Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around October 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Lp during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
Staff lacked consistent knowledge of abuse reporting requirements, with several unable to identify the correct agencies or time frames for reporting. In one case, an allegation of abuse involving a resident was not reported to the Ombudsman and law enforcement within the required two-hour window, as confirmed by the administrator.
Staff did not wear gowns while changing the incontinence brief of a resident with an indwelling catheter, despite facility policy and posted instructions requiring gown and glove use for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Both the staff and the resident confirmed that gowns were not used during these care activities, and interviews with clinical leadership verified that this was not in compliance with infection control protocols.
A resident with multicolored bruising on the left upper chest and armpit was not reported to the Department within the required two-hour timeframe, delaying the investigation of potential abuse. The bruising was first documented on a shower sheet but was not reported until days later. Staff interviews revealed inconsistencies in understanding the abuse reporting protocol, with some believing they had 24 hours to report, contrary to facility policy.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse and Staff Knowledge Deficits
Penalty
Summary
Facility staff demonstrated a lack of knowledge regarding the correct abuse reporting guidelines, including whom to report abuse allegations to and the required time frames for reporting. Interviews with both licensed and unlicensed staff revealed inconsistent and incorrect understanding of the reporting process, with several staff members stating that abuse allegations should be reported within 24 hours, rather than the required two-hour window for incidents involving abuse or serious bodily injury. Some staff were also unclear about which agencies needed to be notified, with responses varying between the state, Ombudsman, law enforcement, and the facility administrator. A specific incident was identified in which an allegation of abuse occurred when a certified nursing assistant was observed holding a sheet over a resident's head and pushing her down. The report of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse was not faxed to the Ombudsman and law enforcement until the following day, exceeding the mandated two-hour reporting window. The administrator confirmed that the facility did not meet the required reporting time frame for this incident.
Failure to Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions During Incontinence Care
Penalty
Summary
Staff failed to follow the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) protocol for a resident with an indwelling catheter. During an observed care activity, two unlicensed staff members changed the resident's incontinence brief without wearing gowns, despite clear signage and facility policy requiring both gowns and gloves for such high-contact care activities. The resident's care plan indicated the presence of an indwelling catheter, and the EBP document posted at the room entrance specified the need for gown and glove use during incontinence care. Both unlicensed staff members confirmed in interviews that they did not wear gowns during the care activity and acknowledged that they should have done so according to EBP guidelines. The resident also verified that staff did not wear gowns and stated that this had been a consistent practice. Interviews with a licensed nurse and the facility's infection preventionist further confirmed that residents with indwelling catheters are placed on EBP and that staff are required to wear gowns and gloves during incontinence care, as outlined in both facility policy and state guidance.
Failure to Timely Report Suspected Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin, potentially resulting from abuse, to the Department within the required two-hour timeframe. This delay hindered the Department's ability to promptly investigate the injury and potential abuse. The incident involved a resident who was found with multicolored bruising on the left upper chest and armpit, which was first documented on a shower sheet on 5/13/24. Despite the documentation, the bruising was not reported to the appropriate authorities until 5/17/24, when it was observed again by staff. The facility's policy mandates that such incidents be reported within two hours, but the report was only completed and faxed on 5/17/24. Interviews with various staff members revealed inconsistencies in the understanding and execution of the abuse reporting protocol. Unlicensed staff and licensed nurses provided conflicting accounts regarding the timing and responsibility of reporting the bruising. Some staff believed they had 24 hours to report suspected abuse, contrary to the facility's policy. Additionally, there was a lack of training for staff on the proper procedures for reporting abuse allegations, which contributed to the delay in reporting. This failure to adhere to the reporting policy placed residents at risk of abuse and delayed necessary investigations.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 64 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Eureka
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granada Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Lp | 4.6 mi | — | 6 | 0 |
| Eureka Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Lp | 5 mi | — | 27 | 0 |
| Fortuna Rehabilitation And Wellness Center, Lp | 10.3 mi | — | 31 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Seaview Rehabilitation & Wellness Center, Lp.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.