Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Boyd Nursing And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to maintain adequate nursing staff, resulting in a one-star staffing rating and a low hours per patient day (PPD) ratio. Residents reported delays in receiving care, such as showers and toileting assistance, due to staffing shortages. Management acknowledged the issue, but efforts to cover shortages were insufficient, leading to unmet resident needs.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment had her hair cut against her religious beliefs without consulting her guardian. Despite clear instructions from the family, a SRNA cut the resident's hair, claiming the resident requested it. Staff interviews confirmed awareness of the family's religious preferences, but the SRNA was not authorized to cut hair, and the guardian should have been consulted.
A facility failed to follow its infection control policy during glucose monitoring for a resident. An LPN placed a glucometer directly on a treatment cart without a barrier, contrary to the facility's guidelines. The resident, with type II diabetes and no cognitive impairment, was involved in the incident. Interviews with facility staff confirmed the expectation to use barriers to prevent contamination.
Inadequate Staffing Leads to Resident Care Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet the needs of its residents, as evidenced by a one-star staffing rating from April to June 2024. The facility assessment indicated a requirement of three state registered nurse aides (SRNAs) and one to two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) per shift. However, on several occasions, including May 1, June 1, June 5, October 12, and October 13, 2024, the facility operated with only two SRNAs per shift. This staffing shortage resulted in a low hours per patient day (PPD) ratio of 1.6, which was below the facility's goal of 2.8 PPD. Residents reported negative impacts due to the staffing deficiencies. One resident filed a grievance after not receiving a shower over the weekend of October 12-13, 2024, and another resident expressed frustration over waiting up to an hour for assistance with toileting needs. The long-term care ombudsman also noted repeated complaints from residents about long call light wait times and missed showers due to short staffing. Interviews with staff confirmed that when only two SRNAs were on duty, residents experienced delays in receiving care, such as repositioning, incontinence care, and showering. The facility's management acknowledged the staffing issues, with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS) and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) both recognizing the need for more SRNAs per shift. The Executive Director (ED) mentioned efforts to cover staffing shortages through incentives and assistance from management and office staff, but these measures were insufficient to meet the facility's staffing requirements. The ED also acknowledged the failure to provide a timely shower to a resident and apologized for the oversight.
Resident's Religious Beliefs Disregarded in Haircut Incident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's religious beliefs by cutting her hair without consulting her guardian. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment due to vascular dementia, was admitted with specific instructions from her family not to cut her hair as it was against their religious beliefs. Despite this, a State Registered Nurse Aide (SRNA) cut the resident's hair after a shower, claiming the resident requested it, although the resident's cognitive status made it unlikely she could make such a request. Interviews with various staff members revealed that the resident's family had clearly communicated their religious preferences, including the requirement for the resident to wear skirts and keep her hair long. Staff members were aware of these preferences, and some had even assisted in maintaining the resident's hair by braiding it. However, the SRNA who cut the hair was no longer employed at the facility and could not be interviewed. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) acknowledged that the SRNA was not authorized to cut hair and that the guardian should have been consulted. The incident was discovered when the resident's daughter noticed the haircut during a visit and expressed her distress, believing the staff cut the hair to avoid caring for it. The Executive Director, who was not employed at the time of the incident, stated that staff should follow residents' religious preferences and consult guardians before making such decisions. The facility's policy on resident rights emphasizes the importance of respecting residents' dignity and personal beliefs, which was not adhered to in this case.
Infection Control Breach During Glucose Monitoring
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its infection prevention and control policy during blood glucose monitoring for one resident. An LPN was observed placing a resident's glucometer directly on the treatment cart without a barrier before obtaining a blood glucose reading. After the reading, the LPN cleaned the glucometer for two minutes and placed it back on the cart to dry, again without a barrier. This action was contrary to the facility's policy, which required the use of a barrier to prevent contamination. The facility's policy, dated March 2022, mandates that nurses practice aseptic techniques and follow the manufacturer's guidelines for cleaning glucometers. Interviews with the ADNS and DNS confirmed that the expectation was for nurses to use a barrier between the glucometer and any multi-use surface. The resident involved, admitted with diagnoses including morbid obesity and type II diabetes, had no cognitive impairment, as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. The Executive Director also emphasized the importance of following infection control policies to prevent the spread of infection.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 63 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Ashland
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingsbrook Lifecare Center | 5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Woodland Oaks | 8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Kings Daughters Medical Center | 8.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Sanctuary At Ohio Valley | 9.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Carter Nursing And Rehabilitation | 10.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Boyd Nursing And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.