Paradise Creek Health And Rehab Of Cascadia
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in Moscow, Idaho.
- Location
- 640 North Eisenhower Street, Moscow, Idaho 83843
- CMS Provider Number
- 135067
- Inspections on file
- 15
- Latest survey
- May 7, 2026
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 3
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Paradise Creek Health And Rehab Of Cascadia during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain sanitary conditions in the walk-in freezer and ice machine area. Ice buildup on freezer lines was encroaching on a box of burritos, and an ice scoop holder attached to the ice machine contained standing water with two scoops resting in it and no visible drainage. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the recurring ice buildup and reported that the standing water issue had not previously been raised. These practices did not follow the facility’s policies for food safety, storage, and ice machine preventative maintenance and had the potential to affect 46 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
A resident with dementia, malnutrition, anemia, CKD3, and other comorbidities was care planned as at risk for nutritional decline and dehydration, with weekly weights and RD review ordered. An RD later documented poor PO intake averaging about 31%, fluid intake around 612 ml with meals, and no routine supplements in place, and recommended starting 2 oz Med Pass BID between meals with nursing to document consumption. No Med Pass order was entered into the EMR, and the resident did not receive the supplement, while experiencing a 10‑lb (6.8%) weight loss over several months. Interviews showed the RD typically communicated recommendations via email and NAR meetings, but NAR meetings had not been held consistently and no email or other system ensured the recommendation was received or implemented; requested policies on RD recommendations/supplement orders and weight loss were not provided.
A resident with multiple cardiopulmonary diagnoses received continuous O2 at 1.5 LPM via nasal cannula without a physician order or corresponding MAR documentation, despite the care plan and MDS indicating a need for and receipt of oxygen therapy. Surveyors observed the resident on oxygen on several occasions, initially without humidification and later with humidification. An LPN and the DON both confirmed at the bedside that the resident had been on oxygen since admission without a provider order, and that no monitoring was documented, contrary to facility policy requiring verification of a provider order before initiating or changing oxygen therapy.
Two residents in a facility experienced deficiencies in care. One resident suffered a fall resulting in a forehead laceration that was not treated promptly, leading to further complications. Neurological checks were not completed as required. Another resident's hospice orders for pain and anxiety management were delayed, affecting their care. Interviews revealed lapses in communication and documentation, with the DON acknowledging the need for immediate implementation of hospice orders and the importance of neuro checks.
The facility failed to ensure food safety and proper sanitation in its kitchen, affecting 41 residents. Observations revealed expired food items in the refrigerator and dry storage, and a freezer with fluctuating temperatures. Improper sanitation practices were noted during food preparation, with a thermometer being inadequately sanitized, risking chemical contamination. The Culinary Manager confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility did not complete annual performance reviews for CNAs, with none of the five CNAs receiving a review within 12 months. Additionally, three CNAs did not receive the required 12 hours of training per year, with CNA1 receiving 2.35 hours, CNA3 receiving seven hours, and CNA4 receiving 8.6 hours. The DON confirmed that no performance reviews were conducted for CNAs employed for over 12 months, potentially affecting care for 43 residents.
The facility failed to provide meals that were palatable and at safe temperatures, affecting several residents. Observations showed improper food temperatures, with hot meals not reaching the required 130°F and cold items exceeding 50°F. Residents reported issues like lack of flavor and cold food, indicating non-compliance with the facility's food preparation policy.
A resident's grievance about inadequate incontinence briefs was not documented or resolved in a timely manner. Despite expressing dissatisfaction with the wrap-around briefs provided, which led to frequent soiling, the facility failed to ensure the resident received the preferred pull-up briefs. Interviews revealed a lack of follow-through in addressing the grievance, resulting in the issue remaining unresolved.
The facility failed to implement and follow fall prevention interventions for three residents, leading to multiple falls. A resident with cognitive impairment did not have a chair alarm as ordered. Another resident, dependent on staff for transfers, fell multiple times due to missing Dycem pads and cushions. A third resident, with impaired mobility, experienced several unwitnessed falls due to inadequate supervision and improper use of assistive devices.
A facility failed to ensure a pharmacist made a written recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident on Seroquel, an antipsychotic medication. Despite the facility's policy requiring documentation of irregularities, no formal recommendation was made, and no GDR was attempted for the resident with dementia and mood disturbance. The DON confirmed the lack of documentation from both the pharmacist and psychiatric physician regarding the GDR.
