Biscayne Health And Rehabilitation Center
Inspection history, citations, penalties and survey trends for this long-term care facility in North Miami, Florida.
- Location
- 12505 Ne 16th Ave, North Miami, Florida 33161
- CMS Provider Number
- 105008
- Inspections on file
- 23
- Latest survey
- October 31, 2024
- Citations (last 12 mo.)
- 8
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Biscayne Health And Rehabilitation Center during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Surveyors found multiple medicated ointments and topical solutions left at the bedside instead of in locked storage, including Diclofenac on a sink, a hydrophilic wound dressing in a basket on a nightstand for a severely cognitively impaired resident, and Ciclopirox solution on another nightstand. Facility policy requires all drugs and biologicals to be stored in locked compartments, and staff, including an LPN, the wound care nurse, and a CNA, stated that medications and ointments are to be kept on locked carts and not in resident rooms, yet these items remained accessible in resident rooms in violation of that policy.
A resident with peripheral vascular disease and a Stage 4 pressure ulcer had a physician’s order for Tramadol to be given on the day shift 30 minutes before wound care, consistent with the care plan and the facility’s pressure ulcer protocol requiring pain assessment and documentation. Review of the MAR for one month showed multiple missing nurse signatures for this ordered pain medication and several entries marked “out of parameters” by an RN without any corresponding progress notes, while the Treatment Record showed that daily wound care was performed. During observed wound care the resident denied pain, and the Wound Care Nurse reported she checks the MAR to verify medication administration, while the DON stated nurses must follow physician orders and document refusals, highlighting that the medical record did not contain complete and accurate documentation of the ordered pre-wound-care pain medication.
Surveyors identified multiple failures to maintain a safe environment, including a razor left on a sink in a cognitively intact resident’s room, that resident’s personal razors stored in a nightstand despite facility rules prohibiting razors in rooms, an LPN discarding unused lancets into regular trash instead of a sharps container after a blood glucose check, and unattended housekeeping carts on an upper floor with germicidal wipes left on top and easily accessible, contrary to facility policy requiring chemicals to be locked in cart compartments.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to keep the environment free of accident hazards when a resident’s room contained an unattended shaving razor on the sink and additional razors in a nightstand, despite leadership stating razors were not permitted in resident rooms. An LPN disposed of unused lancets in regular trash instead of a sharps container, contrary to acknowledged policy. On two occasions, an unattended housekeeping cart on an upper floor had germicidal wipes left on top and easily accessible, even though housekeeping leadership and staff stated that chemicals and disinfectant wipes were to be kept locked in the cart for safety.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to follow its own medication storage policy when medicated ointments and solutions were left unsecured in several resident rooms. A resident with heart failure had Diclofenac ointment on the sink, another resident with bladder cancer had Ciclopirox topical solution on the nightstand, and a severely cognitively impaired resident with a history of cerebral infarction had hydrophilic wound dressing stored in a bedside basket on multiple observations. Staff, including an LPN, a wound care nurse, and the ADON, stated that medications and ointments were supposed to be kept on locked carts and not at the bedside, and that residents were not permitted to keep medications in their rooms, demonstrating noncompliance with the facility’s written storage policy and federal requirements.
A resident with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer and a physician’s order for Tramadol 50 mg to be given on the day shift 30 minutes before wound care had multiple missing and unexplained entries on the MAR, even though the Treatment Record showed that wound care was performed daily. On several days, there were no nurse signatures for the ordered Tramadol, and on other days the MAR was marked as “out of parameters” without any supporting progress notes. The wound care nurse reported relying on the MAR to confirm that pain medication was given before she performed wound care, and the DON stated that nurses are expected to follow physician orders and document refusals, but the record did not contain adequate documentation to demonstrate proper administration or explanation of the ordered pain medication.
Surveyors found that the facility’s QAPI/QAA program was ineffective in correcting repeated deficiencies related to improper medication storage (F0761). Despite having a written QAPI policy, holding monthly QAA Committee meetings attended by the administrator, DON, medical director, and other department heads, and reporting that direct care staff were invited to participate, the same medication storage deficiency previously cited during an earlier survey recurred. With 94 residents in care, the facility’s QAPI activities did not produce an effective plan of action to resolve and prevent the ongoing medication storage problem.
Surveyors found that a cognitively impaired, functionally dependent resident with aphasia did not have a working bedside call light on multiple observations, and the alternative bell was placed out of reach on top of a mini refrigerator. The resident’s care plan and MDS documented extensive ADL assistance needs and fall/safety precautions. The Maintenance Director reported being unaware of the inoperable call light despite an equipment rounding program, while the Administrator described bedside bells as a matter of resident preference rather than a substitute for a nonfunctional call light. A CNA stated that staff are expected to keep call lights within reach and report malfunctions, and facility policy required fully functional, accessible call devices in resident rooms and bathrooms with regular testing, which was not followed in this case.
The facility failed to ensure accurate administration and documentation of controlled medications for multiple residents. A resident had Alprazolam doses removed from the cart after discontinuation without MAR documentation. Another resident's Clonazepam doses were inconsistently documented. Two residents had Oxycodone/Apap removed without MAR entries, indicating systemic issues in handling controlled substances.
A resident's medications were left unsecured at the bedside, and a medication cart was left unlocked and unattended in a hallway. The resident, who was cognitively intact and unable to self-administer medications, confirmed the nurse left the medications. An LPN admitted to leaving the cart unlocked, violating facility policies.
A resident on dialysis with fluid restrictions was provided with excessive fluids, contrary to physician orders. Despite being aware of her fluid restrictions, the resident received 828 ml of fluids during lunch, exceeding the prescribed 240 ml. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's fluid restrictions, contributing to the deficiency.
A facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a central line, leading to deficiencies in infection control. The resident, receiving IV therapy for chronic osteomyelitis, had no EBP signage outside their room, and staff did not consistently wear appropriate PPE. Observations revealed improper maintenance of IV catheter tubing and inadequate cleaning procedures by an LPN. Interviews with staff and the ADON confirmed lapses in EBP protocol adherence.
Improper Bedside Storage of Topical Medications
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves failure to adhere to the facility’s own medication storage policy and state requirements for secure storage of drugs and biologicals. Surveyors observed medicated ointments and topical solutions stored at residents’ bedsides rather than in locked medication storage. On one observation, a container of Diclofenac ointment was found on top of the sink in the room of a resident admitted with heart failure and documented as having no cognitive impairment. In another observation on two separate days, a tube of hydrophilic wound dressing was seen in a basket on the nightstand of a resident admitted with a cerebral infarction due to embolism of the right middle cerebral artery, who was documented as severely cognitively impaired. A third observation found a container of Ciclopirox topical solution on the nightstand of a resident admitted with malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the bladder and no cognitive impairment. Record review of the facility’s “Storage of Medications” policy, revised January 2026, showed that all drugs and biologicals are to be stored in locked compartments under proper environmental controls. Staff interviews confirmed that the facility’s practice is that medications and ointments are to be kept on the locked cart and not allowed at the bedside, with staff stating that creams, ointments, and medicated nail polish are to be returned to the treatment cart after use, and that CNAs are to notify nurses if medications are seen in resident rooms. Despite these stated practices, surveyors found multiple medicated products left in resident rooms, demonstrating that medications were not consistently stored in locked or secure areas as required by policy and regulation.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and execution of this plan of correction does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the terms or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. This plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because it is required by provisions of the Federal and State laws. The facility continues to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored appropriately. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Medications were immediately removed from room for residents #58, #20 and # 29 on 5/11/26. Residents #58, #20 and #29 were not adversely affected by alleged deficient practice. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTED All active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice. No residents were adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. Director of Nursing and/or designee conducted a facility-wide observation audit to ensure that drugs and biologicals are stored appropriately on 05/12/2026. SYSTEMATIC CHANGES The Director of Nursing and/or designee initiated ongoing in-service education with staff on standards of drug and biological storage on 05/20/2026. MONITORINGNursing Supervisor and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored appropriately, 5 days a week for 1 month, then weekly for 3 months.The Director of Nursing and/or designee will report findings of observation/audits to the quality assurance committee monthly for 4 months to ensure continued substantial compliance.
