Not rated by CMS — ratings are suppressed for new or low-volume facilities.
The next survey window likely opens around November 2026
Estimate from public CMS data, current as of June 2026. Survey timing is at the state agency's discretion.
Citation history
Health deficiencies cited at Pioneer House during CMS and state inspections, most recent first.
A resident with schizoaffective disorder, documented as lacking decision-making capacity and assessed as high risk for elopement, refused the wander management system (WMS), yet the care plan did not include specific interventions to monitor safety, address the mental illness diagnosis, or reduce elopement risk. Progress notes showed the resident was restless, agitated, and on high elopement risk, but staff did not document monitoring strategies. When the resident was discovered missing, an LPN did not announce Code Pink, administration was not notified for more than two hours, and police were notified several hours later, contrary to facility policy requiring immediate Code Pink, prompt administration notification, and police notification if the resident was not located after 30 minutes. Staff interviews confirmed the absence of WMS use, difficulty monitoring residents leaving the floor, and lack of a Code Pink announcement, while the DON acknowledged the missing care plan interventions and the failure to follow the elopement procedures.
A resident with extensive burn wounds and homelessness was discharged without arrangements for home health nursing, food, or transportation for follow-up care. The facility did not contact community resources, provide written instructions, or ensure the resident could manage her medical needs post-discharge. Staff interviews confirmed the lack of individualized discharge planning and failure to meet the resident's health and safety needs.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of wandering was not wearing a required wander guard device for multiple shifts, despite physician orders and care plan directives. Staff failed to ensure the device was in place or to document its absence, resulting in the resident leaving the facility unsupervised and being found by law enforcement miles away without the device.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of aggression wandered unsupervised, entering other residents' rooms and physically assaulting two residents, resulting in pain, injury, and fear. Staff and residents reported that the aggressive resident was not adequately monitored, despite known risks and prior incidents, and the facility failed to protect residents from abuse as required by policy.
A resident with encephalopathy and dysphagia was not provided the therapeutic diet ordered by their physician, receiving a pureed meal instead of the prescribed soft and bite-sized texture. This discrepancy was confirmed by facility staff, including a CNA, LN, and the DON, highlighting a failure to adhere to the facility's policy on therapeutic diets.
A resident with multiple health conditions requiring substantial assistance for ADLs was unsafely discharged to a room and board facility without confirming necessary in-home supportive services (IHSS). The facility's SSD and DON failed to verify the availability of IHSS, relying instead on the resident's self-assessment and the room and board representative's understanding. This oversight led to the resident being unable to care for themselves, resulting in hospitalization.
A facility failed to complete and provide an inventory of personal belongings sheet to a resident upon admission, as required by policy. The resident, admitted with anxiety, confirmed that no inventory was conducted, and no copy was given. The DON acknowledged the lack of documentation, which could lead to the resident's belongings being lost or stolen.
A resident with a history of aggression and inappropriate behavior verbally threatened and physically assaulted another resident, causing injury and distress. Another resident experienced multiple episodes of sexual inappropriateness from the same resident. Despite awareness of the resident's behaviors, the facility failed to implement effective interventions to ensure the safety of the affected residents.
A facility failed to document the admission weight of a resident with dysphagia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition, as required by physician orders. The absence of this documentation was confirmed by the ADON, DON, and NC, and the facility could not provide their policy for Admission Assessment despite requests.
A resident, dependent on staff for grooming and hygiene due to cerebral infarction and muscle weakness, did not receive scheduled showers as per their care plan. The resident's care plan required bathing at least twice a week, but records showed only two showers were provided over a specified period. Facility staff confirmed the oversight, acknowledging the failure to adhere to the resident's care plan.
The facility failed to store medications in their original containers for 16 residents, as observed with unlabeled pills in plastic cups in a medication cart. A Licensed Nurse confirmed the safety concern, and the DON highlighted the risk of incorrect identification. Facility policy mandates medications remain in original packaging.
The facility failed to maintain food safety and sanitation standards, affecting 42 residents. Expired and unlabeled food items were found in the kitchen, and there were no temperature logs for certain storage areas. Ice and water dispensers were unclean, and food tray lids were improperly stored on a dirty oven top. The Dietary Manager confirmed these deficiencies.
The facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices, including housekeeping staff not changing gloves, lack of handwashing in the laundry room, and no corrective action for positive legionella tests. LN 1 and CNAs did not perform hand hygiene when passing lunch trays, and LN 1 did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions for a resident with spina bifida and paraplegia.
A resident's right to retain personal possessions was violated when their cell phone was taken without permission after they used it to call 911 due to unresponsive staff. The facility failed to investigate or document the incident, and the phone's whereabouts remain unknown, despite policies requiring prompt investigation of such issues.
A resident reported an incident of sexual and physical abuse to an LN, resulting in a bruise, but the facility failed to investigate or report the allegation. Interviews revealed staff were unaware of the abuse protocol, and the DON and ADM were not informed. The facility's policy requires immediate reporting and investigation, which was not followed, leaving the resident feeling unsafe.
A resident was served meals in polystyrene containers with plastic utensils without any documented orders or dietary instructions, leading to feelings of neglect and diminished self-worth. The DON and DM confirmed the lack of orders for this practice, acknowledging it as a dignity issue. The facility's policy on resident rights, which includes the right to a dignified existence, was not followed.
The facility failed to maintain secured handrails in the corridors of Unit A and Unit B, as required by regulations. Observations showed a resident with impaired cognition and difficulty walking using a walker in a corridor without handrails, and two other residents navigating another corridor also lacking handrails. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the handrails were removed for painting and repairs, with no timeline for reinstallation. The DON acknowledged the increased risk of falls and injuries due to the absence of handrails and admitted the facility lacked a policy for handrails.
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach for two residents, placing them at risk of not being able to ask for assistance. The call lights were found bundled up in a basket above the bedside dresser, out of reach. Staff confirmed the call lights were out of reach and stated they usually place them within reach for resident safety. The facility's policy indicated call lights should be accessible when residents are in bed.
Failure to Prevent Elopement and Follow Elopement Procedures for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
The deficiency involves the facility’s failure to implement measures to prevent an avoidable elopement for a resident with schizoaffective disorder who was assessed as high risk for elopement and lacked decision-making capacity. The resident’s Wandering Risk Assessment identified a high elopement risk, and physician orders and admission documentation indicated the resident did not have capacity to understand choices and make decisions. The care plan documented that the resident was non-compliant with the wander management system (WMS) and was a fall risk, but it did not include nursing interventions for monitoring safety or reducing elopement risk, nor did it address the resident’s schizoaffective disorder or how related behaviors would be monitored. Progress notes documented that the resident refused the WMS and was on high elopement risk, with restlessness and agitation, but staff did not document monitoring interventions or best practices to keep the resident safe from elopement. On the date of the incident, a licensed nurse documented at 7:35 p.m. that the resident was not found in the facility, but there was no documentation that a Code Pink was announced as required by the facility’s elopement emergency procedures. The same nurse documented at 10:05 p.m. that the DON was notified the resident had left the facility, indicating an administration notification delay of more than two hours. A later progress note at 3:17 a.m. showed the DON faxed notification to the police department, exceeding the policy requirement to notify police if the resident is not located after 30 minutes. Staff interviews revealed that residents outside smoking after the main entrance doors locked at 5 p.m. needed to ring a doorbell for re-entry and that one CNA could not tell when residents left the floor if busy elsewhere and confirmed the resident did not wear a WMS and no Code Pink was heard. The DON confirmed the resident lacked capacity, was high risk for elopement, that the care plan did not address the mental illness diagnosis, and that there were no interventions for monitoring safety when the WMS was not worn. The facility’s policies required identification of residents at risk for wandering/elopement, inclusion of safety strategies in the care plan, and initiation of the elopement/missing resident emergency procedure, including announcing Code Pink, notifying administration, and notifying police if the resident was not located after 30 minutes.
