Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Avoca Specialty Care during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with diabetes, hypertension, and hypothyroidism did not receive physician-ordered laboratory tests, including A1c and other labs, as required. Despite clear orders documented in the EMR and care plan, staff failed to ensure the labs were completed, and there was no documentation of the required testing after a certain point. The DON and Administrator confirmed the orders were not followed, and the facility's policy did not specifically address adherence to physician orders.
Two residents who required assistance with bathing did not consistently receive scheduled baths or showers, and there was a lack of documentation showing that staff offered or encouraged bathing as required. One resident did not receive any baths during their stay, while another experienced gaps in bathing and inconsistent documentation, with staff and DON interviews confirming these deficiencies.
Multiple residents did not receive scheduled baths or timely toileting assistance due to staffing shortages and inconsistent follow-up, with documentation showing missed or unoffered baths, long wait times for call lights, and poor hygiene observed among residents. Staff interviews and resident council notes confirmed that care was often delayed or omitted, and facility procedures for documenting refusals and notifying supervisors were not consistently followed.
The facility did not maintain sufficient nursing staff to meet residents' needs, resulting in missed or delayed baths, long call light response times, and inadequate assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. Two residents reported infrequent bathing and extended waits for help, leading to accidents and discomfort. Staff interviews and documentation confirmed that care tasks were often postponed or missed due to staffing shortages, and support staff observed residents left in soiled conditions after night shifts.
The facility did not maintain complete and accurate records for several residents, including missing documentation of bathing refusals, behavioral incidents, and attempts to arrange telehealth appointments. Staff interviews confirmed that required documentation was often omitted, and care plans were not updated in a timely manner to reflect changes in resident needs.
A resident who required assistance for toileting and had no cognitive impairment was left waiting for help and subjected to dismissive treatment by two CNAs, with concerns not reported within the required timeframe. The LPN who witnessed the incident delayed reporting, and the facility's investigation was incomplete, lacking follow-up interviews with the resident, her roommate, and all relevant staff, as well as proper documentation of the resident's psychosocial status.
A resident who required substantial assistance for toileting was subjected to neglectful and condescending treatment by two CNAs, who delayed responding to call lights and refused to assist the resident to the bathroom without a mechanical lift. An LPN witnessed these actions but did not report the concerns to management or authorities within the required two-hour timeframe, resulting in a delayed report to the State Agency. Facility policy required immediate reporting of suspected abuse or neglect, but the process was not followed.
A facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of staff misconduct and possible mistreatment of a resident who required substantial assistance for toileting. The investigation lacked follow-up interviews with the resident after her report of being left without help, did not include input from her roommate or all relevant staff, and omitted documentation of psychosocial checks, contrary to facility policy.
A resident who became dependent on a mechanical lift for transfers did not have this change reflected in her care plan, despite staff using the lift and communicating the change verbally. The care plan and Kardex continued to indicate assistance of two staff without specifying the use of the EZ stand, and staff reported that care plans were not updated promptly, relying instead on verbal communication and the EHR.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and dementia, who required substantial assistance for toileting, repeatedly refused staff help and became verbally aggressive when told a mechanical lift was needed. Staff, including CNAs and an LPN, did not attempt further individualized interventions beyond documenting the refusals, despite facility policy requiring non-pharmacological approaches for problematic behaviors. The care plan directed calm communication, but no additional strategies were used when the resident continued to refuse care.
Surveyors found expired medications and supplies, including multiple bottles of Aspirin and a syringe, in the medication room and on medication carts. An LPN and a CMA were present during these findings, and staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices for checking expiration dates. The DON stated that both pharmacy and staff are responsible for reviewing items as they are stored, in accordance with facility policy.
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff, resulting in delayed call light responses for several residents. A resident with quadriplegia and another with Multiple Sclerosis reported significant delays, with staff confirming that insufficient staffing contributed to these issues. Another resident experienced long wait times affecting family visits, and a resident dependent on staff for transfers waited over an hour for assistance. The DON acknowledged the expectation for call lights to be answered within 15 minutes but noted the absence of a formal policy.