Incomplete Documentation of Pre-Wound-Care Pain Medication for Pressure Ulcer Treatment
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves incomplete and inadequate medical record documentation for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and had a care plan initiated and revised for a pressure ulcer, with interventions directing staff to administer medications and treatments as ordered by the physician. A significant change MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment, required setup/cleanup assistance for eating and oral hygiene, had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer, was on a scheduled pain medication regimen, and experienced moderate, occasional pain in the prior five days. A physician’s order dated 04/23/2026 directed that Tramadol 50 mg be given orally on the day shift for pain, 30 minutes before wound care. Review of the May 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed missing nurse signatures for the ordered Tramadol on multiple dates, despite the Treatment Record reflecting that wound care was performed daily on the day shift. Specifically, there were no signatures on the MAR for the Tramadol dose on four listed dates, and on several other dates the MAR entries were coded as “out of parameters” by an RN without any associated progress notes explaining these entries. During observation of wound care, the resident denied pain at that time, and the Wound Care Nurse stated she checks the MAR to ensure the pre-wound-care pain medication is given and that she performs wound care Monday through Friday while the floor nurse does it on weekends. The DON stated that nurses are to follow physician orders and document if a resident refuses medication. The facility’s pressure ulcer/skin breakdown protocol required pain assessment and documentation, but the clinical record lacked complete, accurate, and properly documented information regarding administration or non-administration of the ordered pre-wound-care pain medication.
Plan Of Correction
N0101 The facility continues to ensure that resident's medical records are complete and accurately documented. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Resident #62 was assessed by Director of Nursing upon notification of surveyor and resident# 62 did not have any adverse outcome related to the alleged deficient practice on 5/13/26. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTED All active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice. Director of Nursing and/or designee conducted a comprehensive chart audit to ensure that residents with pain medications were accurately documented on EMAR on 5/15/26. No residents were adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. SYSTEMATIC CHANGES The Director of Nursing and/or designee initiated ongoing in-service education with clinical staff on standards of accurate medication administration documentation with emphasis on accurate documentation of Pain Medication Refusal. MONITORING Nursing Supervisor and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure accurate documentation of pain medication administration and refusal, 5 days a week for 1 month, then weekly for 3 months. The Director of Nursing and/or designee will report findings of observation/audits to the quality assurance committee monthly for 4 months to ensure continued substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Failure to Control Razors, Sharps, and Chemical Access in Resident Areas
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a safe and hazard‑free environment on one of two floors, including improper handling of razors, sharps, and chemical products. During an observation, a shaving razor was found on the sink in a resident’s room. The resident, who was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15/15 and had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the bladder with self‑care deficits related to activity intolerance and generalized muscle weakness, stated the razor on the sink was not his and that he kept his own razors in the nightstand. The LPN initially removed only the razor from the sink and, when questioned by the surveyor about whether residents were allowed to keep razors in their rooms unattended, acknowledged they were not and then returned to remove the razors from the nightstand as well. Facility leadership, including the ADON, Administrator/Risk Manager, and DON, all stated that residents were not allowed to keep shaving razors in their rooms and that razors were to be kept in the supply room. A second deficiency was identified related to improper disposal of sharps. During a blood glucose check for another resident, an LPN discarded unused lancets into the regular trash in the medication cart rather than into a sharps container. When later asked about the facility’s policy and procedure for lancet disposal, the LPN stated that lancets were to be disposed of in a sharps‑resistant container for safety purposes but did not provide an explanation for why the lancets had been placed in the regular trash. The DON stated that nurses were expected to dispose of both used and unused sharps into sharps containers for safety purposes. A third deficiency involved unsecured chemical products on housekeeping carts. On two separate observations on the second floor, a container of germicidal wipes was found left unattended on top of a housekeeping cart in a hallway, with easy access. Corporate housekeeping staff and the facility’s Housekeeping Director stated that the facility had four housekeeping carts and that all chemicals that could harm residents were supposed to be locked in a compartment on the cart, to which housekeeping staff held the key. A housekeeping staff member also stated that disinfectant wipes and cleaning supplies were to be kept locked in the cart for resident safety. These observations occurred despite the facility’s written “Nursing Home Accident Prevention and Safety Policy,” which states the facility is committed to maintaining a safe and hazard‑free environment, preventing accidents and injuries, identifying and correcting safety risks promptly, and requiring all staff to comply with safety procedures and report unsafe conditions immediately.
Plan Of Correction
The facility continues to ensure that the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as possible. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Resident #29 was not adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. Razor was immediately removed and disposed of from resident's room by nurse on 5/11/26.Germicidal wipes were immediately secured in a locked housekeeping cart on 5/11/26.Staff E was provided with 1:1 education by Director of Nursing regarding the importance of providing an environment free from hazards and accidents with emphasis on keeping hazardous items like razor secured on 5/11/26.Staff G was provided with 1 to 1 education by House Keeping Director regarding ensuring that all housekeeping chemical products are secured in a locked housekeeping cart when not in use on 5/12/2026.IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTEDAll active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice.The Director of Nursing and/ designee conducted a facility-wide observation audit to ensure that hazardous items are locked and secured and that staff are disposing of Sharps in a Sharp Resistant Container on 05/15/2026.The Housekeeping Director conducted a facility-wide observation on 5/15/2026 to ensure that all housekeeping chemical products were secured and locked inside the housekeeping cart when not in use. No residents were adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice SYSTEMATIC CHANGES Director of Nursing initiated ongoing in-service education with staff on standards of maintaining an environment free from hazards/accidents with emphasis on keeping hazardous items like razor secured and properly disposing of sharps in sharps resistant container on 5/20/26. The Housekeeping Director and/or designee initiated ongoing in-service education on standards of maintaining an environment free from hazards/accidents with emphasis on keeping housekeeping chemical products secured and locked in a housekeeping cart when not in use on 5/20/2026. MONITORING The Director of Nursing and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure that hazardous items are locked and secured and sharps are disposed in sharps resistant container weekly for 3 months. The Housekeeping Director and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure that housekeeping chemical products are secured and locked in a housekeeping cart weekly for 3 months. The Director of Nursing, Housekeeping Director and/or designee will report findings of observation/audits to the quality assurance committee monthly for 3 months to ensure continued substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Failure to Control Razors, Sharps, and Chemical Wipes Creating Accident Hazards
