Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
A standard survey is most likely before around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Life Care Center At Inverrary during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with multiple diagnoses, including Dementia and Hypertension, received Atenolol despite a heart rate below the prescribed parameter, and a Multivitamin without the required minerals. Staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner, and the correct supplement was not available in the medication cart.
The facility failed to initiate care plans and accurately assess five residents for the use of bed rails. Additionally, the facility did not honor a resident's representative's decision to decline the use of bed rails and failed to obtain orders for another resident. The Director of Rehabilitation confirmed that the rails being used were not the recommended type.
The facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by not timely relaying the Consulting Pharmacist's recommendations to the resident's Psychiatrist. Despite the recommendation for a gradual dose reduction of Risperidone, the Primary Care Physician did not discuss this with the resident's Guardian or Psychiatrist in a timely manner, leading to the deficiency.
The facility failed to secure OTC and prescription medications, as well as a nebulizer treatment, for a resident with severe dementia. An LPN left the medications unattended during administration, making them accessible to the resident and others. Both the LPN and RN/ADON acknowledged the error.
The facility failed to properly clean and disinfect a glucometer between uses for four residents, did not perform adequate hand hygiene during medication administration for four residents, and did not implement proper Contact Precautions signage for a resident with MRSA. These deficiencies were observed and confirmed through staff interviews and record reviews.
Failure to Follow Physician's Orders for Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician's orders for medication administration for Resident #51, who was readmitted with multiple diagnoses including Dementia, Hypertension, and Anemia. The resident's April 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented orders for Atenolol 25mg daily with parameters to hold the medication if the heart rate was less than 60 bpm and notify the physician, and a Multivitamin with minerals supplement daily for Anemia. On 04/15/24, Staff C administered Atenolol to the resident despite a documented heart rate of 55 bpm and did not notify the physician until 2.5 hours later after surveyor intervention. Additionally, Staff C administered a Multivitamin without the required minerals because the correct supplement was not available in the medication cart. Interviews with Staff C and Staff D confirmed that the physician's orders were not followed. Staff C was unaware of the parameters for Atenolol and acknowledged the error in administering the Multivitamin without minerals. The Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of these findings and acknowledged the failure to follow physician orders for both the antihypertensive medication and the multivitamin supplement.
Failure to Assess and Plan for Bed Rail Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to initiate care plans for the use of bed rails and accurately assess five residents for the use of side rails. The facility's policy required residents to be assessed upon admission, readmission, or upon initiation of bed rails, and reassessed quarterly or with a change of condition. However, the facility did not follow these procedures for Residents #25, #46, #89, #258, and #259. Additionally, the facility did not honor a resident's representative's decision to decline the use of bed rails for Resident #258 and failed to obtain orders for the use of bed rails for Resident #259. Resident #25 had a doctor's order for side rails for support and stability during transfers and bed mobility, but there was no care plan or assessment to determine the potential risks associated with the use of bed rails. Similarly, Resident #46 had orders for side rails but lacked a care plan and assessment. Resident #46 expressed dissatisfaction with the bed rails, stating they were installed to prevent falls, although the resident had no issues with falling out of bed. The Director of Rehabilitation confirmed that the rails being used were half rails and not the recommended quarter rails. Resident #89 had half bed rails in place, but there was no care plan or assessment to determine the potential risks. The resident's ex-wife mentioned that the rails had been on the bed before a fall occurred. Resident #258 had half rails in place despite the resident's representative declining their use. There was no care plan or assessment for the potential risks associated with the use of bed rails. Resident #259 also had half rails in place without any orders, care plan, or assessment to determine the potential risks. The Director of Rehabilitation confirmed that the rails were half side rails and not quarter rails, which would have been more appropriate for the residents' needs.
Failure to Timely Relay Pharmacist's Recommendations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications by not timely relaying the Consulting Pharmacist's recommendations to the resident's Psychiatrist. The resident, who had diagnoses of Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Psychosis, was prescribed Risperidone and Sertraline. Despite the Consulting Pharmacist's recommendation for a gradual dose reduction (GDR) of Risperidone, the Primary Care Physician (PCP) did not discuss this recommendation with the resident's Guardian or Psychiatrist in a timely manner. The resident's behavior had been controlled, and she did not exhibit any abnormal behaviors. The PCP initially denied the GDR recommendation without providing additional rationale and acknowledged during an interview that he had not yet discussed the recommendation with the Guardian or Psychiatrist. The Guardian confirmed that she had not been contacted about the medication changes and stated that the Psychiatrist would need to decide on the GDR. The PCP eventually contacted the Psychiatrist to inform him of the Pharmacist's recommendation, but this was done only after the surveyor's inquiry. The delay in communication and action regarding the GDR recommendation led to the deficiency, as the facility did not ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications in a timely manner.
Failure to Secure Medications in Locked Dementia Unit
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to secure over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription medications, as well as a nebulizer treatment medication solution, for a resident with severe dementia. During a medication administration observation, an LPN was seen placing a cup with eleven different medications and a nebulizer treatment on a tray next to the resident's bed. The LPN then left the medications unattended while washing her hands in the bathroom, making the medications accessible to the resident, other wandering residents, staff members, and visitors. This incident occurred in the facility's locked dementia unit, which houses residents who ambulate and wander throughout the unit. In a subsequent observation, the same LPN placed the resident's medication tray with a nebulizer treatment on the bedside table and left the room to obtain applesauce, again leaving the medication unattended. The resident's medical records did not indicate any self-assessment allowing her to administer her own medications. Both the LPN and the RN/ADON acknowledged that the medications should not have been left unattended. The DON also recognized that the medications should have been secured and not left unattended at the resident's bedside.
Infection Control and Hand Hygiene Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to clean and disinfect the glucometer per manufacturer's instructions for four residents. Staff A, an LPN, was observed using a single glucometer for multiple residents without proper disinfection between uses. Instead of using the recommended Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes, Staff A used alcohol wipes, which is not in accordance with the facility's policy. Additionally, the glucometer was stored without being cleaned and disinfected after use, as confirmed by the Director of Nursing (DON) during an interview. This failure to follow proper cleaning protocols was observed during blood glucose monitoring for Residents #29, #70, #80, and #93. The facility also failed to properly perform hand hygiene during medication administration for four residents. Staff A was observed washing her hands for only five to six seconds after administering medications to two residents and did not use hand sanitizer afterward. Additionally, Staff A did not don gloves while administering eye drops to another resident and washed her hands for only ten seconds afterward. Staff B, an RN, was also observed exiting a resident's room without performing hand hygiene after medication administration. These observations were made during medication administration for Residents #52, #76, #77, and #78. Furthermore, the facility failed to implement proper signage for Contact Precautions as per Physician's orders for a resident with MRSA. Resident #311, who had a diagnosis of MRSA in the wound and was receiving antibiotics via an IV midline, was observed to have an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign instead of the required Contact Precautions sign. This discrepancy was confirmed by the DON, who acknowledged that the posted signage did not follow the Physician's orders. The failure to implement proper signage was observed during a tour of the unit and confirmed through interviews with staff and record reviews.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 292 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 1 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Lauderhill
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palms Care Center And Rehab | 0.6 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Nspire Healthcare Lauderhill | 0.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| St Johns Nursing Center | 1.7 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Nspire Healthcare Plantation | 2.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Springtree Rehabilitation & Health Care Center | 2.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Life Care Center At Inverrary.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.