Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Twin City Health Care during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to adhere to transmission-based precautions for COVID-19, as observed with staff not wearing the required PPE when entering rooms of residents under isolation. Despite signage and available PPE, staff like a housekeeper and CNA did not consistently use N95 masks or face shields, indicating a misunderstanding or non-compliance with the facility's infection control policy.
A facility failed to adhere to proper medication administration protocols for a resident receiving medications via G-tube, resulting in an 8.89% medication error rate. The LPN did not perform necessary checks for tube placement, such as auscultating an air bolus and checking for residual stomach contents, as required by physician's orders and facility policy. The resident had a history of dysphagia, nausea, and vomiting, and the inconsistency in medication administration routes was noted.
Failure to Adhere to Transmission-Based Precautions for COVID-19
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly implement transmission-based precautions (TBP) for COVID-19, as observed during random checks on the 100 and 200 halls. Housekeeper 3 was seen entering and exiting a room with residents under TBP while only wearing gloves and a surgical mask, despite signage indicating the need for a gown, gloves, face shield, and mask. During an interview, Housekeeper 3 incorrectly believed that wearing glasses sufficed in place of a face shield. On another occasion, Housekeeper 3 entered a COVID-19 positive resident's room wearing only a gown and gloves, again not adhering to the required PPE as indicated by the signage. Further observations revealed that CNA 5 entered a resident's room wearing a gown, gloves, surgical mask, and face shield, but not the required N95 mask. Interviews with staff, including LPN 4 and the Director of Nursing (DON), indicated a misunderstanding or lack of adherence to the PPE requirements, with LPN 4 stating that an N95 mask was not necessary. The facility had adequate PPE supplies and had conducted an in-service on infection control, yet issues persisted. Resident 31, who was COVID-19 positive with symptoms, was under strict droplet isolation, but the facility's staff did not consistently follow the transmission-based precautions as per the facility's policy dated October 2015.
Failure to Follow G-tube Medication Administration Protocol
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications administered via gastrostomy tube (G-tube) were given according to physician's orders and facility policy, resulting in an 8.89% medication error rate. During an observation, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered multiple medications to a resident through a G-tube without performing the required checks for tube placement, such as auscultating an air bolus and checking for residual stomach contents. The resident's medical record indicated that these checks were necessary before administering medications, as per the physician's orders and facility policy. The resident involved had a history of dysphagia, nausea, and vomiting, and was receiving medications via G-tube. The facility's policy required that the placement of the G-tube be verified by auscultating the abdomen and checking for gastric content before medication administration. However, these procedures were not followed, as confirmed by interviews with the LPN and the Director of Nursing (DON). The resident's medication administration had been inconsistent, alternating between oral and G-tube routes, which was discussed in a care plan meeting. Despite this, the failure to adhere to the established protocol for G-tube medication administration led to the identified deficiency.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 166 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Gas City
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonial Oaks Health Care Center | 3.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Wesleyan Health Care Center | 4.1 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Aperion Care Marion Llc | 4.9 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| University Nursing Center | 6.1 mi | — | 18 | 1 |
| Miller's Merry Manor | 6.5 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Twin City Health Care.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.