A facility failed to accurately assess a resident's use of an anticoagulant during the MDS observation period. The resident was documented as using an anticoagulant, but was only taking baby Aspirin, an anti-platelet. The MDS coordinator misidentified Aspirin as an anticoagulant due to the resident's history of blood clots, leading to incorrect coding on the MDS. The facility's policy requires accurate resident assessments, which was not followed.
A resident with quadriplegia and an enteral tube did not receive proper infection prevention measures during medication administration. A nurse failed to wear a gown, as required by the facility's enhanced barrier precautions policy for residents with indwelling medical devices. The Director of Nursing confirmed the expectation for appropriate PPE use, indicating a lapse in infection control protocols.
The facility failed to provide adequate bathing and personal hygiene care for several residents due to staffing shortages. Residents reported missed baths and inadequate grooming, with staff confirming that baths were not consistently completed. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the issue, stating that residents should receive baths twice a week unless they refuse, and that nail trimming should occur during bath times.
The facility experienced significant staffing shortages, resulting in delayed responses to resident call lights, with some waiting up to 40 minutes. Residents and staff reported consistent issues with insufficient staffing, particularly during evening and weekend shifts, affecting the quality of care. The DON acknowledged staffing was based on census rather than resident acuity, contributing to the problem.
The facility failed to maintain adequate kitchen staffing, leading to untrained staff from other departments, such as CNAs and LPNs, stepping in to perform dietary tasks. Residents expressed dissatisfaction with meal services, and staff reported being asked to assist in the kitchen without proper training or certification. The dietary manager's absence and the facility's inability to retain kitchen staff contributed to this issue.
The facility was found to have deficiencies in food storage and handling practices. Hamburger meat was improperly stored, and moldy green peppers were found in the cooler. A dietary aide used the same gloves for handling both dirty and clean dishes, violating infection control practices. Additionally, a staff member handled ready-to-eat food with bare hands, contrary to facility policy.
The facility failed to maintain resident dignity and respect, as evidenced by an LPN's inappropriate behavior towards multiple residents. A resident reported the LPN's dismissive and unhelpful attitude, while another overheard her using profane language and speaking negatively about residents. Staff interviews confirmed the LPN's frequent use of profanity and complaints about residents, impacting the residents' sense of dignity. The facility's policies emphasize treating residents with kindness and respect, which was not upheld in these instances.
A resident with mild cognitive impairment and identified as an elopement risk left the facility unsupervised. Staff failed to follow proper procedures when responding to a door alarm, assuming another staff member had triggered it. The resident was later found and returned without injury, but the incident highlighted inconsistencies in staff understanding and execution of elopement protocols.
The facility failed to dispose of room trays with leftover food in a timely manner, as trays were found in residents' rooms long after meals. A dietary aide noted finding dishes after weekends, and a resident reported uncollected dishes from breakfast and lunch. The DON acknowledged shared responsibility for tray collection but noted policy ambiguity regarding timing.
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and use of vape pens for two residents. One resident had vape pens in his room without documentation of his ability to smoke safely, while another used a THC and CBD vape pen indoors, contrary to the facility's smoking policy. The policy requires smoking evaluations and prohibits smoking inside, but the resident was found with a vape pen and THC gummies in her room, which were later removed.