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain an environment as free of accident hazards as possible and to provide adequate supervision and safe handling of potentially hazardous items. On one floor, a shaving razor was observed on the sink in a resident’s room. When questioned, the resident stated the razor on the sink was not his and showed the surveyor separate razors he kept in his nightstand. The resident’s record showed admission with malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the bladder and care plans for ADL self-care deficits related to activity intolerance, generalized muscle weakness, bladder cancer, and a history of gross hematuria, with interventions including encouraging and assisting with bathing, personal hygiene, and oral care. Facility leadership, including the ADON, Administrator/Risk Manager, and DON, stated that residents were not allowed to keep shaving razors in their rooms and that razors were to be kept in the supply room. Additional observations showed that staff did not consistently follow safe disposal practices for sharps and did not secure chemical products as required by facility policy. An LPN performing a blood glucose check discarded unused lancets into the medication cart trash instead of a sharps container, despite acknowledging that lancets were to be disposed of in a sharps-resistant container. On two separate observations, a housekeeping cart on the second floor was left unattended with a container of germicidal wipes placed on top of the cart and easily accessible. Corporate housekeeping staff and the Housekeeping Director stated that all chemicals that could harm residents should be locked in the cart’s compartment, and housekeeping staff reported that disinfectant wipes and cleaning supplies were to be kept locked in the cart for resident safety. The facility’s written “Nursing Home Accident Prevention and Safety Policy” stated a commitment to maintaining a safe, hazard-free environment and identifying and correcting safety risks promptly.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and execution of this plan of correction does not constitute admission or agreement by the provider of the terms or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. This plan of correction is prepared and/or executed solely because it is required by provisions of the Federal and State laws. The facility continues to ensure that the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as possible. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Resident #29 was not adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. Razor was immediately removed and disposed of from resident's room by nurse on 5/11/26. Germicidal wipes were immediately secured in a locked housekeeping cart on 5/11/26. Staff E was provided with 1:1 education by the Director of Nursing regarding the importance of providing an environment free from hazards and accidents with emphasis on keeping hazardous items like razor secured on 5/11/26. Staff G was provided with 1 to 1 education by House Keeping Director regarding ensuring that all housekeeping chemical products are secured in a locked housekeeping cart when not in use on 5/12/2026. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTED All active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice. The Director of Nursing and/ designee conducted a facility-wide observation audit to ensure that hazardous items are locked and secured and that staff are disposing of Sharps in a Sharp Resistant Container on 05/15/2026. The Housekeeping Director conducted a facility-wide observation on 5/15/2026 to ensure that all housekeeping chemical products were secured and locked inside the housekeeping cart when not in use. No residents were adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. SYSTEMATIC CHANGES Director of Nursing initiated ongoing in-service education with staff on standards of maintaining an environment free from hazards/accidents with emphasis on keeping hazardous items like razor secured and properly disposing of sharps in sharps resistant container on 5/20/26. The Housekeeping Director and/or designee initiated ongoing in-service education on standards of maintaining an environment free from hazards/accidents with emphasis on keeping housekeeping chemical products secured and locked in a housekeeping cart when not in use on 5/20/2026. MONITORING The Director of Nursing and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure that hazardous items are locked and secured and sharps are disposed in sharps resistant container weekly for 3 months. The Housekeeping Director and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure that housekeeping chemical products are secured and locked in a housekeeping cart weekly for 3 months. The Director of Nursing, Housekeeping Director and/or designee will report findings of observation/audits to the quality assurance committee monthly for 3 months to ensure continued substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Unsecured Medicated Ointments and Solutions Left in Resident Rooms
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s labeling and storage of drugs and biologicals when medicated ointments and solutions were found unsecured in multiple resident rooms on the second floor. During observation, a container of Diclofenac ointment was seen on top of the sink in one resident’s room, and a container of Ciclopirox topical solution was observed on another resident’s nightstand. Both of these residents’ clinical records showed they had no cognitive impairment, with diagnoses including heart failure for one resident and malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of the bladder for the other. Additional observations showed a tube of hydrophilic wound dressing stored in a basket on a different resident’s nightstand on two separate occasions. Clinical records for this resident indicated admission with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction due to embolism of the right middle cerebral artery and severe cognitive impairment. These findings conflicted with the facility’s written “Storage of Medications” policy, revised January 2026, which states that all drugs and biologicals are to be stored in locked compartments under proper environmental controls. Staff interviews confirmed that medications and ointments were expected to be kept on locked carts and not at the bedside, and that residents were not allowed to keep medications in their rooms, indicating that the observed bedside storage of medicated products did not comply with facility policy and regulatory requirements.
Plan Of Correction
The facility continues to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored appropriately. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Medications were immediately removed from room for residents #58, #20, and #29 on 5/11/26. Residents #58, #20, and #29 were not adversely affected by alleged deficient practice. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTED All active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice. No residents were adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. Director of Nursing and/or designee conducted a facility-wide observation audit to ensure that drugs and biologicals are stored appropriately on 05/12/2026. SYSTEMATIC CHANGES The Director of Nursing and/or designee initiated ongoing in-service education with staff on standards. of drug and biological storage on 05/20/2026. MONITORING Nursing Supervisor and/or designee will conduct random observation audits to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored appropriately, 5 days a week for 1 month, then weekly for 3 months. The Director of Nursing and/or designee will report findings of observation/audits to the quality assurance committee monthly for 4 months to ensure continued substantial compliance.
Incomplete Documentation of Ordered Pain Medication Prior to Wound Care
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s maintenance of complete and accurately documented medical records related to pain medication administration prior to wound care for one resident with a pressure ulcer. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease and had a care plan for a Stage 4 pressure ulcer that included administering medications and treatments as ordered. A significant change MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment, required setup/cleanup assistance for eating and oral hygiene, had a Stage 4 pressure ulcer, received a scheduled pain medication regimen, and experienced moderate, occasional pain. A physician’s order dated 04/23/2026 directed that Tramadol 50 mg be given orally on the day shift for pain, 30 minutes before wound care. Review of the May 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed missing nurse signatures for the ordered Tramadol on multiple dates (05/02, 05/03, 05/09, and 05/10), despite the Treatment Record reflecting that wound care was performed daily on the day shift. On additional dates (05/04–05/06 and 05/11), the MAR entries for Tramadol were signed with code “4” indicating “out of parameters” by a registered nurse, but there were no associated progress notes explaining these entries. The wound care nurse reported that the resident had an order for Tramadol prior to wound care, that she performs wound care Monday through Friday, and that the floor nurse performs it on weekends, and she stated she checks the MAR to ensure the medication was given. The DON stated that nurses are to follow physician orders and document if a resident refuses medication. The facility’s pressure ulcer/skin breakdown protocol required pain assessment and documentation, but the medical record lacked adequate documentation to show that the ordered pain medication was administered or appropriately addressed on the identified dates.
Plan Of Correction
The facility continues to ensure that resident's medical records are complete and accurately documented. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Resident #62 was assessed by Director of Nursing upon notification of surveyor and resident #62 did not have any adverse outcome related to the alleged deficient practice on 5/13/26. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTED All active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice. Director of Nursing and/or designee conducted a comprehensive chart audit to ensure that residents with pain medications were accurately documented on EMAR on 5/15/26. No residents were adversely affected by the alleged deficient practice. SYSTEMATIC CHANGES The Director of Nursing and/or designee initiated ongoing in-service education with clinical staff on standards of accurate medication administration documentation with emphasis on accurate documentation of Pain Medication Refusal. MONITORING Nursing Supervisor and/or designee will conduct random observation and/or audits to ensure accurate documentation of pain medication administration and refusal, 5 days a week for 1 month, then weekly for 3 months. The Director of Nursing and/or designee will report findings of observation/audits to the quality assurance committee monthly for 4 months to ensure continued substantial compliance is achieved and maintained.
