Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around December 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Mystic Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center, Llc during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A facility failed to maintain a safe environment when a dirty meal tray cart with uncovered leftover food and an open garbage was routinely left overnight in a hallway outside a locked kitchen, accessible to cognitively impaired, wandering residents on modified diets, including pureed and mechanical soft textures with thin liquids. One resident with dementia, dysphagia, severe memory deficits, and dependence on staff for eating accessed a peanut butter sandwich from the unattended cart and choked, requiring an LPN to perform the Heimlich maneuver. Staff interviews revealed that this resident habitually wandered at night seeking food and had previously attempted to take food from the cart, but these behaviors were not reported to licensed staff. The Director of Food Service and DON were aware that the cart was not consistently locked in the kitchen, and a new RN supervisor on duty had not been oriented to the meal tray collection and cart storage process. The facility lacked a specific policy on food cart storage or food disposal, despite having general policies on safe environment and management of wandering and elopement risk, resulting in an Immediate Jeopardy finding.
A resident with dementia, COPD, dysphagia, severe memory deficits, and dependence on staff for eating had a care plan and Resident Care Card directing a regular pureed diet with thin liquids, aspiration monitoring during meals, and removal of accessible food due to food-seeking behavior. Staff failed to follow these directives when the resident, who habitually wandered at night looking for food, accessed a peanut butter sandwich from a food cart and choked, requiring an LPN to perform the Heimlich maneuver. A NA had previously seen the resident attempt to take and eat food from the cart, did not report these incidents to nursing staff, was unaware of the prescribed pureed diet, and provided snacks at night without knowledge of dietary restrictions, while the DON was unaware of the prior food cart incidents.
A resident with dementia, dysphagia, severe memory deficits, and dependence on staff for eating was care planned and ordered for a regular, pureed diet with thin liquids and had a Wanderguard for wandering risk. During a night shift, the resident, who habitually wandered the halls seeking food, accessed a food cart outside the locked kitchen, took a peanut butter sandwich inconsistent with the prescribed diet, and began choking. A NA observed the choking and alerted an LPN, who performed the Heimlich maneuver. The NA reported having previously seen the resident attempt to take and eat food from the food cart but did not report these behaviors to licensed staff and was unaware of the resident’s pureed diet, while the DON was unaware of the prior unsafe eating incidents.
A resident with significant physical and mental health needs was subjected to loud and derogatory remarks by a nursing assistant during toileting care. Two other NAs witnessed the incident and reported that the staff member questioned the resident's need for care and expressed frustration about being assigned to the resident, in violation of facility policies on resident rights and abuse prevention.
A resident with significant care needs was subjected to disparaging and vulgar remarks by a nursing assistant regarding incontinence and food intake. Although two staff members reported the incident to supervisory staff, the nursing supervisor did not escalate the allegation, initiate an incident report, or remove the accused staff member from duty. The DON was not informed until the next day, resulting in a delay in addressing the abuse allegation as required by facility policy.
A resident with cognitive impairment and muscle weakness sustained significant burns to the thigh and genital area after spilling hot chocolate, due to the facility's failure to implement an ordered sippy cup intervention and lack of communication among staff. The resident continued to receive hot beverages in open cups, and required assessments and investigations into the injuries were not completed as per facility policy.
A resident with dementia, muscle weakness, and polyneuropathy developed new wounds that were not promptly addressed in the care plan, with a delay of 10 days before updates were made. Additionally, the care plan did not include interventions for the resident's frequent refusals of care, despite staff being aware of this behavior. Facility policy required timely updates to care plans for changes in resident status, but this was not followed.
A resident with dementia and polyneuropathy experienced injuries of unknown origin, but staff failed to perform a timely full body skin assessment after the initial wound was discovered, and did not document nursing notes every shift as ordered by the physician. Facility policy requiring immediate assessment and documentation of unexplained injuries was not followed, as confirmed by staff interviews and record review.
Several residents with cognitive and physical impairments reported mistreatment and fear related to a staff member, but the facility failed to document grievances, provide required follow-up, or offer timely support as outlined in its own policy. Staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that complaints were not properly recorded or resolved, and administrative staff were unaware of key incidents.
