Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Centre Pointe Health And Rehab Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident's tube feeding was not administered according to physician orders, with discrepancies in the feeding rate and water flush observed over two days. The facility's policy on enteral feeding was not followed, leading to the deficiency.
The facility failed to properly document vaccination consents for three residents. One resident's consent form was signed by a nurse instead of the representative, while two other residents' forms were either undated or lacked indication of vaccination request or refusal. The Infection Preventionist acknowledged these oversights, which were against the facility's policy requiring clear documentation of vaccine decisions upon admission.
A facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a resident's CPAP machine, despite its presence in the resident's room and inclusion in the care plan. The resident, with diagnoses of COPD and sleep apnea, had a previous CPAP order that was discontinued, leaving no active order. The DON confirmed the absence of an active order, contrary to the facility's policy requiring such verification.
A resident readmitted with an unstageable pressure ulcer did not receive specific treatment for the ulcer until two days after arrival. The facility's wound care specialist and DON confirmed the delay, noting that initial care only included a barrier cream for incontinence, not the necessary wound care.
The facility failed to ensure that wound care documentation was completed for two residents. One resident had missing documentation for nystatin-triamcinolone cream and zinc barrier cream applications, while another resident had missing documentation for Triad Hydrophilic Wound Dress Paste applications. Both residents reported inconsistencies in their wound care treatments.
Failure to Follow Physician Orders for Tube Feeding
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to physician orders for tube feeding administration for a resident. During a facility tour, it was observed that the resident's tube feeding pump was present, but the prescribed tube feeding formulary was not infusing. Subsequent observations revealed that the resident was receiving Osmolite 1.5 at a rate of 65 mL/hr with a water flush of 240 mL every 4 hours, which did not align with the physician's order of 55 mL/hr for 22 hours with a water bolus of 200 mL every 4 hours. This discrepancy was noted on multiple occasions over two days. Interviews with facility staff, including a registered nurse and the administration, confirmed the oversight. The registered nurse acknowledged the error and adjusted the feeding rate to match the physician's order. The facility's policy on enteral feeding, which requires verification of physician orders and setting the proper rate on the pump, was not followed, leading to the deficiency. The administration conducted an audit and discovered the incorrect feeding and water flush rates for the resident.
Failure to Properly Document Vaccination Consents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly offer and document influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 vaccinations for three residents. For one resident, the consent form was signed by a nurse instead of the resident's designated representative, indicating a failure to obtain proper consent. Another resident's consent form was undated and did not specify whether the resident requested or refused the vaccinations. Similarly, a third resident's consent form was dated but also lacked an indication of whether the resident requested or refused the vaccinations. During an interview, the facility's Infection Preventionist acknowledged these oversights, stating that the consent forms should have been signed by the resident or their representative, dated, and should have clearly indicated the resident's decision regarding the vaccinations. The facility's policy requires documentation of the resident's request or refusal of vaccines upon admission, with instructions for the resident or legal representative to mark their decision and sign and date the form. These procedural lapses led to the deficiency noted in the report.
Failure to Obtain Physician's Order for CPAP Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine for one of the residents reviewed. During an observation, a CPAP machine was noted in the resident's room, but a review of the medical records showed no active physician's order for its use. The resident had been readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and sleep apnea, conditions that typically require CPAP therapy. Although there was a previous order for CPAP use, it had been discontinued, and the current care plan still included CPAP interventions without a corresponding active physician's order. The Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no active order for the CPAP machine, despite the resident's care plan indicating its use. The facility's policy on CPAP use, dated 2017, requires verification of a physician's order, including specific settings and usage instructions, which was not adhered to in this case.
Failure to Provide Timely Pressure Ulcer Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide timely treatment for a pressure ulcer upon the admission of a resident. The resident was readmitted to the facility with a new diagnosis of an unstageable pressure ulcer in the sacral region. Despite the resident's condition and incontinence of bladder and bowel, the admission orders did not include specific treatment for the pressure ulcer until two days after arrival. The physician's order for the necessary wound care was only issued on the third day after the resident's readmission, which included the application of Dakin's solution, Santyl ointment, and hydrogel, followed by covering the wound with a foam dressing. Interviews with the facility's wound care specialist and the Director of Nursing confirmed the delay in providing appropriate treatment for the pressure ulcer. The wound care specialist acknowledged that the resident should have been admitted with orders for pressure ulcer care. The Director of Nursing stated that the resident's skin was treated with a barrier cream upon arrival, consistent with the facility's protocol for incontinent residents, but verified that the specific wound care order was not issued until two days later. This delay in treatment was a significant oversight in the care of the resident's pressure ulcer.
Failure to Document Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that wound care documentation was completed for two residents. Resident #2 had a physician's order for nystatin-triamcinolone cream twice a day for skin management starting on 4/24/24. However, the Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that documentation was not completed on the evening shift of 4/25/24 and the day shift of 4/27/24. Additionally, another physician's order for zinc barrier cream to be applied twice a day starting on 3/24/24 was not documented on multiple occasions, including 4/21/24 at 9:00 am and 6:00 pm, 4/25/24 at 6:00 pm, and 4/27/24 at 9:00 am. Resident #2 expressed concerns about the inconsistency of her wound care during an interview on 4/30/24. Resident #3 had a physician's order for Triad Hydrophilic Wound Dress Paste to be applied to the sacrum and buttocks every shift starting on 4/4/24. The MAR revealed that documentation was not completed for the daytime applications on 4/16/24 and 4/21/24, and for the evening applications on 4/14/24, 4/15/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, and 4/25/24. Resident #3 also reported missed wound care treatments during an interview on 4/30/24. The Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the lack of documentation and stated that facility protocols require documentation if treatment was given, refused, or the reason it was not given.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 49 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Tallahassee
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviata At Tallahassee | 0.8 mi | — | 24 | 0 |
| Seven Hills Health & Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Aviata At The Gardens - Tallahassee | 1.2 mi | — | 10 | 0 |
| Tallahassee Memorial Hospital Extended Care | 1.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Westminster Oaks | 2.1 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Centre Pointe Health And Rehab Center.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.