Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
Past the typical resurvey interval — a standard survey could occur at any time
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Encore At West Meadow during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with chronic lorazepam use was readmitted with an order for lorazepam, but did not receive any doses for several days due to the medication not being available. Nursing staff documented the delay, and the resident subsequently experienced withdrawal symptoms, including a seizure that required hospital transfer. Review of records confirmed the missed doses and lack of documentation for some scheduled administrations.
Admission assessments for four residents were completed by LPNs instead of an RN, contrary to state requirements and facility policy. Multiple admission evaluations, such as clinical admission, Braden Scale, and fall risk, were documented by LPNs, and this was confirmed by the DON during interviews.
A resident with chronic anxiety disorder and a physician's order for lorazepam did not receive the medication for two days due to pharmacy profiling errors and issues with matching the prescription to available emergency stock. Nursing staff documented missed doses and delays, and the resident ultimately experienced a seizure and required hospitalization after missing four doses.
The facility's kitchen was found to be unsanitary, with trash, food debris, and a greasy substance on the floors and equipment. The juice machine and grease interceptor box were also unclean. Despite a cleaning schedule, the kitchen remained dirty, potentially affecting 89 of 91 residents. The CDM and Administrator acknowledged the issues, citing challenges in maintaining cleanliness.
A facility failed to include a resident in their person-centered care planning process. Despite the resident being cognitively intact, there was no evidence of their attendance at care plan meetings, and the resident confirmed not being invited. The Social Services Director admitted that inviting the resident had been missed, contrary to the facility's policy requiring resident participation.
A resident's privacy was compromised during medication administration when an LPN applied a Lidocaine pain patch at the nurses' station, exposing the resident's shoulder and upper chest area in front of others. The LPN and DON acknowledged this action violated the resident's dignity and privacy.
A facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to a resident and their representative during a hospitalization. Despite a verbal request for a bed hold, there was no documented evidence that written information was provided, as required by the facility's policy. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in the notification process, with some indicating verbal communication and others mentioning inclusion in the discharge packet.
A facility failed to accurately document a resident's continuous oxygen therapy in the MDS assessment. The resident, admitted with congestive heart failure and shortness of breath, was ordered to receive oxygen therapy, but this was not recorded in the MDS. The omission was confirmed by the MDS Coordinator upon review of the resident's records.
The facility failed to update care plans for three residents, affecting their care. One resident's plan lacked details on oxygen therapy, another's did not address wandering behavior, and a third's omitted a urinary catheter. Staff interviews confirmed the expectation to update plans as needed, but this was not done.
A facility failed to increase assessment frequency for a resident diagnosed with COVID-19, as required by their policy. Despite orders to monitor vital signs and symptoms daily, documentation was inconsistent during the resident's isolation period. Interviews with staff revealed an expectation for shift-based assessments, but the resident's records showed gaps in documentation.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment wandered into another resident's room at night, leading to an incident where he pulled down his pants and sat on a chair. The facility failed to revise the resident's care plan or implement interventions to address his wandering behavior, as revealed by interviews with staff and a lack of documentation.
A facility failed to provide appropriate care for a resident with a urinary catheter. The resident's physician orders for the catheter were not transcribed, and the care plan was not updated. Observations showed the drainage bag and tubing on the floor, potentially affecting urine flow. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight in documentation and care plan updates.
The facility failed to administer oxygen at the prescribed levels for two residents, leading to potential respiratory distress. One resident with COPD had their oxygen concentrator set incorrectly at 4.5 LPM and later at 2 LPM, instead of the prescribed 3 LPM. Another resident with congestive heart failure had their oxygen set at 3 LPM instead of the prescribed 2 LPM, and the concentrator's filter was clogged with dust. The Medical Director and LPN Supervisor confirmed the importance of adhering to physician orders and maintaining equipment.
A facility failed to document an end date for a PRN psychotropic medication for a resident with anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder. The resident had an order for clonazepam as needed, but it lacked a 14-day end date or a documented rationale for extension, contrary to facility policy. Staff interviews confirmed the oversight, highlighting the potential for medication use without ongoing physician assessment.
A medication cart on the second floor was left unlocked and unattended, posing a risk to a resident with impaired decision-making skills. Additionally, expired supplies were found in the medication storage room, indicating lapses in weekly inspections by the LPN Supervisor.
