Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Riverwalk Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with dementia and a history of falls was admitted to the facility and experienced two unwitnessed falls on the day of admission. The facility failed to accurately assess the resident's fall risk and implement specific interventions. Documentation of the falls was incomplete and delayed, and the facility's fall management policy was not followed.
The facility failed to ensure proper shift-to-shift narcotic count and reconciliation for six medication carts, as observed during a survey. Narcotic Count Sheets lacked signatures and reconciliation for various dates in October 2024. Nursing staff acknowledged the lapses, and the DON noted the use of incorrect forms, which were later changed.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for three residents, leading to deficiencies in infection control. A resident with a Stage III pressure ulcer did not have EBP signs, and staff did not wear gowns during wound care. Another resident with a gastrostomy tube was not provided EBP during medication administration. A third resident with a chronic wound also lacked proper EBP during care. These oversights indicate a systemic issue in the facility's infection prevention program.
The facility failed to manage medication storage and labeling properly. In the D hall, an unlabeled ondansetron pill and an expired insulin pen were found. In Cottage 2, an unlabeled morphine bottle was discovered. Staff acknowledged these issues, which violated the facility's policies on medication management.
A resident with type 2 diabetes was given the wrong type of insulin due to a nurse's failure to verify the medication before administration. The resident was supposed to receive Levemir but was given Novolog instead, leading to fluctuating blood sugar levels and a trip to the ER. The nurse did not follow the facility's policy on medication verification.
The facility failed to date insulin vials and pens after opening, as required by policy. During observations, multiple in-use insulins for several residents were found without open dates on two medication carts. Both an RN and an LPN indicated that they would normally date the insulins, but this was not done in these instances.
Failure to Implement and Document Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately assess and document fall risks and interventions for Resident F, who was admitted with a history of falls, unspecified dementia, and difficulty walking. Upon admission, the resident's fall risk was assessed as moderate, but the assessment inaccurately noted no falls in the previous six months, despite documentation of a fall one week prior. The care plan included general fall prevention interventions, but specific interventions tailored to the resident's needs were not implemented. On the day of admission, Resident F experienced two unwitnessed falls. The first fall occurred when the resident was found seated on the floor, and the second fall resulted in a head laceration and a brain bleed, requiring hospitalization. The staff did not immediately assess the resident or the environment after the falls, and the fall event documentation was incomplete and delayed. The facility's policy required immediate assessment and documentation of falls, which was not followed. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility's fall management policy was not adhered to, as the staff member on duty did not follow procedures for reporting and documenting falls. The Director of Nursing indicated that fall interventions should be specific to each resident, but this was not the case for Resident F. The facility's policy also required that all new admissions be considered fall risks, but the interventions were not adequately tailored to address Resident F's specific risk factors.
Failure in Shift-to-Shift Narcotic Reconciliation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper shift-to-shift narcotic count and reconciliation for six out of seven medication carts reviewed. During observations, it was found that the Narcotic Count Sheets for these carts lacked signatures and reconciliation for various dates in October 2024. This deficiency was noted across multiple medication carts, including those labeled HI, [NAME], C, D, and Cottage 2. The absence of required signatures and reconciliation was confirmed through interviews with the nursing staff, who acknowledged the lapses in procedure. For the HI medication cart, the Narcotic Count Sheet lacked shift-to-shift count and reconciliation signatures for several dates, including the 1st through the 12th of October. LPN 7 admitted that the narcotic count was not signed for the day shift on the 25th of October, as she was late, and the count was completed by another LPN without proper reconciliation. Similar issues were observed with the [NAME] medication cart, where the Narcotic Count Sheet was missing signatures for multiple shifts, and LPN 8 confirmed the oversight during the interview. The D hall and C hall medication carts also exhibited similar deficiencies, with missing narcotic card counts and reconciliation signatures for numerous dates. RN 3, responsible for these carts, acknowledged the requirement for completing the sign-in/sign-out sheet at the beginning and end of each shift. The Cottage 2 medication cart had similar issues, with LPN 4 confirming the lack of proper documentation. The Director of Nursing (DON) later indicated that the facility had been using incorrect forms, which were changed on October 10th, but the expectation for complete documentation remained unfulfilled.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during high-contact care for three residents, leading to deficiencies in infection control. Resident 41, who had a Stage III pressure ulcer, did not have EBP signs outside or inside her room, and her clinical record lacked a care plan for EBP. During wound care, staff did not wear gowns, exposing their clothing to potential contamination. Interviews revealed that staff were unaware of the need for EBP for residents with open wounds, indicating a lack of proper implementation and communication of infection control protocols. Resident 2, diagnosed with spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy and other conditions, was at risk of transferring multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) due to an indwelling medical device. Although an EBP sign was present, a nurse failed to don a gown while administering medication through the resident's gastrostomy tube, contrary to the facility's isolation care plan. This oversight highlights a gap in adherence to EBP protocols, which are crucial for preventing the spread of infections in residents with medical devices. Resident 79, with a diagnosis including a malignant neoplasm of the prostate and a Stage 3 pressure ulcer, was also subject to EBP due to his chronic wound. Despite the presence of an EBP sign, staff members did not wear gowns during wound care, failing to comply with the required precautions. Interviews with staff and the Infection Preventionist confirmed that EBP protocols were not consistently followed, underscoring a systemic issue in the facility's infection prevention and control program.