Ineffective QAPI Program Fails to Correct Repeated Medication Storage Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to demonstrate an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI/QAA) program to correct repeated deficiencies related to medication storage (F0761). Surveyors identified that the facility had previously been cited for failing to properly store medications during a recertification and re-licensure survey with an exit date of October 31, 2024. Despite this prior citation, the same deficient practice of improper medication storage was again identified, indicating that the facility did not effectively correct or prevent recurrence of the problem area. Record review showed that the facility held monthly QAA Committee meetings, as evidenced by sign-in sheets dated 02/10/2026, 03/10/2026, and 04/14/2026. Attendees included the Administrator, DON, Medical Director, and other department heads. The facility’s written QAPI policy, implemented on 9/1/2022 and revised on 1/1/2026, stated that it was the facility’s policy to maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program focusing on outcomes of care and quality of life, and that the QA Committee was to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. During an interview, the Administrator reported that the QAA Committee membership included the Medical Director, nursing home administrator, other department heads, and invited direct care staff, and that they met monthly and as needed to assess ways to make improvements. However, the survey findings indicated that, despite these meetings and the written QAPI policy, the facility’s QAPI/QAA activities did not result in an effective plan of action to correct the repeated deficiency in medication storage. At the time of the survey, there were 94 residents residing in the facility, and the Administrator was informed of concerns related to the repeated deficiencies and the facility’s QAPI activities.
Plan Of Correction
The facility continues to ensure that the quality assurance and improvement program is used to identify and track areas for improvement throughout the facility. IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION Ad hoc QA meeting performed on 5/15/26 to address QAPI/QAA concerns and plan of action for current alleged deficiencies including alleged noncompliance with QAPI/QAA Improvement Activities. IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER RESIDENTS HAVING POTENTIAL TO BE AFFECTED All active residents in the facility can potentially be affected by the alleged deficient practice. Administrator/Risk Manager reviewed and audited previous 6 months of QA meetings on 5/18/26 to ensure areas of concern were addressed. SYSTEMATIC CHANGES On 5/19/26, ongoing in-services was conducted by Regional Consultant with facility Quality Assurance Committee about Quality Assurance and Performance improvement Policy with emphasis on implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of performance improvement projects. The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee will meet monthly and conduct random audit of 1 current performance improvement project monthly to validate reported substantial compliance. MONITORING The Interdisciplinary Team as well as Regional Consultant will attend monthly QAPI meeting to ensure QAA Committee compliance with QAPI process. Regional Consultant will assist with random audit process for 3 months. Any and all findings will be reported during monthly quality assurance meeting until substantial compliance is achieved.
Nonfunctioning Call Light and Inaccessible Bell for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the resident call system when a cognitively impaired resident with aphasia and significant self-care deficits did not have a functioning bedside call light on three separate observations. On each observation, the call light was present near the resident’s bed but was not operational, and the resident’s bell was placed on top of a mini refrigerator beside the bed rather than within reach. The resident’s care plan documented self-care deficits and the need for assistance with most ADLs, including fall and safety precautions, and the MDS showed total dependence for toileting and lower body dressing, setup assistance for eating, partial assistance for upper body dressing, and substantial assistance for showering and position changes. Interviews revealed that the Maintenance Director was unaware that the resident’s call light was not operating, despite a facility program in which department heads are assigned to check resident equipment. The Administrator stated that bedside bells were considered a resident preference and that residents could choose to use either the bell or the call light, but not because the call light was nonfunctional. A CNA reported that staff are expected to ensure call lights are within reach and to report nonfunctioning call lights immediately for repair. The facility’s policy required each resident room to have fully functional bedside, toilet, and shower call devices within reach of residents, with systems tested upon installation, monthly, and after maintenance, and accessible from beds, chairs, and bathroom floors, which was not met for this resident.
Deficiencies in Medication Administration and Documentation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration and documentation of medications for several residents. Specifically, for Resident #51, there was an order for Alprazolam that was discontinued, yet doses were documented as removed from the medication cart after the discontinuation date. However, there was no documentation of the medication being administered on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This indicates a failure in the facility's process for handling discontinued medications and ensuring accurate record-keeping. For Resident #43, there was an order for Clonazepam, but the Medication Monitoring/Control Record showed missing documentation for several doses. The MAR indicated that some doses were administered, but one dose was left blank, suggesting inconsistencies in documentation practices. This inconsistency raises concerns about the accuracy of medication administration records and the potential for medication errors. Resident #83 and Resident #35 also experienced issues with the documentation of controlled medications. For Resident #83, multiple instances were noted where Oxycodone/Apap was removed from the medication cart without corresponding documentation on the MAR. Similarly, for Resident #35, several doses of Oxycodone/Apap were removed from the cart, but there was no documentation of administration on the MAR. These findings highlight a systemic issue within the facility regarding the handling and documentation of controlled substances, which could lead to significant medication management problems.
Medication Security Deficiencies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly secure medications for a resident and left a medication cart unlocked and unattended. Specifically, medications were left at the bedside of a resident who was cognitively intact and did not have a history of refusing medications or the ability to self-administer them. The medications were placed on the over-bed table by a nurse, and the resident confirmed that the nurse had left them there. The Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that the medications were left by the nurse and not brought in by the resident's family. Additionally, a medication cart was observed to be left unlocked and unattended in a hallway with multiple residents, visitors, and staff passing by. A Licensed Practical Nurse admitted to leaving the cart unlocked and unattended but was unsure how it happened. These actions are in violation of the facility's policies on administering and storing medications, which require that medications be administered safely and that medication carts not be left unlocked and unattended.
Failure to Adhere to Fluid Restriction Orders for Dialysis Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to fluid restriction orders for a resident undergoing dialysis, identified as Resident #16. The resident was readmitted with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease, Muscle Weakness, and Type 2 Diabetes, and was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15. Physician orders specified a no added salt diet with a 1,500 ml fluid restriction, allocating specific amounts for each meal. However, observations revealed that the resident was provided with excessive fluids, including 16 ounces of water in a Styrofoam cup near her bed and additional fluids during lunch, totaling 828 ml, which exceeded the prescribed 240 ml for the lunch meal. The resident was aware of being on fluid restrictions but was unclear about the specific limits. Interviews with staff highlighted a lack of communication and awareness regarding the resident's fluid restrictions. A Certified Nursing Assistant was unaware that Resident #16 was on fluid restrictions and did not acknowledge providing the excess water. The Clinical Dietitian confirmed that fluid restrictions are listed in the electronic system and on meal tickets, yet the oversight occurred. The Registered Dietitian's progress note indicated the resident's non-compliance with the renal diet and fluid restrictions, and the care plan acknowledged the risk of complications due to hemodialysis, yet the facility failed to ensure compliance with the fluid restriction orders.
Failure to Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident with Central Line
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to properly implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a central line, leading to deficiencies in infection prevention and control. The resident, who was admitted with chronic osteomyelitis and type 2 diabetes, was receiving intravenous (IV) therapy with Vancomycin. Despite the facility's policy requiring EBP for residents with indwelling medical devices, no signage was posted outside the resident's room to indicate the need for EBP, and staff did not consistently wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during care. During observations, surveyors noted that the IV catheter tubing was not maintained in a sterile manner, as it was wrapped around the IV pole without a sterile cap. A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed entering the resident's room to flush the central line and attach the IV medication tubing without donning a gown, which is required under EBP. The LPN also failed to clean the tip of the catheter properly before attaching the uncapped IV tubing, further compromising infection control. Interviews with staff, including Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), revealed a lack of adherence to EBP protocols. The ADON, who is responsible for posting precautionary signage, acknowledged the absence of a sign for the resident with a central line. The Director of Nursing (DON) also confirmed that the nurse should have worn a gown while providing IV care. These lapses in protocol highlight the facility's failure to maintain adequate infection prevention measures for residents with high-risk medical conditions.