Unsanitary Walk-In Freezer and Ice Scoop Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food storage and ice handling areas. During an initial kitchen tour, the walk-in freezer was found to have ice buildup on the freezer lines that extended far enough to encroach on the upper stacked box of burritos. The Dietary Manager acknowledged during interview that this ice buildup had occurred before. At the end of the tour, inspection of the ice machine revealed an ice scoop holder mounted on the side of the machine containing two ice scoops, with approximately 20 milliliters of standing water in the bottom of the holder and the scoops in direct contact with the water, and no visible way for the water to drain. The Dietary Manager stated that no one had ever mentioned the standing water in the scoop holder before. These conditions were inconsistent with the facility’s written policies on food safety and storage and on ice machine preventative maintenance, which require that food and supplies be stored and handled to ensure safety and sanitation and that exterior surfaces, including the catch basin, be wiped down with a clean cloth and food-safe sanitizer. The deficiency had the potential to affect 46 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
Failure to Implement RD Supplement Recommendation for Resident With Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a registered dietician’s (RD) recommendation to address gradual weight loss for one resident. The resident was admitted with dementia with behavioral disturbance, malnutrition, anemia, osteoporosis, B vitamin deficiency, history of alcohol abuse, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Her care plan identified her as at risk for nutritional decline and dehydration or potential fluid deficit, with approaches including weekly weights, completion of a Mini Nutritional Assessment, provision of meals per physician diet order with intake documentation, and RD review as indicated. A quarterly MDS showed severely impaired cognition, risk for pressure ulcers, receipt of a therapeutic diet, and a need for set-up or clean-up assistance with eating. On a nutritional review, the RD documented that the resident’s average intake was about 31%, average fluid intake with meals was about 612 ml, and that there were no routine supplements in place, although the RD felt she would benefit from additional support. The RD recommended initiating 2 oz Med Pass BID between meals and directed nursing to document the amount consumed. However, there was no corresponding Med Pass order in the EMR, and the resident did not receive the supplement. The resident experienced a 10‑lb (6.8%) weight loss over four months, with a low of 128.4 lbs. Interviews revealed that the RD expected recommendations to be implemented within 48 hours and typically communicated them via email to nursing and through Nutrition At Risk (NAR) meetings, but there had been no consistent NAR meetings and no email or other system in place to ensure the RD’s recommendation for Med Pass was communicated and implemented. Requested policies on RD recommendations/supplement orders and weight loss were not provided before survey exit.
Oxygen Therapy Administered Without Physician Order or Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to obtain a physician’s order, in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy, before administering oxygen to a resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension, malignant neoplasm of the cardia and lower third of the esophagus, abnormal lung findings, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. The resident’s care plan documented a potential for altered respiratory status and the need for oxygen therapy via nasal cannula, and the admission MDS indicated the resident received oxygen while in the facility. However, review of the electronic medical record, including the Order Recap Report, MAR, and progress notes for the relevant period, revealed no physician order for oxygen and no documentation that oxygen was being administered or monitored. Surveyor observations on multiple dates showed the resident receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 1.5 LPM, initially without humidification and later with humidification. During interviews at the bedside, an LPN confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen at 1.5 LPM, acknowledged there was no physician’s order for oxygen, and stated the resident had been on oxygen since admission, with no MAR documentation of monitoring. The DON also confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen at 1.5 LPM without a corresponding physician’s order and stated that an order should have been obtained before oxygen was administered. Review of the facility’s “Oxygen Administration, Safety, Storage & Maintenance” policy showed that staff were required to verify a provider order prior to initiating or changing oxygen therapy, which was not followed in this case.