Failure to Complete Physician-Ordered Laboratory Testing
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for laboratory testing for one resident with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hypothyroidism. The resident's care plan and electronic medical record (EMR) included multiple physician orders for A1c and other labs to be completed at specified intervals. Despite these orders, there was no documentation that the required labs were completed after a certain date. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that orders for A1c checks and other labs were not carried out as directed, and this was further corroborated by a review of the EMR and staff interviews. The deficiency was identified through interviews, record reviews, and policy review, which revealed that staff did not consistently enter or complete lab orders in the EMR as required. The DON and Administrator both stated their expectations that staff should enter and complete orders as directed, but the lack of documentation and follow-through resulted in missed laboratory testing for the resident. The facility's policy on medication and treatment orders did not specifically address the requirement to follow physician orders, contributing to the failure to ensure labs were completed as ordered.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing Assistance and Inadequate Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide scheduled bathing assistance to two residents who required help with activities of daily living. One resident, with diagnoses including cancer, anemia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, heart failure, and end stage renal disease, was admitted and discharged within a week and required assistance from one staff member for bathing. Despite being scheduled for sponge baths or showers twice weekly, there was no documentation that this resident received any baths during their stay, nor were there records of attempts to offer or encourage bathing. Another resident, with moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and a history of stroke, required substantial assistance for bathing. This resident was scheduled for baths or showers twice weekly, but records showed inconsistent documentation between electronic and paper forms. There was a period of several days without a documented bath, and no evidence of additional attempts to offer or encourage bathing after a refusal. Staff interviews confirmed that documentation practices were inconsistent and that required follow-up after refusals was not always performed or recorded.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Bathing and Timely Toileting Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that residents received baths at the frequency required by their care plans, specifically twice a week or as requested, for six residents reviewed. Documentation revealed multiple instances where baths were not offered or documented as being offered, particularly after a resident refused or when 'not applicable' was recorded. In several cases, there were extended periods where no bath was documented, and residents reported receiving baths far less frequently than scheduled. Some residents also reported not being offered alternative hygiene measures, such as washcloths for freshening up, when baths were missed. Additionally, the facility failed to provide timely toileting assistance for two residents. Residents described long wait times for call lights to be answered, sometimes up to an hour, resulting in incontinence episodes and discomfort. Staff interviews confirmed that staffing shortages contributed to delays in providing care, including both bathing and toileting assistance. Staff also reported that when there were not enough CNAs on shift, baths would be postponed or missed entirely, and documentation practices included marking 'not applicable' when baths were not completed due to staffing issues. Resident council notes and grievances further corroborated concerns about inadequate bathing and nail care. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent practices regarding documentation and follow-up when residents refused baths, as well as reliance on the next shift to complete missed baths. Observations of residents confirmed poor hygiene, such as long and dirty fingernails and strong odors, further evidencing the lack of consistent care. Facility policy required documentation of refusals and notification of supervisors, but these procedures were not consistently followed.
Failure to Provide Adequate Nursing Staff for Resident Care Needs
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to meet the daily needs of all residents, as evidenced by multiple observations, interviews, and documentation reviews. Residents reported not receiving scheduled baths, experiencing long wait times for call light responses, and not receiving timely assistance with toileting needs. For example, one resident with a left below-knee amputation and significant assistance needs stated he was only receiving one bath per week instead of the scheduled two, and sometimes went two weeks without a shower. He also described waiting up to 45 minutes for help during the day and having accidents due to delayed assistance, particularly at night when staff would turn off his call light while he was asleep without providing care. Another resident, who was dependent on staff for bathing and dressing, reported receiving a bath only once a month, despite preferring weekly baths. He also described long waits for call light responses, sometimes up to an hour, resulting in accidents while waiting for help with toileting. Observations confirmed that his fingernails were long and dirty, and a strong odor was present during care, indicating lapses in personal hygiene assistance. Staff interviews corroborated these issues, with CNAs and LPNs acknowledging that baths and other care tasks were often missed or delayed due to insufficient staffing, especially when only one or two CNAs were present on a shift. Resident council notes and grievance forms further documented ongoing concerns about inadequate staffing, missed baths, and long call light response times. Staff described a routine of passing missed baths to the next shift and documenting 'NA' when baths were not completed due to staffing shortages. The Director of Nursing confirmed that staffing levels were often insufficient, leading to delays or missed care, and that baths would be postponed when there were not enough staff members available. Housekeeping and laundry staff also reported finding residents soaked in bed in the mornings, particularly after night shifts with minimal staffing.
