Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Correctionville Specialty Care during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing assistance to three residents due to staffing shortages. A resident with diabetes and a diabetic ulcer was not offered a bath since admission, while another with muscle wasting did not receive weekly baths as scheduled. A third resident with legal blindness also missed scheduled baths. Staff admitted to inaccurately documenting refusals due to previous instructions, highlighting discrepancies in care records.
A resident with polyneuropathy and moderate cognitive impairment experienced multiple unwitnessed falls, but the facility failed to complete required neurological assessments. Staff interviews indicated that the increased workload from recent admissions hindered their ability to perform necessary care.
The facility failed to maintain a safe environment for two residents, as TV cords were observed hanging close to call light strings, posing a potential hazard. A CNA and a resident's family member reported that a resident mistook the TV cords for the call light, nearly causing the TV to fall. The facility's policy did not address these hazards, and the Administrator acknowledged the issue upon observation.
The facility experienced delays in answering call lights, with residents waiting over 15 minutes for assistance due to staffing shortages. A resident reported waiting over an hour for bedtime care, while another expressed frustration over repeated delays. Staff interviews confirmed that insufficient staffing, particularly with new admissions, hindered timely responses. The facility's policy lacked a specified response time, though the Administrator indicated a 15-minute expectation.
The facility failed to update care plans for residents on psychotropic medications, omitting targeted behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions. This affected residents with conditions like anxiety, depression, and dementia, as their care plans lacked necessary details for monitoring behaviors. The DON was unaware of the requirement to include targeted behaviors in care plans.
The facility failed to submit accurate staffing reports to CMS, resulting in a one-star staffing rating. The DON worked extra shifts on nights and weekends, and an employee from the attached assisted living facility also worked hours that were not reported. This led to discrepancies in the reported staffing data.
An LPN failed to follow infection control protocols during blood sugar testing for two residents. The LPN did not use a protective barrier for testing supplies, neglected hand hygiene after glove removal, and did not sanitize the glucometer. The facility's policy requires these measures to prevent blood borne pathogen transmission.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing Assistance Due to Staffing Issues
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing assistance to three residents, leading to a deficiency in care. Resident #2, a new admission with diabetes mellitus and a diabetic ulcer, reported not being offered a bath since admission, despite being scheduled for baths twice a week. Documentation showed that baths were marked as not applicable on the scheduled days, indicating a lack of care provided. Resident #6, who has difficulty walking and muscle wasting, was scheduled for weekly baths but reported not receiving them consistently. Although staff documented refusals on two occasions, the resident denied refusing baths during the relevant period. This discrepancy suggests that the resident's needs were not met as per the care plan. Resident #9, with legal blindness and muscle weakness, also reported not receiving a bath since a specific date, despite being scheduled for assistance. Interviews with staff revealed that short staffing and the need for two-person assistance for many residents contributed to the failure to provide scheduled baths. Staff admitted to documenting refusals inaccurately due to instructions from a previous DON, further complicating the accuracy of care records.
Failure to Complete Neurological Assessments After Falls
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete necessary neurological assessments for a resident who experienced multiple unwitnessed falls. The resident, who had diagnoses of polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, and repeated falls, was documented to have moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 9. Despite the facility's policy requiring specific intervals for neurological assessments following a fall, the assessments were either not completed or improperly completed on several occasions. Interviews with staff revealed that the nursing team was struggling to keep up with the necessary care due to an increased workload from recent admissions. A registered nurse mentioned the difficulty in completing tasks due to the influx of new residents. The facility's administrator acknowledged the issue, noting that the staff needed time to adjust to the additional workload, which included eight new admissions over three weeks.
Hazardous TV Cord Placement in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents and hazards for two residents. Staff and family interviews revealed that one resident repeatedly pulled on TV wires, mistaking them for the call light, which almost resulted in the TV being pulled off the wall. Observations confirmed that the TV cords were hanging close to the call light strings in both residents' rooms, with the TVs positioned over their beds. The facility's Homelike Environment policy, last revised in February 2021, did not address these environmental hazards. The Administrator acknowledged the potential hazard upon observation and indicated that maintenance would address the issue.
