Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around January 2027
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Sierra View Homes during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Two residents with new diagnoses of serious mental illness were not referred for a required Level II PASRR evaluation. Facility records showed that after being diagnosed with conditions such as bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and psychosis, the necessary referral to the state-designated authority was not made. Staff interviews revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through regarding the PASRR process.
The facility failed to accurately code the MDS for two residents, resulting in one being incorrectly documented as rarely/never understood and another missing active diagnoses of anxiety and depression. The errors were identified during a survey, and facility leadership confirmed that the MDS did not accurately reflect the residents' conditions at the time of assessment.
A resident receiving hospice care did not have hospice services addressed in their care plan, despite documentation and staff acknowledgment that such services were being provided. Facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator and DON, confirmed the omission and stated that the care plan should have included details about hospice involvement and services.
Failure to Refer Residents for Level II PASRR After New Mental Illness Diagnoses
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to refer two residents for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after they were diagnosed with new serious mental illnesses. According to facility policy, a resident review (RR) must be initiated and a Level I screening submitted in the PASRR system when there is a significant change in a resident's physical or mental condition, including new diagnoses of serious mental illness. For both residents, medical records showed new diagnoses of conditions such as bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, psychosis, and dementia with agitation, but there was no evidence that the facility referred them to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II PASRR evaluation. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and follow-through regarding the PASRR process. The Admissions Coordinator stated that the MDS Coordinator was responsible for updating the PASRR when a new mental illness diagnosis occurred, but acknowledged that the process had not been completed. The MDS Coordinator confirmed she was unaware that a Level II PASRR was required for the affected residents. The Executive Director stated that staff were expected to revise and resubmit the PASRR to the state agency, but this had not occurred for either resident.
Inaccurate MDS Coding for Two Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two residents, resulting in inaccurate assessments. For one resident with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a significant change in status MDS was coded to indicate the resident was rarely or never understood. Upon review, the MDS Coordinator acknowledged this was an error and that the resident's cognitive ability had been incorrectly documented. The inaccuracy was not identified until it was brought to the attention of the MDS Coordinator during the survey. For another resident with a history of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, the quarterly MDS did not reflect active diagnoses of anxiety or depression, despite these being present in the resident's medical history. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that these diagnoses were omitted from the MDS and subsequently amended the record. Both the DON and Executive Director stated their expectation that the MDS should accurately reflect residents' cognitive status and active diagnoses, but these were not captured at the time of the assessments.
Failure to Include Hospice Services in Resident Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing hospice care for a resident who was admitted with a history of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder and was receiving hospice services. Documentation review showed that although the resident's admission orders included hospice care and restrictions on hospitalization and routine tests, there was no evidence in the care plan to indicate hospice services were addressed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) confirmed the resident was on hospice, but the care plan did not reflect this, nor did it specify the services to be provided by the hospice agency. Interviews with facility staff, including the MDS Coordinator and the Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that hospice care was not included in the resident's care plan. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged the omission and stated that hospice should be included so staff are aware of the services and the involvement of the hospice team. The DON also stated that the care plan should include the reason for hospice admission and any specific requests from the resident or family. The Executive Director confirmed the expectation that hospice care be identified in the care plan.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 288 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Reedley
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vineyard Care Center | 0.5 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Palm Village Retirement Comm. | 1.2 mi | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dinuba Healthcare | 5.3 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
| Kingsburg Center | 8.3 mi | — | 3 | 0 |
| Bethel Lutheran Home | 9.1 mi | — | 17 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Sierra View Homes.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.