Failure to Maintain Complete and Accurate Medical Records
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for all seven residents reviewed, as evidenced by missing or incomplete documentation regarding bathing, behavioral incidents, and telehealth appointment attempts. For multiple residents, scheduled bath or shower documentation frequently indicated refusals or was marked as 'not applicable,' yet corresponding progress notes lacked explanations for these refusals or the reasons for the 'not applicable' entries. Facility policy required that refusals and interventions be documented, but this was not consistently done. Additionally, staff interviews confirmed that documentation of refusals and interventions was often omitted, and supervisors were not always notified as required. In the case of a resident with no cognitive impairment but significant physical care needs, there was a lack of documentation regarding behavioral incidents and refusals of care. Staff described episodes where the resident refused to use a mechanical lift for transfers, became combative, and refused assistance with toileting and hygiene. Despite these events, there were no corresponding progress notes or behavior documentation in the resident's record for the relevant period. The care plan also did not reflect the use of the mechanical lift until months after the resident began requiring it, and staff acknowledged that these behaviors and refusals should have been documented according to facility policy. Another resident's record lacked documentation of failed attempts to arrange telehealth appointments with a specialist. The resident reported being informed by the facility that the specialist discontinued services due to missed appointments and that the clinic was uncooperative in setting up telehealth visits. Management confirmed that communication with the clinic occurred but admitted that documentation of these efforts was not completed. These omissions in recordkeeping are contrary to accepted professional standards and the facility's own policies.
Failure to Timely Report and Investigate Alleged Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policies when concerns about the treatment of a resident were not reported within the required two-hour timeframe, and a thorough investigation was not completed. A staff LPN observed two CNAs neglecting call lights, delaying rounds, and interacting with a resident in a condescending and dismissive manner during the night shift. The resident, who had a BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment and required assistance for toileting, was denied timely help and subjected to inappropriate communication by staff. The LPN reported these concerns to a day shift RN but was unsure if further reporting occurred, and only provided a written statement to the DON after a delay of more than two days. The facility's investigative file revealed significant gaps in the investigation process. Although the facility's policy required immediate reporting of abuse allegations to the administrator and a thorough investigation, the initial report to the state agency was not made until several days after the incident. The investigation did not include follow-up interviews with the resident after her initial statement, nor did it include interviews with her roommate regarding the incident or with all staff who had contact with the resident during the relevant period. The social worker who interviewed the resident did not pursue further questions or follow-up, and the DON was unaware of key statements made by the resident. Documentation of the investigation was incomplete, lacking evidence of follow-up on the resident's psychosocial status and missing interviews with relevant staff and witnesses. The facility's own policies outlined the need for comprehensive documentation and interviews, but these steps were not fully carried out. The resident involved reported being left on the side of her bed for two hours in pain and feeling abused, but there was no documented follow-up to assess her well-being after the incident.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse and Neglect
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report concerns regarding the treatment of a resident within the required two-hour timeframe after the alleged incident was observed. According to the records, a resident with a BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment, who required substantial assistance for toileting and was frequently incontinent, was involved in an incident where two CNAs were observed neglecting call lights, delaying rounds, and interacting with residents in a condescending and dismissive manner. The CNAs were also reported to have refused to assist the resident to the bathroom without the use of a mechanical lift, despite the resident's insistence that she did not need it, and ultimately denied her request to use the bathroom. The LPN who witnessed these events reported that the CNAs left call lights unanswered for extended periods, failed to perform regular rounds, and did not provide basic care such as turning hospice residents or passing out ice water. The LPN observed the CNAs speaking to residents in a manner she found inappropriate and witnessed them laughing at and dismissing the resident's needs. The LPN did not immediately report these concerns to facility management or the appropriate authorities, instead waiting until after her next shift to provide a written statement to the DON. The facility's policy required that any suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation be reported immediately, defined as within two hours, to the administrator and other officials as required by law. However, the initial report to the State Agency was not made until several days after the incident, and the LPN acknowledged uncertainty about the reporting process and who to contact at the time. The delay in reporting was confirmed by both the LPN and the DON, who stated that the LPN was educated on the need for immediate reporting after the fact.
