Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Northview Health And Living during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Nursing staff did not clarify unclear medication orders for a resident with Parkinson's Disease, resulting in the resident not receiving prescribed extended-release carbidopa-levodopa. Despite established policies and multiple opportunities for clarification, staff failed to communicate with the neurologist or properly reconcile the orders, leading to a lapse in medication administration.
A resident with a history of dementia and other health issues struggled to eat independently due to inadequate assistance from staff. Observations showed that food and drinks were often out of reach, and staff assistance was inconsistent. Despite an increase in the resident's need for help, the care plan was not updated to reflect these changes, violating the facility's policy on care plan revisions.
The facility failed to provide adequate dining assistance to two residents, resulting in unmet nutritional needs. One resident struggled with utensil use and food reach, while another received minimal staff interaction during meals. Both residents' care plans were not updated to reflect their increased need for assistance.
A resident at high risk for falls experienced multiple incidents due to the facility's failure to consistently implement documented interventions. Despite requiring two staff members for transfers, the resident was repeatedly lowered to the floor by only one staff member. Inconsistencies in updating and following CNA Care Guides contributed to the deficiency.
The facility failed to label and date medications on three medication carts, including insulin vials and respiratory medications. An LPN and a QMA confirmed that these medications should have been dated when opened. The facility's policy requires multi-dose medication vials/devices to be labeled with the date opened, which was not followed.
The facility failed to post complete daily nurse staffing information, affecting all 70 residents. Observations showed missing facility census data and inaccurate staffing hours. The issue arose from the absence of the Scheduler, with no reassignment of duties, leading to outdated postings. The facility's policy requires daily updates, including the resident census, which was not followed.
Failure to Clarify and Administer Parkinson's Medication Orders
Penalty
Summary
Nursing staff failed to competently administer medication for a resident with multiple complex diagnoses, including Parkinson's Disease, following re-admission to the facility. The resident's hospital discharge orders included both immediate-release and extended-release carbidopa-levodopa, with specific dosing instructions. However, the extended-release medication was ordered as 'as needed' rather than as a routine medication, which was highly unusual and not consistent with the resident's established regimen. The medication administration record showed that the resident had not received any extended-release carbidopa-levodopa since re-admission. Interviews with facility staff, including the pharmacist, nurse practitioner, and nursing leadership, revealed that the medication orders were unclear and should have been clarified upon admission. The nurse practitioner was unaware of the 'as needed' order for the extended-release medication and believed there may have been a transcription error. The neurologist's office confirmed that the resident had been taking both forms of carbidopa-levodopa routinely for 1-2 years and that the facility had not communicated with them regarding the resident's re-admission or medication changes. Facility policies and job descriptions required nursing staff to clarify unclear orders and ensure accurate medication reconciliation at admission. Despite these requirements, the orders were not clarified, and the resident did not receive the prescribed extended-release medication. This failure was acknowledged by multiple staff members, including the RN responsible for auditing the orders, the nurse practitioner, and the director of nursing.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Dining
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the dignity of a resident, identified as Resident 49, during dining by not providing adequate assistance with meals. Observations revealed that Resident 49 struggled to eat independently, often holding her fork upside down and unable to reach her food and drinks. Despite these challenges, staff assistance was inconsistent and insufficient, with food and drinks frequently placed out of the resident's reach, and staff only intermittently providing help. Interviews with staff members, including CNA 9 and LPN 7, indicated a lack of awareness and timely intervention regarding Resident 49's difficulties. CNA 9 noted that a divided plate might have been helpful, while LPN 7 speculated that the resident might have vision issues affecting her ability to eat. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and CNA 8 acknowledged an increase in the resident's need for assistance, yet the care plan was not updated to reflect these changes. Resident 49's clinical records showed a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia. The care plan, which was not revised following a 12/30/24 MDS assessment, failed to address the resident's increased need for substantial assistance with eating. The facility's policy on care plan revisions upon status change was not followed, as the care plan did not incorporate necessary updates to ensure the resident received appropriate dining assistance.
