Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around February 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Harmony Health And Rehabilitation during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to provide timely SNFABN/NOMC notices for two residents receiving skilled therapy. In both cases, the ABN was signed after therapy had already ended, while the residents remained in the facility. The SSD said she completed the forms but did not know the required timeframe and did not have a policy for the NOMC/ABN process.
Failure to provide required transfer and bed-hold notices: A resident with intact cognition, osteomyelitis, and an amputation was sent from a vascular appointment to the hospital and later returned to the facility. Staff reported that bed-hold forms were handled informally, the BOM was not notified of written transfer notices, and the ombudsman was not notified of hospital transfers. The Administrator was unsure about written transfer notices with appeal rights and ombudsman contact information, and the facility policy required written bed-hold information within 24 hours of an emergency transfer.
Failure to complete baseline care plans for two newly admitted residents. One resident’s EMR showed admission documentation but no baseline care plan in the Evaluation tab, and staff including the MDSC, Administrator, and an LPN confirmed it was not done. The second resident had diagnoses including DM, weakness, dementia, MDD, and HTN, with diet and code status orders documented, but no evidence the baseline care plan was developed, provided, or reviewed; the MDSC, DON, and UM2 confirmed it had not been completed.
A resident with ESRD and scheduled hemodialysis had incomplete dialysis coordination and documentation. The facility record lacked orders for dialysis site or pre-/post-dialysis assessments, and dialysis communication forms were often incomplete, with missing pre-dialysis information, weights, fluid removal, and vital signs. Staff also reported difficulty obtaining information from the dialysis center, and the administrator stated there was no formal contract or agreement with the dialysis provider.
A resident with hemiplegia, contractures, seizures, and dementia—requiring two-person assist for all ADLs—sustained fractures after falling from bed during incontinent care provided by only one CNA, contrary to the care plan. The care plan interventions for fall prevention were not followed, and staff interviews confirmed care plans were not consistently updated or adhered to.
A resident with significant physical and cognitive impairments, requiring two-person assist for all ADLs and transfers, was left unattended by a CNA during incontinent care. The resident rolled out of bed and sustained fractures to the left femur and right tibia. Staff interviews and documentation confirmed the resident's need for two-person assistance was clearly indicated in the care plan and electronic records, but this protocol was not followed, resulting in actual harm.
The facility did not ensure that wound care treatments were accurately documented for three residents with pressure ulcers, resulting in multiple missed entries on the Treatment Administration Record despite physician orders and facility policy requiring timely documentation. The DON confirmed that nurses performed the treatments but failed to record them, leading to incomplete medical records.
The facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary condition, as a black substance was found inside during an inspection. Additionally, two dietary staff members were observed without hairnets in the kitchen, despite being aware of the requirement. The facility's policy on cleaning and staff head covering was not adequately enforced.
The facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection prevention training program for staff, as outlined in their policy. The DON could not provide documentation of in-service training, and an LPN showed confusion about Enhanced Barrier Precautions, indicating a lack of understanding of infection control measures. This deficiency could increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections.
A resident with a long history of smoking was denied the right to smoke by the Interim DON due to health concerns, without a physician's order or updated care plan. Despite having little cognitive impairment, the resident was not allowed to attend smoke breaks, causing distress. The facility's policy emphasizes respecting residents' autonomy, including their choice to smoke.
The facility failed to follow care plans for three residents, leading to deficiencies in oxygen therapy and catheter management. One resident received oxygen at a higher flow rate than prescribed, while another's catheter drainage bag was placed on the floor without care plan documentation. A third resident adjusted their oxygen flow rate without this behavior being care planned. Staff confirmed these discrepancies, indicating lapses in adhering to and updating care plans.
A facility failed to ensure proper administration of inhaled medication for a resident with COPD and pneumonia. An RN administered a Trelegy inhaler without instructing the resident to rinse their mouth afterward, contrary to the DON's expectations. The facility lacked a policy for inhaled medication administration, contributing to this deficiency.
A resident with COPD and pneumonia was observed receiving oxygen at three liters per minute, contrary to the physician's order of two liters per minute. This discrepancy was confirmed by an LPN, who acknowledged the incorrect setting. The facility's policy requires verification of physician orders, which was not followed, potentially putting the resident at risk.
The facility failed to follow infection control practices during medication administration and catheter management for two residents. An LPN did not perform hand hygiene during medication administration, and another LPN handled medication with bare hands and did not sanitize between glove changes. A resident's catheter bag was found on the floor, contrary to infection control protocols. Additionally, the facility's infection control policies had not been reviewed annually as required.