Failure to Conduct Thorough Investigation of Alleged Resident Mistreatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into allegations of staff misconduct and potential resident mistreatment. Documentation revealed that a resident, who had no cognitive impairment and required substantial assistance for toileting, reported being left on the side of her bed for two hours after being told by an aide that she would not be helped. The resident described experiencing pain as a result. Staff statements indicated that call lights were ignored for extended periods, rounds were delayed, and staff interactions with residents were at times rude and dismissive. An LPN observed aides refusing to assist residents promptly and speaking to them in a condescending manner, including an incident where a resident was denied bathroom assistance unless she agreed to use a mechanical lift, which she refused. The facility's investigative file included statements from some staff and a resident questionnaire, but lacked critical follow-up. There was no documented follow-up interview with the resident who made the abuse allegation to assess her psychosocial status after the incident. The investigative file also did not include an interview with the resident's roommate regarding the specific morning in question, nor were staff from all shifts who had contact with the resident after the alleged incident interviewed. Additionally, a key RN who was reportedly informed of the concerns was not interviewed, and attempts to contact her were unsuccessful. The facility's policy required thorough investigation of all allegations, including interviews with witnesses, the resident, staff from all shifts, and the resident's roommate, as well as complete documentation. The investigation did not meet these requirements, as several necessary interviews and follow-ups were omitted, and there was a lack of documentation regarding checks on the resident's well-being after the incident.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Change in Transfer Assistance
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to update the care plan for one resident after her transfer assistance needs changed to require the use of a mechanical lift (EZ stand). The resident, who had no cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting and transfers, experienced a decline in mobility and began requiring mechanical lift assistance. Despite this change, her care plan and bedside Kardex continued to document the need for substantial assistance of two staff for transfers, without specifying the use of the EZ stand. Staff interviews revealed that the change in transfer method was communicated verbally between shifts rather than through formal care plan updates. Multiple staff members, including CNAs and the LPN, confirmed that the resident's transfer method had changed and that the care plan was not updated to reflect this. The DON acknowledged that care plans should be updated as needed and that staff rely on the Kardex and EHR for resident care information. The facility's policy required comprehensive, person-centered care plans to be developed and implemented for each resident, but this was not followed in this instance, resulting in the care plan lacking documentation of the mechanical lift requirement.
Failure to Implement Individualized Interventions for Resident with Dementia-Related Behaviors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement additional individualized interventions for a resident with moderate cognitive impairment and dementia who exhibited behavioral issues during toileting assistance. The resident, who required substantial assistance for transfers and toileting and was frequently incontinent, refused staff help to use the bathroom and to be checked or changed when incontinent. Staff interactions revealed that the resident became upset and combative when told she needed to use a mechanical lift, refusing both the equipment and staff assistance, and using verbal aggression toward staff members. Staff interviews indicated that after the resident refused care, the CNAs and the LPN did not attempt further individualized approaches or interventions beyond documenting the refusal. The LPN declined to assist further, stating that nothing more could be done if the resident refused, and the CNAs continued to check on the resident but were unable to provide care due to her continued refusals. The staff did not attempt to involve other potential interventions, such as involving the nurse in a different approach or contacting the resident's family, despite the facility's policy on problematic behavior management and the DON's later statements about possible alternative strategies. The care plan for the resident included directions for staff to use calm communication and not to argue, but there was no evidence that additional or individualized non-pharmacological interventions were attempted when the resident refused care. The facility's policy required staff to identify and manage problematic behaviors with appropriate interventions, but in this instance, staff actions were limited to initial attempts and documentation, without further escalation or adaptation to the resident's behavioral needs.
Expired Medications and Supplies Found in Medication Storage Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors observed that medications and supplies in the medication room and on medication carts were not consistently stored within their expiration dates. During a medication room inspection with an LPN present, 12 unopened bottles of Aspirin 81 mg were found to be expired. The LPN stated she believed the DON had overlooked these items. Additionally, a check of two medication carts with a CMA present revealed an expired, empty syringe and an opened bottle of expired Aspirin 81 mg filled to the rim. The CMA was informed of the expired items at the time of the observation. Staff interviews indicated a lack of consistent oversight regarding expired items. One LPN denied having issues with expired items, stating that if expired items are found, they are usually treatment supplies that are rarely used and are discarded when noticed. The DON reported that she attempts to review the medication room and that the pharmacy conducts monthly checks, with staff also reviewing medications and supplies as they are put away. The facility's policy requires all drugs and biologicals to be stored in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.