Multiple residents with cognitive and physical impairments reported verbal and physical mistreatment by a staff member, but staff failed to document, investigate, and report these abuse allegations to the State Agency as required by facility policy. Despite some immediate actions, such as staff suspension, there was no evidence of timely notification or proper follow-up.
Multiple residents reported abuse or neglect by a staff member, including physical and verbal mistreatment, but the facility failed to conduct complete investigations or document the allegations as required. Staff did not consistently obtain statements from all involved, and complaints were not always recorded in nurse's notes or the grievance log, resulting in unresolved and uninvestigated incidents.
A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, requiring two staff for care due to behavioral issues, was forcefully pushed into a wheelchair by a staff member who was providing care alone. The resident sustained a bruise and skin tear, and the incident was not promptly reported or investigated according to facility policy, resulting in a failure to protect the resident from abuse.
A resident with dementia and behavioral disturbances, who was care planned for two staff to provide care during a specific shift due to aggression and sundowning, was instead cared for by a single nursing assistant. The staff member was unaware of the updated care plan and the requirement was not communicated, resulting in care being provided alone and an incident involving physical altercation and injury.
Immediate Jeopardy from Unsecured Food Cart Access by Wandering Residents with Dysphagia
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards and to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents, specifically related to the storage and handling of food carts and leftover food. A food cart used for collecting dirty meal trays was routinely left overnight in the hallway outside a locked kitchen door, without a cover on the cart or on the attached garbage container. This cart, sometimes containing leftover food on plates or in an open garbage, was accessible to cognitively impaired residents with wandering behaviors and prescribed modified diets. The facility did not have a policy addressing food cart storage or proper disposal of food, and the process for securing the cart inside the kitchen was not consistently followed, despite the expectation that the supervising nurse would lock the cart in the kitchen. Four residents with cognitive impairment, dysphagia, and/or wandering and elopement risk were identified as being affected by this unsafe practice. One resident had dementia, COPD, dysphagia, severe memory deficits, was dependent on staff for eating, and was on a regular pureed diet with thin liquids. This resident’s care plan and physician orders included a Wanderguard for wandering and elopement risk and interventions for wandering and nutrition, including a pureed diet and cues to eat slowly. Another resident had cerebral infarction, COPD, diabetes, severe memory deficits, and was on a low concentrated sweet, mechanical soft diet with thin liquids, with a Wanderguard and interventions for wandering and elopement. A third resident had dementia, diabetes, dysphagia, severe memory deficits, required set-up assistance for meals, and was on a low concentrated sweet, no added salt, mechanical soft diet with thin liquids, with a Wanderguard and interventions for wandering. A fourth resident had schizophrenia, anxiety, dysphagia, moderate memory deficits, was independent with eating and mobility, and was on a regular mechanical soft diet with thin liquids, with a Wanderguard and identified risk for choking due to poor dental hygiene. The unsafe environment directly resulted in a choking episode for one resident. During an overnight shift, a nurse aide observed this resident, known to wander the halls at night looking for food and able to open unit double doors, at the food cart outside the locked kitchen door, choking after taking a piece of a peanut butter sandwich from the unattended cart. The LPN on duty performed the Heimlich maneuver, and the resident expelled the sandwich contents and returned to baseline. The nurse aide reported that the resident had previously attempted to take food from the dirty food cart on multiple occasions and had once taken a bite of a sandwich from the cart, but these incidents were not reported to licensed staff. The DON was aware the resident wandered and wore a Wanderguard but was not aware the resident was seeking food from the cart. The Director of Food Service and DON both acknowledged that the cart was not consistently locked in the kitchen, and the new RN supervisor on duty the night of the choking episode had not been trained on the meal tray collection process or the requirement to secure the cart, contributing to the failure to prevent access to the food cart and resulting in Immediate Jeopardy. Additional information from interviews further supports the pattern of unsafe practice. The Director of Food Service described the standard process of using the cart to collect trays, scrape food into the attached garbage, and return the cart to the kitchen, and stated that when dietary staff left at night, an empty cart was left outside the locked kitchen for staff to return remaining dishes, with the expectation that food would be scraped into the open garbage. He reported having previously informed Administration that the cart was not being stored inside the locked kitchen. A dietary aide on the morning shift confirmed that his first task was to empty plates from the cart left in the hallway overnight and that sometimes food remained on plates and sometimes it had been scraped into the open garbage. The Building Specific Orientation Tour for the RN supervisor did not include training on meal tray collection or food cart storage. The facility’s existing policies on providing a safe and homelike environment and on elopements and wandering residents required a safe physical layout and systematic monitoring and management of residents at risk for wandering and elopement, but there was no specific policy addressing food cart storage or food disposal, and the failure to secure the cart and to communicate and act on known wandering and food-seeking behaviors led to the identified deficiency and Immediate Jeopardy.
