Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Creasy Springs Health Campus during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident was administered multiple medications in error after admission due to a failure in the medication transcription and verification process. An LPN transcribed the wrong medication orders, and the required second nurse check was not performed, resulting in the resident receiving 23 doses of 11 different medications not prescribed for him over several days. The error was discovered only after a review of records, despite concerns raised by the resident's family.
A resident with dementia and Alzheimer's disease, who was not identified as exit-seeking, was allowed to leave a secured unit unsupervised after a CNA mistook the individual for a visitor and opened a secured door. The resident was later found walking outside by another staff member and returned to the facility. The facility was unaware of the elopement until notified by the staff member who found the resident.
A facility failed to maintain a resident's dignity during meal service when a CNA stood while assisting a resident with feeding, contrary to facility policy. The resident, with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's and dementia, had a care plan addressing significant weight loss. Staff interviews confirmed that standing while feeding could intimidate residents, and the facility's guidelines emphasized the importance of promoting dignity during dining.
The facility failed to promptly implement DNR orders for two residents, despite their advance directive wishes. One resident had a signed advance directive and POST form indicating DNR, but a physician's order initially indicated full code status. Similarly, another resident's DNR status was delayed in being reflected in a physician's order. The facility's policy required review of advance directives at admission, but there were delays in updating physician orders to match residents' wishes.
A facility failed to update a resident's PASARR Level I to reflect current mental health diagnoses and medications, despite physician's orders for antidepressant and anxiety medications. The Social Service Director confirmed the oversight, which was inconsistent with the facility's policy requiring updates for severe mental illness or psychiatric medication regimens.
A resident with hypertension and chronic kidney disease received lisinopril despite physician orders to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was below 110. The MAR showed multiple instances of administration with blood pressure readings below this threshold. Facility policies require reviewing orders and vital signs before medication administration, but these were not followed.
The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen administration for two residents, leading to a deficiency in respiratory care. One resident with pulmonary fibrosis and another with multiple health issues were both placed on oxygen without timely physician orders, contrary to facility policy.
A resident with pneumonia and impaired kidney function received double doses of Augmentin due to the facility's failure to discontinue an initial order when a new one was issued. The resident, with a GFR of 24, was administered both 500 mg and 875 mg doses from 1/27/25 to 2/2/25. The facility's MAR did not automatically update with the pharmacy's system, requiring manual discontinuation of the previous order, which was not done.
The facility failed to manage medications properly, with a compromised lorazepam card found on the 200-hall cart and an unopened insulin pen improperly stored on the 300-hall cart. Additionally, drinking cups were stored under the sink in the 200-medication room, violating facility policy.
Two residents in a LTC facility received incorrect meal consistencies due to failures in implementing hospital discharge diet orders. One resident with dysphagia was served a regular meal instead of a mechanical soft diet, while another with multiple health issues received a regular diet instead of a soft and bite-sized consistency. Staff interviews revealed communication lapses and reliance on electronic systems for diet updates, leading to these deficiencies.
A facility failed to follow infection control protocols when a QMA handled a pain pill without gloves for a resident with multiple health conditions. The QMA picked the pill from a cup with bare hands and placed it in the resident's mouth after it fell on his shirt, contrary to the facility's policy requiring gloves for handling medications.
A resident with chronic kidney disease received duplicate doses of Augmentin due to a failure in the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The resident was prescribed two different dosages without discontinuing the initial order, leading to inappropriate medication administration. The oversight was not identified by the clinical team or the pharmacy, despite daily reviews of new antibiotic orders.
A resident with multiple health conditions did not receive an influenza vaccination in a timely manner despite signing a consent form. The facility's process involved educating the resident and ordering the vaccine, but the administration was delayed, deviating from the policy that residents receive immunizations per their request.
A resident with multiple health conditions signed a consent form for a COVID-19 vaccine, but the facility failed to administer the vaccine in a timely manner, resulting in a delay of several months. The facility's policy required timely vaccination upon consent, but the process of batching vaccines led to a significant delay.