Deficiencies in Timely Care and Documentation for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate and timely nursing care for two residents, resulting in significant deficiencies. Resident 30 experienced a fall that resulted in a significant laceration to her forehead. Despite the severity of the injury, the resident was not sent to the emergency department in a timely manner. The hospice nurse advised against sending the resident to the hospital, and the facility staff did not follow up adequately. As a result, the wound could not be sutured and required debridement and continued treatment weeks after the fall. Additionally, neurological checks were not completed as required, which could have helped detect any changes in the resident's condition. Resident 43's hospice orders were not implemented in a timely manner, which affected the resident's pain management. The hospice orders were faxed to the facility, but they were not documented into the medical record until several days later. This delay meant that the resident did not receive the updated medication orders for pain and anxiety management promptly. The facility staff found the hospice orders on the nursing manager's desk days after they were sent, indicating a lapse in communication and documentation processes. Interviews with family members and facility staff revealed that there was a lack of coordination and follow-up regarding the residents' care. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the hospice orders should have been implemented immediately and that the neuro checks for Resident 30 were crucial for monitoring potential changes in mental status. These deficiencies highlight the need for improved communication and adherence to care protocols to ensure residents receive timely and appropriate care.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure food safety and proper sanitation practices in its kitchen, which had the potential to affect the 41 residents served food from the kitchen. During observations, it was found that the walk-in refrigerator contained expired food items, including sour cream and potato salad, which were confirmed by the Culinary Manager (CM) and subsequently disposed of. Additionally, the freezer was observed to have food that was not fully frozen, with the temperature recorded at 28 degrees Fahrenheit, which is above the recommended range. The CM acknowledged that the freezer temperatures had been fluctuating and that affected food had been discarded. Furthermore, the dry storage area contained expired honey thickened dairy liquids and chicken noodle soup, which were also confirmed by the CM. Improper sanitation practices were observed during food preparation. Cook1 was seen using a thermometer to check the temperature of lasagna, but instead of using thermometer wipes, he used a bucket of sanitizer water and a rag, which could lead to chemical contamination. The CM confirmed that the proper procedure was not followed, and the pan of lasagna tested with the improperly sanitized thermometer was discarded. The Registered Dietitian (RD) and the CM confirmed the presence of expired foods and stated that the freezer was currently functioning properly.
Deficiency in CNA Performance Reviews and Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that annual performance reviews were completed for every nurse aide, with none of the five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) having received a performance review within 12 months. Additionally, the facility did not provide the required minimum of 12 hours of training per year for three of the five CNAs reviewed. Specifically, CNA1 received 2.35 hours, CNA3 received seven hours, and CNA4 received 8.6 hours of training over the past year. The training provided did include abuse and dementia training. During an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that no performance reviews had been conducted for the CNAs who had worked at the facility for over 12 months. This deficiency had the potential to impact the current skillset and knowledge level necessary for the care of 43 census residents.
Deficiency in Meal Palatability and Temperature
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that meals provided to residents were palatable, attractive, and served at safe and appetizing temperatures. This deficiency was identified through observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policies. Five residents expressed dissatisfaction with the meals, citing issues such as lack of flavor, inadequate seasoning, and improper temperatures. For instance, one resident mentioned that the food had no flavor and lacked salt, while another described the food as cold and unseasoned. Additionally, a resident noted that the water was not hot enough for cocoa, and there were no condiments available. Observations revealed that the food temperatures were not maintained appropriately. During a test tray evaluation, the lasagna was found to be 118 degrees Fahrenheit, the salad was 89 degrees Fahrenheit, and the custard was 54 degrees Fahrenheit, all of which were outside the recommended temperature ranges. The Registered Dietitian confirmed these findings and noted that the hot food should have been around 130 degrees Fahrenheit, and the cold food should have been around 50 degrees Fahrenheit. The improper placement of the salad on the same plate as the lasagna was identified as a contributing factor to the temperature issues. The facility's policy on food preparation emphasized the importance of conserving nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, which was not adhered to in this instance.
Failure to Address Resident's Grievance on Incontinence Products
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document, investigate, and resolve a verbal grievance raised by a resident, identified as R8, regarding the type of incontinence briefs provided. R8, who was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15, expressed dissatisfaction during a Resident Council Meeting about not receiving the large heavy pull-up briefs ordered by his doctor. Instead, he was provided with wrap-around briefs, which he found inadequate, leading to frequent soiling of his clothing and bedding. Despite the resident's clear communication of his needs and preferences, the grievance was not formally documented or addressed in a timely manner. Interviews with various staff members, including the Activity Manager, Social Services Manager, and Central Supply Specialist, revealed a lack of follow-through in addressing R8's grievance. Although the Central Supply Specialist ordered pull-up briefs for R8, there was no subsequent check to ensure the resident received them. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the issue but could not provide documentation that the pull-up briefs were ordered and provided to R8. This oversight resulted in R8's grievance remaining unresolved for an extended period.