Inadequate Staffing Leads to Delayed Call Light Responses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate nursing staff to ensure timely response to call lights, compromising resident safety. Resident #15, who has quadriplegia and is dependent on staff for various activities, reported that call lights often took longer than 20 minutes to be answered, with delays extending up to an hour during overnight shifts. Observations confirmed that call lights in Resident #15's room were not answered promptly. Similarly, Resident #20, diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis, experienced delays of up to 30 minutes or more for call light responses, as corroborated by staff interviews indicating that insufficient staffing contributed to these delays. Resident #37, who requires assistance with transfers, reported long wait times for call light responses, affecting her ability to accommodate family visits. Resident #21, who is totally dependent on staff for transfers, recounted an incident where he waited over an hour on a bedpan for assistance. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the facility's expectation for call lights to be answered within 15 minutes but admitted there was no formal policy in place. These findings highlight the facility's failure to meet the needs of residents due to inadequate staffing levels, as evidenced by the delayed response to call lights.
Inaccurate Assessment of Anticoagulant Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately assess the use of an anticoagulant for a resident during the observation period of the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The MDS for the resident documented the use of an anticoagulant, but upon review, it was found that the resident was only taking baby Aspirin, which is an anti-platelet, not an anticoagulant. The resident confirmed that the only blood thinner they took was baby Aspirin. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed a physician's order for Aspirin 81 mg daily for pain. The MDS coordinator identified Aspirin as an anticoagulant due to the resident's history of blood clots. However, the Regional Clinical Reimbursement Specialist clarified that Aspirin should be coded as an anti-platelet according to RAI guidelines, indicating the MDS was incorrectly coded. The facility's policy requires the MDS Coordinator to ensure accurate resident assessments, which was not adhered to in this case.
Infection Control Lapse in Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to appropriate infection prevention practices during medication administration for a resident with an enteral tube. The resident, who had a BIMS score indicating no cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of quadriplegia, was observed receiving medication through an enteral tube by a registered nurse. Although the nurse completed hand hygiene and wore gloves, they did not don a gown as required by the facility's policy for enhanced barrier precautions for residents with indwelling medical devices such as feeding tubes. The facility's policy, aligned with CDC guidelines, mandates the use of personal protective equipment, including gowns, during high-contact care activities for residents with indwelling medical devices, regardless of their MDRO colonization status. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation was for staff to wear appropriate PPE, including gowns, during such procedures. The failure to follow these precautions was acknowledged by the Director of Nursing, highlighting a lapse in adherence to infection control protocols.
Inadequate Bathing and Hygiene Care Due to Staffing Issues
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate bathing and personal hygiene care for several residents, as observed through clinical record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews. Resident #5, who required assistance from two staff members for bathing, did not receive a bath on one scheduled day, and reported receiving only one bath per week due to staff shortages. Resident #8, who required total assistance for bathing, was found to have long fingernails and reported not having a bath for a month, with no staff offering or explaining the lack of bathing services. Resident #9, who required assistance from two staff members for bathing, went ten days without a bath, despite being scheduled for three baths a week. His son confirmed the inconsistency in bathing schedules and noted that staff often cited understaffing as the reason for missed baths. Resident #11, who required partial assistance with personal hygiene, was observed with long leg hair and stated that staff did not assist with shaving, although she desired it. Staff interviews revealed that baths were not consistently completed due to insufficient staffing, with some staff stating that baths were not done on evening shifts unless there was enough staff. The Director of Nursing confirmed that residents should receive baths twice a week unless they refuse, and that nail trimming should occur during bath times. The facility's policies emphasized the importance of maintaining residents' personal hygiene and dignity, which were not upheld in these instances.