A resident with a history of wandering and multiple behavioral health diagnoses eloped from a secure unit and was found outside the facility. Despite facility policy requiring notification, staff interviews and record review showed that neither the physician nor the responsible party were informed of the incident, and no documentation of such notification was found.
A resident with a history of wandering and multiple behavioral health diagnoses eloped from the facility, but the care plan was not updated to reflect this incident. Although several staff members were aware of the event and documentation confirmed the resident exited through a non-secure door, the MDS Coordinator did not revise the care plan due to being unaware of the elopement.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering was able to exit the facility unsupervised through a side door, despite being assessed as at risk for elopement and assigned to a secure unit. Staff interviews and maintenance records revealed lapses in supervision and door security, as well as confusion among staff regarding the resident's location and the events leading up to the elopement.
Late SNFABN Notices for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide Form CMS-10055, Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), in a timely manner for two residents reviewed for liability notices. For one resident, the record showed skilled therapy services were scheduled to end on 12/10/2025, but the SNF ABN was signed on 12/22/2025, 11 days after therapy services ended. The resident remained in the facility after the end of skilled therapy services, and the Administrator stated the resident still had skilled benefit days remaining. For the second resident, the record showed skilled services ended on 12/18/2025, but the SNF ABN was signed on 12/22/2025, 4 days after therapy services ended. This resident also remained in the facility after the end of skilled therapy services. The Social Services Director stated she completed the SNFABN documents but was not aware of a specific time frame for completion and did not have a policy and procedure for the NOMC/ABN. The Therapy Director stated she informed the team during morning meetings when a resident would be coming off therapy services and that the Social Worker was given the information three days prior to therapy ending.
Failure to Provide Transfer and Bed-Hold Notices
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the ombudsman and failed to provide a resident and the resident's representative with the required written transfer and bed-hold notices after an emergency hospital transfer for R87. R87 was originally admitted to the facility and later readmitted, with diagnoses including osteomyelitis and acquired absence of the left foot. The quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/21/26 showed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Progress notes documented that R87 was out of the facility for a vascular appointment on 02/02/2026 and was admitted to the hospital the same day, then returned to the facility on 02/13/2026 via stretcher. Interviews showed that the Social Services Director had no role in providing bed-hold or written transfer notices. The Business Office Manager stated nurses completed bed-hold forms when residents were sent to the hospital and placed copies under her door, but she was unaware of any written transfer notice and did not notify the ombudsman of transfers or discharges. An LPN confirmed that when a resident was transferred to the hospital, information including a bed-hold notice was sent with the resident and a copy was placed under the BOM's door. The Administrator stated residents were given a bed-hold policy when leaving, was unsure about any written notice of transfer that included appeal rights and ombudsman contact information, and did not have a policy for that notice. The facility policy titled Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer stated that before transfer to the hospital or therapeutic leave, the resident and/or representative would be provided written information about bed-hold and reserve bed payment policies, and that in an emergency transfer the facility would provide written notice of its bed-hold policies within 24 hours.
Failure to Complete Baseline Care Plans for Two Newly Admitted Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for two of 27 sampled residents, R85 and R29. Review of R85’s EMR showed an admission date of 10/31/2025, but there was no documentation in the Evaluation tab that the baseline care plan had been completed. During interview, the MDSC stated that it is the nurse’s responsibility to complete the baseline care plan at the time of admission and said it did not appear to have been done for R85. The Administrator also confirmed that R85’s baseline care plan was not done and stated that the care plan would be located in the EMR under the Evaluation tab. The Administrator further stated the facility did not have a policy for baseline care plans, and an LPN stated she did not know about doing a baseline care plan at the time of admission and that the charge nurse only completes the Nursing Admission/readmission Evaluation document. Review of R29’s EMR showed admission with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, dementia, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Physician orders included a regular diet, mechanical soft with chopped meats texture, thin liquids, and full code status. The EMR contained no documentation that a baseline care plan was developed upon admission or that it was generated, provided, or reviewed with R29 or the resident’s representative. The MDSC stated the baseline care plan is conducted by the unit nurse and confirmed it had not been completed for R29. The DON stated that when a resident is admitted, the admission assessment is completed by the nurse and an initial baseline care plan is generated, but said there was miscommunication and the baseline care plan for R29 was not completed. UM2 also confirmed that R29’s baseline care plan had not been completed.