Failure to Implement Fall Prevention Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement and follow interventions to prevent additional falls for three residents, increasing the risk of further falls and potential injury. Resident 9, who was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of falls, was ordered to have a bed and chair alarm due to her cognitive history and desire for independence. However, observations revealed that while a bed alarm was in place, a chair alarm was not, contrary to the physician's orders and the resident's care plan. Resident 33, who was severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for transfers, experienced multiple falls from his wheelchair. The care plan included interventions such as a Dycem pad and a comfort cushion to prevent falls. However, during incidents where the resident slid out of the wheelchair, it was noted that the Dycem pad was not in place, and the comfort cushion was not used until after subsequent falls, despite being part of the care plan. Resident 42, who had intact cognition but was at risk for falls due to impaired mobility and a terminal prognosis, experienced several unwitnessed falls. The falls were attributed to factors such as the resident being barefoot, using an unsteady commode, and inadequate supervision. Interventions like ensuring proper footwear, using a call light, and placing the bed against the wall were not effectively implemented or documented in the care plan until after multiple falls occurred.
Failure to Document Gradual Dose Reduction for Antipsychotic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a licensed pharmacist made a written recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for a resident prescribed an antipsychotic medication. The facility's Drug Regimen Review policy requires that any irregularities noted by the pharmacist during the monthly drug regimen review be documented and sent to the attending physician and other relevant staff. However, for one resident with dementia and mood disturbance, no such recommendation was made, despite the resident being on Seroquel since January 2024 without a GDR attempt. The resident, who was severely impaired in cognition, was identified as having behavioral symptoms and was administered Seroquel without a GDR. The Director of Nursing confirmed that although a GDR was discussed with the pharmacist and a psychiatric doctor, no formal written recommendation was completed. Additionally, there was no documentation from the pharmacist or psychiatric physician regarding the GDR, and no medication recommendations were made by the pharmacist for the resident over the past 12 months.
Latest citations in Idaho
A resident admitted with a diagnosis of PTSD and severe cognitive deficits had an admission MDS and an Interim History and Physical documenting PTSD, but the Idaho PASRR Level I form incorrectly indicated no major mental illness, even though PTSD is listed on the form as a major mental illness. The SSD stated he reviewed hospital records and the chart but missed the PTSD diagnosis and did not mark it on the PASARR, contrary to facility expectations and policy requiring accurate pre-admission screening for serious mental disorders and appropriate follow-up evaluation when a Level I screen is positive.
A resident with COPD and dementia, receiving scheduled nebulizer treatments, was found on multiple occasions to have a nebulizer mask stored on top of the machine rather than in a sanitary manner. A CNA and a nurse aide in training confirmed the mask’s placement, and an LPN reported that masks were routinely cleaned, dried, and then stored on top of the machine. The DON later acknowledged that masks should be washed, dried, and placed on a clean surface, and facility policy required oxygen and respiratory supplies to be stored in a plastic bag when not in use.
Staff failed to consistently implement and follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care for two residents. For a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter and an EBP order, an RN and a CNA removed their gowns after catheter care and performed a heel and toe dressing change wearing only gloves, despite a door sign requiring gown and gloves for wound care and other high-contact care. For another resident with multiple open leg wounds and active wound care orders, an RN and a nurse aide performed dressing changes with gloves only, without gowns, and there was no EBP signage or order in place. Interviews with nursing staff, the IP, and the DON revealed inconsistent understanding and application of the facility’s EBP policy, which requires gown and gloves for high-contact care activities, including wound care and device care, for residents with chronic wounds or indwelling devices.
A resident with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and a history of breast cancer had previously received PPSV23 and PCV13 at the appropriate age, but review of the EMR and vaccine consent form showed the pneumococcal section was marked as "not needed" and no additional pneumococcal vaccine was offered. The ADON/IP acknowledged that, according to CDC guidelines, the resident was not fully vaccinated and should have been offered PCV20, and the DON stated her expectation that vaccine status be reviewed on admission and tracked to ensure residents are fully vaccinated.