Three residents with cognitive impairments and a history of wandering were able to exit the facility unsupervised on multiple occasions, despite care plans and interventions such as wander-guards. Staff were unaware of the residents' absence until notified by others, and facility doors and alarm systems were not consistently secured or monitored, allowing residents to leave undetected.
Three separate elopement incidents involving three residents were not recognized or reported by facility staff as allegations of neglect, despite policy and state law requiring immediate reporting to the state agency. Staff interviews revealed misunderstandings about what constitutes an elopement and when reporting is necessary.
Seven staff members, including a receptionist, RN, LPN, and three CNAs, did not complete required Behavioral Health training as determined by the facility assessment. This was confirmed by facility leadership and documented in employee training records.
A resident eloped from the facility, and the required investigation into this incident was not conducted. When surveyors requested documentation, the DON confirmed that no investigative records were available, despite facility policy requiring thorough investigation of such events.
Mandatory QAPI training was not completed for six staff members, including an RN, an LPN, and several CNAs, as confirmed by facility leadership and employee training records.
Significant Medication Error: Missed Lorazepam Doses Result in Withdrawal Seizure
Penalty
Summary
A resident with a history of anxiety disorder and chronic lorazepam use was readmitted to the facility with an order for lorazepam 2 mg twice daily. Upon readmission, the medication was not available, and multiple nursing staff documented in the electronic medical record that the resident was waiting for pharmacy delivery. Despite these notes, the resident did not receive any doses of lorazepam for several days following readmission. During this period, the resident began to experience withdrawal symptoms, culminating in a seizure that required transfer to the hospital. Hospital records confirmed that the resident had not received lorazepam since returning to the facility, and both the resident and hospital staff noted the absence of the medication. The resident reported a long-term history of lorazepam use and stated that she had not received her medication due to it being unavailable at the facility. A review of the medication administration record confirmed that several scheduled doses of lorazepam were not administered, with some doses lacking any documentation. Facility leadership confirmed during interviews that the resident did not receive any lorazepam doses during the specified period, resulting in benzodiazepine withdrawal and a seizure event.
Failure to Ensure RN Completion of Admission Assessments
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that admission assessments for four residents were completed by a registered nurse (RN) as required by the Delaware State Code and the facility's own policy. Instead, licensed practical nurses (LPNs) completed multiple admission evaluations, including clinical admission, Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk, lift/transfer evaluation, elopement evaluation, fall risk evaluation, dehydration risk evaluation, trauma informed care, and functional abilities and goals. The records for each resident showed that these assessments were documented and completed by LPNs at the time of admission or readmission, rather than by an RN. Interviews with facility staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that LPNs had performed several of the required admission evaluations. The deficiency was identified for all four residents reviewed for admission, with each case lacking RN-completed admission assessments as mandated. The findings were discussed with facility leadership during the exit conference.
Failure to Provide Timely Pharmaceutical Services Resulting in Missed Medication and Hospitalization
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of a resident who was readmitted with diagnoses including diabetes and chronic anxiety disorder. Upon admission, the resident had an active order for lorazepam 2 mg orally twice daily, as documented in the hospital discharge summary and confirmed by the attending physician. However, the medication was not available for administration, and nursing staff documented multiple missed doses over a two-day period, noting that the resident was a new admit and the facility was waiting for pharmacy delivery. The delay in receiving lorazepam was due to a series of communication and procedural errors between the facility and the pharmacy. The pharmacy received the prescription but had the resident profiled under independent living rather than the skilled nursing facility, resulting in a lack of necessary allergy information and confusion about the resident's location. Additionally, the pharmacy could not release lorazepam from the emergency medication box because the available formulation (0.5 mg) did not match the physician's order (1 mg or 2 mg), and regulations required an exact match between the prescription and the medication formulation in the E box. As a result of these failures, the resident missed four doses of lorazepam and subsequently experienced a seizure, requiring transfer to the hospital. Documentation from the hospital confirmed that the resident had missed several doses of her chronic lorazepam regimen for unclear reasons, and the facility's records indicated that the medication was delivered only at the time the resident was experiencing a medical emergency and was unable to swallow.
