Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Life Care Center Of Fort Wayne during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with end stage kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, and dependence on dialysis, but with normal cognition per BIMS, gave a CNA a bank card to purchase food. The resident later discovered multiple unauthorized charges at a beverage establishment and a gas station that were not approved. An incident report showed that police were contacted regarding the misappropriation, and the Administrator confirmed that the CNA was responsible for the unauthorized transactions. The facility could not provide a current policy on misappropriation of funds.
The facility failed to maintain complete and consistent documentation for opioid medications for two residents receiving Morphine and Oxycodone for pain and related symptoms. Physician orders required PRN administration of these controlled substances, but multiple instances were found where the MAR showed doses not recorded on the controlled substance record, and where the controlled substance record showed doses not documented on the MAR. An LPN confirmed that controlled medications must be signed out on the controlled substance record and documented on the MAR, and that lack of initials on the MAR would mean a dose was not given, contrary to the facility’s controlled substance management policy requiring timely documentation on both records.
A resident with chronic respiratory failure and CHF on hospice care was observed receiving oxygen at 3 L/min via nasal cannula, contrary to physician orders specifying 2 L/min continuously and 4 L/min as needed. Nursing staff adjusted oxygen flow based on saturation and resident needs, but documentation and orders did not support the use of 3 L/min or titration, resulting in a failure to follow prescriber orders.
A resident reported being blind, but the facility failed to address her vision concerns adequately. Despite a diagnosis of macular degeneration and myopia, follow-up appointments were missed, and her care plan did not include interventions for impaired vision. The DON confirmed these oversights, acknowledging that the resident's vision issues should have been documented and addressed.
Failure to Safeguard Resident Finances Resulting in Misappropriation of Funds
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure safekeeping of a resident’s finances when a cognitively intact resident with end stage kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, and dependence on dialysis had personal funds misappropriated by staff. The resident, whose quarterly MDS showed a BIMS score of 13 indicating normal cognition, reported that he gave a CNA his bank card to purchase noodles from a gas station. Subsequently, he discovered multiple unauthorized charges on his card for a beverage establishment and additional gas station purchases that he had not approved. An incident report documented that local police were contacted to report the misappropriation of the resident’s money, and the Administrator later confirmed that the CNA was responsible for the multiple unauthorized charges to the resident’s card. During the survey, the facility was unable to provide a current policy addressing misappropriation of funds.
Incomplete and Inconsistent Documentation of Opioid Administration Records
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain complete and accurate medication administration records (MARs) and controlled substance records for residents receiving opioid medications. For a resident with Alzheimer’s dementia, failure to thrive, and abnormal weight loss, a physician ordered Morphine Sulfate Concentrate 100 mg/5 ml, 0.25 ml by mouth every 2 hours as needed for pain or shortness of breath. In December, the MAR showed Morphine administrations on specific dates and times that were not reflected on the controlled substance record, and the controlled substance record showed additional administrations that were not documented on the MAR. Specifically, on one date the MAR showed doses at 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. that were not recorded on the controlled substance record, and on another date the MAR showed an 8:00 a.m. dose while the controlled substance record showed doses at 8:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and 9:49 p.m., with no corresponding MAR entries for the latter two times. A second resident with bladder cancer had a physician order for Oxycodone Oral Concentrate 100 mg/5 ml, 1 ml by mouth every 4 hours as needed for breakthrough pain. In November, multiple discrepancies were identified between the MAR and the controlled substance record for this medication. On several dates, the controlled substance record showed Oxycodone doses administered at various times that were not documented on the MAR, and on other dates the MAR showed doses that were not reflected on the controlled substance record. During an interview, an LPN stated that whenever a controlled medication such as an opioid is administered, it must be signed out on the controlled substance record and documented on the MAR, and that if a medication is not initialed on the MAR, it would mean the medication had not been given. The facility’s policy on managing controlled substances required timely documentation of administrations on both the descending count sheet and the MAR for each routine and as-needed dose, which was not followed in these instances.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Oxygen Administration
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration for a resident with chronic respiratory failure and congestive heart failure who was admitted to hospice care. Observations revealed that the resident was receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula, despite the physician's order specifying 2 liters per minute continuously and 4 liters per minute as needed. There was no order for oxygen at 3 liters per minute, and documentation did not support titration based on the resident's needs or comfort. Interviews with nursing staff indicated that adjustments to the oxygen flow were made based on the resident's oxygen saturation and reported needs, but the resident was unable to adjust the oxygen herself. Record reviews showed inconsistencies between the facility's documentation and the hospice communication book regarding the prescribed oxygen flow rates. The facility's policy required adherence to prescriber orders, but this was not followed in the resident's care.
Failure to Address Vision Concerns for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure vision concerns were addressed for a resident, identified as Resident 23, who reported being blind. During an interview, Resident 23 indicated she was unable to see the face of the person speaking to her and that the facility was aware of her condition. A review of Resident 23's medical records revealed diagnoses including heart failure, myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension, but no mention of macular degeneration or blindness. A medical appointment at a vision care ophthalmology center diagnosed her with macular degeneration and myopia and recommended a consultation with a low vision specialist. However, the follow-up appointment was canceled and rescheduled, but Resident 23 was hospitalized and missed the rescheduled appointment. No further appointments were made, and her care plan did not include any interventions related to her impaired vision. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident 23's history and physicals did not include the diagnosis of macular degeneration or nearsightedness. The DON acknowledged that the follow-up appointment should have been rescheduled after the resident missed it due to hospitalization and that her impaired vision should have been included in her care plan, MDS, and listed as a diagnosis. The facility's policy on Vision and Hearing Assistive Devices, which was reviewed, indicated that residents should receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities, but this was not followed in Resident 23's case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 263 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fort Wayne
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit City Nursing And Rehabilitation | 0.9 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Saint Anne Home | 1.3 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Glenbrook Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center | 1.6 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Byron Health Center | 1.7 mi | — | 15 | 0 |
| Heritage Park | 2 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Life Care Center Of Fort Wayne.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.