Failure to Provide Adequate Dining Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate assistance and cuing during dining to maximize the abilities of two residents, Resident 49 and Resident 223, who were reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). During multiple dining observations, Resident 49 struggled to use utensils properly and reach her food and drinks, often leaving her meal uneaten. Despite some staff intervention, such as repositioning utensils and moving food closer, the assistance was inconsistent and insufficient to meet her needs. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness of the resident's increased need for assistance and potential issues with depth perception. Resident 49's clinical record indicated a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia with anxiety. Her care plan, however, was not updated to reflect her increased need for substantial to maximal assistance with eating, as identified in a recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The care plan also failed to address her nutritional needs adequately, despite her participation in a fortified food program and receiving a daily health shake supplement. Similarly, Resident 223 required extensive assistance with eating and drinking, as noted in his admission MDS assessment. Observations showed that he often did not eat his meals and received little to no staff interaction or assistance during dining. His care plan indicated a need for substantial assistance, but staff did not consistently provide the necessary support. Interviews with staff highlighted the resident's confusion and the lack of proactive measures to ensure he received adequate nutrition during meals.
Failure to Implement Fall Interventions for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a fall intervention to prevent further falls for a resident identified as being at high risk for falls. The resident, who had diagnoses including heart failure, generalized muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet, experienced multiple falls despite being assessed as requiring two staff members for assistance during transfers. The resident's care plan and CNA Care Guides were not consistently updated or followed, leading to repeated incidents where the resident was lowered to the floor by only one staff member. The resident's clinical record indicated a history of falls, with specific incidents occurring on multiple dates. Despite interventions such as the use of a mechanical lift and two-person assistance being documented, these were not consistently implemented. Interviews with staff revealed that the CNA Care Guides lacked clear instructions on the number of staff required for transfers, contributing to the failure to prevent further falls. The facility's policies on comprehensive care plans and fall prevention were not effectively executed, as evidenced by the repeated falls and lack of adherence to documented interventions. Staff interviews highlighted gaps in communication and documentation, with care plan interventions not being carried forward on CNA Care Guides, leading to inconsistencies in the care provided to the resident.
Failure to Label and Date Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to appropriately label and date medications on three medication carts, which was identified during a survey. On the 100 hall medication cart #1, an opened and undated vial of insulin lispro was found, with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirming that insulin should be labeled with an opened date. Similarly, on the 100 hall medication cart #2, an opened and undated insulin glargine (Quikpen) was discovered, with a Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) acknowledging that the insulin was supposed to be dated when opened. Additionally, the 100 hall respiratory cart contained several medications, including albuterol sulfate inhalers and fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol powder, that lacked open dates. One albuterol sulfate inhaler was also found to be expired. The QMA indicated that inhalers should be dated when opened, and the Respiratory Therapist confirmed that both inhalers and nebulizer ampules should have been dated. The Unit Manager stated that undated medications should not be used and should be disposed of if the date cannot be determined. The facility's policy requires multi-dose medication vials/devices to be labeled with the date opened, which was not adhered to in these instances.
Incomplete Daily Nurse Staffing Information
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to post complete nurse staffing information daily, which had the potential to affect all 70 residents. Observations on consecutive days revealed that the nurse staffing information posted on the bulletin board in the main hallway was incomplete, as it lacked the facility census for the day. Additionally, the staffing hours posted were inaccurate, with discrepancies in the total hours calculated for each shift. On one occasion, the staffing information was not updated for the current date, remaining unchanged from the previous day. Interviews with facility staff, including the Business Office Manager and the Administrator, confirmed that the staffing information was not updated due to the absence of the Scheduler, and no one was assigned to take over this responsibility. The Administrator acknowledged that the staffing should have been updated in the morning and admitted that the postings consistently lacked the facility census. The facility's policy, dated 10/2017, requires daily posting of nurse staffing information, including the facility's current resident census, in a clear and readable format, but this was not adhered to.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 481 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 6 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Anderson
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edgewater Woods | 0.2 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Beaumont Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center | 0.5 mi | — | 27 | 0 |
| Envive Of Anderson | 2.2 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Bethany Pointe Health Campus | 3 mi | — | 4 | 1 |
| Countryside Manor Health & Living Community | 3.4 mi | — | 20 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Northview Health And Living.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.