Sanitation Deficiencies in Kitchen
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, which has the potential to affect 89 of 91 residents who received meals and beverages prepared in and served from the facility's kitchen. During an initial kitchen tour, surveyors observed trash, food debris, dust, dirt, and a greasy blackish-brown substance on the floors, underneath the dishwasher, freezer, cooler, and shelving. This substance was also found on the legs and feet of equipment, and underneath freestanding coolers, freezers, the range, ovens, prep tables, and shelving. Additionally, the commercial juice machine had water lines stained with a brownish-red substance, and the drip tray and spout covers were stained with a reddish substance. The 3-compartment sink's grease interceptor box was covered in food debris and a brownish greasy substance. Interviews with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and Cook1 revealed that the kitchen floors were supposed to be cleaned twice daily, as outlined in the kitchen's Utility Cleaning Schedule. However, despite these cleaning efforts, the floor remained dirty, with debris and stains still visible underneath the kitchen equipment. The CDM stated that the juice machine vendor was responsible for cleaning the internal parts of the machine, while facility staff were to clean the drip pan daily. The Administrator acknowledged the concerns and suggested that meal delivery carts might be contributing to the dirt and debris in the kitchen, but also noted that the kitchen could benefit from a deep cleaning.
Resident Excluded from Care Plan Meetings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was included in the development and implementation of their person-centered care plan. The facility's policy requires the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan in conjunction with the resident and their family or legal representative, ensuring the resident is informed of their right to participate and is given advance notice of care plan conferences. However, there was no documented evidence that the resident attended care plan meetings on two occasions, despite being cognitively intact with a perfect BIMS score. The resident confirmed not being invited to recent care plan meetings, and the Social Services Director acknowledged that inviting the resident had been overlooked.
Resident Privacy Breach During Medication Administration
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain the personal privacy of a resident during medication administration. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including sarcopenia and osteoarthritis, was observed receiving a Lidocaine 4% pain patch at the nurses' station. During this process, the LPN pulled the resident's shirt over her shoulder, exposing her shoulder and upper chest area in the presence of a male cognitively impaired resident, three staff members, and a visitor. The LPN did not offer the resident the option to return to her room for the application of the pain patch. Interviews conducted with the LPN and the Director of Nursing confirmed that the resident's privacy was not maintained during the procedure. The LPN acknowledged that the resident should have been taken back to her room for the application of the pain patch. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that the nurse's actions violated the resident's dignity and privacy, as outlined in the facility's policy on dignity, which emphasizes the protection of resident privacy during personal care and treatment procedures.
Failure to Provide Written Bed Hold Notification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to a resident and their responsible party during a hospitalization event. The resident, who was admitted with acute respiratory failure and dysphagia, was diagnosed with COVID-19 and transferred to a hospital. Despite the spouse's verbal request for a bed hold, there was no documented evidence in the electronic medical record (EMR) that written information regarding the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the resident or their representative. Interviews with facility staff revealed inconsistencies in the process of notifying residents and their representatives about the bed hold policy. The Social Services Director indicated that nurses verbally informed families, while the Administrator and Unit Manager mentioned that a copy of the bed hold policy was included in the discharge packet. However, the Assistant Director of Nursing confirmed that unless documented, there was no evidence that the resident or representative received the written notification. The facility's policy requires that written information about the bed hold policy be provided at least twice, including at the time of transfer, which was not adhered to in this case.
Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Resident Receiving Oxygen Therapy
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident, identified as R22, out of 25 sampled residents. R22 was admitted with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and shortness of breath and was ordered to receive continuous oxygen therapy at two liters via nasal cannula. However, the admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date of 09/29/24, did not document the resident's continuous oxygen therapy in Section O, which is designated for Special Procedures, Treatments, and Programs. This oversight was confirmed during an interview with the MDS Coordinator, who reviewed the resident's physician orders and treatment records and acknowledged the omission in the MDS documentation.
Failure to Revise Care Plans for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to revise care plans for three residents, which could potentially affect the care provided to them. For one resident, the care plan was not updated to include continuous oxygen therapy, despite physician orders indicating its necessity and observations confirming its use. Another resident's care plan was not revised following an incident where the resident wandered into a female resident's room and exhibited inappropriate behavior. Although the facility conducted an investigation, the care plan did not reflect the incident or any interventions to prevent future occurrences. Additionally, a third resident's care plan was not updated to include the use of a urinary catheter, which was necessary due to urinary retention. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator, ADON, and DON, revealed that it was expected for nurses to update care plans as needed. The facility's policy also emphasized the importance of revising care plans when there are changes in a resident's condition. However, these expectations were not met, leading to deficiencies in the care planning process.
