Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Kennybrook Village during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to effectively implement a QAPI process to address repeat deficiencies related to following resident menus, as identified in consecutive surveys. Despite assigning staff to watch a video on diet portion sizes, there was no documentation of follow-up to assess the efficacy of the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
The facility did not follow dietary guidelines for two residents on pureed diets and all residents receiving gravy. Staff failed to measure and use appropriate scoop sizes, resulting in incorrect portion sizes. The facility's policy on portion sizes was not adhered to, leading to discrepancies in serving sizes for pureed pork, vegetables, and gravy.
The facility failed to maintain food at a safe and appetizing temperature during a lunch service. A Dietary Aide recorded the temperature of salmon croquettes at 123.5°F before service, below the required 135°F. After the meal, several items, including salmon croquettes, mashed potatoes, and egg rolls, were below the required temperature. The facility's policy states food must be above 135°F to prevent foodborne illness. The Administrator acknowledged the need for staff to ensure correct temperatures and report discrepancies.
The facility was found deficient in maintaining sanitary practices for food storage and handling. Observations revealed undated and unlabeled food items in the kitchen and improper hand hygiene by staff during food preparation. These actions violated the facility's policies on food safety and cross-contamination prevention.
Repeat Deficiencies in QAPI Process for Resident Menus
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in multiple repeat deficiencies during the current recertification and complaint survey. The facility had a census of 35 residents. The Provider History Report indicated that the facility received the same deficiency for three consecutive recertification surveys, specifically for failing to accurately follow resident menus. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) stated that all staff were assigned to watch a video on diet portion sizes as part of the QAPI Performance Improvement Plan (PIP). However, the Administrator acknowledged that there was no documentation of follow-up to assess the efficacy of the PIP, despite the facility's policy indicating that ongoing monitoring should be achieved using specific tools and that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee should monitor progress and provide input.
Failure to Follow Dietary Guidelines for Pureed Diets and Gravy Portions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to the prescribed dietary requirements for two residents on pureed diets and all residents receiving gravy. During meal preparation, Staff B, a cook, did not measure the total volume of pureed pork and failed to use the appropriate disher scoop size as per the facility's guidelines. Similarly, Staff C, a dietary aide, used a black handled scoop for gravy without knowing its size, which was later identified as a one-ounce scoop, resulting in under-serving. The menu specified a #6 scoop for pureed pork and a #12 scoop for pureed vegetables, but these were not followed, leading to significant discrepancies in portion sizes. The facility's policy on Kitchen Weights and Measures, revised in 2018, mandates that cooks and staff follow portion sizes per the menu using appropriate utensils. However, the staff did not comply with this policy, as evidenced by the incorrect serving sizes for pureed pork, vegetables, and gravy. The Certified Dietary Manager confirmed the use of a facility-specific conversion chart, but it was not effectively utilized by the staff. The administrator acknowledged that staff should adhere to the scoop diagram and menu serving sizes, indicating a lapse in following established procedures.
Failure to Maintain Safe Food Temperatures
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain food at a safe and appetizing temperature during a lunch service, as observed on January 8, 2023. Staff C, a Dietary Aide, recorded the temperature of salmon croquettes at 123.5°F before service, which is below the required 135°F to prevent the growth of pathogenic organisms. After the meal service, further temperature checks revealed that several menu items, including salmon croquettes, mashed potatoes, vegetable egg rolls, pureed pork, and mechanical soft egg rolls, were all below the required temperature. The facility's policy on food preparation and service, revised in October 2018, states that food must be maintained above 135°F to prevent foodborne illness. The Administrator acknowledged that staff should have ensured the food was at the correct temperature before serving and reported any discrepancies to the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM).
Sanitary Practices and Food Handling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary practices in food storage and handling, as observed during a survey. In the kitchen, multiple items in the refrigerator and freezer were found undated and unlabeled, including packs of hot-dog looking items, bags of grapes, a bottle of root beer, and various other food items. Additionally, the kitchen area and dry goods storage contained unlabeled and undated items, such as sugar bins with a scoop lying on top of the sugar, and bags of flaky and grain-shaped items. These observations indicate a lack of adherence to the facility's policy on food receiving and storage, which requires all foods to be labeled and dated. Furthermore, staff members were observed not following proper hand hygiene and glove use protocols. Staff A used the same gloves to handle a spray can and egg rolls without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene. Similarly, Staff B handled various food items and utensils without changing gloves or washing hands, including touching a freezer door, bread loaf, lunch meat, and a mustard container. These actions demonstrate a failure to prevent cross-contamination, as required by the facility's policies. The administrator acknowledged that staff should adhere to these policies to ensure food safety.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 279 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 3 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Grimes
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brio Of Johnston, Llc | 3.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Royal Oaks Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | 4.9 mi | — | 15 | 1 |
| Deerfield Health Care Center | 5.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Granger Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 5.2 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| The Village Of Legacy Pointe Nursing Facility | 5.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Kennybrook Village.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.