Dialysis Care Not Properly Coordinated or Documented
Penalty
Summary
Safe, appropriate dialysis care/services were not provided for a resident with ESRD and dependence on renal dialysis. The resident was admitted with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and was scheduled for hemodialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday at an outside dialysis center. The care plan included instructions not to draw blood or take blood pressure in the arm with the graft, encourage attendance at scheduled dialysis, monitor labs, and monitor vital signs, but the only related orders in the record were for Enhanced Barrier Precautions and the hemodialysis schedule. There were no orders for assessment of the dialysis site or for pre- or post-dialysis resident assessments. Review of dialysis communication forms from 01/01/2026 through 03/03/2026 showed communication on 14 of 16 dialysis treatments, but the pre-dialysis section was not filled out or was only partially filled out on 12 of 14 forms. The dialysis center information was missing weights, fluid removed, and/or vital signs on nine dates. The post-dialysis section, which included assessment of the shunt/catheter and vital signs, was completed and signed by the dialysis center on seven occasions. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility nurse was expected to complete the pre-dialysis section, that the unit manager had difficulty obtaining post-weights and often left messages that were not returned, and that the DON was unsure who was responsible for the post-assessment portion. The administrator stated the dialysis center refused to provide a contract or formal agreement with the facility.
Failure to Follow Care Plan for Fall Prevention Results in Resident Injury
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when staff failed to follow the care plan interventions related to fall prevention for a resident with significant medical and cognitive impairments. The resident had a history of hemiplegia, contractures in both knees, seizures, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL), including transfers, which required assistance from two or more staff members. The care plan specifically identified the resident as being at risk for falls and required a two-person assist for ADL care due to extensive assistance needs and confusion, including delusions about being able to walk. Despite these documented needs and interventions, only one CNA provided incontinent care, during which the resident rolled out of bed and fell to the floor. As a result, the resident sustained a distal fracture of the left femur and a fracture of the lower end of the right tibia. Review of facility policy and interviews confirmed that care plans were not consistently updated or followed, and the required two-person assist was not provided at the time of the incident.
Failure to Provide Required Two-Person Assist Results in Resident Fall and Fractures
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident who required a two-person assist for all activities of daily living (ADL) care and transfers was provided incontinent care by only one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). During this care, the resident rolled out of bed and fell to the floor, resulting in a distal fracture of the left femur and a fracture of the lower end of the right tibia. The resident's care plan and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment clearly indicated the need for two-person assistance due to significant physical and cognitive impairments, including hemiplegia, contractures, seizures, altered mental status, and a history of attempting to get out of bed unassisted. The facility's policy on incidents and accidents required staff to provide immediate assistance and follow established protocols to prevent accidents. However, interviews and record reviews revealed that the CNA entered the resident's room alone to provide care, contrary to the care plan and facility policy. The CNA left the resident on his side to retrieve an item from the hallway, during which time the resident continued to roll and fell from the bed. Documentation in the electronic medical record and staff interviews confirmed that the resident was dependent on staff for all ADLs and required two-person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Further interviews with facility staff, including the Administrator, LPNs, and other CNAs, confirmed that the resident's need for two-person assistance was documented in the care plan, Kardex, and Point Click Care (PCC) system. Staff were expected to communicate changes in resident care needs during shift changes and to verify assistance requirements in the PCC system. Despite these protocols, the failure to provide adequate supervision and follow the resident's care plan directly led to the resident's fall and subsequent injuries.
Failure to Document Wound Care Treatments as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure accurate and complete documentation of wound care treatments for three residents with pressure ulcers. For one resident with multiple chronic conditions, including congestive heart failure and peripheral vascular disease, there was no documentation on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for several dates when wound care was ordered. Another resident with diabetes and a chronic venous ulcer also had missing documentation on the TAR for multiple dates in both May and June, despite physician orders specifying wound care on certain days. A third resident with a history of diabetic foot ulcer and other chronic illnesses similarly had gaps in documentation for ordered wound treatments. The facility's policy required that wound treatments be documented at the time of each treatment, and if no treatment was due, the status of the dressing should be recorded each shift. However, review of the TARs showed that documentation was not consistently completed as required. The Director of Nursing confirmed that, although nurses were performing the treatments, they were not documenting them on the TARs, leading to incomplete medical records for these residents.
Deficiencies in Ice Machine Sanitation and Staff Head Covering
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a clean and sanitary condition, as evidenced by the presence of a black substance on the upper inside of the machine. This was observed during an inspection in the main kitchen, where a white napkin used to wipe the area revealed the black substance. The facility's policy on cleaning the ice machine and equipment was reviewed, which outlined procedures for regular cleaning and sanitization. However, the observation indicated that these procedures were not adequately followed, as the ice machine was not maintained in a clean state. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate head coverings in the food service area. During the inspection, two dietary staff members, identified as Dishwasher AA and Dishwasher BB, were observed without hairnets. Interviews with the staff confirmed that they were aware of the requirement to wear hairnets upon entering the kitchen but failed to do so. The Dietary Manager also confirmed that staff had been in-serviced about wearing hairnets and that hairnets were available outside the kitchen. This oversight in enforcing the use of hairnets further contributed to the facility's failure to adhere to professional standards in food service areas.