Latest citations in Florida
Surveyors found that the facility failed to comply with 42 CFR 483.73(a) by not conducting the required annual review and update of its Emergency Preparedness (EP) plan. During record review, no documentation showed that the EP plan had been reviewed or updated within the past year, and the Administrator confirmed that the Emergency Management Plan had not been reviewed or revised as required.
Surveyors found that smoke/fire-rated enclosures were not properly maintained, with penetrations in smoke barriers in several general storage rooms across multiple smoke compartments. The Maintenance Director stated that insulation and fiberglass were used to pack and cover these holes but could not confirm that the materials were approved for fire-rated construction. Inspectors observed penetrations covered with fiberglass and noted a hole in one fiberglass panel in a storage room, resulting in a deficiency under NFPA 101 requirements for smoke barrier construction.
Surveyors found that fixed patient-care electrical equipment was not properly maintained or inspected in accordance with NFPA 99. In one room, a bedside remote had mismatched insulation and exposed wiring, and in another room, a call button receptacle had exposed low-voltage conductors. The Maintenance Director acknowledged both issues and reported that new bed remotes had been received but not yet installed.
Surveyors found that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment, with strong, persistent urine and feces odors noted throughout multiple halls and confirmed by staff. On two nursing units, hallways and resident rooms contained torn flooring, food debris, broken blinds, dirty and leaking toilets and sinks, rusted and corroded fixtures, missing outlet covers with oxygen concentrators plugged in, exposed light sockets, unmade and visibly soiled beds, and black, mold-like substances on walls and around toilet bases. Bathrooms had missing ceiling tiles, cracked door facings with brown stains, used briefs and torn toilet paper on floors, and toilets with brown or rust-like buildup. Outside, the patio and fencing area had broken and rotted railings, exposed rusted nails, fallen palm fronds, and overgrown vegetation, and the Administrator acknowledged the area was not safe for residents. Housekeeping and maintenance staff described daily cleaning and a work-order process, but the Maintenance Director reported being unaware of many of the observed issues, and the DON confirmed there was no specific environmental cleaning policy despite job descriptions and a general policy requiring a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment.
A resident exited the building through a bedroom window, walked off the property, and was observed and redirected by staff with assistance from law enforcement, who encountered the resident down the road and helped escort the resident back. The facility’s internal documentation lacked staff or witness statements and characterized the event as the resident remaining on facility grounds without injury. Despite the resident’s account, a police report, and a maintenance staff report confirming that the resident left the premises and that law enforcement responded, the DON did not report the incident to required state and federal agencies, even though the DON acknowledged that any incident involving law enforcement response must be reported.
A resident with moderate cognitive impairment and a history of stroke was repeatedly observed over several days in visibly soiled clothing and bedding, with a strong urine odor, despite stating multiple times that he had requested assistance with changing and hygiene. Documentation indicated he was independent with toileting and personal hygiene and only occasionally incontinent, but his care plan lacked detail on the level of assistance needed, while an LPN reported he actually required staff help with bathing, grooming, toileting, and care. Laundry practices involved leaving clean, labeled clothing bagged in the linen room for nursing staff to distribute rather than returning it directly to rooms, and the DON reported that staff were expected to round every two hours and as needed to keep residents clean and dry, although there were no written ADL or resident care policies in place.
Surveyors observed four full O2 cylinders on one nursing unit stored unsecured directly on the floor under a sign labeled "FULL CYLINDERS" instead of in a secured storage rack. The ADON confirmed the cylinders were full and should not be on the ground. Reference to NFPA 99 showed that freestanding cylinders must be protected from damage and properly chained or supported in a stand or cart. The DON and Maintenance Director both acknowledged that O2 cylinders are required to be stored in a secure rack, should never be on the floor, and that unsecured cylinders on the floor present a safety risk.
A resident with multiple cardiopulmonary conditions and a documented full code status was found unresponsive without pulse or respirations during the night shift. A CNA notified the RN, who either instructed CNAs to clean and cover the resident or, per her and an LPN’s account, called a code blue and performed CPR with the LPN for about 20 minutes before stopping, without calling 911. The RN believed the resident was on hospice and did not verify code status, then notified the DON, provider, and family instead of EMS. Several hours later, after the DON called the facility and asked whether 911 had been contacted, the RN called 911 and briefly reinitiated CPR shortly before EMS arrived and pronounced the resident deceased, documenting postmortem changes. The facility’s investigation and root cause analysis found that staff failed to follow policy requiring immediate EMS activation and continuous CPR for full code residents until EMS arrival, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy finding.
A resident with full code status was found unresponsive without respirations or pulse during the night shift. An RN and an LPN initiated CPR but did not activate EMS, and they discontinued CPR after about 20 minutes. The RN, who lacked documented orientation and competency assessment and had obtained BLS certification through a fully online, non–instructor-led course, pronounced the resident deceased without authority and later stated she believed the resident was on hospice and did not verify code status. The LPN’s BLS certification was expired, and a CNA with an expired BLS certification performed several chest compressions despite facility policy that CNAs were not to perform CPR. The RN had not participated in documented code blue drills, and leadership confirmed that required clinical orientation and skills competencies had not been completed for her, leading surveyors to determine that staff were not adequately trained or competent to respond to a cardiopulmonary arrest for a full code resident, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy finding.
Surveyors found multiple instances of improper use of relocatable power taps (RPTs) and extension cords during a facility tour with the Maintenance Director. In the social services office, an RPT was plugged into another RPT connected to a wall outlet, with the cord running across a walkway and taped to the floor. In the multipurpose room, a television was plugged into an extension cord, and in the MDS office, an RPT was plugged into another RPT with an outlet adapter in use. These conditions did not comply with NFPA 101, NFPA 99, and NFPA 70 standards governing electrical equipment, power strips, and extension cords.
Failure to Annually Review and Update Emergency Preparedness Plan
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency related to the facility’s Emergency Preparedness (EP) Program under 42 CFR 483.73(a). During record review at 4:00 PM, surveyors examined the facility’s EP documentation and found no evidence that the emergency preparedness plan had been reviewed or updated on an annual basis as required. The regulation mandates that LTC facilities develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that is reviewed and updated at least annually to comply with applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. In an interview, the Administrator acknowledged that the facility’s Emergency Management Plan had not been reviewed or updated. No documentation was provided to show that the required annual review and update of the EP plan had occurred. The deficiency is based solely on the lack of documented annual review and update of the emergency preparedness plan by facility administration; no specific resident cases or clinical events were described in the report.
Plan Of Correction
Preparation and/or execution of the Plan of Correction does not constitute admission or agreement of the provider of the truth of the facts alleged or conclusions set forth in the statement of deficiencies. The Plan of Correction is prepared and/or executed solely because it is required by the provision of Federal and State law. Facility EP was reviewed and signed off on by the DON, Maintenance Director and Administrator. The facility has determined that all residents have the potential to be affected. An in-service education program will be conducted by the administrator. The administrator will conduct monthly random checks to verify completed documentation.
Improper Repair of Smoke Barrier Penetrations in Multiple Smoke Compartments
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s maintenance of smoke/fire-rated enclosures, specifically related to penetrations in smoke barriers in multiple smoke compartments. During an interview, the Maintenance Director reported that insulation was used to pack holes and then covered with fiberglass in general storage rooms in smoke compartments 1, 2, and 3, but was unable to confirm whether these materials were approved for use in fire-rated walls. Subsequent observation showed that the penetrations were indeed covered with fiberglass, and one general storage room in smoke compartment 2 had a hole in one of the fiberglass panels. The report states that this failure to properly maintain penetrations through smoke/fire-rated construction could allow smoke and flammable gases to spread to other areas and cause the smoke/fire-rated construction to fail to perform as designed.
