Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sheffield Care Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to submit accurate staffing data to CMS for FY 2024, Quarters 1-3, due to changes in the time clock system that led to incorrect report formatting. This resulted in a one-star staffing rating and issues like low weekend staffing and no RN hours, despite schedules showing appropriate coverage.
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an indwelling catheter and did not handle isolation laundry with appropriate PPE. A resident's room lacked EBP setup, and a laundry aide did not wear a gown when handling isolation laundry, contrary to facility policy. The facility's Director of Nursing and Administrator were unaware of EBP requirements until the survey.
The facility did not ensure that two Dietary Aides completed the required Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter Training within six months of their hire dates. Despite the facility's policy mandating such training, both employees' files lacked certification of completion. The Administrator and Administrative Assistant acknowledged this oversight.
Failure to Submit Accurate Staffing Data to CMS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for Fiscal Year 2024, Quarters 1, 2, and 3. This failure was identified through a review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, facility staffing review, policy review, and staff interviews. The facility, which reported a census of 56 residents, did not submit the required staffing data due to changes in the facility's time clock system. The Administrative Assistant/Office Manager was unaware of these changes, which resulted in the submitted reports being in an incorrect format for PBJ reporting. Consequently, the facility did not successfully submit the data for the specified quarters. The PBJ Staffing Data Reports for the mentioned quarters triggered several issues, including a failure to submit data for the quarter, a one-star staffing rating, excessively low weekend staffing, no RN hours, and a lack of licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day. Despite these findings, a review of nursing staffing schedules for August and September 2024 showed appropriate nursing staffing, with 8-hour daily RN coverage and 24-hour licensed nursing coverage. The facility's staffing policy, revised in October 2017, states that licensed nurses and certified nursing assistants are available 24 hours a day to provide direct resident care services, and staffing numbers are determined by the needs of the residents based on their care plans.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions and Proper Laundry Handling
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an indwelling catheter, as required to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Resident #23, who had intact cognition and a diagnosis of urine retention, did not have EBP set up in his room, which was confirmed during an interview with the resident. The facility's Director of Nursing and Administrator were unaware of EBP requirements until they reviewed information online during the survey. Additionally, the facility did not handle laundry from isolation rooms with the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). A laundry aide reported that she did not wear a gown when handling isolation laundry in red bags, although she used a mask, gloves, and face shield. The aide described her process of handling the laundry, which involved placing the bag on the ground and shaking its contents into the washing machine, without wearing a gown as required by the facility's policy. The facility's failure to implement EBP and handle isolation laundry with appropriate PPE was noted during the survey. The facility's linen, laundry, and textile handling policy required staff to handle all used laundry as potentially contaminated and to use standard precautions, including wearing gowns when sorting and rinsing. The facility's lack of adherence to these guidelines contributed to the identified deficiencies.
Failure to Complete Mandatory Abuse Training
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that two of its five employees, specifically Staff A and Staff B, met the requirements for Mandatory Adult Abuse Training. Staff A, a Dietary Aide, was hired on January 29, 2024, and was required to complete the two-hour Dependent Adult Abuse Mandatory Reporter Training by July 29, 2024. However, their employee file lacked a certification of completion. Similarly, Staff B, also a Dietary Aide, was hired on February 2, 2024, with a training due date of August 29, 2024, but their file also lacked the necessary certification. The facility's Abuse Prevention Policy, revised in December 2016, mandates staff training on abuse prevention, identification, and reporting, among other topics. During interviews, both the Administrator and the Administrative Assistant/Office Manager acknowledged that the employees should have completed the training within six months of their hire date, but they did not.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 36 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Sheffield
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Community Nursing Home | 6.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Franklin General Hospital | 10.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Rehabilitation Center Of Hampton | 10.8 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| I O O F Home And Community Therapy Center | 16.8 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Heritage Care And Rehabilitation Center | 17.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Sheffield Care Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.