Deficiency in Infection Prevention Training Program
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to establish, implement, and sustain a comprehensive training program for all staff, which included education on standards, policies, and procedures for infection prevention. The facility's policy titled 'Annual Inservice Education for Long Term Care 2024' outlined an annual education calendar that was supposed to be implemented each year, covering various topics including infection control and prevention. However, the facility was unable to provide documentation of in-service training provided to staff, indicating a lapse in the execution of the training program. During the survey, the Director of Nursing (DON) admitted to being unable to locate any records of in-service education provided by the previous DON. Additionally, an LPN expressed confusion about Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during an interview, revealing a lack of understanding of the difference between EBP and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). The LPN was also unsure about the documentation process for this information in the resident's chart. This lack of training and understanding among staff had the potential to increase the risk of healthcare-associated infections and compromise the quality of care provided to the residents.
Resident's Right to Smoke Denied Without Proper Assessment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination and dignity by not allowing them to exercise their right to smoke. The resident, who had a history of smoking a pack a day for over 50 years, was restricted from smoking by the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) due to health concerns such as pneumonia, coughing, and lips turning blue. However, this decision was made without a physician's order, an updated care plan, or a completed smoking assessment indicating that the resident was ineligible to smoke. The facility's policy on Resident Rights and Dignity Management emphasizes the importance of respecting residents' autonomy, including their choice to smoke. The resident, identified as having schizoaffective disorder bipolar, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emphysema, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating little to no cognitive impairment. Despite this, the resident was not allowed to attend the designated smoke break, which was confirmed through observation and interviews. The Nurse Practitioner noted that the resident should have been informed about the potential health risks of smoking but still allowed to make their own decision. The resident expressed that the restriction on smoking was causing more harm than good, as it significantly reduced their smoking from three to four cigarettes per day to none.
Failure to Follow Care Plans for Oxygen Therapy and Catheter Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the care plan was followed for three residents, leading to deficiencies in their care. For one resident with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia, the care plan required oxygen therapy at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. However, observations revealed that the oxygen was being delivered at 3 liters per minute, contrary to the physician's order. This discrepancy was confirmed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and the Unit Manager, who acknowledged that the care plan was not being adhered to. Another resident with neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and other conditions had an indwelling catheter. The care plan did not address the placement of the catheter drainage bag, which was observed lying on the floor during multiple visits. An LPN confirmed that the bag was placed on the floor to facilitate drainage, but this practice was not included in the care plan. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that this situation needed to be care planned, indicating a lapse in updating the care plan to reflect the resident's needs. The third resident, diagnosed with COPD and chronic respiratory failure, was observed receiving oxygen at a higher flow rate than prescribed. The resident adjusted the oxygen flow rate himself, setting it at 4 liters per minute instead of the ordered 2 liters. An LPN confirmed that the resident had been educated about the risks of adjusting the oxygen flow, but the behavior was not care planned. The MDS Coordinator and DON both acknowledged that the resident's behavior should have been included in the care plan, highlighting a failure to document and address the resident's actions in the care plan.
Failure to Ensure Proper Administration of Inhaled Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure proper administration of inhaled respiratory medication for a resident diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia. During an observation, a Registered Nurse (RN) prepared and administered a Trelegy inhaler to the resident without instructing them to rinse their mouth afterward, which is a standard practice to prevent potential side effects. The RN confirmed in an interview that she does not typically instruct residents to rinse their mouths after using inhalers, although some staff do. The facility did not provide a policy for administering inhaled medications when requested. The Director of Nurses (DON) stated that it is her expectation for residents to rinse their mouths after receiving inhaled medications. The resident's care plan included administering aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered and monitoring for side effects, but the lack of mouth rinsing was not addressed. This oversight in following proper medication administration procedures was identified as a deficiency during the survey.
