Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around April 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Indian Creek Healthcare Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident was discharged to an acute care hospital, but review of MDS listings showed that no discharge MDS assessment was completed for that resident. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that a discharge assessment is required whenever a resident leaves the facility and could not explain why it was missed. The Executive Director reported there was no specific facility policy for MDS assessments and that staff relied on the RAI manual for guidance.
A resident with epilepsy and a history of falls was found on the floor after an unwitnessed fall, with the bed alarm cord detached. Although the care plan required a bed alarm for safety, there was no documented order for staff to check the alarm's placement and function every shift prior to the incident. Leadership confirmed the absence of a bed alarm policy and that staff were expected to monitor the alarm each shift.
A facility failed to implement a hospital discharge order for a BiPAP machine for a resident with COPD and acute respiratory failure. The resident's clinical record lacked documentation of BiPAP orders, and the machine was not available upon admission. The resident experienced shortness of breath and was transferred to the emergency room. Communication with the family about the BiPAP machine was unsuccessful in locating it.
A resident with dementia was photographed by a nurse aide in training while on a commode, and the image was shared via social media with another staff member and an outsider. This action violated the facility's policy against unauthorized disclosure of resident images, which prohibits taking and distributing photos that demean or humiliate residents.
A facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving a resident whose photo was taken and shared on social media by a nurse aide in training (NAIT). The incident was not reported to the Indiana Department of Health because the resident was not identifiable to others, although the facility knew who the resident was. The NAIT was terminated, but the incident was only reported months later. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and depressive episodes.
Failure to Complete Required Discharge MDS Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to complete a required discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident. Record review showed that Resident 90 was admitted on an unspecified date and discharged on 2/10/26 to an acute care hospital, but the MDS listings contained no completed discharge assessment for this resident. During interview, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that a discharge assessment should be completed whenever a resident is discharged and could provide no reason why this assessment was missed for Resident 90. In a separate interview, the Executive Director stated there was no facility policy regarding MDS assessments and that assessments were completed using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual. These findings were cited under 410 IAC 3.1-31(d).
Failure to Ensure Bed Alarm Monitoring for Fall-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an intervention was in place for staff to monitor the placement and functionality of a resident's bed alarm. A resident with diagnoses including epilepsy and convulsions, and identified as being at risk for falls due to seizures, was observed with a bed alarm in place. The care plan indicated the need for a bed alarm for safety, but after an unwitnessed fall where the resident was found on the floor with the bed alarm cord ripped from the alarm, the care plan was updated to use a cordless alarm. However, prior to a specific date, the clinical record did not contain documentation of an order for staff to check the placement and function of the bed alarm every shift. Interviews with facility leadership confirmed there was no policy on bed alarms and that staff were expected to check the alarm every shift.
Failure to Implement BiPAP Order for Resident with Respiratory Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a hospital discharge order for a BiPAP machine for a resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia. Upon admission, the resident's clinical record did not document any BiPAP orders, despite the hospital discharge summary indicating the need for a BiPAP machine at night and as needed during the day. The resident arrived at the facility by ambulance, and the Nurse Practitioner noted the requirement for a BiPAP machine, but it was not available. The resident experienced an acute onset of shortness of breath, with an oxygen level reading of 85% on a nasal cannula, and was transferred to the emergency room after a breathing treatment proved ineffective. The facility communicated with the resident's family regarding the BiPAP machine, but it was not located at the resident's home. The facility indicated they could acquire one, but the family insisted it had already been paid for and would search again. The deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation.
Unauthorized Photograph of Resident by Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident abuse involving a resident diagnosed with dementia, anxiety, and depressive episodes. A nurse aide in training (NAIT) took a photograph of the resident while she was sitting on a commode with her pants down, capturing her from head to feet, including a side view of her face. This photograph was then sent via social media to another staff member and an individual outside the facility. The incident was reported to the Indiana Department of Health, and it was confirmed that the NAIT admitted to sending the photo to a fellow staff member. The facility's policy, titled 'Unauthorized Disclosure of Resident Images,' explicitly prohibits taking and distributing photographs of residents, especially in a manner that demeans or humiliates them. During an interview, a certified nurse aide (CNA) confirmed that taking pictures or videos of residents or posting them on social media is not allowed. The Director of Nursing provided documentation that defined mistreatment as taking unauthorized photos, which aligns with the incident involving the NAIT.
Failure to Report Allegation of Abuse to Proper Authorities
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the proper agencies, including the Indiana Department of Health, for one of the eight facility-reported incidents reviewed. During an interview, the Director of Nursing indicated that a staff member, a nurse aide in training (NAIT 4), had taken a picture of a resident, Resident B, and posted it on Snapchat. The incident was not reported because the resident was not identifiable to others, although the facility knew who the resident was. The Regional Director of Clinical Operations also indicated that the incident was not reported due to the lack of intent to harm or abuse the resident, and the resident had no psychosocial changes. However, NAIT 4 was terminated due to her actions. The incident report, dated January 30, 2024, and reported to the Indiana Department of Health on November 25, 2024, indicated that the facility was contacted regarding a possible photo taken of Resident B in the bathroom. The clinical record for Resident B showed diagnoses including dementia with other behavioral disturbances, anxiety, and depressive episodes. The investigation conducted on January 30, 2024, revealed that NAIT 4 sent a photograph of Resident B through social media, showing the resident sitting on a commode with her pants down to her thighs. The facility's policy on unauthorized disclosure of resident images, dated August 10, 2016, prohibits employees from taking and distributing photographs that demean or humiliate a resident. The facility's occurrence incident reporting policy emphasizes the importance of resident safety and the requirement to report state-reportable incidents as required.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 230 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Corydon
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harrison Healthcare Center | 0.2 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Harrison Springs Health Campus | 2.6 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| Waters Of Georgetown, The | 10.9 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| Todd-dickey Nursing And Rehabilitation | 12.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Brandenburg Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 14.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Indian Creek Healthcare Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.