Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Greenville Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to notify a resident's guardian about the outcome of a grievance filed regarding the resident's care. The grievance involved the resident being placed in the wrong wheelchair and allegedly kept in bed. Although the grievance was documented and handled by the Executive Director, the guardian was not informed of the grievance's status or resolution, contrary to the facility's policy.
A medication error rate of 5.71% was identified when a QMA administered eye drops to a resident in both eyes instead of the left eye as per physician's orders. The QMA followed medication labels rather than verifying the orders in the resident's chart, leading to the error. Interviews with staff indicated a failure to adhere to the facility's medication administration policy.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and dental issues was not provided routine dental services despite consent and evident need. The facility's staff failed to schedule the resident for dental appointments, resulting in the resident not receiving necessary dental care.
The facility failed to administer nighttime medications at preferred times for three residents, disrupting their sleep and violating their rights to self-determination. Despite the facility's policy, medications were given much later than ordered, often after midnight. An LPN responsible for administering medications cited delays, while the DON acknowledged the need to accommodate residents' preferences.
The facility did not include the total number of RNs, LPNs, and CNAs in its daily staffing postings, as required by its policy. This oversight was discovered during a review of postings from a specific period, revealing that while the postings included the facility name, census, date, and actual hours worked, they lacked the total number of staff scheduled. Interviews indicated a lack of awareness and training on this requirement among the staff responsible for completing the postings.
Failure to Notify Guardian of Grievance Outcome
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its grievance policy regarding the notification of grievance status and outcomes to a resident's guardian. The grievance was filed by the guardian of a resident with hemiplegia and a history of traumatic brain injury, concerning the resident being placed in the wrong wheelchair and allegedly being kept in bed. The grievance was documented by the Business Office Manager (BOM) and was supposed to be handled by the Executive Director (ED), who was the designated Grievance Officer. However, the guardian was not informed of the grievance's status or resolution, contrary to the facility's policy. The grievance form indicated that the guardian was notified, but there was no record of when this occurred, and the ED confirmed that no notification was given. The ED admitted to not following the facility's grievance policy, which required keeping the resident or their representative informed of the grievance's progress and providing a written decision at the conclusion of the investigation. This oversight led to the guardian being unaware of the grievance's outcome, highlighting a failure in the facility's grievance handling process.
Medication Error Rate Exceeds 5% Due to Incorrect Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5%, resulting in a rate of 5.71% during a medication administration task. This deficiency was identified through observation, interview, and record review, affecting one resident out of three reviewed. The resident involved had a history of type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy and chronic kidney disease. The medication error occurred when a Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) administered prednisolone acetate and ofloxacin ophthalmic solutions into both eyes of the resident, contrary to the physician's orders, which specified administration in only the left eye. The QMA followed the medication labels instead of the active orders in the resident's chart, leading to the error. Interviews with the QMA, a Registered Nurse (RN), the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), and the Executive Director (ED) revealed that the QMA should have verified the orders against the medication labels and consulted with the nurse if discrepancies were found. The facility's policy required staff to follow the physician's orders and ensure medication administration was accurate, but this protocol was not adhered to, resulting in the medication error.
Failure to Provide Routine Dental Services
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide routine dental services for a resident, identified as Resident #12, who was admitted with severe cognitive impairment and various medical conditions, including dysphagia and chronic ischemic heart disease. Upon admission, the resident's responsible party consented to dental services, and the resident's care plan noted missing and decayed teeth. Despite this, the resident was not scheduled for dental appointments on two occasions when the facility's contracted dental company visited. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident expressed a desire for dentures and had visible dental issues, including missing and decayed teeth. Staff members, including a State Registered Nurse Aide and a Licensed Practical Nurse, acknowledged the resident's dental problems but did not ensure the resident was seen by a dentist. The Social Services Director and the Director of Nursing Services confirmed that the resident had consented to dental services but had not been referred for a dental visit. The Executive Director and other staff members stated that the facility's process involved assessing dental needs upon admission and referring residents with consent to the dental service company. However, the resident was not referred for a routine dental visit, despite having signed a consent form and having evident dental issues. The facility's failure to follow its policy for dental services resulted in the resident not receiving necessary dental care.
Failure to Administer Nighttime Medications at Preferred Times
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that three residents received their nighttime medications at their preferred times, which is a violation of the residents' rights to self-determination and choice. The facility's policy on medication administration states that medications should be administered as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards. However, the residents reported receiving their medications much later than the ordered times, often after midnight, which disrupted their sleep and was against their preferences. Resident 30, with intact cognition, reported receiving medications after midnight, which was too late and disrupted their sleep. Resident 38, also with intact cognition, preferred to receive medications around 7:00 PM or 8:00 PM but reported receiving them as late as 2:00 AM. Resident 46, with intact cognition, reported receiving medications at midnight, which was too late and required them to be awakened. LPN #16, responsible for administering the medications, stated that she usually finished by 10:30 PM but could be delayed until 11:30 PM. The Director of Nursing Services acknowledged that residents' preferences should be accommodated, and grievances should be completed if preferences are not met.
Failure to Include Total Staff Numbers in Daily Postings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the posted nurse staffing information included the total number of staff working for each discipline, which had the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. The facility's policy required that the Nurse Staffing Sheet be posted daily and include the facility name, current date, resident census, and the total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and certified nurse aides (CNAs) or medication aides. However, a review of the facility's daily staff postings from May 21, 2024, through June 19, 2024, revealed that while the postings included the facility name, census, date, and actual hours worked, they did not reflect the total number of RNs, LPNs, and unlicensed nursing staff scheduled to work each day. Interviews conducted during the investigation revealed a lack of awareness and training regarding the requirement to include the total number of staff in the postings. The Scheduler, who was responsible for completing the daily staff postings, stated that she was trained by the previous Scheduler and was never informed to include the number of RNs, LPNs, and CNAs or medication aides. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) expressed that her expectation was for the Scheduler to follow the policy, while the Executive Director (ED) admitted to being unaware of the need to include the actual number and hours worked for the nursing staff in the postings. This oversight in adhering to the facility's policy led to the deficiency identified by the surveyors.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 15 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Greenville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple Health And Rehabilitation | 0 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Owensboro Health Muhlenberg Community Hospital Ltc | 1.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Brighton Cornerstone Group, Llc | 19.2 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Ridgewood Terrace Health And Rehabilitation Center | 19.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Madisonville Health And Rehabilitation, Llc | 19.5 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Greenville Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.