Two residents who experienced emergent hospital transfers for issues including abnormal critical labs, uncontrollable pain, and SOB with low O2 saturation were not provided with required written bed-hold policies and transfer notices. One resident had severely impaired cognition, and another was cognitively intact and later died at the hospital. Progress notes documented the transfers and that contacts or family were notified, but there was no documentation that written notices addressing bed-hold, appeal rights, or ombudsman information were given, despite facility policies requiring such written information at admission and again at or shortly after transfer. The Administrator confirmed that bed-hold notices were not sent for these residents.
Two residents who required staff assistance with ADLs did not receive showers and hair washing as care-planned and expected. One resident with dementia and cervical spine conditions was observed with flaky skin and greasy hair, and the family’s shower calendar showed only four showers in a month despite an expectation of three per week, with no refusals documented in the record or care plan. Another cognitively intact resident with quadriplegia and spinal stenosis reported rarely receiving scheduled showers, and was observed with long, greasy hair, again with no refusals documented. The DON and Administrator acknowledged CNAs believed they could not provide baths without a dedicated bath team and historically had no room assignments, despite facility policy requiring provision and documentation of ADL care and refusals.
Surveyors found multiple expired medications, including various insulin products, Trulicity injection pens, and a large bottle of Gabapentin solution, stored in a medication room refrigerator and still available for use. The MDS coordinator confirmed the drugs were expired. The DON reported that no one had been specifically assigned to check the refrigerator for expired medications, while an LPN stated she only reviewed medication carts and did not check refrigerated stock. Facility policies required checking expiration/beyond-use dates before administration, dating multi-dose containers when opened, discarding them within specified time frames, and returning or destroying outdated medications, but these procedures were not followed for the medications in the refrigerator.
Surveyors found that the facility did not maintain sanitary conditions in the walk-in freezer and ice machine area. Ice buildup on freezer lines was encroaching on a box of burritos, and an ice scoop holder attached to the ice machine contained standing water with two scoops resting in it and no visible drainage. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the recurring ice buildup and reported that the standing water issue had not previously been raised. These practices did not follow the facility’s policies for food safety, storage, and ice machine preventative maintenance and had the potential to affect 46 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
A resident with dementia, malnutrition, anemia, CKD3, and other comorbidities was care planned as at risk for nutritional decline and dehydration, with weekly weights and RD review ordered. An RD later documented poor PO intake averaging about 31%, fluid intake around 612 ml with meals, and no routine supplements in place, and recommended starting 2 oz Med Pass BID between meals with nursing to document consumption. No Med Pass order was entered into the EMR, and the resident did not receive the supplement, while experiencing a 10‑lb (6.8%) weight loss over several months. Interviews showed the RD typically communicated recommendations via email and NAR meetings, but NAR meetings had not been held consistently and no email or other system ensured the recommendation was received or implemented; requested policies on RD recommendations/supplement orders and weight loss were not provided.
A resident with multiple cardiopulmonary diagnoses received continuous O2 at 1.5 LPM via nasal cannula without a physician order or corresponding MAR documentation, despite the care plan and MDS indicating a need for and receipt of oxygen therapy. Surveyors observed the resident on oxygen on several occasions, initially without humidification and later with humidification. An LPN and the DON both confirmed at the bedside that the resident had been on oxygen since admission without a provider order, and that no monitoring was documented, contrary to facility policy requiring verification of a provider order before initiating or changing oxygen therapy.
Failure to Update PASARR for Resident With PTSD Diagnosis
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a PASARR Level I screen was accurately completed and updated to reflect a major mental illness diagnosis for one resident. The resident’s admission MDS, with an ARD of 03/30/26, showed a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and a BIMS score of 3/15, indicating severe cognitive deficits. An Interim History and Physical dated 03/25/26 also documented PTSD as a diagnosis. However, the Idaho PASRR Level I form dated 03/19/26 indicated “No” under the section asking whether the individual had any major mental illnesses, despite PTSD being listed on the form as a qualifying major mental illness and despite the resident having that diagnosis. The Social Services Director reported that he reviewed hospital records and the resident’s chart to ensure that diagnoses on the admitting PASARR matched the resident’s conditions, and he confirmed the resident was admitted with PTSD. He acknowledged that he missed the PTSD diagnosis and that it should have been marked on the PASARR. During an interview, the DON and Administrator stated the expectation that all PASARRs be correct and that, if not correct at admission, a new PASARR should be submitted. The facility’s PASRR policy specified that potential admissions are to be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities prior to admission and that a positive Level I screen requires a Level II evaluation by the state-designated authority prior to admission unless otherwise authorized.