Failure to Administer Oxygen Therapy as Ordered
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer oxygen therapy to a resident, identified as R24, in accordance with the physician's orders. R24, who was admitted with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia, was observed receiving oxygen at a rate of three liters per minute via nasal cannula, despite the physician's order specifying two liters per minute as needed for shortness of breath. This discrepancy was confirmed by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) during an observation and interview, who acknowledged that the oxygen concentrator was set incorrectly. The facility's policy on Respiratory System Management requires verification of the physician's order in the resident's clinical record, which was not adhered to in this case. The resident's care plan, which included monitoring for signs of acute respiratory insufficiency and ensuring oxygen settings as ordered, was not followed. Interviews with the LPN and the Unit Manager confirmed that it is the responsibility of the nursing staff to ensure compliance with physician orders and care plans, which was not done in this instance, potentially putting the resident at risk for medical complications.
Infection Control Deficiencies in Medication Administration and Catheter Management
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper infection control practices during medication administration for two residents. During an observation, an LPN did not perform hand hygiene before or after preparing and administering medications to a resident with acute and chronic respiratory failure and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The LPN admitted to not following the hand hygiene protocol. In another instance, a different LPN handled a medication capsule with bare hands and failed to perform hand hygiene between glove changes during medication administration. The facility also failed to ensure proper management of an indwelling catheter for a resident with neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, colostomy malfunction, and chronic viral hepatitis C. Observations revealed that the resident's catheter bag was repeatedly found lying on the floor, which was confirmed by an LPN who stated that it was necessary for drainage. The Director of Nurses acknowledged that a catheter bag should never be on the floor and should be placed on a barrier if necessary. Additionally, the facility did not review its infection control policies and procedures annually as required. The Infection Control Manual had not been updated for over a year, with the last revision dated September 2023. The Director of Nurses confirmed the oversight and indicated that the facility would begin updating the policies and procedures.
Failure to Notify Physician and Responsible Party After Resident Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to notify the physician and responsible party following an elopement incident involving a resident with a history of wandering and elopement risk. The facility's own Elopement Management policy required that, after an elopement, a progress note be completed in the clinical record with an accurate timeline of events and that both the medical doctor and responsible party be notified and documentation of this notification be made. Review of the clinical record for the resident, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unsteadiness on feet, revealed no evidence that such notifications were made after the resident left the secure unit and exited the facility. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was found outside the facility and returned to the secure unit, but staff could not recall the exact date of the incident. One LPN stated she found the resident outside and returned him to the secure unit, while another LPN, who was working on the secure unit at the time, was unaware of the incident and did not notify the physician or responsible party. A CNA also recalled the resident leaving the facility but did not provide further details regarding notification. Documentation, including a maintenance request, confirmed the resident exited through a side door, but there was no record of required notifications being made.
Failure to Update Care Plan After Resident Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise and update the care plan for one resident following an elopement event. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unsteadiness on feet, was assessed as exhibiting wandering behavior and was independent in mobility and ambulation. The resident's care plan, initiated previously, identified a risk for elopement and included placement on a secure unit. However, after the resident eloped from the facility, there was no evidence that the care plan was updated to reflect this incident, as required by the facility's Elopement Standard and Task List. Staff interviews revealed that multiple staff members were aware of the resident's elopement, with one LPN finding the resident outside and a CNA recalling the incident. Despite this, the MDS Coordinator confirmed she was unaware of the elopement at the time, which resulted in the care plan not being revised. Documentation, including a maintenance request, confirmed the resident exited through a side door not associated with the secure unit. The lack of care plan revision following the elopement constituted the identified deficiency.
Failure to Prevent Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision and Door Security
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and secure the environment to prevent elopement for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering. The resident, who had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unsteadiness on feet, was assessed as being at risk for elopement and was supposed to reside on a secure unit. Despite these precautions, the resident was able to exit the facility through a side door on the North Hall, which was not the secure unit assigned at the time. Staff interviews and maintenance records confirmed that the resident was found outside the facility and brought back inside, with uncertainty about how the resident exited and which unit the resident was residing on at the time. The facility's Elopement Standard required accurate documentation and supervision for residents at risk of elopement, but the incident revealed lapses in both supervision and door security. Maintenance logs showed the door had been checked and passed prior to the incident, but the resident was still able to exit. Staff accounts indicated confusion regarding the resident's whereabouts and the timeline of events, and there was a lack of clarity about which staff were responsible for the resident's supervision at the time of the elopement. The failure to secure the door and provide adequate supervision directly led to the resident's unsupervised exit from the facility.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 61 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Fitzgerald
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pruitthealth - Fitzgerald | 2 mi | — | 4 | 0 |
| Palemon Gaskins Mem Nsg Home | 7.6 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| Pruitthealth - Ocilla | 7.8 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Abbeville Crossing Of Journey Llc | 19.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Rehabilitation Center Of South Georgia | 21.3 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Harmony Health And Rehabilitation.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.