Failure to Maintain and Inspect Patient-Care Electrical Equipment
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified a deficiency in the facility’s compliance with NFPA 99 requirements for testing and maintaining fixed patient-care electrical equipment. During an observation in one resident room, the bedside remote was found to have two different types of insulation and exposed wiring. In another resident room, the call button receptacle was observed with exposed low-voltage conductors. These conditions were noted during a survey of two of six smoke compartments. During an interview conducted at the time of the observations, the Maintenance Director stated that the facility had just received a new shipment of bed remotes and had not yet replaced the existing ones. The Maintenance Director also acknowledged the issue with the exposed conductors at the call button receptacle. The surveyors cited this as a failure to properly inspect and maintain fixed patient care electrical equipment in accordance with NFPA 99 (2012 Edition), sections 10.3 and 10.5.2.1.
Widespread Odors and Environmental Disrepair in Resident Care Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment as required by 42 CFR 483.10(i). Upon entrance to the building on multiple days, surveyors noted a strong, pungent odor of urine and feces throughout the facility, with the odor particularly strong on the 200, 300, and 400 halls. Staff interviews confirmed that the building "usually smells like" urine, and staff attributed the odor to residents defecating and urinating on the floor, an old building structure, and cleaning products that sanitize but do not deodorize. Housekeeping staff reported that they clean resident rooms daily but that nursing staff must first clean fecal and urine waste before housekeeping can sanitize, and delays by nursing staff in doing so postponed housekeeping’s ability to address the odors. On the 300 unit, surveyors observed multiple environmental and sanitation issues in resident rooms and bathrooms. The hallway had torn flooring, food particles, and a butter knife on the floor. Individual rooms had food debris, a straw on the floor, and broken blinds. Bathrooms contained dark brown stains on walls, rusted ceiling tile trim, toilets with brownish substances inside, and wet floors around toilets. Trim was missing around toilet bases, exposing a black, mold-like substance. Corroded and rusted sink faucet handles, leaking faucets, rusted pipes under sinks with buildup of corrosion, and rusted sprinklers were observed. Some toilets and three-in-one commodes had duct tape on them, and bathroom walls had black, mold-like substances. Doors and door facings showed rust, scrape marks, chipped and peeling paint, and exposed wood. In some rooms, electrical outlets had no covers while oxygen concentrators were plugged into them, boards covered windows, light fixtures over beds lacked covers with sockets exposed, and one fixture had only one bulb. A resident bed appeared dirty with a black substance on it, and dresser drawers were broken with drawer fronts on the floor. On the 400 unit, surveyors again noted a strong odor of urine upon entry and found additional environmental deficiencies. Bathrooms had missing ceiling tiles, broken emergency light covers with no pull strings, and toilet tank covers that did not fit properly, exposing the inside of the tank. In one bathroom, torn toilet paper and used briefs were lying in the corner of the floor, and toilets had brown, rust-like substances inside the bowls. Door facings appeared cracked with brown substances along the sides, and toilets had brownish-black buildup around the bases with broken, peeling trim. Light bases on walls had rust-like appearances, multiple rooms had broken or missing blinds, and some outlets lacked covers while oxygen concentrators were plugged into them. Some rooms had unmade beds, exposed wires at outlets, toilets with dark brown-black rings around the base and flooring, uncovered light fixtures, leaking sinks with rusted pipes, loose flooring, loose toilet seats, and dry red substances on door frames. Surveyors also observed deficiencies in the outdoor patio area adjacent to the locked unit. The gate code was broken, and a resident lock was placed on the gate. The patio and surrounding fencing had fallen palm fronds on the grass, broken and rotted wooden fence railings, unsteady railings, and multiple exposed rusted nails protruding from the railings where boards were broken or detached. Overgrown trees and bushes from the perimeter extended through the fence railings. When asked, the Administrator acknowledged that the area was not safe for residents and stated that they planned to have it redone in the future. The Maintenance Director reported that he and one other maintenance person relied on work orders and verbal reports to identify needed repairs and stated he was not aware of the specific room and equipment issues on the 300 and 400 units. Housekeeping staff stated they would report broken items via a work order book or text to maintenance, but one housekeeper, who cleaned the 400 unit daily, denied noticing stains or biohazard-like materials on walls and door frames despite the surveyors’ observations. Review of facility documents showed that the housekeeper job description required staff to maintain assigned work areas in a clean, safe, comfortable, and attractive manner and to report maintenance problems noted during cleaning. A facility policy titled "Policies and Practices - Control" stated that the facility must maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for personnel, residents, visitors, and the public. The DON stated that blinds had been changed out and new cabinets and door handles purchased, and that staff were directed to use standard precautions when cleaning rooms, but also stated there was no policy specific to cleaning the environment. These observations and interviews demonstrated that the facility did not maintain sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior conditions, did not adequately control offensive odors, and did not ensure that the physical environment, including resident rooms, bathrooms, and outdoor areas, was maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike condition as required by regulation.
Failure to Report Elopement Incident Involving Law Enforcement
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to report an elopement incident to required state and federal agencies as mandated by 42 CFR 483.12(c). On the referenced date, Resident #5 exited the building through his bedroom window around 12:15 PM and walked across the facility property toward the perimeter fence. A CNA observed the resident outside and called for assistance, after which staff redirected and escorted the resident back into the building and placed him on one-to-one supervision. The facility’s internal incident documentation noted the window exit and subsequent maintenance inspection of the window seals but did not include any staff or witness statements. The DON later stated that the resident never left facility grounds and was returned without injury, and therefore the incident was not considered reportable. However, interviews and external records showed that the resident did leave the facility premises and that law enforcement was involved. Resident #5 recalled being outside the facility, being brought back by staff and a “police man,” and being told by the officer not to leave again. A police report from the local police department confirmed an encounter with the resident outside the facility and that an officer assisted staff in escorting him back. Maintenance staff (Staff G) also reported that the resident climbed out the window, left the facility property, and was stopped “down the road,” then redirected back with law enforcement assistance. In interviews, the DON initially denied that law enforcement had been notified or involved, then later acknowledged that law enforcement had responded but asserted they did not come into the facility. The DON also confirmed awareness that any incident in which law enforcement investigates or responds is required to be reported, yet the elopement and law enforcement involvement were not reported to the State Survey Agency or other required officials within the required time frames.