Staffing Shortages Lead to Delayed Call Light Responses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of residents, particularly in answering call lights in a timely manner. Observations on a specific date revealed numerous call lights going unanswered for extended periods, ranging from 16 to 40 minutes. This issue was corroborated by resident council meeting notes and grievance forms, where residents consistently reported delays in call light responses. For instance, Resident #9 expressed frustration over the time it took to get assistance, and Resident #6 reported waiting 45 minutes in soiled conditions before receiving help. Interviews with staff and residents further highlighted the staffing inadequacies. Staff members, including CNAs, reported that call lights could take over 30 minutes to be answered due to insufficient staffing levels. They described scenarios where only two CNAs were available to assist a significant number of residents, many of whom required two-person assistance for transfers. This staffing shortage was particularly acute during evening and weekend shifts, leading to delays in attending to residents' needs and completing routine tasks. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that staffing was based on census rather than resident acuity, which contributed to the problem. Despite the expectation that call lights be answered within 15 minutes, this standard was not consistently met. The DON admitted that while efforts were made to increase staffing, call-ins and other issues often left the facility understaffed, impacting the quality of care provided to residents.
Inadequate Kitchen Staffing Leads to Unqualified Staff Performing Dietary Tasks
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that qualified staff were consistently available to assist in the kitchen, leading to untrained staff from other departments stepping in to perform dietary tasks. This issue was highlighted by grievances from residents who expressed dissatisfaction with meal services, such as not receiving ordered meals and being asked to prepare their own food. The facility's census was reported to be 30 residents, and the dietary manager's unexpected absence exacerbated the staffing shortage, prompting the administrator to pull staff from other departments to fill in. Multiple staff members, including CNAs, nurses, and maintenance personnel, reported being asked to assist in the kitchen without proper training or certification. Some staff members, like Staff E CNA, were involved in cooking meals despite lacking dietary certifications, relying instead on previous experience and kitchen charts to guide them. Others, like Staff P LPN, assisted with meal service under the supervision of the dietary manager, who was unable to perform her duties due to medical reasons. The facility's job descriptions for CNAs and cooks did not include kitchen duties for CNAs, indicating a misalignment between staff roles and responsibilities. Despite the lack of formal training, staff were frequently asked to perform dietary tasks, such as serving meals and preparing room trays, due to the facility's inability to maintain adequate kitchen staffing. This situation persisted over several months, with staff expressing concerns about their lack of training and the facility's reliance on unqualified personnel to meet dietary needs.
Food Storage and Handling Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner, as observed during a survey. On two separate occasions, hamburger meat was found in a gray hard plastic bin with red, bloody fluid at the bottom, indicating improper storage. Additionally, moldy green peppers were found in the walk-in cooler, suggesting a lack of proper food inspection and disposal. These observations were made despite the facility's policy requiring food to be stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. In the dish area, a dietary aide was observed using the same pair of gloves to handle both dirty and clean dishes, violating infection control practices. The aide moved a trash can, handled clean dishes, and cleaned the dirty side of the dish area without changing gloves or washing hands between tasks. This practice was contrary to the facility's policy, which requires handwashing between tasks to prevent cross-contamination. Furthermore, a staff member was seen handling ready-to-eat food with bare hands, contrary to the facility's policy that prohibits direct contact with food without gloves. The staff member plated sandwiches and handled various items without wearing gloves, even after touching her hairline and clothing. This behavior was inconsistent with the facility's guidelines, which mandate the use of gloves or utensils when serving ready-to-eat foods.