Improper Storage of Nebulizer Mask and Respiratory Supplies
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the sanitary storage of respiratory equipment for one resident receiving respiratory care. The resident was admitted with COPD and unspecified dementia and had care plan focuses for terminal prognosis due to COPD and shortness of breath, with interventions including administration of inhalers and nebulized medications as ordered. Physician orders included scheduled ipratropium-albuterol nebulizer treatments twice daily for COPD. During multiple observations in the resident’s shared room, the nebulizer mask was seen lying on top of the nebulizer machine rather than being stored in a sanitary manner. Staff interviews confirmed the observed storage practice. A CNA and a nurse aide in training each verified that the nebulizer mask was lying on top of the machine at the times of observation. An LPN stated that masks were cleaned after use, dried, and then stored on top of the machine, and acknowledged this could be an infection control issue. During a later observation, the LPN again confirmed the mask was on top of the machine. In an interview, the DON, with the Administrator present, stated the mask should be washed, dried, and placed on a clean surface and acknowledged it could be an infection control issue, and the facility’s written policy specified that oxygen and respiratory supplies were to be stored in a plastic bag when not in use.
Failure to Implement and Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s infection prevention and control program related to improper use and implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care. One resident with an indwelling urinary catheter had an active order and care plan for EBP, and a door sign specifying that gown and gloves were required for high-contact resident care activities, including wound care and device care. During an observation, an RN and a CNA entered this resident’s room, performed hand hygiene, donned gown and gloves, and completed catheter care in accordance with the posted EBP instructions. However, after completing catheter care, the RN instructed the CNA that they could remove their gowns because EBP was “only for the catheter,” and both staff removed their gowns and gloves, performed hand hygiene, and then donned only clean gloves to perform a dressing change on the resident’s right heel and pinky toe, despite the door sign indicating gown and gloves were required for wound care. A second resident had multiple open wounds on both lower extremities that required cleansing, application of collagen with wound gel and alginate, and coverage with border gauze dressings. Progress notes documented that these wounds originated as skin tears and were slowly healing, and active wound care orders were in place. During an observation of wound care for this resident, an RN and a nurse aide performed hand hygiene and donned gloves but did not wear gowns. There was no EBP sign or PPE set up outside the room, and there was no order for EBP in the electronic medical record, even though the resident had open wounds requiring dressing changes. In interviews, the RN stated that EBP was required for chronic wounds such as pressure, venous, and arterial wounds, and that EBP for the first resident applied only to catheter care. The CNA reported that she relied on the door sign and believed she only needed to gown for catheter care, brief care, or toileting, and not for transferring if she was not in contact with the catheter. The Infection Preventionist explained that EBP was used for chronic wounds and indwelling devices and stated that staff would only need to gown when providing care to the Foley catheter, while the DON stated that EBP was for residents with devices or dressing changes to prevent MDROs and that staff should wear gown and gloves even when not providing direct catheter care. The facility’s written EBP policy specified that EBP applies to residents with chronic wounds and/or indwelling medical devices and that PPE for EBP is necessary when performing high-contact care activities, including wound care and medical device care, which was not consistently followed in the observed wound care encounters.
Failure to Offer Pneumococcal Vaccination per CDC Guidelines
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s implementation of its pneumococcal vaccination policy for one resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and a history of malignant neoplasm of the breast, and was over the age threshold referenced in CDC guidance. Record review showed the resident had previously received PPSV23 on 06/07/04 and PCV13 (Prevnar 13) on 11/04/14, both administered when the resident was older than the specified age. The resident’s Informed Consent Form for vaccines, dated 09/17/25, had the pneumococcal section marked as “not needed,” despite documentation of prior PPSV23 and PCV13 doses. During interviews, the ADON/Infection Preventionist stated she tracks resident vaccine records on a spreadsheet and confirmed that, based on CDC recommendations, the resident was not fully vaccinated and should have been offered PCV20. She also stated she did not know why “not needed” was written on the consent form. The DON stated her expectation was that residents’ vaccine status would be reviewed on admission, tracked when due, and that the IP nurse would review pneumonia vaccine status to determine if residents were fully vaccinated and offer the vaccine if not. Review of the facility’s pneumococcal vaccination policy and the CDC Adult Immunization Schedule showed that, for adults who previously received both PCV13 and PPSV23 with PPSV23 given at age 65 or older, one dose of PCV20 or PCV21 should be considered at least five years after the last pneumococcal vaccine dose, indicating the resident met criteria to be offered an additional pneumococcal vaccine dose.