Failure to Provide Timely ADL and Hygiene Care to a Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors found that the facility failed to provide necessary ADL care, including grooming and hygiene, to a dependent resident over multiple days. The resident was repeatedly observed in visibly soiled clothing with a strong odor of urine, first standing in his doorway holding onto a wheelchair with wet navy pants saturated down to his calves, stating he had been waiting for staff to change his clothes. More than an hour later the same day, he remained in the same soiled pants and shirt while seated in a wheelchair near the nurses’ station. The following day, he was again observed wearing the same soiled clothes, smelling of urine, with his shirt stained with food and a dark liquid. His room had a strong urine odor, his bed was soiled with urine, and only two pairs of pants were seen on a chair with no other clothing available in the room. On a subsequent observation, he was seated on the edge of his bed wearing different pants and no shirt, with yellow-stained sheets beneath him and his previously soiled clothes on the floor; he reported that he had requested assistance but no staff had come, so he changed himself. Record review showed the resident had a history of stroke and repeated unspecified conditions, with a recent Quarterly MDS indicating moderate cognitive impairment (BIMS score of 10). The MDS documented him as independent for toileting, showering, personal hygiene, and related ADLs, and only occasionally incontinent, but his care plan did not specify the level of assistance he required for incontinence care and other ADLs. In contrast, an LPN familiar with the resident stated he required staff assistance with bathing, grooming, toileting, and care, and that he did not refuse such assistance and appropriately requested help. The LPN also explained that personal clothing was laundered at the facility and left bagged in the linen room for nursing staff to distribute, rather than being returned directly to resident rooms. The DON stated that staff were expected to follow best practices, including rounding every two hours and as needed to keep residents clean and dry, and acknowledged that all residents required some level of assistance with ADLs. The DON further stated the facility had no written ADL, resident care, or quality of care policies, despite these expectations.
Unsecured Storage of Full Oxygen Cylinders on Nursing Unit
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors found that the facility failed to ensure safe storage of oxygen cylinders on the West 1 unit. At 9:03 a.m., four full oxygen cylinders were observed stored unsecured directly on the ground rather than in the designated secured cylinder storage rack, under a sign labeled "FULL CYLINDERS." Photographic evidence was obtained of this condition. At 9:18 a.m., the ADON confirmed that the four cylinders were full and acknowledged they should not be stored on the ground. Review of NFPA 99 (2021) 11.6.2.3(11) indicated that cylinders must be protected from damage and that freestanding cylinders must be properly chained or supported in a proper stand or cart. Later that day, the DON stated that oxygen cylinders should be stored in a secure rack and never directly on the ground, and acknowledged that unsecured cylinders on the floor were a safety risk. The Maintenance Director also confirmed that oxygen cylinders should be in a secure rack and never stored directly on the ground, stating that cylinders stored on the floor can tip over and cause damage. These observations and interviews demonstrated noncompliance with regulatory and NFPA standards for safe storage of oxygen cylinders.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction constitutes a written allegation of compliance for the deficiency cited. Submission of this plan of correction is not an admission that the deficiency exists or that one was cited correctly. This plan of correction is submitted to meet the requirements established by the State and Federal law. The four unsecured [R] cylinders on the West 1 unit were secured. The Nursing Department completed a baseline audit of [R] cylinder storage within the facility to ensure all [R] cylinders were secured and stored properly. Ongoing education will be completed with current facility staff regarding the facility's [R] storage policy and procedure; and will be completed during new hire and agency orientation to the facility by ADON/designee. Audits will be completed by the Director of Nursing/designee regarding adherence to the facility's [R] storage policy and procedure twice weekly x 4 weeks, then weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 4 months, or until continued substantial compliance has been met. Results of audits will be reported to the QAPI Committee on a monthly basis by the Director of Nursing/designee.
Failure to Provide Required CPR and Activate EMS for Full Code Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to provide immediate and appropriate basic life support, including CPR, to a resident with a documented full code status when the resident was found unresponsive. The resident had diagnoses including a slow-progressing circulatory condition involving narrowing or blockage of vessels, a condition that restricts airflow and makes breathing difficult, and other listed conditions. The physician’s order specified “Full Code,” and the care plan documented that the resident was under court-ordered guardianship with wishes honored as full code. The facility’s policy required that in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, staff immediately call for assistance, overhead page a code, begin CPR in the absence of a valid DNR, and continue CPR until EMS assumes responsibility or the resident responds. On the night of the incident at approximately 2:00–2:07 a.m., a CNA found the resident unresponsive in bed and notified the RN on duty. One CNA’s written statement indicated that the RN said she already knew the resident was going to die and instructed the CNA to clean and cover the resident. Another CNA’s account stated that the RN came to the room, took vital signs, and then instructed her to clean the resident. The RN’s own written statement and interview indicated that she called a code blue, that an LPN brought the crash cart, and that they performed CPR for approximately 20 minutes. The LPN’s statement corroborated that a code blue was called, that he brought the crash cart, and that CPR was performed for about 20 minutes before the RN stopped and stated that the resident was gone or words to that effect. The RN acknowledged that the resident had no vital signs but was warm and not responding, and she stated that she believed the resident was on hospice and therefore did not call 911. After CPR was discontinued, the RN did not activate EMS and instead notified the DON, the provider, and the resident’s family. The DON documented receiving a message from the RN that the resident had no pulse and no blood pressure and that the assigned nurse had initiated CPR but was unable to revive the resident. The DON later received a text from the RN that the resident had expired. The DON stated that at approximately 6:00 a.m. she called the facility and asked if 911 had been called, and upon learning it had not, she instructed the RN to call 911. The RN then reinitiated CPR at around 6:00 a.m., approximately four hours after the resident was first found without pulse or respirations, and stated that they tried to do something until EMS arrived because EMS had to see them doing CPR. EMS records showed activation at 6:18 a.m., arrival at 6:27 a.m., and pronouncement of death at 6:31 a.m., with documentation that CPR was not attempted by EMS because it was considered futile and that the resident exhibited postmortem changes. The Medical Director confirmed that the resident was full code and stated that staff should have started CPR and called 911 and that CPR should not be done four hours after a resident is pronounced dead. The facility’s investigation and a root cause analysis concluded that the RN and LPN did not follow the facility’s established policy and procedure to call 911 and administer CPR to a full code resident until EMS arrival. The root cause was identified as the nurse’s belief that the resident was on hospice and her failure to check the resident’s code status as outlined in facility policy. The surveyors determined that the failure to immediately activate EMS and to continue CPR until EMS arrival for this full code resident constituted noncompliance with the requirement to provide basic life support and resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy determination.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction is submitted as required under Federal and State regulations and statutes applicable to long term care providers. This plan of correction does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of the facility, and such liability is hereby specifically denied. The submission of this plan does not constitute agreement by the facility that the surveyors' findings or conclusions are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency, or that the scope or severity regarding any of these deficiencies cited are correctly applied. Resident #1 no longer resides in the facility as of 4.7.26. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. All codes to 1.1.26 were reviewed to ensure protocol was followed. No outliers were noted. All licensed nurses received education from the Director of Nursing and/or nursing management on [R] policy and procedure and Florida [R] policy. This includes where to find the code status. Education addressed what to do for full code hospice residents. Education completed with CNA's that protocol is that they do not assist with [R] or breaths during a [R] event. All education will be added to new hire orientation. Code drills will occur 3 x weekly x 4 weeks, followed by 2 x weekly x 4 weeks, followed by 1 x weekly x 4 weeks. Results will be brought to QAPI to determine need for ongoing auditing.
Removal Plan
- Educated licensed nurses on CPR policy and procedure and Florida Do Not Resuscitate (DNRO) policy, including where to find code status and what to do for full code hospice residents; emphasized initiating emergency services immediately when resident is full code, continuing CPR until EMS arrives, and that nurses cannot pronounce death or stop CPR on a full code resident unless instructed by EMS.
- Implemented emergency response “Code Blue” drills on all three shifts, including full code and full code hospice scenarios, with emphasis on calling 911 immediately.
- Educated licensed nurses and CNAs on the facility abuse and neglect policy, including resident rights.
- Required licensed nurses to complete a CPR post-test; restricted staff who have not completed education/testing from working until completion.
- Educated licensed nurses regarding change in condition.
- Placed laminated instructions on how to overhead page during a code at all nursing station phones and other designated phones.
- Held a Quality Improvement Performance Committee meeting to review root cause analysis findings and approve recommendations.