Failure to Maintain Resident Dignity and Respect
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to uphold the residents' rights to dignity and respect, as evidenced by the behavior of Staff P, an LPN, towards multiple residents. Resident #5, with no cognitive impairment, reported that Staff P was dismissive and unhelpful, refusing to assist her roommate and declining to turn off the overhead light when requested. Resident #6, also cognitively intact, overheard Staff P using profane language and speaking negatively about residents while at the nurse's station. Resident #8, who communicates using a board, indicated that Staff P was not nice when speaking with him. These interactions suggest a pattern of disrespectful communication by Staff P, impacting the residents' sense of dignity. Interviews with other staff members corroborated the residents' accounts, with several CNAs and LPNs acknowledging Staff P's use of inappropriate language and negative comments about residents. Staff I and Staff E reported that Staff P frequently used profanity and complained about residents, while Staff H noted that Resident #5 refused treatment from Staff P due to her demeanor. The Director of Nursing was informed of these issues and acknowledged the need to address the negative environment created by Staff P's behavior. The facility's policies on resident rights and dignity emphasize the importance of treating residents with kindness and respect, which was not upheld in these instances.
Failure to Supervise Resident Leads to Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adequately supervise a cognitively impaired resident, leading to an elopement incident. The resident, who had a BIMS score indicating mild cognitive impairment and was identified as an elopement risk, left the building without staff knowledge. On the day of the incident, staff responded to an alarmed door but did not physically check outside to confirm if a resident had exited. The staff member assumed they saw another staff member and did not initiate a head count to ensure all residents were accounted for. The resident was later found by an Assisted Living (AL) attendant and returned to the facility without injuries. The facility's investigation revealed that the staff member who responded to the alarm did not follow proper procedures, such as going outside to check for residents or conducting a head count. The facility's policy and procedures for responding to door alarms were not effectively followed, contributing to the resident's unsupervised exit. Interviews with staff indicated a lack of consistent understanding and execution of the facility's elopement protocols. Some staff members were unaware of the need to conduct a head count or physically check outside when an alarm sounded. The facility's documentation and training on elopement prevention and response were insufficient, as evidenced by the staff's varied responses and the absence of a clear protocol for handling such incidents.
Improper Disposal of Room Trays
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly dispose of room trays with leftover food in a timely manner, as observed during a survey. On multiple occasions, trays with leftover food and drinks were found in residents' rooms long after meals were served. For instance, a dietary aide reported finding dishes in residents' rooms after returning from a weekend off, indicating that trays were not collected promptly. Additionally, a resident reported that her dishes from breakfast and lunch were not picked up until after she had gone to the dining room for dinner. Another resident's room was observed with a plate, silverware, and a coffee mug left on the bedside table for an extended period. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the responsibility for collecting room trays is shared between dietary and nursing staff, but noted that there is some ambiguity in the facility's policy regarding the timing of tray collection. The policy states that trays should be collected within an hour of meal completion, but the Director mentioned that it is often left to the discretion of the resident. The facility's meal times are set, but the lack of adherence to the policy resulted in trays being left in rooms for prolonged periods, contributing to the deficiency.
Improper Storage and Use of Vape Pens
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper storage and use of vape pens for two residents. Resident #6 had three vape pens observed in his room without any documentation in his clinical record regarding his ability to smoke with or without supervision. Additionally, Resident #6 was seen outside with staff assistance using his vape pen. Resident #7 also had no documentation in her clinical record about her ability to smoke with or without supervision. Staff were aware that Resident #7 used her vape pen in her room, which contained THC and CBD, and she claimed it was prescribed for pain management. Despite the facility's policy requiring smoking evaluations and designated smoking areas, Resident #7 used her vape pen indoors. The facility's smoking policy, revised in 2017, mandates that residents be informed of designated smoking areas and evaluated for their ability to smoke safely. The policy prohibits smoking inside the facility and requires that residents with smoking privileges not keep smoking articles in their possession. However, Resident #7 was found with a vape pen and THC gummies in her room, which were later removed by management after a police officer's visit. The Director of Nursing confirmed that Resident #7 had not been going outside to smoke as required by the policy, and the resident was educated about the prohibition of such items in the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 70 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Avoca
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elm Crest Retirement Community | 10.3 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Oakland Manor | 13.1 mi | — | 31 | 0 |
| Salem Lutheran Home | 18 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Heritage House | 21.3 mi | — | 8 | 0 |
| Atlantic Specialty Care | 21.7 mi | — | 9 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Avoca Specialty Care.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.