Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Margate Health And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
The facility failed to follow infection control protocols in three areas: laundry aides handled clean linens without PPE, an LPN cleaned a glucometer without gloves, and a Unit Manager did not adhere to Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with a sacral wound. These deficiencies were acknowledged by facility staff and management.
A resident with Hemiplegia and Anemia was not provided necessary assistance during dining, despite requiring substantial help. Observations showed the resident was left unattended with meal trays, leading to unsuccessful eating attempts and food spillage. Staff interviews revealed misunderstandings about the resident's needs, with a CNA incorrectly stating the resident could eat alone, while the dietitian confirmed the need for assistance.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment experienced a delay in receiving emergency dental care due to communication issues and lack of follow-up by the facility. Despite repeated complaints of tooth pain and administration of pain medication, the resident was not seen by a dentist for over a month after a consult was ordered.
The facility failed to provide meals in accordance with Mechanical Soft Diet guidelines, affecting several residents. Observations revealed that vegetables were not adequately cooked or cut, making them difficult to eat. Interviews with staff confirmed the meals did not meet the required standards for residents with cognitive impairments.
Infection Control Deficiencies in PPE Usage and Protocol Adherence
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to proper infection prevention and control protocols in three distinct areas. Firstly, during a laundry room tour, it was observed that laundry aides were handling clean resident linens and gowns without wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), such as aprons. The aides were seen folding linens in their facility uniforms, which they wore from home to work, allowing the linens to come into contact with their clothing. This practice was acknowledged by the Maintenance/Housekeeping Director and the Administrator as not meeting the facility's standards. Secondly, during a glucometer observation for a resident with multiple diagnoses including diabetes and dementia, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed cleaning the glucometer machine with bare hands instead of wearing gloves as required by the facility's policy. The LPN repeated this action multiple times during the observation, despite acknowledging that gloves should have been worn. This lapse in protocol was also recognized by the Registered Nurse Unit Manager and the Director of Nursing. Lastly, the facility did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a sacral wound. A Unit Manager was observed interacting with the resident and handling linens without wearing gloves or performing hand hygiene, despite the presence of a CDC EBP sign on the resident's door. The Unit Manager also failed to encourage the resident to perform hand hygiene before eating. These actions were shared with the Administrator during an interview.
Failure to Assist Resident During Dining
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide necessary assistance during dining for a resident who required substantial/maximal assistance. The resident, diagnosed with Hemiplegia and Anemia, was observed multiple times attempting to eat meals without staff assistance, despite being assessed as needing significant help during dining. Observations revealed the resident was left unattended with meal trays, resulting in unsuccessful attempts to eat and food spillage. The resident's care plan indicated the need for meal intake observation and reporting of lack of intake, which was not adhered to. Interviews with facility staff revealed discrepancies in understanding the resident's needs. The MDS assessment coordinator clarified that substantial/maximal assistance meant staff should perform more than 50% of the feeding work, requiring handover hand assistance throughout mealtime. However, a CNA incorrectly stated that the resident could eat alone and did not need assistance. The facility's dietitian confirmed the resident's need for meal assistance and highlighted the importance of consuming fortified meals, as the resident was also on a tube feeding regimen to supplement nutritional intake.
Failure to Provide Emergency Dental Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide emergency dental services for a resident with severe cognitive impairment, who was admitted with diagnoses including aphasia following cerebral infarction and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The resident, who had a BIMS score of 1, indicated pain on the left side of her face during an interview with a surveyor. Despite this, there was no documentation of pain relief or nursing notes regarding tooth pain on the day the pain was first reported. The resident had a history of tooth pain, as evidenced by the administration of acetaminophen for toothache on multiple occasions, yet there was a significant delay in dental consultation. A dental consult was ordered on a specific date, but the dentist did not see the resident until over a month later. The dentist was unaware of the resident's tooth pain, which contributed to the delay in care. Communication issues were noted, including a change in social workers and a lack of follow-up by the facility when the resident continued to complain of tooth pain. Interviews with staff revealed a lack of awareness and documentation regarding the resident's dental issues, indicating a breakdown in the facility's process for addressing dental emergencies.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Mechanical Soft Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide food in a form that meets the needs of residents on Mechanical Soft Diets, as observed during dining for six residents. The facility's diet guidelines specify that vegetables should be well-cooked and diced, and starches like pasta should be diced soft. However, during observations, it was noted that the vegetables served were over 2 inches in length, partially cooked, and difficult to cut with a fork, which is not in compliance with the guidelines for a Mechanical Soft Diet. Resident #127, who has moderate cognitive impairment, was observed struggling with the meal provided, which included pasta and California vegetables that were not adequately prepared for a Mechanical Soft Diet. Similarly, Resident #22, with severe cognitive impairment, expressed difficulty in eating the vegetables due to their size and texture, stating they made her sick. Other residents, including Resident #101, Resident #47, Resident #104, and Resident #24, were also served meals that did not meet the dietary requirements, with vegetables and pasta that were not appropriately prepared. Interviews with the facility's Speech Therapist and Dietitian confirmed that the vegetables should be soft enough to be easily cut with a fork, which was not the case during the observations. The deficiency was consistent across multiple residents, indicating a systemic issue in the preparation of meals for those on Mechanical Soft Diets, leading to non-compliance with the dietary needs of the residents.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 248 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Margate
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solaris Healthcare Coconut Creek | 1.6 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| John Knox Village Of Pompano Beach | 4.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Pompano Health And Rehabilitation Center | 5.1 mi | — | 21 | 0 |
| Tamarac Center For Rehabilitation And Healing | 5.1 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Deerfield Beach Health And Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Margate Health And Rehabilitation Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.