Medication Transcription Error on Admission Leads to Multiple Medication Errors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that medications were transcribed correctly upon admission for a resident, resulting in significant medication errors. Upon admission, a staff member transcribed medication orders for the resident, but the orders entered into the resident's record were actually those intended for another resident. This error was not identified because the required second nurse check, as outlined in facility policy, was not completed. As a result, the resident received multiple medications that were not prescribed for him over several days. The resident's family member noticed that a staff member attempted to administer unfamiliar medications and raised concerns with the staff. Despite this, the resident continued to receive incorrect medications for several days. The clinical record review confirmed that 11 medications not ordered by the transferring hospital were administered in error, with a total of 23 incorrect doses given over four days. The medications included drugs for Alzheimer's disease, overactive bladder, anxiety, high blood pressure, diarrhea, stomach acid, potassium supplementation, pain, depression, nausea, and constipation. The facility's own policies required that all new admission orders be double-checked by a second nurse and that the five rights of medication administration be followed. However, these procedures were not followed in this case, leading to the administration of multiple incorrect medications. The error was only discovered after several days when a review of the records was conducted, confirming that the resident had received medications intended for another individual.
Resident with Dementia Allowed to Exit Secured Unit Unsupervised
Penalty
Summary
A resident with dementia and Alzheimer's disease, newly admitted to the secured locked unit, was able to leave the facility unsupervised. The resident was not identified as exit-seeking and had no history of elopement according to the admission assessment. On the day of the incident, a CNA responded to a door alarm and, after interacting with the resident who requested to go outside, allowed the resident to exit through a secured door by entering the code. The CNA mistook the resident for a visitor and did not provide supervision as the resident left the building. The resident was later observed by another staff member walking on a sidewalk away from the facility and was subsequently escorted back. The facility was unaware of the resident's elopement until notified by the staff member who found the resident. Documentation confirmed that the door alarm functioned as intended, but staff failed to follow elopement prevention protocols, resulting in the resident being unsupervised outside the facility for a period of time.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity During Meal Service
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity during meal service. During an observation, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was seen standing while assisting a resident with feeding in the dining room. The CNA remained standing for the entirety of the meal, which is against the facility's policy that requires staff to sit at eye level with residents while assisting them with eating. This action was observed despite the facility's guidelines emphasizing the importance of promoting resident independence and dignity during dining. The resident involved had a clinical record indicating diagnoses such as Alzheimer's, hypertensive, anxiety disorder, tachycardia, dementia, and acute kidney failure. The care plan for the resident, who had experienced significant weight loss, included interventions like offering encouragement and assistance with eating. Interviews with staff revealed that standing while feeding residents could make them feel intimidated, and it was acknowledged by the CNA involved that this practice was not appropriate. The facility's documents and policies clearly outlined the expectation for staff to treat residents with dignity and respect, including during meal times.
Failure to Implement DNR Orders Promptly
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to promptly implement a do not resuscitate (DNR) order for two residents, despite their advance directive wishes. Resident 152 had a signed Indiana advance directive form and a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form indicating a DNR status, yet a physician's order dated 1/23/25 indicated full code status. It was not until 1/24/25 that a physician's order reflected the resident's DNR status. The Legacy Director confirmed that the facility's process involved meeting with residents and their representatives to discuss code status, ensuring paperwork was signed, and updating the electronic medical record. However, there was a delay in aligning the physician's order with the resident's advance directive. Similarly, Resident 160 had a signed State of Indiana Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate Declaration and Order on 1/9/25, but a physician's order on 1/7/25 indicated full code status. The resident's DNR status was not reflected in a physician's order until 1/17/25. The facility's policy required that advance directives be reviewed at admission and that nursing staff obtain an order from the attending physician for the desired code status. Despite this policy, there was a delay in updating the physician's order to match the resident's advance directive, as confirmed by interviews with facility staff.
Failure to Update PASARR for Resident's Mental Health Diagnoses and Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a revised Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I was submitted to reflect a resident's current diagnoses and medications. The clinical record for a resident was reviewed, revealing diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. However, the PASARR Level I, dated 1/7/25, indicated no known or suspected mental health diagnoses and no mental health medications being prescribed. This was inconsistent with the physician's orders dated 1/6/25 and 1/7/25, which included prescriptions for trazodone, sertraline, and buspirone, all medications related to mental health conditions. During an interview, the Social Service Director acknowledged that a new Level I PASARR was not completed to reflect the resident's mental health diagnoses and medications. The facility's policy, as provided by the Director of Nursing, indicated that certain conditions, such as severe mental illness or a psychiatric diagnosis and medication regimen, would trigger a Level II PASARR. The failure to update the PASARR to include the resident's mental health diagnoses and medications represents a deficiency in the facility's compliance with the PASARR requirements.