Delayed Call Light Response Due to Staffing Shortages
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to consistently answer call lights within a reasonable amount of time, as reported by three residents. Resident #6, who had intact cognition and required assistance with transfers, reported waiting over 15 minutes for call lights 1-4 times a day. Resident #7, also with intact cognition, reported waiting over an hour most nights before 10 PM for assistance with bedtime care. Resident #9, who required partial assistance for daily activities, stated that call lights were answered after more than 15 minutes 2-3 times every evening, leading to frustration. Staff interviews revealed that the facility was short-staffed, contributing to delays in responding to call lights. Staff C, a CNA, mentioned that only two staff members were available on the floor, which was insufficient to meet the needs of new residents requiring two-person assistance. Staff A, an RN, confirmed that call lights took over 15 minutes to answer due to a lack of help, especially with recent admissions. The facility's policy on answering call lights did not specify a required response time, although the Administrator stated it should be within 15 minutes.
Failure to Revise Care Plans for Residents on Psychotropic Medications
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to review and revise care plans for four residents who were receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant, and psychotic medications. Specifically, the care plans did not identify the targeted behaviors for these residents, nor did they include non-pharmacological interventions or specify which behaviors staff should monitor. This deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews, affecting residents with various diagnoses such as anxiety disorder, depression, dementia, bipolar disease, schizophrenia, and delirium. Resident #3, with a BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment, was taking medications like Duloxetine and Aripiprazole but lacked a comprehensive care plan addressing targeted behaviors. Similarly, Resident #26, also with no cognitive impairment, was on medications such as Mirtazapine and Seroquel without a detailed care plan. Another resident, also identified as #3 in a separate instance, was on multiple medications including Clozapine and Quetiapine, yet their care plan was incomplete. Lastly, Resident #21, with severe cognitive impairment, was on medications like Escitalopram and Trazodone, but their care plan did not include necessary behavioral monitoring details. The Director of Nursing was unaware that targeted behaviors needed to be included in the care plans, which contributed to the oversight.
Inaccurate Staffing Reports Submitted to CMS
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to submit accurate staffing reports for the CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for the period of July 1 to September 30. The report triggered for excessively low weekend staffing and a one-star staffing rating. Upon review, it was found that the facility scheduled an extra CNA on weekdays to complete baths, and the Director of Nursing (DON) worked additional shifts on nights and weekends. However, these additional hours worked by the DON and an employee from the attached assisted living facility were not reported to CMS. The facility's policy, established in October 2017, requires that staffing and census information be reported electronically to CMS through the PBJ system in compliance with the Affordable Care Act. The policy outlines that direct-care staffing information should include staff hired directly by the facility, those hired through an agency, and contract employees. Despite this, the facility failed to include all worked hours in their reports, leading to inaccurate data submission. This discrepancy was confirmed during an interview with the Administrator and DON, who acknowledged the failure to report the worked hours accurately.
Infection Control Deficiency in Blood Sugar Testing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct blood sugar tests in a manner that protected residents from blood borne pathogens, as observed in two separate incidents involving Resident #3 and Resident #15. In the first incident, Staff A, an LPN, entered Resident #15's room with a bag of supplies for a blood sugar test and placed the testing supplies directly on the bedside table without using a protective barrier. After performing the blood sugar test, Staff A placed the glucometer back on the table without a barrier, failed to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves, and did not sanitize the glucometer before placing it back into the bag. In the second incident, Staff A used a wheelchair to transfer Resident #3 to the nurse's station and placed the blood sugar testing supplies directly on the countertop without a barrier. Similar to the first incident, Staff A failed to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves and did not sanitize the glucometer before placing it back into the bag. The facility's policy, dated October 2011, requires staff to clean reusable equipment per manufacturer instructions and perform hand hygiene after removing gloves. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staff should place a protective barrier between testing supplies and surfaces and perform hand hygiene immediately after glove removal.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 52 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Correctionville
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan - Holstein | 11.5 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Kingsley Specialty Care | 12.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Willow Dale Wellness Village | 14.7 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Careage Hills Rehabilitation And Healthcare | 22.2 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Maple Heights | 22.3 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Correctionville Specialty Care.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.