Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment, with issues such as peeling baseboards, exposed pipes, and an air conditioning unit falling off the wall. Water temperatures in several rooms exceeded the recommended maximum, with some reaching 127.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The maintenance assistant had not calibrated the thermometer used for checking water temperatures, and the facility's policies on maintaining a safe environment were not followed.
The facility failed to ensure call light accessibility for two residents. One resident's call light was repeatedly found on the floor, out of reach, despite her care plan requirements. Another resident, with a history of behavioral disturbances, had no call light in her room due to her tendency to throw items. Instead, a Wander Guard was used, but its placement and function were not consistently checked. The facility lacked documentation of staff checks and had no policy for the Wander Guard, although it was stated that provider's orders should be followed.
The facility failed to ensure accurate MDS Assessments for several residents, leading to discrepancies in recorded diagnoses and medication administration. Errors included incorrect documentation of anticoagulant use, unrecorded diagnoses of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and schizoaffective disorder, and a misreported diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. These inaccuracies were identified through interviews and record reviews, with the Regional Nurse acknowledging the discrepancies and the lack of a specific policy for MDS Assessments.
A facility failed to provide necessary care and complete assessments for a resident requiring dialysis. The resident's medical record lacked post-dialysis documentation, and the facility did not have a current dialysis contract. Observations showed incomplete or missing post-dialysis assessments, and staff interviews confirmed the expectation to perform and document these assessments. The facility's Hemodialysis Policy required ongoing assessment and monitoring, which was not adhered to, as evidenced by the lack of documentation and absence of a current dialysis contract.
Environmental and Water Temperature Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in several resident rooms and a shower room, as observed during a survey. Specific issues included bathrooms with holes in the walls, exposed pipes, peeling baseboards, uncovered bedpans, and scuffed floors. Additionally, an air conditioning unit was found to be falling off the wall in one room. These conditions were noted in six out of thirteen resident rooms and one of two shower rooms observed. Water temperatures in multiple rooms exceeded the recommended maximum of 120 degrees Fahrenheit, with temperatures recorded as high as 127.5 degrees. Residents reported that the water was hot, though none reported being burned. The maintenance assistant acknowledged that the water lines' location in the attic and external temperatures could contribute to elevated water temperatures. However, there was no recent notification of concerns from staff or residents regarding water temperatures. The maintenance assistant admitted to not calibrating the thermometer used for checking water temperatures, which could affect the accuracy of the readings. The facility's policies on safe water temperatures and maintaining a homelike environment were not adhered to, as evidenced by the conditions observed. The report relates to a specific complaint, indicating ongoing issues with the facility's environment and maintenance practices.
Failure to Ensure Call Light Accessibility for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accommodate the needs of two residents regarding the accessibility of call lights. Resident 26 was observed multiple times with her call light lying on the floor, out of reach, despite her care plan indicating the need for the call bell to be within reach due to her severe cognitive impairment and mobility issues. The resident's medical records showed diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia and heart failure, necessitating supervision for various activities. A CNA confirmed that the call lights should be within reach of residents, yet this was not adhered to in Resident 26's case. Resident 38, who had a history of dementia with behavioral disturbances, was observed without a call light in her room. The CNA explained that the call light was removed due to the resident's tendency to throw and break items. Instead, a Wander Guard was used, but there was a lapse in checking its placement and function as per the physician's orders. The resident's care plan required the call bell to be within reach, but this was not implemented. The facility lacked documentation of staff checks on the resident, and there was no policy for the Wander Guard, although it was stated that provider's orders and care plan interventions should be followed.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Multiple Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for several residents, leading to discrepancies in recorded diagnoses and medication administration. For instance, a resident was incorrectly documented as receiving an anticoagulant when they were only prescribed antiplatelet medications like aspirin and Plavix. Another resident with active diagnoses of anxiety and depression was marked as not having these conditions on their MDS Assessment, despite care plans indicating otherwise. Additionally, a resident with PTSD was not accurately reflected in their MDS Assessment, even though their care plan included a history of trauma and related psychoactive medication. Further inaccuracies were noted with a resident being marked as having atrial fibrillation without any supporting documentation in their clinical record. Another resident with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was not correctly identified in their MDS Assessment, despite it being listed in their care plan. These errors were identified through interviews and record reviews, highlighting a lack of accurate reflection of residents' active diagnoses and medication use in the MDS Assessments. The Regional Nurse acknowledged these discrepancies and noted the absence of a specific policy for MDS Assessments, relying instead on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual.
Failure to Provide Complete Dialysis Care and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary care and complete assessments for a resident requiring dialysis services. The resident, who was diagnosed with end-stage renal disease and dependent on renal dialysis, did not have post-dialysis assessment documentation in their medical record. The facility also did not have a current dialysis contract at the time of the survey. The resident's clinical record, including progress notes and the Medication Administration Record (MAR), lacked documentation of post-dialysis assessments, such as vital signs, mental status, and access site evaluations. Observations and interviews revealed that the staff did not consistently complete the post-dialysis assessment sections on the dialysis/observation communication forms. Several forms were either incomplete or missing, and the assessments that were documented often lacked critical information, such as the resident's name, time of completion, and evaluations of pain, mental status, and access site conditions. The Director of Nursing (DON) and a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) confirmed that the staff was expected to perform these assessments and document them in the resident's clinical record. Additionally, the facility's Hemodialysis Policy outlined the requirement for ongoing assessment and monitoring of residents before and after dialysis treatments, including documentation of vital signs, access site conditions, and any complications. However, the facility did not adhere to these standards, as evidenced by the lack of completed documentation and the absence of a current contract with the dialysis provider. The Administrator acknowledged the absence of a current contract with the dialysis company, further highlighting the facility's failure to ensure proper dialysis care and services.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 136 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Petersburg
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Manor Care Center | 1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Good Samaritan Home & Rehabilitative Center | 10.6 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Villages At Oak Ridge, The | 12.1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Hillside Manor Nursing Home | 13.4 mi | — | 30 | 1 |
| Prairie Village Nursing And Rehabilitation | 13.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Brickyard Healthcare - Petersburg Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.