Failure to Hold Medication as Ordered for Blood Pressure Parameters
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to physician's orders regarding the administration of lisinopril for a resident with essential primary hypertension, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The physician's order specified that lisinopril should be held if the resident's systolic blood pressure was less than 110. However, the Medication Administration Records (MAR) from July to October 2024 indicated that lisinopril was administered multiple times when the resident's systolic blood pressure was below the specified threshold, with readings as low as 97. An interview with a nurse confirmed that medications should be held if a resident's blood pressure is outside the hold parameters, and such instances should be documented on the MAR. The facility's policies on medication administration, which were reviewed and confirmed by the Director of Nursing and a Clinical Support nurse, emphasize the importance of reviewing and confirming medication orders and checking vital signs before administering medications. Despite these guidelines, the facility did not comply with the physician's order, leading to the administration of unnecessary medication to the resident.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order for Oxygen Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the administration of oxygen for two residents, leading to a deficiency in respiratory care. Resident 150 was observed wearing 2 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula without a prior physician's order. The resident's clinical record indicated a history of pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and other significant health issues. Despite the resident using oxygen at night in the hospital before arriving at the facility, a physician's order for oxygen was not obtained until after the resident had already been receiving oxygen at the facility. Similarly, Resident 156 was placed on oxygen due to low O2 saturations, but a physician's order was not obtained until several days later. The resident's clinical record showed a history of hemiplegia, diabetes, heart failure, and asthma. Nursing progress notes documented the resident's oxygen use, but the order for oxygen administration was delayed. The facility's policy allowed for emergency oxygen administration as a nursing intervention, but a physician's order was required thereafter, which was not promptly obtained in these cases.
Failure to Discontinue Duplicate Antibiotic Order Leads to Double Dosing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the discontinuation of an order for Augmentin 500 mg when a new order for Augmentin 875 mg was received, resulting in double dosing of the antibiotic for a resident with pneumonia. The resident, who had a history of hemiplegia, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and other conditions, was administered both doses from 1/27/25 to 2/2/25. The resident's GFR was low at 24, indicating impaired kidney function, which necessitated a lower dose of Augmentin. Despite the pharmacy's usual practice of canceling duplicate orders, the facility did not send a discontinue order for the initial dose, leading to both doses being administered. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist and a pharmacist revealed that the facility's MAR did not automatically update with the pharmacy's system, requiring manual discontinuation of the previous order. The pharmacist noted that the resident should not have received the 875 mg dose due to her impaired renal function. An LPN indicated that she would verify doctor's orders and consult with a pharmacist if she encountered duplicate medications on the MAR, although she was not involved in administering the medications during the double dosing period. A Medication Error Event progress note confirmed the occurrence of the medication error due to the duplicate order.
Medication Storage and Handling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly manage and store medications, leading to several deficiencies. On the 200-hall medication cart, a compromised controlled substance card of lorazepam for a resident was found with taped slots, indicating improper handling. The lorazepam tablets had expired, and there was no current order for them in the Electronic Health Record. The Licensed Practical Nurse on duty did not notice the tape during the narcotics count, and the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that the pills needed to be destroyed by two nurses. Additionally, on the 300-hall medication cart, an unopened Humalog insulin pen for another resident was improperly stored outside of the refrigerator, contrary to the storage instructions. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the insulin pen should have been refrigerated until needed and should be destroyed if not stored correctly. Furthermore, in the 200-medication room, drinking cups were improperly stored under the sink, which was against facility policy. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that nothing should be stored under the sink, and the cups needed to be destroyed.
