Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at St Luke's Helen G Nassif Transitional Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including dementia and Parkinson's, was not provided with necessary toileting assistance as per their care plan. Despite being frequently incontinent and requiring substantial assistance, the resident was left in a recliner for several hours after appearing to void in the chair, without receiving incontinence care. The facility lacked a specific policy on toileting, relying on the care plan, which was not followed in this instance.
The facility failed to review the Baseline Care Plan with a resident or their legal representative. The MDS Coordinator completed the plan electronically, but it was not provided to or discussed with the resident or family, despite the resident having moderate cognitive loss. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, and the facility's policy requiring documentation of the review was not followed.
Failure to Provide Toileting Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate toileting assistance to a resident diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, dementia, adult failure to thrive, and schizophrenia, who was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required substantial assistance with toileting and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The care plan directed staff to assist with toileting before and after meals, at bedtime, and as needed, as well as to provide incontinence care after each episode. However, on the observed date, the resident was not toileted after being moved from the dining room to a recliner in the lounge area, where he subsequently appeared to void in his chair. Despite the resident's apparent incontinence at 12:38 PM, staff did not provide toileting assistance or incontinence care for several hours. The resident remained in the recliner until at least 3:00 PM, with the carpet beneath him visibly stained. The Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that staff were expected to toilet residents before and after meals, at bedtime, and every two hours at night, but the facility lacked a specific policy on how and when to toilet residents, relying instead on the care plan. This oversight resulted in the resident sitting in soiled conditions for an extended period, indicating a failure to adhere to the care plan and provide necessary assistance.
Failure to Review Baseline Care Plan with Resident or Representative
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to address the Baseline Care Plan with the resident or the resident's legal representative for a resident who was admitted to the facility. The Baseline Care Plan was completed electronically by the MDS Coordinator, but the Resident and Resident Representative Signatures Lines were left blank, and there were no notations indicating that the Baseline Care Plan had been reviewed with the resident or family. The resident had a moderate cognitive loss, as indicated by a BIMS score of 10 out of 15. Progress notes from the relevant period lacked documentation that the resident or the resident's representative received a copy of the Baseline Care Plan or that it had been reviewed with them. Interviews with staff and the resident's family confirmed that the Baseline Care Plan was neither provided to nor discussed with the resident or their family. The MDS Coordinator and the DON had different understandings of the process, with the MDS Coordinator believing that the DON would handle the review and signature process. The DON acknowledged that the Baseline Care Plan should have been reviewed with the resident or family and documented accordingly, but this was not done. The facility's policy required that a written summary of the Baseline Care Plan be provided to the resident and their representative, with documentation in the medical record, but this was not followed in this case.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 107 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Cedar Rapids
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northbrook Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | — | 5 | 0 |
| Hiawatha Care Center | 1.9 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Cottage Grove Place | 2.3 mi | — | 2 | 1 |
| Harmony Cedar Rapids | 2.3 mi | — | 12 | 0 |
| Meth-wick Health Center | 2.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for St Luke's Helen G Nassif Transitional Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.