Medication Storage and Labeling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly manage medication storage and labeling, as observed during a survey. In the D hall medication cart, an unlabeled 8 mg ondansetron pill was found, and a glargine insulin pen with an open date was identified as expired. During the observation, RN 3 acknowledged that the ondansetron pill had fallen out of its bag and confirmed that the insulin pen was expired and should not be administered to the resident. In Cottage 2, a medication storage observation revealed an unlabeled bottle of morphine with approximately 14 units remaining. LPN 4 indicated that the bottle had been removed from the facility's medication management system and should have been labeled with resident information. The facility's policy on medication storage and expiration, as well as a document on dating medications and supplies, emphasized the importance of discarding expired or undated medications and ensuring proper labeling, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Failure to Verify Correct Insulin Type Before Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to verify the correct type of insulin prior to administration for a resident, resulting in the wrong type of insulin being given. The resident, who had type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, was supposed to receive 55 units of Levemir (long-acting insulin) but was instead given 55 units of Novolog (short-acting insulin). This error was discovered immediately after administration when the nurse noticed the insulin pen was orange (Novolog) instead of green (Levemir). The resident's blood sugar was monitored, and he was sent to the emergency room for further evaluation and treatment. His blood sugar levels fluctuated, requiring treatment with dextrose and supplemental potassium for hypokalemia. He was eventually stabilized and returned to the facility with an IV in place for continued monitoring. The nurse involved in the incident indicated it was her first time working on that medication cart and did not verify the insulin pen before administration. She later realized that someone else's insulin pen was in the resident's storage bag. The facility's policy on medication administration requires staff to verify the medication name and dose against the medication order each time a medication is administered. This policy was not followed, leading to the medication error. The resident was cognitively intact and aware of the error, and the facility provided education to the nurse involved after the incident.
Failure to Date Insulin Vials and Pens
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to date residents' insulin vials and insulin flex pens after opening, which is a violation of the facility's policy. During a medication administration observation, an RN administered 22 units of Lispro insulin to a resident, and neither the insulin vial nor the container had an open date on it. Further inspection of the H hall medication cart revealed that other in-use insulins for multiple residents also lacked open dates. Specifically, the Lispro insulin vials for two residents, a glargine-yfgn insulin pen, and insulin aspart and glargine-fygn insulin pens for other residents were found without open dates. The RN indicated that they would normally date the insulin vials and pens after opening, but this was not done in these instances. Additionally, an observation of the K/I hall medication cart showed that another resident's in-use insulin glargine pen also had no open date, despite 160 units of insulin being used from the 300-unit pen. The LPN indicated that she would normally date the insulin as soon as she pulled it from the refrigerator. The facility's policy, revised on 1/1/22, clearly states that staff should enter the date opened on the label of medications with shortened expiration dates, such as insulins. This deficiency was related to a specific complaint investigation.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 770 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Noblesville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harbour Manor Health & Living Community | 0.7 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Prairie Lakes Health Campus | 3.7 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Bridgewater Healthcare Center | 5.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Maple Park Village | 5.6 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Mcgivney Health Care Center | 5.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Riverwalk Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.