Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at University Post Acute during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, diagnosed with dementia and Alzheimer's, left the facility unnoticed and traveled 17 miles away. The facility's safety and supervision policy was not followed, as the resident's absence went unnoticed by staff. Interviews with the ADON and DON confirmed the lapse in supervision, which is a core component of the facility's safety policy.
The facility failed to accurately code the MDS assessments for two residents, resulting in deficiencies. One resident receiving hospice care was not coded as such in the MDS, despite an order for hospice services. Another resident taking an antidepressant medication was not reflected in the MDS, even though the medication was administered regularly. The MDS Coordinator, DON, and Administrator acknowledged the errors and emphasized the importance of accurate MDS coding.
A facility failed to complete a PASARR evaluation for a resident who received new mental health diagnoses, including anxiety disorder, depression, and schizoaffective disorder. Despite the resident's severe cognitive impairment and active diagnoses, no PASARR evaluation was documented. The Assistant Director of Nursing was unaware of the need for a new PASARR, and the Director of Nursing acknowledged the oversight.
A resident with serious mental illness and intellectual disabilities was admitted to the facility with a 30-day Exempted Hospital Discharge, but the facility failed to complete a PASARR evaluation after the resident remained beyond the exemption period. The ADON was unfamiliar with the resubmission requirement, leading to non-compliance with federal regulations.
The facility failed to comply with federal regulations regarding resident room size, with 19 out of 21 rooms not meeting the required square footage per resident. Measurements showed that rooms with four beds provided only 73.2 square feet per resident, while two-bed rooms provided between 69.85 and 77.5 square feet per resident. The Director of Maintenance and the Administrator confirmed the accuracy of these measurements and acknowledged the non-compliance.
Resident Elopement Due to Lack of Supervision
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to adhere to its safety and supervision policy when a resident with severe cognitive impairment left the facility without staff knowledge. The resident, who had been diagnosed with unspecified dementia and Alzheimer's disease, was admitted with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident left the facility around lunchtime and was found approximately 17 miles away at an acute general hospital later that day. The incident was not noticed by the staff until the resident was reported missing. Interviews with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the resident's absence went unnoticed, and the facility's safety and supervision policy was not followed. The facility's policy emphasized that resident supervision is a core component of safety, with the type and frequency of supervision determined by individual needs and environmental hazards. However, the lack of adherence to this policy resulted in the resident's elopement, posing a potential safety risk.
Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Hospice and Antidepressant Care
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two residents, leading to deficiencies in the documentation of their care. For one resident, who was admitted on December 10, 2021, and had a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain, the MDS assessment did not reflect that the resident was receiving hospice care, despite an order for hospice services dated May 23, 2024. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that hospice care should have been coded in the MDS, but it was not. The Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator both stated that the MDS should be coded correctly to accurately reflect the resident's status. For another resident, admitted on November 3, 2022, with a diagnosis of dementia, the MDS assessment failed to indicate that the resident was taking an antidepressant medication, escitalopram, which had been prescribed on April 2, 2024. The Medication Administration Record showed that the medication was administered throughout May 2024. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that the antidepressant should have been coded on the MDS. The DON reiterated the expectation for accurate MDS coding, and the Administrator also expected the MDS to be coded correctly, although he was not directly involved in the MDS process.
Failure to Complete PASARR Evaluation for New Mental Health Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) evaluation was completed for a resident who received new mental health diagnoses. The resident, admitted on March 18, 2022, was diagnosed with anxiety disorder, depression, and schizoaffective disorder on April 6, 2022. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on July 2, 2024, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and active diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and schizophrenia. The resident's care plan, updated on February 8, 2024, noted the use of psychotropic medications for schizoaffective disorder and valproic acid for mood disorder. Despite these new diagnoses, the resident's medical record showed no evidence of a completed PASARR evaluation. During interviews, the Assistant Director of Nursing stated that a Level I PASARR was submitted initially, but she was unaware that a new PASARR was required after the resident received new diagnoses. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the PASARR should have been resubmitted to reflect the resident's new serious mental illness diagnoses.
Failure to Complete PASARR Evaluation for Resident with Mental Illness
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) evaluation was completed for a resident with a history of serious mental illness and intellectual disabilities. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified psychosis, and suicidal ideation. Despite these conditions, the resident's PASARR Level I Screening initially indicated a negative outcome due to a 30-day Exempted Hospital Discharge. However, the facility did not complete a PASARR evaluation after the resident remained in the facility beyond the 30-day exemption period. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) admitted during an interview that the PASARR for the resident was missed because she was not familiar with the 30-day exemption and resubmission requirement. The Director of Nursing confirmed that the PASARR should have been resubmitted after the 30-day period. This oversight resulted in the facility's failure to comply with federal regulations requiring the screening and evaluation of individuals with serious mental illness or intellectual disabilities to determine the appropriate level of care and specialized services needed.
Non-Compliance with Resident Room Size Regulations
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that resident rooms met the required minimum square footage per resident, as outlined in federal regulations. Specifically, the facility did not provide at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple occupancy rooms and 100 square feet for single occupancy rooms. The Client Accommodations Analysis, completed by the Administrator, revealed that 19 out of 21 resident rooms did not meet these requirements. Measurements showed that rooms with four beds provided only 73.2 square feet per resident, while rooms with two beds provided between 69.85 and 77.5 square feet per resident. Interviews conducted with the Director of Maintenance and the Administrator confirmed the accuracy of the room measurements and acknowledged that most resident rooms did not comply with federal size regulations. The Administrator also stated that there had been no issues with care related to room size and that the facility did not have a policy regarding room size. This deficiency was identified through document review and interviews, highlighting a significant non-compliance with federal standards for resident accommodations.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 599 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 5 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Mentone
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highland Care Center Of Redlands | 3.2 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Plymouth Village | 3.7 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| Cedar Mountain Post Acute | 4 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
| Madison Grove Post Acute | 5.5 mi | — | 16 | 0 |
| Redlands Healthcare Center | 5.5 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for University Post Acute.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.