Failure to Provide Required Bed-Hold and Transfer Notices for Hospital Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide required written bed-hold policies and transfer notices to two residents and/or their resident representatives when the residents were emergently transferred to the hospital. One resident had severely impaired cognition with a BIMS score of 3/15 and was transferred to the hospital due to abnormal critical lab results, then later returned to the facility. Documentation showed that the facility called the contact on file and a POA returned the call, but there was no documentation that a written transfer notice or bed-hold information was provided. The facility’s own policy required that written transfer/discharge notices include the reason for transfer, effective date, receiving location, a statement of the right to appeal, and contact information for the state LTC ombudsman and protection and advocacy agencies, as well as sending a copy to the ombudsman. A second resident, who had intact cognition with a BIMS score of 15/15, was transferred to the hospital on one occasion for uncontrollable pain and returned to the facility, and on another occasion for SOB, tremors in both arms, and oxygen saturation below 88%, after which the resident expired at the hospital. Progress notes documented the transfers and that the family was notified, but there was no documentation that written transfer notices or bed-hold policies were provided at either transfer. The facility’s bed-hold policy required that all residents or their representatives, regardless of payor source, receive written information about facility and state bed-hold policies twice: in advance of transfer (e.g., in the admission packet) and again at the time of transfer, or within 24 hours for emergency transfers. During an interview, the Administrator confirmed that bed-hold notices had not been sent for these two residents.
Failure to Provide Required Showering and Hygiene Assistance for Dependent Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide required assistance with showering and personal hygiene for two residents who were dependent on staff for ADLs. One resident was observed with flaky skin and greasy hair, and the resident’s family member reported the resident was supposed to receive three showers or baths per week but was “lucky to get one.” The family maintained a calendar showing the resident received only four showers in the month of April. The resident’s admission record showed diagnoses including traumatic spondylolisthesis of the cervical spine, unspecified dementia, and cervical spinal stenosis. The quarterly MDS documented moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 10 and a need for substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing, with no documentation of care refusals. The resident’s care plan identified an ADL self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance, limited mobility, limited ROM, and neck pain, and contained no documentation of rejection of care or a pattern of negative responses. A second resident was observed with waist-length hair that appeared greasy at the crown and in need of washing. This resident stated she was supposed to receive three showers or baths per week but was “lucky” to get one, and reported staff told her they were short-staffed and that there was no bath team. Her admission record listed diagnoses including quadriplegia at C5–C7, bipolar disorder, and spinal stenosis. Her quarterly MDS documented that she was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and required partial/moderate assistance for showering/bathing, with no documentation of refusing care. Her care plan identified an ADL self-care performance deficit related to incomplete quadriplegia and did not document any concerns with rejection of care for ADLs, including showering. The DON and Administrator acknowledged that CNAs believed they were short-staffed without a bath team and were unaccustomed to providing baths and grooming when the bath team was unavailable, and that previously there had been no CNA room assignments, resulting in a lack of accountability for residents’ care. The facility’s ADL policy required that residents unable to perform ADLs independently receive services necessary to maintain grooming and personal hygiene and that refusals be documented in the clinical record.
Expired Medications Not Removed From Medication Room Refrigerator
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a failure to properly manage and discard expired medications stored in a medication room refrigerator. During an observation of the medication storage room refrigerator with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator, multiple expired medications were found, including one Lispro insulin vial and one Lantus insulin vial, both with expiration dates of 01/23/26 and no open dates on the vials. An Apidra Solostar insulin pen with an expiration date of 02/04/26, a Trulicity 3 mg/0.5 ml injection pen carton with two pens remaining and an expiration date of 01/16/26 with no open date on the carton, and a 500 ml bottle of Gabapentin solution with 450 ml remaining and an expiration date of 10/02/23 with no open date on the bottle were also present. These medications remained stored in the refrigerator and available for use despite being outdated. During interviews, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that the medications in the storage refrigerator were expired and stated that an LPN was responsible for monitoring medication expiration dates for medications stored there. The DON reported that she did not think anyone had been assigned to check the medication storage refrigerator for expired medications and acknowledged that expired medications should have been destroyed by staff or returned to the pharmacy. The LPN later stated that she reviewed all medication carts for expired medications but did not check the medications stored in the refrigerator. Review of facility policies showed requirements that expiration or beyond-use dates be checked prior to administration, that multi-dose containers be dated when opened and discarded within 28 days unless otherwise specified, and that discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications be returned or destroyed per pharmacy instructions, which were not followed in this instance.
