Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Forest Park Health Campus during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident was found with medications at the bedside without a documented assessment or physician's order for self-administration. The resident, who was cognitively intact, self-administered morning medications and breathing treatments. The facility's policy requires an assessment and physician evaluation for self-medication, which was not completed.
The facility failed to provide adequate bathing assistance to three residents, leading to unmet personal hygiene needs. A resident with pulmonary disease and osteoarthritis received only two showers in January, despite being scheduled for three weekly. Another resident with respiratory failure and anxiety received four showers in January, while a third resident with multiple medical conditions received only two showers over three months. The residents expressed dissatisfaction with their hygiene, citing greasy hair and inadequate cleanliness. The DON acknowledged the nursing staff's responsibility to ensure twice-weekly showers.
A facility failed to identify and document a resident's skin alteration, despite a physician order for weekly skin assessments. The resident, with a history of edema and dysphagia, reported an abrasion on the right ankle that had been present for over a year. The MAR only showed staff initials without detailed results, leading to the oversight. The resident self-treated the abrasion, and a nurse was unaware of the condition and self-administration of cortisone spray.
The facility failed to document meal intakes for three residents with significant medical conditions, including pressure ulcers and weight loss. Reviews showed that 7.5% to 13.7% of meals were not documented, and the Administrator confirmed the lack of a specific policy addressing this requirement.
Failure to Assess and Document Self-Administration of Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) determined and documented the clinical appropriateness of self-administration of medications for Resident 39. During an observation, Resident 39 was found with a full cup of open pills and a vial of fluid for breathing treatments at his bedside, which he indicated were his morning medications and self-administered breathing treatment. Despite being cognitively intact for daily decision-making, as indicated by an Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, there was no physician's order or self-administration assessment documented in Resident 39's clinical record. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that medications should not be left at the bedside and that it was the IDT's responsibility to complete a self-medication administration assessment for any resident self-administering medications. Additionally, the DON stated that nursing staff should ensure a physician's order is in place for residents who self-administer medications. The facility's policy on self-administration of medications requires an assessment and physician evaluation before allowing residents to self-medicate, which was not followed in this case.
Failure to Provide Adequate Bathing Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate assistance with bathing for three residents, leading to a deficiency in meeting their personal hygiene needs. Resident 7, who has pulmonary disease and osteoarthritis, was scheduled for showers three times a week but reported receiving only two showers and two baths in January 2025. She expressed dissatisfaction with her hygiene, noting greasy hair and a lack of cleanliness. The resident attributed the missed showers to staffing shortages, as communicated by a CNA. Resident 41, diagnosed with respiratory failure and anxiety, was scheduled for showers twice a week but received only four showers and one bath in January 2025. She expressed a preference for more frequent showers, ideally two to three times a week. Similarly, Resident 31, with multiple medical conditions including hemiplegia and osteoarthritis, was scheduled for two showers a week but received only two showers and nine bed baths over a three-month period. He expressed dissatisfaction with the bed baths, noting that his hair was not always washed, leaving it greasy and uncombed. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the responsibility of the nursing staff to ensure residents receive showers twice a week.
Failure to Identify and Document Skin Alteration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to identify and appropriately document a skin alteration for a resident with a history of edema and dysphagia. Upon admission, the resident was assessed as having no skin impairments, and a physician order was in place for weekly skin assessments. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) only reflected the initials of the staff completing the assessments, with no detailed results recorded. This lack of documentation led to the oversight of a skin abrasion on the resident's right ankle, which the resident reported had been present for over a year. During an observation and interview, the resident disclosed self-treating the abrasion with over-the-counter cortisone spray and covering it with a paper towel. A registered nurse confirmed the presence of the abrasion but admitted to never having seen the resident's ankle before and was unaware of the resident's self-administration of cortisone spray. The facility's policy required weekly skin observations to be documented, indicating any new or existing skin impairments, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Document Meal Intakes for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the documentation of meal intakes for three residents, all of whom had significant medical conditions including pressure ulcers, weight loss, and required assistance with meals. Resident B, diagnosed with Lewy body dementia, dysphagia, and recurrent coccyx ulcer, experienced significant weight loss since admission. A review of her meal intakes from February 1 to March 20 revealed that 7.5% of her meals were not documented. The Administrator confirmed that all meal intakes should be documented but could not locate a specific policy addressing this requirement. Resident C, diagnosed with a pressure wound, gallstones, and cognitive developmental delay, also experienced weight loss and required meal assistance. A review of his meal intakes for the same period showed that 7.6% of his meals were not documented. Similar to Resident B, the Administrator confirmed the expectation for documentation but acknowledged the absence of a specific policy. Resident D, diagnosed with dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and a sacral area pressure ulcer, had recent weight fluctuations. A review of his meal intakes indicated that 13.7% of his meals were not documented. The Administrator reiterated the requirement for documentation of meal intakes but again noted the lack of a specific policy. This deficiency was identified during a complaint investigation.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 130 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Richmond
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arbor Trace Health & Living Community | 1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Brickyard Healthcare - Golden Rule Care Center | 1.6 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| Rosebud Village | 3.4 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Willows Of Richmond | 3.4 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Springs Of Richmond, The | 3.7 mi | — | 14 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Forest Park Health Campus.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.