stage CVA and another with end-stage CAD were not coded for hospice care in their MDS assessments, despite physician orders indicating hospice admission. This discrepancy was confirmed during a review with S2MDS.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Neglect Following Resident Fall During Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the State Survey Agency within the required 2-hour timeframe after learning of the incident. According to the facility's policy, any employee or agent who becomes aware of abuse or neglect must immediately report the matter to the administrator or DON, and the administrator or designee must report to the mandated state agency within 2 hours. In this case, a resident experienced a fall in a facility van due to improper use of the Q'straint wheelchair securement system by a staff member. The incident was discovered and occurred at the same time, but the report to the Statewide Incident Management System (SIMS) was not made until eight days later. The staff member responsible for transporting the resident admitted to not following proper procedures for securing the wheelchair, despite having received training. The administrator confirmed that the fall was determined to be the result of willful and neglectful improper use of the Q'straint system. The administrator also stated he was unaware of the requirement to report incidents occurring in facility transportation vehicles, which contributed to the delay in reporting the incident as required by state guidelines.
Deficiencies in Kitchen Sanitation and Food Safety Practices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment, which is essential to prevent cross-contamination and foodborne illnesses. During an initial tour of the kitchen, several issues were observed, including expired food items such as Ready Care Thickener and Silk Milk, as well as unlabeled and undated food in the refrigerator. Additionally, there were multiple instances of food residue and crumbs on various surfaces and equipment, such as the spice shelf, slicer, and rolling pin. The presence of dirt and dust on shelves holding clean cups and serving dishes further highlighted the lack of cleanliness in the kitchen. The facility also did not adhere to professional standards for food storage and safety. Several food items, including hot dog and hamburger buns, were found without expiration or received dates, which is against the facility's policy. The ice scoop holder connected to the ice machine contained yellow residue, and there were dried food residues on the stove, fryer, and other kitchen equipment. These conditions indicate a failure to follow the facility's policies on cleaning and maintaining kitchen appliances and storage areas. Furthermore, the facility did not ensure that kitchen staff adhered to sanitary practices, as evidenced by a dietary worker not wearing a beard restraint. This was confirmed by the Dietary Manager, who acknowledged that the worker should have been wearing the appropriate hair restraint. The combination of these deficiencies had the potential to affect the 83 residents who consumed meals prepared in the facility's kitchen, posing a risk to their health and safety.
Failure to Follow Recipe and Portion Control for Pureed and Mechanically Soft Meals
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its policies and procedures regarding the preparation and serving of pureed and mechanically soft meals, which are crucial for residents with moderate to severe swallowing difficulties. Specifically, the kitchen staff did not follow the standardized recipe for pureed dinner rolls, using water instead of the required whole milk. This deviation from the recipe was observed during a meal preparation session, where the cook admitted to not using recipes and relying on memory instead. This practice was confirmed by the dietician, who acknowledged that the correct ingredients were not used, potentially affecting the nutritional value of the meals. Additionally, the facility did not ensure the use of appropriate portion sizes for pureed and mechanically soft meals. During an observation of the serving line, it was noted that incorrect scoops were used, resulting in portions smaller than those specified in the facility's portion sheet. The cook and dietary manager confirmed that the portion sheet was available but not followed, leading to potential nutritional deficiencies for residents on these specialized diets. The dietician confirmed that the failure to use the correct scoops could result in residents not receiving their recommended nutritional needs.
Failure to Conduct Level II PASARR Evaluation for Resident with Mental Disorder
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a qualified mental disorder was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II PASARR evaluation and determination. This deficiency was identified during a review of the facility's policy on Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), which aims to ensure that individuals with mental disorders or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes. The policy requires the completion of Level II evaluations to assess the need for nursing facility placement and services, including behavioral health services. The deficiency involved a resident who was admitted with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder, and Schizoaffective Disorder. The resident was diagnosed with Schizoaffective Disorder on 05/24/2021, but there was no evidence that a Level II evaluation and determination had been submitted. An interview with the Social Services Director confirmed that she was responsible for submitting reviews to the Office of Behavioral Health when a resident had a new qualifying mental illness. She acknowledged that she did not submit the necessary review for the resident's new diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, which should have been done.
Deficiencies in Respiratory Care for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards for two residents. For one resident, the oxygen equipment was not stored in a sanitary manner as required by the facility's policy. The resident's nasal cannula was observed left exposed to air on top of the oxygen concentrator instead of being stored in a bag when not in use. This was confirmed by the Assistant Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the staff should have stored the oxygen tubing properly. Another resident, who was diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and required continuous oxygen therapy, was found without the prescribed oxygen during lunch. The resident's oxygen concentrator was turned off, and no oxygen was being administered via nasal cannula. This was confirmed by an LPN, who stated that the resident was supposed to receive continuous oxygen and that the staff controlled the oxygen concentrator. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that continuous oxygen meant the resident should receive oxygen at all times.
Failure to Document Resident Fall in Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain accurately documented medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. Specifically, the facility did not document a fall in the resident-centered plan of care for one of the residents investigated for falls. The resident in question was admitted with diagnoses including muscle spasm, pain, ataxia, and cognitive communication deficit, and had a moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 9. An incident report revealed that the resident experienced a fall, resulting in a hematoma and swelling, and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Despite the occurrence of the fall, the resident's care plan did not include any documentation related to the incident. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN responsible for the Minimum Data Set and the Director of Nursing, confirmed the omission. Both staff members acknowledged that all falls should be documented in the resident's comprehensive plan of care, yet the review of the resident's care plan showed no such documentation for the fall that occurred.
Failure to Ensure Current Hospice Plan of Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to collaborate with a hospice agency to ensure a resident had a current hospice plan of care. A resident was admitted with diagnoses including Atherosclerotic heart disease, Anxiety disorder, and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3. A physician's order dated 06/06/2024 indicated the resident was to be admitted to hospice care due to terminal Coronary Artery Disease. However, a review of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and hard chart did not reveal a hospice plan of care. During an interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DON), it was confirmed that the hospice plan of care was missing from the resident's record, despite the DON's statement that hospice communications and documents were supposed to be scanned into each hospice resident's EHR and checked weekly by the DON, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and Quality Assurance (QA) nurse.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Hospice Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the hospice care status of two residents. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction due to Embolism of Left Middle Cerebral Artery, Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, and Dysphagia, and had a physician's order indicating admission with hospice care for end-stage Cerebrovascular Accident. However, the quarterly MDS assessment did not code the resident for hospice care. Similarly, Resident #2, admitted with Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery without Angina Pectoris, Alzheimer's Disease, and Dysphagia, had a physician's order for hospice care due to end-stage Coronary Artery Disease, but the MDS assessment also failed to reflect this hospice care status. During an interview and record review, S2MDS confirmed that the MDS assessments for both residents should have been coded for receiving hospice services, but they were not. This oversight was identified during a review of the residents' quarterly MDS assessments, which were conducted on specific dates in 2024.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 83 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Abbeville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maison Du Monde Living Center | 1.1 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Vermilion Health Care Center | 6.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Pelican Pointe Healthcare And Rehabilitation | 8.4 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Kaplan Healthcare Center | 11.3 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
| Maison De Lafayette | 12.5 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Eastridge Nursing & Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.