Failure to Follow Care Plan for Pureed Diet and Aspiration Precautions
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure staff followed a resident’s person-centered care plan and Resident Care Card (RCC) regarding a prescribed pureed diet and required monitoring for aspiration. The resident had dementia, COPD, dysphagia, severe short- and long-term memory deficits (BIMS score of 2), was dependent on staff for eating, and was identified as at risk for weight loss, wandering, and elopement. The care plan and RCC directed a regular, pureed texture diet with thin liquids, cues to eat slowly, maintaining an upright position after meals, offering snacks between meals and at bedtime as appropriate, monitoring during meals for aspiration, and removing food from the whole room due to the resident’s tendency to seek food from the roommate. Physician’s orders also specified a regular, pureed texture diet with thin liquids. Despite these directives, staff actions and inactions led to the resident accessing and consuming food inconsistent with the prescribed diet. During the night shift, the resident habitually wandered the hallway looking for food and had previously attempted to take food from the dirty food cart and had taken a bite of a sandwich from the cart, but the NA who observed these behaviors did not report them to a nurse, believing staff were already aware. The NA was not aware the resident was on a pureed diet and reported giving the resident snacks such as chocolate pudding during the night. On one occasion, the resident took a piece of a peanut butter sandwich from the food cart located outside the locked kitchen door and choked on it, requiring the LPN to perform the Heimlich maneuver to expel the sandwich. The DON later stated she was unaware of the prior incidents with the food cart and that the NA should have reported them, while facility policy directed that staff follow the plan of care and Care Card.
Failure to Ensure Staff Awareness of Prescribed Diet and Reporting of Unsafe Eating Behaviors
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to ensure nursing staff were aware of a cognitively impaired resident’s prescribed pureed diet and to report and address unsafe eating behaviors. The resident had dementia, COPD, dysphagia, severe memory deficits (BIMS score of 2), was dependent on staff for eating, and had care plan interventions for a regular, pureed diet with thin liquids, cues to eat slowly, remaining upright after meals, and snacks between meals and at bedtime. The resident was also care planned and ordered for a Wanderguard due to wandering and elopement risk. Despite these orders and care plan interventions, the resident was able to access a food cart located outside the locked kitchen door and obtain a peanut butter sandwich that was inconsistent with the prescribed pureed diet. On the night of the incident, the resident wandered in the hallway and took a piece of a peanut butter sandwich from the food cart, then began choking. NA #1 observed the resident at the food cart choking and alerted LPN #1, who performed the Heimlich maneuver and the resident expelled the sandwich contents. NA #1 reported that the resident habitually wandered the hallway during the night looking for food, had previously attempted to take food from the dirty food cart, and had been seen taking a bite of a sandwich from the cart, but these prior incidents were not reported to licensed staff because NA #1 believed staff were already aware. NA #1 was not aware the resident was on a pureed diet and had been giving the resident snacks such as chocolate pudding at night. The DON stated she was unaware of the prior sandwich incident and confirmed that NA #1 had not reported the resident’s attempts to take or eat food from the food cart and that such incidents should have been reported to a licensed nurse.