- Held a Quality Improvement Performance Committee meeting to review progress of the plan and approve recommendations.
- Completed a “like resident” audit of all expired residents and rehospitalizations for a defined period to determine whether involved staff were the same as the code event and whether proper procedure was followed.
Failure to Provide Competent CPR Response and Verify Code Status for Full Code Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure that nursing staff possessed and demonstrated the competencies required to respond appropriately to a cardiopulmonary emergency for a resident with full code status. Resident #1, who was designated as full code, was found unresponsive and without respirations or pulse at approximately 2:07 a.m. Clinical staff, consisting of an RN (Staff A) and an LPN (Staff B), initiated CPR but did not activate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) as required by facility policy for a full code resident. After approximately 20 minutes of CPR, the RN and LPN stopped resuscitation efforts without EMS involvement. The RN, without authority to do so, pronounced the resident deceased based on the absence of vital signs and did not verify the resident’s code status before discontinuing CPR. The RN later stated she believed the resident was on hospice and therefore did not call 911, and that she was confused about which residents were hospice and which were full code. The LPN reported that he assumed the RN had called 911 and continued CPR for about 20 minutes until the RN “called the code” and left, and he acknowledged that he knew CPR should continue until EMS arrival but did not speak up. Four hours after CPR was stopped, at approximately 6:00 a.m., the RN restarted CPR and activated EMS after receiving instructions from the DON. The investigation further identified that the RN had no documented orientation, onboarding education, or skills competency assessments since hire, despite being promoted to weekend supervisor. Her BLS certification had been obtained through a fully online course without an instructor or live feedback. The LPN’s BLS certification was expired, and a CNA who performed several chest compressions also had an expired BLS certification, even though facility policy did not permit CNAs to perform CPR. Facility records showed that monthly code blue drills had been conducted, but there was no documentation that the RN had ever participated in these drills. Leadership interviews confirmed that required clinical orientation and competency evaluations had not been completed for the RN, and that she had failed tests for a clinical manager position but was nonetheless functioning in a supervisory role. These actions and omissions led surveyors to determine that staff were not adequately trained or competent to respond to cardiopulmonary arrest for residents with full code status, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy determination. The facility’s own root cause analysis, as reflected in meeting minutes, identified that the nurse did not check the resident’s code status and lacked knowledge about when CPR could be discontinued and when 911 should be called. The analysis documented that the nurse believed the resident was hospice and therefore did not start or continue CPR appropriately or call EMS when the resident was found without respirations and pulse. The facility assessment tool and policies referenced the need for staff training and competencies in identifying changes in condition, end-of-life care, advance care planning, and adherence to the CPR policy, but the documented events showed that these expectations were not met in practice for the staff involved in this incident. Surveyors concluded that the failure to ensure nursing staff were trained and competent to respond appropriately to cardiopulmonary arrest for a full code resident, including immediate initiation and continuation of CPR and activation of EMS, constituted noncompliance with requirements for sufficient and competent nursing staff. The failure affected Resident #1 and placed other full code residents at risk, leading to an Immediate Jeopardy finding that was later reduced in scope and severity after verification of an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy removal plan.
Plan Of Correction
This plan of correction is submitted as required under Federal and State regulations and statutes applicable to long term care providers. This plan of correction does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of the facility, and such liability is hereby specifically denied. The submission of this plan does not constitute agreement by the facility that the surveyors' findings or conclusions are accurate, that the findings constitute a deficiency, or that the scope or severity regarding any of these deficiencies cited are correctly applied Resident # 1 no longer resides in the facility as of 4.7.26. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. All licensed nurses were audited to ensure current [R] certification. Facility will ensure [R] certification through a [R] provider whose training includes a [R] on session either in a physical or virtual instructor-led setting in accordance with accepted national standards. Human resources, or designee, will audit monthly to ensure all licensed nurses have a current [R] certification.Education was completed with licensed nurses on initiating [R] services immediately when a resident is full code. Education included that [R] is to continue on a full code resident until [R] arrives and that the nurse cannot pronounce [R] on the full code resident and/or stop [R] until instructed by [R].Education will be added to new hire orientation.7 random licensed nurses will complete a knowledge quiz related to code events. Per week x 4 weeks, followed by 5 nurses x 4 weeks, then 3 nurses x 4 weeks. Results will be brought to QAPI to determine need for ongoing auditing.
Removal Plan
- Regional Director of Clinical Services educated the Administrator and Director of Nursing regarding the CPR policy and the need to immediately contact emergency medical services (911) in the event of a full code; Administrator and DON signed the education
- Regional Director of Clinical Services provided documented education to the Administrator and Director of Nursing regarding the CPR policy and the need to immediately contact emergency medical services (911) in the event of a full code
- Director of Nursing and/or nursing management educated all licensed nurses on the CPR policy and procedure, including where to find code status and what to do for full code hospice residents
- Reinforced through education that CPR must be initiated immediately for full code residents, continued until EMS arrives, and that nurses cannot pronounce death or stop CPR on a full code resident unless instructed by EMS
- Conducted an Ad Hoc Quality Improvement Performance Committee meeting to review root cause analysis recommendations related to the incident; recommendations approved
- Conducted a follow-up Ad Hoc Quality Improvement Performance Committee meeting to review progress on the plan; recommendations approved
Improper Use of Power Strips and Extension Cords in Multiple Facility Areas
Penalty
Summary
Surveyors identified deficiencies related to the use and maintenance of relocatable power taps (RPTs) and extension cords that did not comply with NFPA 101, NFPA 99, and NFPA 70 requirements. During a facility tour conducted between 11:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. with the Maintenance Director, surveyors observed in the social services office an RPT plugged into another RPT, which was then plugged into a wall outlet, with the cord running across a walkway and taped to the floor. In the multipurpose room, a television was found plugged into an extension cord, contrary to standards that prohibit using extension cords as a substitute for fixed wiring and require temporary extensions to be removed immediately after use. Further observations included the MDS office, where an RPT was plugged into another RPT and an outlet adapter was in use. These configurations did not meet the NFPA 99 provisions governing the proper use of power strips and extension cords, including requirements that power strips be appropriately rated and used only as intended, and that extension cords not be used as permanent wiring. During concurrent interviews, the Maintenance Director acknowledged these findings as they were observed by the surveyors.
Plan Of Correction
The RPT observed plugged into an RPT plugged into an outlet in the Social Services Office was removed. The extension cord used to plug in the television in the multipurpose room was removed. The RPT plugged into an RPT and outlet adapter in the MDS office was removed. Additional offices and resident care areas will be reviewed for the improper use of plug adapters, power strips and extension. The Executive Director/designee will educate the Maintenance Director on the importance of NFPA 101 Electrical Equipment- Power and Extension specific to the improper use of plug adapters, power strips, and extension and will continue to monitor in accordance with NFPA standards. Any findings will be reported to the monthly QAPI Committee for further review. The RPT observed plugged into an RPT plugged into an outlet in the Social Services Office was removed. The extension cord used to plug in the television in the multipurpose room was removed. The RPT plugged into an RPT and outlet adapter in the MDS office was removed. Additional offices and resident care areas will be reviewed for the improper use of plug adapters, power strips and extension. The Executive Director/designee will educate the Maintenance Director on the importance of NFPA 101 Electrical Equipment - Power and Extension specific to the improper use of plug adapters, power strips, and extension and will continue to monitor in accordance with NFPA standards. Any findings will be reported to the monthly QAPI Committee for further review.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release June 24, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
Trusted by long-term care providers and associations.