Unsanitary Walk-In Freezer and Ice Scoop Storage Practices
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in food storage and ice handling areas. During an initial kitchen tour, the walk-in freezer was found to have ice buildup on the freezer lines that extended far enough to encroach on the upper stacked box of burritos. The Dietary Manager acknowledged during interview that this ice buildup had occurred before. At the end of the tour, inspection of the ice machine revealed an ice scoop holder mounted on the side of the machine containing two ice scoops, with approximately 20 milliliters of standing water in the bottom of the holder and the scoops in direct contact with the water, and no visible way for the water to drain. The Dietary Manager stated that no one had ever mentioned the standing water in the scoop holder before. These conditions were inconsistent with the facility’s written policies on food safety and storage and on ice machine preventative maintenance, which require that food and supplies be stored and handled to ensure safety and sanitation and that exterior surfaces, including the catch basin, be wiped down with a clean cloth and food-safe sanitizer. The deficiency had the potential to affect 46 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
Failure to Implement RD Supplement Recommendation for Resident With Weight Loss
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement a registered dietician’s (RD) recommendation to address gradual weight loss for one resident. The resident was admitted with dementia with behavioral disturbance, malnutrition, anemia, osteoporosis, B vitamin deficiency, history of alcohol abuse, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. Her care plan identified her as at risk for nutritional decline and dehydration or potential fluid deficit, with approaches including weekly weights, completion of a Mini Nutritional Assessment, provision of meals per physician diet order with intake documentation, and RD review as indicated. A quarterly MDS showed severely impaired cognition, risk for pressure ulcers, receipt of a therapeutic diet, and a need for set-up or clean-up assistance with eating. On a nutritional review, the RD documented that the resident’s average intake was about 31%, average fluid intake with meals was about 612 ml, and that there were no routine supplements in place, although the RD felt she would benefit from additional support. The RD recommended initiating 2 oz Med Pass BID between meals and directed nursing to document the amount consumed. However, there was no corresponding Med Pass order in the EMR, and the resident did not receive the supplement. The resident experienced a 10‑lb (6.8%) weight loss over four months, with a low of 128.4 lbs. Interviews revealed that the RD expected recommendations to be implemented within 48 hours and typically communicated them via email to nursing and through Nutrition At Risk (NAR) meetings, but there had been no consistent NAR meetings and no email or other system in place to ensure the RD’s recommendation for Med Pass was communicated and implemented. Requested policies on RD recommendations/supplement orders and weight loss were not provided before survey exit.
Oxygen Therapy Administered Without Physician Order or Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to obtain a physician’s order, in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy, before administering oxygen to a resident. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including pulmonary hypertension, malignant neoplasm of the cardia and lower third of the esophagus, abnormal lung findings, and chronic systolic congestive heart failure. The resident’s care plan documented a potential for altered respiratory status and the need for oxygen therapy via nasal cannula, and the admission MDS indicated the resident received oxygen while in the facility. However, review of the electronic medical record, including the Order Recap Report, MAR, and progress notes for the relevant period, revealed no physician order for oxygen and no documentation that oxygen was being administered or monitored. Surveyor observations on multiple dates showed the resident receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 1.5 LPM, initially without humidification and later with humidification. During interviews at the bedside, an LPN confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen at 1.5 LPM, acknowledged there was no physician’s order for oxygen, and stated the resident had been on oxygen since admission, with no MAR documentation of monitoring. The DON also confirmed the resident was receiving oxygen at 1.5 LPM without a corresponding physician’s order and stated that an order should have been obtained before oxygen was administered. Review of the facility’s “Oxygen Administration, Safety, Storage & Maintenance” policy showed that staff were required to verify a provider order prior to initiating or changing oxygen therapy, which was not followed in this case.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
