Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Claiborne Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to ensure a resident's medical records accurately reflected their advance directive wishes. The resident's profile page and physician's orders listed them as Full Code, while the comprehensive care plan and LaPost indicated a DNR status. This inconsistency was confirmed by the DON and the resident's health care representative.
The facility failed to ensure proper use and documentation of bed rails for four residents, lacking physician orders, risk assessments, and care plans. Observations and staff interviews confirmed the use of bed rails without necessary documentation, highlighting a deficiency in care planning and risk assessment.
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as required by their infection control policy. Staff were observed not using appropriate PPE during high-contact care activities for residents with indwelling medical devices. Interviews confirmed that residents needing EBP were not properly identified, and necessary signage and PPE were not available. A CNA was seen exiting a resident's room with dirty linens using only gloves, despite EBP signage being present.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment was found to be using a lap tray as a restraint without a physician's order, consent, or assessment. The facility's policy requires these steps for restraint use, but they were not followed, leading to a deficiency.
Inconsistent Documentation of Advance Directives
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's medical records accurately reflected their advance directive wishes. Specifically, the records for a resident indicated inconsistencies between the profile page, physician's orders, medication administration records, comprehensive care plan, and the LaPost document. The resident's profile page and physician's orders listed the resident as Full Code, allowing the use of an AED, while the comprehensive care plan and LaPost indicated a DNR status, as confirmed by the resident's brother and health care representative. The inconsistency was confirmed during an interview with the Director of Nursing, who acknowledged that the resident's code status was not consistent across the various documents. This discrepancy highlights a failure in the facility's process to ensure that the resident's wishes regarding resuscitation were accurately documented and followed, potentially leading to actions contrary to the resident's advance directives.
Deficiency in Bed Rail Use and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the correct use and maintenance of bed rails for four residents, leading to a deficiency in care planning and risk assessment. The report highlights that the facility did not have physician orders, risk assessments for entrapment, or care plans in place for the use of bed rails for these residents. This oversight was identified through record reviews, observations, and interviews conducted by surveyors. Resident #7, who has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for bed mobility, was observed with bed rails in use without a physician's order or a risk assessment. Similarly, Resident #27, who has intact cognition and uses a wheelchair, also had bed rails in place without the necessary documentation or assessment. Interviews with staff confirmed the use of bed rails for mobility and transfers, yet no formal care plan or order was documented. Resident #90, with ongoing assessment, and Resident #240, with moderately impaired cognition, were both observed using bed rails without the required physician's order, risk assessment, or care plan. Staff interviews further confirmed the use of bed rails for assistance, yet the facility failed to document or assess the risks associated with their use. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the lack of orders, care plans, and assessments for these residents, indicating a systemic issue in the facility's management of bed rail use.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program, specifically in implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Observations revealed that staff did not use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during high-contact resident care activities. For instance, two CNAs were observed performing pericare for a resident with a PEG feeding tube using only gloves, contrary to the facility's policy that requires gown and glove use for residents with indwelling medical devices. Throughout the survey, there was no evidence of EBP being implemented for residents who required it, as per the facility's policy. Interviews with staff, including a Medical Records staff member and a Corporate Nurse, confirmed that residents needing EBP were not properly identified, and necessary signage and PPE were not available. An LPN also reported that staff were not using PPE when entering rooms of residents on EBP. Additionally, a CNA was observed exiting a resident's room with dirty linens in gloved hands, without using any other PPE, despite EBP signage being present outside the room.
Failure to Obtain Proper Authorization for Restraint Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the use of physical restraints not required for medical treatment. Specifically, the facility did not have a written order, consent, or assessment for the use of a lap tray as a restraint for Resident #37. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was totally dependent on staff for mobility and other activities, was observed with a lap tray secured to a geri-chair. The resident was unable to remove the lap tray, which was considered a restraint according to the facility's policy. Observations and interviews revealed that the lap tray was used beyond meal times, and the resident's responsible party expressed a preference for its use to prevent falls. However, the facility's Director of Nursing and Corporate Nurse confirmed that the lap tray was a restraint since the resident could not remove it. The facility's policy required a physician's order, consent, and an assessment for restraint use, none of which were present in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 10 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Homer
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Nursing Center | 6.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Presbyterian Village Of Homer | 8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Meadowview Health & Rehab Center | 20.6 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Town & Country Health & Rehab | 22 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Willow Ridge Nursing And Rehabilitation Center,llc | 23.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Claiborne Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.