Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Gardens Court during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Three residents reported incidents of undignified treatment by staff, including rough handling, yelling, and ignoring preferences. One resident was left alone in the bathroom, another was yelled at about bed height, and a third was forced to use a heavy blanket. These actions violated the facility's policy on resident dignity and respect.
The facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care. One resident had conflicting catheter orders and no documentation of refusal to use an anchor. Another resident had an undocumented dressing on a skin tear, and a third resident experienced issues with a wound VAC, with no clear documentation of actions taken. These deficiencies highlight a failure in maintaining complete and accurate records.
Failure to Uphold Resident Dignity and Respect
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to treat three residents with dignity and respect, as required by their policy. Resident #67, who was cognitively intact and hard of hearing, reported that a CNA, referred to as Staff A, threw a washcloth at her, left her alone in the bathroom, and was rough during care. Additionally, Staff A placed Resident #67's food tray on the counter instead of the table and screamed at her when asked to move it. Resident #67 expressed fear of retaliation and did not report the incidents initially. Resident #103, also cognitively intact, reported an incident with a nurse who yelled at him about the height of his bed during the night. The nurse made a sarcastic comment about putting the bed on the roof when he gets home. Resident #103 did not feel it was verbal abuse but did not feel treated with dignity. He mentioned the incident to his therapist but did not report it further. Resident #35, with minimal cognitive impairment, stated that some staff members were mean, providing an example of being forced to have a heavy blanket over him despite his preference not to. He was unable to provide further examples but reiterated that some staff were mean. These incidents highlight a failure to uphold the residents' rights to dignity and respect as outlined in the facility's policy.
Deficiencies in Medical Record Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation in the medical records for three residents, leading to deficiencies in care. For one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter, there were conflicting orders for catheter sizes and a lack of documentation regarding the use of an anchoring device to prevent infections. The resident expressed a preference not to use the anchor, but this refusal and the associated risks were not documented in the medical record. The Unit Manager acknowledged the absence of documentation regarding the resident's refusal and the need for an anchor. Another resident, who had a skin tear on the left elbow, was observed with a gauze wrap on the elbow, but there was no documentation of this dressing in the medical records. The resident and staff were uncertain about the dressing's purpose, and the Wound Care Nurse was unaware of any issues or dressings related to the elbow. Upon review, the electronic record lacked any documentation of the elbow condition or the dressing applied, indicating a failure in maintaining accurate medical records. For a third resident, who had undergone joint replacement surgery, there was a lack of documentation regarding the management of a wound VAC. The resident reported that the VAC had stopped working, and the staff was unsure of the appropriate actions to take. Although the wound VAC company and the surgeon's office were contacted, the medical records did not reflect these communications or any subsequent orders for care. This lack of documentation and clarity in the medical records highlights a deficiency in the facility's ability to maintain accurate and complete records for resident care.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 98 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Palm Beach Gardens
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursing Center At La Posada, The | 0.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Prosper Health And Rehabilitation Center | 1.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Waterford, The | 2.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Luxe At Jupiter Rehabilitation Center (the) | 3.2 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Chatsworth At Pga National | 3.6 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Gardens Court.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.