Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at North River Health Campus during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a high risk for falls did not consistently receive a required Dycem anti-slip mat in their wheelchair, as ordered and outlined in their care plan. During a transfer, staff failed to ensure the intervention was in place, despite recent falls and clear policy requirements for consistent implementation and care plan updates.
The facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment was completed accurately for a resident reviewed for restraints. A family member indicated that restraints had never been used on the resident, and the clinical record lacked documentation related to physical restraints. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the assessment was marked in error, and the Administrator stated that the facility follows the RAI manual for guidance on coding MDS Assessments.
A resident with COPD and respiratory failure was observed without oxygen being administered as ordered. The oxygen equipment was found unplugged, turned off, and not properly labeled. The facility did not comply with physician orders for continuous oxygen therapy and monthly tubing changes.
The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of resident records for two residents with pressure ulcers and one resident with dental issues. Inconsistencies and errors in the records were identified, including mislabeling of wounds and incorrect dental assessments.
The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with a permcath dialysis catheter. Two CNAs did not wear PPE while transferring the resident and changing bed linens, despite the resident being on enhanced barrier precautions. The resident confirmed the lack of PPE use, and the care plan and physician orders required PPE during high-contact care activities.
Failure to Consistently Implement Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident, identified as having severe cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease and dementia, did not consistently receive required fall prevention interventions. During an observation, the resident was transferred from a wheelchair to a shower chair by two CNAs, and it was noted that the wheelchair lacked a Dycem anti-slip mat, which was ordered by the physician to be used during specific times of the day. The resident's care plan, which identified them as a high fall risk, included the use of a Dycem on the wheelchair cushion and keeping personal items within reach. However, this intervention was not in place at the time of observation. The resident's clinical record showed a recent fall incident where the Dycem was reportedly in place, but subsequent observations revealed lapses in the consistent implementation of this intervention. Staff interviews confirmed that the Dycem should have been in use, and facility policy required care plans to be updated after any fall or change in interventions. Despite these requirements, the intervention was not consistently applied, leading to a failure in providing adequate supervision and accident prevention for the resident.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Restraints
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed accurately for a resident reviewed for restraints. A family member indicated that restraints had never been used on the resident. The resident's clinical record, which included diagnoses of dementia and anxiety disorder, lacked any documentation related to the use of physical restraints. However, the most recent Quarterly MDS Assessment inaccurately indicated that physical restraints were used less than daily during the 7-day look-back period. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that this was marked in error and that the facility did not use restraints on any resident. The Administrator stated that the facility follows the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual for guidance on coding MDS Assessments.
Failure to Ensure Proper Respiratory Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper respiratory care for Resident 47, who was observed without oxygen being administered despite having a physician's order for continuous oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula. During observations on two separate days, the oxygen concentrator was found unplugged and turned off, and the humidification bottle, oxygen tubing, and oxygen tubing bag were not labeled with dates or initials. Additionally, a portable oxygen concentrator attached to the resident's wheelchair was not in use and also lacked proper labeling. Resident 47's clinical record indicated diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and bronchopneumonia. The resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance for transfers and mobility. Despite the physician's orders and care plans specifying the need for continuous oxygen therapy and monthly tubing changes, the facility did not comply with these directives. An interview with a registered nurse revealed a discrepancy in the facility's practice, stating that oxygen tubing was changed weekly and placed in a bag with the resident's name and date, which was not observed in practice. The facility did not provide a current oxygen administration policy when requested.
Inaccurate Documentation of Resident Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure resident records were accurate for two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and one resident reviewed for dental issues. Resident 43's clinical record showed inconsistencies in the documentation of pressure ulcers. The records indicated various stages and conditions of the wounds, but the assessments were not entered timely, and there were discrepancies in the wound descriptions. The Clinical Support Nurse confirmed that the wounds should have been documented as moisture-associated skin damage (MASD) and not unstageable pressure ulcers. Additionally, the wound nurse was new and confused bruised tissue with necrotic tissue, leading to inaccurate documentation. Resident 101's clinical record also contained inaccuracies regarding a pressure ulcer on the left plantar foot. The wound was documented as necrotic, but the Regional Support Nurse later clarified that it was blanchable and more like a bruise. The person responsible for the assessment was new and had made an incorrect entry, leading to the mislabeling of the wound as necrotic. Resident 47's clinical record showed discrepancies in the documentation of dental issues. The admission observation indicated no oral cavity issues, but the most recent Admission MDS Assessment and care plan noted broken or missing teeth. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the care plan contained incorrect information and that the admission assessment was marked in error. The Clinical Support Nurse stated there was no specific policy related to documentation, but it was company policy to document accurately and timely.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the implementation of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during a random observation for a resident with a permcath dialysis catheter. During the observation, two CNAs entered the resident's room with a Hoyer lift and did not apply personal protective equipment (PPE). The CNAs transferred the resident to a wheelchair and changed the soiled bed linens without wearing PPE, despite the resident being on enhanced barrier precautions due to the presence of a central line. The resident confirmed that staff did not wear PPE during transfers, and an RN indicated that staff were supposed to wear PPE during direct contact with residents on enhanced barrier precautions. The resident's clinical record showed diagnoses including complications of a vascular dialysis catheter and end-stage renal disease. The resident was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for mobility, transfer, and dressing. Physician orders and the care plan required staff to use enhanced barrier precautions, including wearing a gown and gloves during high-contact care activities. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Standard Operating Procedure also mandated the use of PPE during high-contact activities for residents with indwelling medical devices. Despite these requirements, the staff failed to follow the EBP protocol during the observed care activities.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 274 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Evansville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethel Manor | 6.4 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
| Heritage Center | 7.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| North Park Nursing Center | 7.9 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Parkview Care Center | 8.6 mi | — | 24 | 0 |
| River Pointe Health Campus | 8.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for North River Health Campus.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.