Failure to Increase Assessment Frequency for COVID-19 Positive Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to increase the frequency of assessments for a resident diagnosed with COVID-19, which was a deficiency identified during a survey. The resident, who was admitted with acute respiratory failure and dysphagia, tested positive for COVID-19 during outbreak testing. Despite an order to monitor vital signs and symptoms daily, the facility did not document these assessments consistently during the resident's isolation period. Specifically, there was no documented evidence of assessments, including vital signs and lung sounds, on several days within the ten-day isolation period. Interviews with facility staff, including an LPN, the Infection Preventionist (IP), and the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed that there was an expectation for nurses to complete and document COVID-19 assessments every shift for residents with COVID-19. However, the resident's electronic medical record showed less than daily documentation of these assessments. The facility's policy required increased clinical monitoring for residents with confirmed COVID-19, but this was not adhered to, leading to the deficiency.
Inadequate Supervision of Resident with Wandering Behavior
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident, identified as R65, who was admitted with diagnoses including cognitive communication, dementia, anxiety disorders, and altered mental status. R65 was assessed to have severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making, with a BIMS score of 00. Despite this, the facility did not document any wandering behaviors during the initial assessment period. However, an incident occurred where R65 wandered into a female resident's room at night, pulled down his pants, and sat on a chair next to her bed. The female resident, upon waking, took pictures and called for nursing staff, but R65 had returned to his room by the time they arrived. The female resident reported no physical contact and expressed a desire for R65 not to enter her room again. The facility's investigation into the incident revealed a lack of documented evidence that R65's care plan was revised to address his wandering behavior. There were no interventions identified or implemented to protect R65 or other residents from potential harm. Interviews with the Social Services Director, Medical Director, and Assistant Director of Nursing indicated a lack of documentation and clarity on the interventions discussed or implemented following the incident. The facility's policy on incident/accident reports was not effectively utilized to analyze and address individual resident vulnerabilities, contributing to the deficiency in supervision and safety measures for R65 and other residents.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Urinary Catheter Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for a resident with a urinary catheter. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, hydronephrosis, urinary retention, and chronic kidney disease, did not have physician orders for the use of a urinary catheter transcribed into their monthly orders. Additionally, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the presence of the urinary catheter. Observations revealed that the urinary drainage bag and tubing were placed directly on the floor, which could inhibit proper urine flow. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the discharge orders for the urinary catheter were not transcribed to the resident's monthly orders, and the care plan was not revised accordingly. The LPN involved acknowledged the oversight and indicated a misunderstanding regarding the transcription of orders and care plan updates. This lack of proper documentation and catheter management had the potential to contribute to the resident's risk of developing reoccurring urinary tract infections.
Failure to Administer Oxygen at Prescribed Levels
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to administer oxygen at the physician-prescribed dose for two residents, leading to potential respiratory distress. Resident 9, who was admitted with pneumonia, COPD, and chronic respiratory failure, had a physician order for oxygen at 3 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula. However, observations revealed the oxygen concentrator was set incorrectly at 4.5 LPM and later at 2 LPM. The Medical Director confirmed the importance of maintaining the prescribed oxygen level due to the resident's risk of hypoxia. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 acknowledged the discrepancy and suggested that another staff member might have changed the settings by mistake. Resident 22, admitted with congestive heart failure and shortness of breath, was prescribed continuous oxygen therapy at 2 LPM. Observations showed the oxygen was set at 3 LPM, and the oxygen concentrator's filter was clogged with dust. The Medical Director emphasized the need for oxygen to be delivered according to the physician's orders and for any changes to be communicated to the physician. The LPN Supervisor confirmed that nurses were responsible for maintaining the oxygen concentrator's cleanliness and ensuring the correct oxygen settings.
Failure to Document End Date for PRN Psychotropic Medication
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to document an end date for a PRN psychotropic medication for one resident, which was identified during a review of unnecessary medications. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder, had an order for clonazepam 0.5mg every 24 hours as needed for anxiety, but the order lacked an end date. This oversight was confirmed during interviews with the resident, who reported infrequent use of the medication, and with staff members, including an LPN and a Unit Manager, who acknowledged the absence of a 14-day end date or a documented rationale for extending the order. The facility's policy on psychotropic medication use requires PRN orders to have a 14-day limit unless a rationale for extension is documented. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing and the Director of Nursing confirmed the expectation for PRN psychotropic medications to have a 14-day end date or a documented rationale for extension. The failure to adhere to this policy had the potential for residents to receive psychotropic medications without ongoing assessment by a physician or practitioner for continued appropriateness.