Failure to Protect Resident from Verbal Mistreatment by Staff
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when a resident with a history of stroke, hemiplegia, anxiety, and major depression, who was dependent on staff for toileting and other activities of daily living, was subjected to verbal mistreatment by a nursing assistant (NA). The resident was frequently incontinent and required emotional support as part of their care plan. On the evening in question, two other nursing assistants witnessed and reported that the NA assigned to the resident spoke to them in a loud and derogatory manner, questioning why the resident needed to defecate and expressing frustration about having the resident on her assignment. The incident was reported to supervisory staff, and it was noted that the resident appeared stunned by the interaction. Facility documentation and interviews confirmed that the NA's communication style was inconsistent with facility expectations and policies regarding resident rights and abuse prevention. Although the facility's internal investigation did not substantiate abuse due to the resident's inability to recall the incident, multiple staff members corroborated the inappropriate language and tone used by the NA. The supervisor and DON were aware of previous concerns regarding the NA's communication style, but the incident was not immediately investigated in detail at the time it was reported.
Failure to Timely Report Allegation of Verbal Abuse
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to promptly report an allegation of verbal abuse involving a resident who was dependent for toileting, transfers, and bed mobility, and had a history of stroke, anxiety, and major depression. The incident occurred when a nursing assistant (NA) made disparaging and vulgar remarks to the resident regarding their incontinence and dietary intake. Two other staff members witnessed or overheard the incident and reported it to the charge nurse and supervisor. Despite being informed of the incident, the nursing supervisor did not initiate an incident report, notify the Director of Nursing (DON), or remove the accused staff member from duty to protect residents. The supervisor also did not gather specific details about the interaction or recognize the need for immediate escalation, even though she acknowledged that such behavior would be considered abusive. The DON was not notified of the allegation until the following day, resulting in a delay in the investigation and appropriate response. Facility policy required immediate reporting of suspected abuse to management, but this protocol was not followed, leading to a failure in timely reporting and response to the abuse allegation.
Failure to Prevent and Respond to Resident Burns from Hot Beverage Spill
Penalty
Summary
A resident with dementia, generalized muscle weakness, and polyneuropathy experienced multiple incidents resulting in injuries, including burns from a hot beverage spill. The resident was assessed as having moderately impaired cognition and was independent with eating and mobility. Despite this, the resident sustained a significant burn wound to the right inner thigh and genital area after spilling hot chocolate, as identified by occupational therapy and wound care staff. The clinical record did not initially identify the cause of the inner thigh wound, nor did it document wound treatment, monitoring, or preventative interventions after the wound was discovered. Following the burn incident, a physician's order was entered for the resident to use a sippy cup for all beverages to prevent further accidents. However, this intervention was not implemented effectively. Multiple staff members, including nursing assistants, therapy, and dietary staff, were unaware of the sippy cup order, and the intervention was not reflected on the resident's care card or adaptive equipment lists. Observations confirmed that the resident continued to receive hot beverages in open cups, and staff interviews revealed a lack of communication and process for ensuring adaptive equipment orders were followed. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct a full investigation into the injuries of unknown origin, as required by policy. There was no documentation of a completed accident and investigation report for the initial wound, and a full body skin assessment was not performed after the incident. The facility's policy required immediate assessment and investigation of unexplained injuries, but these steps were not documented or completed. The serving temperatures of hot beverages were also found to be high, with no policy provided regarding safe serving temperatures.
Failure to Timely Update Care Plan After New Wounds and Address Refusals of Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to timely review and revise the care plan for a resident following the discovery of new wounds and did not address the resident's frequent refusals of care. Specifically, after a 16 cm by 7 cm skin tear was identified on the resident's right inner thigh, there was no documentation of an intervention being implemented immediately after the wound was discovered. Additionally, the resident's care plan was not updated to reflect the new wound until 10 days after the initial identification. The facility's own policy and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) confirmed that interventions and care plan updates should have occurred within 24 hours of the incident, but this did not happen. Furthermore, documentation related to the investigation of the injury of unknown origin could not be located by the DNS. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, generalized muscle weakness, and polyneuropathy, also had a documented history of refusing care such as bathroom assistance, use of the call bell, personal care, and showering. Despite this, the care plan and care card did not include interventions or strategies to address these refusals, such as reapproaching the resident. Multiple nursing assistants and the DNS confirmed the resident's pattern of refusals, but the social worker responsible for updating behavior-related care plans was not aware of these refusals. The facility's policy required ongoing changes in resident status to be updated in the care plan, but this was not followed in this case.