Dietary Management Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately initiate the correct diet orders upon admission for two residents, leading to inappropriate meal consistencies being served. Resident 151, who had a history of cerebrovascular accident, Alzheimer's dementia, and dysphagia, was observed receiving a regular consistency meal instead of the prescribed mechanical soft diet. The resident's hospital discharge summary recommended a Level 5 Minced and Moist diet, but due to a series of miscommunications and errors in updating the diet orders, the resident was initially served inappropriate food items. The Speech Therapist intervened, and the meal was corrected, but not before the resident had already started eating the incorrect meal. Resident 156, who had multiple health issues including hemiplegia, diabetes, and heart failure, was also affected by incorrect diet orders. The hospital discharge summary indicated a Level 6 Soft and Bite-Sized diet, but the facility ordered a regular consistency diet instead. This oversight was compounded by the resident's ongoing health issues, including pneumonia and a productive cough, which raised concerns about potential aspiration. The facility's failure to recognize and implement the correct diet order from the hospital discharge summary contributed to the resident's risk of aspiration. Interviews with facility staff revealed systemic issues in the communication and implementation of diet orders. The Director of Dining Services noted reliance on the electronic medical record system for diet order updates, which failed to capture last-minute changes. Additionally, the Clinical Support Nurse admitted to not seeing the correct diet order on the hospital discharge summary, leading to the incorrect diet being ordered. These lapses in communication and procedure resulted in the residents receiving inappropriate meals, highlighting deficiencies in the facility's dietary management processes.
Infection Control Breach During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during medication administration for a resident. During an observation, a Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) was seen handling a pain pill without wearing gloves. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including end-stage renal disease and chronic heart failure, requested only the pain pill from a cup containing multiple medications. The QMA picked the pill out with bare hands and handed it to the resident, who then dropped it onto his shirt. The QMA subsequently picked the pill up from the resident's shirt and placed it in his mouth without donning gloves. The facility's policy on oral medication administration requires staff to avoid touching medications unless wearing gloves, which was not followed in this instance.
Failure in Antibiotic Stewardship Leads to Duplicate Dosing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper monitoring of antibiotic use under its antibiotic stewardship program, resulting in a resident receiving duplicate doses of the same antibiotic. Resident 156, who had a history of hemiplegia, diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, was prescribed Augmentin for pneumonia. Initially, a dose of 500-125 mg was ordered, but a subsequent order increased the dosage to 875-125 mg without discontinuing the initial order. This led to the resident receiving both dosages concurrently, which was inappropriate given her renal function. The Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist was unaware of the duplicate dosing and did not investigate the higher dosage. The pharmacy did not receive a discontinue order for the initial dose, resulting in both dosages appearing on the facility's Medication Administration Record. Despite daily reviews of new antibiotic orders, the clinical team failed to identify and address the duplicate dosing. The facility's policy on antibiotic stewardship was not effectively implemented, as evidenced by the lack of action to prevent the medication error that occurred.
Failure to Administer Timely Influenza Vaccination
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an influenza vaccination during the current influenza season for a resident who had requested it with a signed consent form. The resident, who had multiple health conditions including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Alzheimer's disease, signed a consent form for the influenza vaccine on January 2, 2024. However, the resident's medical record did not show any influenza vaccination administered between the date of the signed consent and the administration of the vaccine on October 4, 2024. Interviews with the Clinical Support Nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing revealed that the facility's process involved educating the resident or family after consent was signed and then ordering the vaccine. The Assistant Director of Nursing mentioned that vaccines were occasionally batched but were typically administered within a few days to a week. Despite this process, the resident did not receive the influenza vaccine in a timely manner as per their request, which was a deviation from the facility's policy that stated residents would receive immunizations per their request.
Failure to Timely Administer COVID-19 Vaccine
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a COVID-19 vaccination to a resident who had requested it and signed a consent form. Resident 13, who had multiple health conditions including type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and Alzheimer's disease, signed a consent form for the COVID-19 vaccine on January 2, 2024. However, the resident's medical record did not show any vaccination administered between the date of consent and October 4, 2024, when the vaccine was finally given. Interviews with the Clinical Support Nurse and the Assistant Director of Nursing revealed that the facility's process involved educating the resident or family and then ordering the vaccine, which could sometimes be batched and administered within a few days to a week. Despite this procedure, there was a significant delay in administering the vaccine to Resident 13, which was not in accordance with the facility's policy that required residents to receive immunizations per their request upon signing the consent form.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 67 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lafayette
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Springs At Lafayette, The | 2.4 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
| St Mary Healthcare Center | 2.6 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Rosewalk Village At Lafayette | 3 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Majestic Care Of Lafayette | 3.4 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Saint Anthony Rehab And Nursing Center | 3.4 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Creasy Springs Health Campus.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.