Medication Cart Security and Expired Supplies
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to secure a medication cart on the second floor, which was observed to be unlocked and unattended for nearly ten minutes. The cart contained insulin pens, over-the-counter medications, and a locked narcotic box. During this time, a resident with severe decision-making impairments and a tendency to wander was nearby, posing a potential hazard. Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) 4 and 5, who were sharing the cart, were unaware of its unlocked state, acknowledging the risk it posed to the resident. Additionally, an inspection of the second-floor medication storage room revealed expired supplies, including hypodermic needles, syringes, extension sets, nutritional supplements, and various dressings. The LPN Supervisor admitted to attempting weekly inspections but had missed these expired items. The facility's policies on medication cart security and medication storage and labeling were reviewed, highlighting the requirement for carts to be locked when not in use and for expired medications to be managed according to pharmacy instructions.
Failure to Prevent Resident Elopements Due to Inadequate Supervision and Unsafe Environment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and maintain a safe environment for three residents identified as at risk for wandering and elopement. Each of these residents had documented cognitive impairments, including dementia and severe cognitive deficits, and were assessed as high risk for elopement upon admission or following incidents. Despite care plans and physician orders for interventions such as wander-guards and frequent checks, the residents were able to exit the facility unsupervised on multiple occasions. In each case, staff were unaware that the residents had left the building until notified by visitors, other staff, or by finding the residents outside. One resident with a history of dementia and unsteadiness was found outside the facility by a visitor, prompting a reassessment and the application of a wander-guard. Another resident, also with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, eloped twice within a short period. On one occasion, the resident was found in the parking lot, and on another, near a busy roadway. Staff interviews revealed that alarms were sometimes disarmed by non-nursing staff or family members, and that signage intended to restrict alarm disarming to nursing staff was not consistently posted. Additionally, the resident was able to remove her own wander-guard using scissors found in her room, further compromising her safety. A third resident, initially assessed as not at risk for elopement, was later found outside the building by a speech therapist after being reported by a visitor. This resident was subsequently reassessed as high risk and provided with a wander-guard. Observations during the survey revealed that certain doors between the healthcare and independent living areas were routinely left open, and that alarms could not be heard at a distance, allowing residents to exit undetected. Staff interviews confirmed a lack of awareness regarding the residents' whereabouts at the time of the elopements, and documentation of frequent rounding was not maintained.
Failure to Report Elopements as Neglect
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to recognize and report three separate elopement incidents involving three residents as allegations of neglect, as required by their own policy and state law. The incidents occurred on multiple dates, with each resident leaving the facility premises. Despite the facility's policy stating that any suspicion of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation must be reported immediately to the administrator and state agency, the facility did not report these elopements. Record review showed that the last elopement reported to the State Agency was in the previous year, and interviews with facility staff confirmed that the incidents were not reported due to a misunderstanding of what constitutes an elopement and uncertainty about reporting requirements.
Failure to Provide Required Behavioral Health Training to Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that seven out of ten reviewed staff members completed the required Behavioral Health training as determined by the facility assessment. Review of employee training records showed that a receptionist, an RN, three CNAs, an LPN, and another staff member did not have evidence of completing this training, despite being hired between November 2021 and October 2023. During an interview, the Executive Director confirmed that these staff members had not received the required training. These findings were discussed with facility leadership during the exit conference.
Failure to Investigate Resident Elopement
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of neglect involving one resident who eloped from the facility. According to the facility's policy, all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation are required to be thoroughly investigated. On 7/11/24, a progress note documented that the resident had eloped. When surveyors requested investigative documents related to this incident, the Director of Nursing confirmed that no such documents existed for the resident's elopement. This lack of investigation was confirmed during the exit conference with facility leadership.
Failure to Provide Required QAPI Training to Staff
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that mandatory Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training was completed for six out of ten staff members reviewed. Employee training records showed no evidence that a registered nurse, a licensed practical nurse, three certified nursing assistants, and one other staff member received the required QAPI training, despite being hired between November 2021 and October 2023. During an interview, the Executive Director confirmed that these staff members had not received the necessary training. These findings were reviewed with facility leadership during the exit conference. No information regarding residents, their medical history, or their condition at the time of the deficiency was provided in the report.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 278 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 4 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Newark
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newark Manor Nursing Home | 2.2 mi | — | 7 | 0 |
| Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Jeanne Jugan Residence | 3.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Cadia Rehabilitation Pike Creek | 3.8 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Excelcare At Newark Llc | 4 mi | — | 12 | 1 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Encore At West Meadow.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.