Failure to Perform Timely Full Body Skin Assessment and Required Documentation After Injury
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a full body skin assessment was performed after the discovery of an injury of unknown origin for a resident with dementia, generalized muscle weakness, and polyneuropathy. After a significant skin tear was identified on the resident's right inner thigh, neither the charge nurse nor the wound nurse completed a full body skin assessment at the time of discovery. The first documented full body skin assessment occurred three days later, which did not reveal any new wounds. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed that the assessment was not performed immediately, as each nurse believed the other would complete it. Additionally, the facility did not comply with physician orders to document nursing notes every shift for 72 hours following the discovery of a wound to the resident's genitals. Review of the clinical record showed multiple shifts where required documentation was missing. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS) confirmed that notes should have been documented every shift per the physician's order, but this was not done. Facility policy required immediate assessment and documentation of unexplained injuries, as well as weekly and as-needed full body skin audits by licensed nurses. Despite these policies, the required assessments and documentation were not completed as directed after the discovery of the resident's injuries. The failure to follow these protocols was confirmed through staff interviews and review of facility documentation.
Failure to Address and Document Resident Grievances and Allegations of Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to honor residents' rights to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal, and did not follow its own grievance policy regarding prompt resolution and support after allegations of abuse or mistreatment. Multiple residents with varying degrees of cognitive and physical impairment reported incidents involving a nursing assistant who was described as rude, rough, and frightening. These residents expressed fear, anxiety, and reluctance to seek assistance due to the staff member's behavior. Despite these reports, there was no evidence in the grievance book or social service documentation that grievances were filed or that the required follow-up and support were provided to the residents. Interviews with staff revealed that although some staff members were made aware of the residents' complaints and concerns, they either did not document the incidents or failed to ensure that grievance forms were completed and submitted according to facility policy. Social service notes did not reflect any follow-up or support for the residents after the allegations, and the required daily meetings with residents for 72 hours following an abuse allegation were not documented. Additionally, administrative staff and the Director of Nursing were unaware of some of the reported incidents and could not locate any related grievance forms or investigations, despite being listed as participants in disciplinary records. The facility's own policy required that concerns and complaints be actively addressed, documented, and communicated to the resident or their representative. However, the review of records and interviews confirmed that these procedures were not followed for several residents who reported mistreatment. The lack of documentation and follow-up resulted in unresolved grievances and a failure to provide the necessary support to residents after allegations of abuse or mistreatment.
Failure to Timely Report Alleged Abuse to State Agency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure timely reporting of allegations of abuse and mistreatment to the State Agency for four out of six residents reviewed. Multiple residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment and physical dependency reported incidents involving a nursing assistant who was described as rude, rough, and verbally abusive. These allegations were communicated to various staff members, including occupational therapy, social work, and nursing supervisors. In several cases, residents expressed fear and distress related to the staff member's behavior, and some reported being afraid to request assistance due to concerns about being yelled at or mistreated. Despite these reports, there was a lack of documentation and follow-up regarding the allegations. Staff interviews revealed that while some immediate actions, such as suspending the accused staff member, were taken, there was confusion and inconsistency about whether the incidents met the criteria for abuse and should be reported to the State Agency. Statements and grievances were not consistently documented, and there was no evidence that the required notifications to the State Agency were made. The facility's own policy required immediate reporting of any abuse allegations, but this protocol was not followed. The review of the State Agency Reportable Events website confirmed that none of the incidents involving the four residents were reported as required. Interviews with current and former staff, including the DON and Administrator, indicated an inability to identify or locate documentation related to the incidents. The lack of timely reporting and investigation of these abuse allegations constitutes a deficiency in the facility's compliance with mandated abuse reporting requirements.
