Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Bayside Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident's privacy was compromised during catheter care when a wound care nurse left the door and bedside curtain open, exposing the resident to the hallway. The nurse acknowledged the oversight, and the Director of Nursing confirmed that privacy should have been maintained.
The facility failed to report incidents of resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse to the State Survey Agency. One incident involved a resident throwing coffee at another during a verbal altercation, and another involved a resident in a verbal and physical altercation. These incidents were not reported as they were categorized as behavioral issues rather than abuse.
A facility failed to investigate incidents of resident-to-resident abuse, including one where a resident threw coffee on another and another involving a verbal and physical altercation. Despite documentation and discussions, no follow-up or investigation was conducted, and staff did not recognize these as abuse incidents.
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as it did not include infection-causing organisms in its surveillance. Additionally, a CNA used unsanitary gloves for catheter care, and an LPN performed wound care with unsecured hair touching her gloves, both of which are improper practices.
The facility did not maintain a system for feedback reports on antibiotic usage and resistance patterns. A review showed no documentation, and the DON/Infection Preventionist confirmed the lack of evidence regarding antibiotic practices.
A facility failed to conduct a required PASARR Level II evaluation for a resident diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and Delusional Disorder. The resident was admitted with a Level I PASARR, but no Level II evaluation was documented. The social worker confirmed the oversight and verified with the Office of Aging and Adult Services that the evaluation was necessary.
A facility failed to complete a Level II PASARR for a resident diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and PTSD. Despite these diagnoses being documented in the resident's medical records and quarterly MDS, the Level 1 PASARR assessment did not reflect any mental illness. No referral was made for a Level II PASARR evaluation, as confirmed by the social worker.
The facility failed to ensure CNAs performed proper hand hygiene during incontinence care for two residents. Observations showed that after providing care, one CNA did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and touched various items, while another CNA did not remove gloves before accessing a cabinet and failed to perform hand hygiene before handling barrier cream. Interviews confirmed these lapses, and the DON acknowledged the failure to follow the facility's hand hygiene policy.
Privacy Breach During Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of a resident during medical care. Resident #32, who had a suprapubic catheter, was observed receiving catheter care from a wound care nurse (S5WCN) with the door and bedside curtain open, exposing the resident to the hallway. This lack of privacy was confirmed during an interview with S5WCN, who acknowledged that the door and curtain should have been closed to maintain the resident's privacy. The Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist also confirmed that privacy should have been maintained during the procedure.
Failure to Report Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an alleged incident of resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse to the State Survey Agency, as required by their policy. The incident involved two residents, one of whom threw coffee at the other during a verbal altercation in the dining room. Despite the facility's policy mandating immediate reporting of such incidents, the Director of Nursing and the Administrator determined that the incident was merely a verbal disagreement and did not report it. Additionally, another incident involving the same resident, who was involved in a verbal and physical altercation with an unidentified resident, was also not reported. The facility's policy requires all incidents of alleged abuse to be reported to the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and respective Department Head, and then to the Health Standard within two hours. However, the incidents on two separate occasions were not reported because they were categorized as behavioral issues rather than abuse. The Director of Nursing and the Administrator confirmed that these incidents were not reported to the State Survey Agency, as they did not involve staff and were not considered abuse under their definitions.
Failure to Investigate Resident-to-Resident Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged incident of resident-to-resident verbal and/or physical abuse involving two residents. The facility's policy mandates a timely and thorough investigation of all reports and allegations of abuse, but this was not adhered to in the incidents involving these residents. The first incident occurred when one resident threw coffee on another resident during a verbal interaction in the dining room. Despite the incident being documented in the care plans and discussed in a daily quality assurance meeting, no further follow-up or investigation was initiated. In another incident, a resident was involved in a verbal and physical altercation with an unidentified resident. The resident was observed yelling racial slurs and cursing, and subsequently fell while attempting to hit the other resident. The unidentified resident then began to hit the resident who had fallen. Although supervisors were notified of the alleged abuse, the incident was not investigated as an allegation of abuse, and the facility did not provide any documentation of an investigation. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and the Administrator, revealed a lack of recognition of these incidents as potential abuse. The staff considered these incidents as mere altercations between residents and did not meet the definition of abuse since they did not involve staff. Consequently, no written statements or interviews with staff were conducted, and the facility failed to provide any documentation of an investigation as required by their policy.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program, as evidenced by several deficiencies. Firstly, the facility did not include the infection-causing organism in their infection control surveillance for several months, from June to September 2024. This was confirmed by the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist, who acknowledged that while the organism information was available in residents' charts, it was not part of the facility's infection surveillance. This omission could hinder the facility's ability to track and manage infections effectively. Additionally, there were specific instances of improper infection control practices observed. A Certified Nursing Assistant used gloves stored in her pocket for catheter care on a resident, which is not a sanitary practice. The CNA admitted to this action, and the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist did not recognize it as a problem. Furthermore, a Licensed Practical Nurse performed wound care on another resident while her long hair, which was not contained, touched her gloves. The LPN acknowledged that her hair should have been secured before performing the procedure. These actions demonstrate a lack of adherence to proper infection control protocols.
Lack of Antibiotic Monitoring System
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a system for providing feedback reports on antibiotic usage, antibiotic resistance patterns based on laboratory data, and antibiotic prescribing practices for practitioners. A review of the facility's Infection Control documentation revealed no documented evidence of such a system. During an interview, the Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist confirmed the absence of documented evidence regarding antibiotic usage or resistance patterns in the facility.
Failure to Conduct Required PASARR Level II Evaluation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with newly identified mental health diagnoses was referred for a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II evaluation as required. Resident #60 was admitted with a Level I PASARR and later diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Delusional Disorder. Despite these diagnoses, there was no documented evidence of a Level II PASARR being completed for the resident. Interviews revealed that the social worker had never completed a Level II PASARR evaluation and confirmed that no evaluation was conducted for Resident #60 following the diagnoses, as required. The social worker later confirmed with the Office of Aging and Adult Services that a Level II PASARR was indeed necessary for the resident due to the mental health diagnoses.
Failure to Complete Level II PASARR for Resident with Mental Illness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a Level II Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed for a resident diagnosed with mental illness. Resident #9, who was admitted with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), did not have a Level II PASARR assessment reflecting these mental health diagnoses. The resident's medical records and a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) confirmed these diagnoses, yet the Level 1 PASARR assessment completed earlier did not document any mental illness. Furthermore, there was no evidence of a referral to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II PASARR evaluation, as required. This oversight was confirmed by the facility's social worker during an interview.
Failure in Hand Hygiene During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) during incontinence care for two residents. The facility's policy on hand hygiene, revised on 08/30/2023, mandates that staff perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with residents, after contact with body fluids, and after removing gloves. However, observations revealed that S3CNA did not perform hand hygiene after removing gloves following incontinence care for a resident, and subsequently touched various items such as a fall mat, door handle, and call bell. Similarly, S4CNA did not remove gloves after cleaning a resident's vaginal area and opened the resident's cabinet without performing hand hygiene. After removing gloves, S4CNA also failed to perform hand hygiene before reaching into her pocket for barrier cream. Interviews with the CNAs confirmed these lapses in hand hygiene, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged that the CNAs should have adhered to the facility's hand hygiene policy.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 90 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Gretna
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willow Wood At Woldenberg Village | 3.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Our Lady Of Wisdom Community Care Center | 3.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| St Luke's Living Center | 4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Wynhoven Community Care Center | 4.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Marrero Healthcare Center | 4.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Bayside Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.