Failure to Investigate and Document Abuse Allegations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to appropriately investigate and document allegations of abuse or neglect for multiple residents. In one case, a resident with dementia and behavioral disturbances reported being physically assaulted by a staff member, resulting in visible bruising. Although an initial investigation was started, the facility did not obtain statements from all staff present during the incident, as acknowledged by the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) and Administrator. The investigation was therefore incomplete, and not all relevant staff were interviewed. Several other residents with varying cognitive and physical impairments reported concerns about a specific nursing assistant's (NA) behavior, including verbal abuse, rough care, and fear of retaliation. These complaints were reported to various staff members, including nursing supervisors and social workers, but were not consistently documented in nurse's notes or the grievance book. In some cases, staff members who received the complaints did not recall being notified, and there was a lack of follow-up or resolution communicated to the residents. Additionally, statements and documentation related to these allegations were either not completed or not retained, and the facility was unable to identify or locate records of certain complaints and investigations. The facility's abuse prevention policy requires prompt and thorough investigation of all abuse allegations, including interviewing all relevant staff and reporting to the appropriate authorities. However, the report shows that the facility did not follow these procedures for multiple allegations, resulting in incomplete investigations and a lack of documentation. The DNS and Administrator were unaware of some complaints and could not account for missing records or unresolved grievances, indicating systemic failures in responding to and investigating abuse allegations as required by policy.
Failure to Protect Resident from Abuse and Follow Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
A resident with dementia and severe cognitive impairment, who required supervision and two staff for care during certain shifts due to aggression and sundowning behaviors, was involved in an incident where a staff member was observed pushing the resident forcefully into a wheelchair. The resident had a history of combative behaviors and was care planned for specific interventions, including staff explanations and the presence of two staff during care. Despite these interventions, the staff member provided care alone and did not follow the care plan requirements. On the evening of the incident, another staff member witnessed the resident being pushed down into the wheelchair by the shoulders in a manner described as not gentle but a hard push. The resident repeatedly asked the staff member to leave, but the staff member remained, leading to the resident striking the staff member. The resident was later found with a bruise and skin tear on the right hand, which the resident attributed to being punched by the staff member. The incident was not immediately reported to supervisory staff, and initial reports to the nurse on duty were not acted upon or escalated as required by facility policy. The facility's documentation and interviews revealed that the required reporting and investigation procedures were not followed promptly. The nurse on duty did not report the incident to the appropriate supervisor, and the staff member involved continued to work with the resident despite the care plan indicating two staff were needed. The facility's abuse prevention policy required immediate reporting and protection of residents during investigations, but these procedures were not adhered to, resulting in a failure to ensure the resident was free from abuse.
Failure to Provide Two Staff for Care as Required by Resident Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure that two staff members were present to provide care to a resident with dementia and behavioral disturbances during the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift, as required by the resident's care plan. The resident, who had severely impaired cognition and a history of aggression and sundowning behaviors, was care planned to have two staff for all care during this shift. On the evening in question, only one nursing assistant provided care, contrary to the care plan and the resident's care card instructions. The nursing assistant was not aware of the recent update to the care plan and reported that the change had not been communicated to him, although he acknowledged that he should have followed the care card. The incident was reported after the resident alleged that a male staff member entered the room, was rough, and hit the resident multiple times, resulting in a bruise and a small scab on the resident's hand. Facility investigation found that the resident, who was known to be combative, had struck the nursing assistant, but there was no evidence to substantiate abuse by the staff member. Interviews with staff and facility leadership confirmed that the care plan requiring two staff was not followed, and the nursing assistant should have requested assistance when the resident became agitated. The facility was unable to provide a policy on Resident Care Cards when requested.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 121 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mystic
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple Rehab Mystic | 0.9 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Pendleton Rehabilitation And Nursing Center | 1.3 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Avalon Health Care Center At Stoneridge | 1.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Complete Care At Groton Regency | 3.7 mi | — | 13 | 0 |
| Fairview | 5.6 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Mystic Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center, Llc.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.