Failure to Ensure Safe and Coordinated Discharge Planning
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for a resident who was homeless and required ongoing care for multiple burn wounds. The resident, admitted with third-degree burns covering 20-29% of her body, muscle wasting, mobility disorders, and MRSA carrier status, was discharged without proper arrangements for home health nursing services, food, or transportation to follow-up medical appointments. The case manager/social worker did not contact homeless shelters or home health agencies, nor did she provide the resident with written discharge instructions or information for follow-up care. The resident was only verbally informed of her discharge the day before and was not advised of her right to appeal the discharge. The discharge plan was not individualized or reviewed with the resident, and the facility did not ensure that the resident's needs and preferences were met. The administrator attempted to secure a motel room for three nights but did not make a reservation or arrange for food, nursing care, or a long-term shelter solution. There was no documentation of a discharge plan or communication with the resident regarding the plan. The facility's own policy required a discharge summary and plan to be developed and reviewed with the resident and family at least 24 hours before discharge, but this was not followed. Interviews with facility staff, including the DON and wound nurse, revealed a lack of awareness and preparation for the resident's discharge needs. The wound nurse acknowledged that the resident would not be able to care for wounds on her back and had not provided any education or training for wound care. The facility's failure to coordinate post-discharge care, secure appropriate shelter, and provide necessary information and resources resulted in a discharge process that did not address the resident's health and safety needs.
Failure to Ensure Use of Wandering Device for High-Risk Resident
Penalty
Summary
A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and ensure that a resident at high risk for elopement was wearing a required wandering device, as ordered by the physician and outlined in the care plan. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 4/15, a history of dementia, falls, and spinal fracture, was known to wander and exhibit exit-seeking behaviors. Staff interviews confirmed that the resident was supposed to wear a wander guard on the left ankle, which would trigger an alarm if the resident approached an exit. However, documentation in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the resident was not wearing the device for six consecutive shifts prior to the incident. On the day of the incident, the resident was able to leave the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge. The absence of the wandering device was confirmed by both staff and the resident's responsible party, who reported not seeing the device on the resident prior to the elopement. The resident was later found by law enforcement more than two miles from the facility, without the wandering device, and was returned to the facility. The facility's own policies required identification of residents at risk for wandering and implementation of safety interventions, including the use of a wander guard, but these were not followed in this case. Record reviews and staff interviews further revealed that nurses were expected to check and document the presence of the wandering device each shift, and to immediately replace it if missing. Despite these expectations, there was no documentation or action taken to ensure the device was in place during the period leading up to the resident's elopement. The failure to follow physician orders, care plan interventions, and facility policy directly led to the resident's unsupervised exit from the facility.
Failure to Prevent Resident-to-Resident Physical Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect residents from physical abuse, resulting in two residents experiencing pain, injury, and fear for their safety. One resident with severe cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and a history of behavioral disturbances was known to wander unsupervised and had prior incidents of aggression. This resident entered another resident's room, touched personal belongings, ate food, and became physically aggressive when confronted, swinging her arms and making physical contact that resulted in redness on the other resident's neck. The affected resident, who had intact cognition and a history of depression and chronic pain, reported feeling abused and expressed fear, leading him to avoid activities and remain in his room for safety. In a separate incident, the same resident with cognitive impairment approached another resident in the dining room, touched her belongings, and slapped her on the back of the head when she tried to intervene. The resident who was struck, who had moderate cognitive impairment, hemiplegia, and mental health diagnoses, complained of pain and expressed feeling unsafe and wanting to leave the facility. Witnesses, including another resident and staff, confirmed the aggressive behavior and noted that the resident responsible for the incidents was not monitored at all times, despite being on special monitoring due to her known wandering and aggression. Staff interviews revealed that the facility did not provide sufficient supervision to prevent the aggressive resident from entering other residents' rooms or causing harm. Multiple staff members and residents reported that the aggressive resident frequently wandered unsupervised and that staff were often too busy to monitor her continuously. The facility's policy stated that residents have the right to be free from abuse, including abuse by other residents, but the observed incidents and staff accounts demonstrated a failure to uphold this standard.
Failure to Provide Correct Therapeutic Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for one of the sampled residents, who was admitted with diagnoses including encephalopathy and dysphagia. The physician's order specified a regular diet with soft and bite-sized texture, but the resident received a meal with a pureed food item and a tray card indicating a mince moist diet. This discrepancy was confirmed during observations and interviews with a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA), a Licensed Nurse (LN), a kitchen staff member, and the Director of Nursing (DON). The facility's policy on therapeutic diets, which requires that diet orders match the terminology used by the food and nutrition services department, was not followed. The DON acknowledged that the diet provided did not match the physician's order, and the kitchen staff confirmed that the mince moist and soft, bite-sized diets are different orders. This failure had the potential to impact the resident's nutritional status, as the diet provided did not align with the resident's treatment plan and preferences.
Unsafe Discharge of Resident Without Adequate Support
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide a safe discharge for a resident who was discharged to a room and board facility that did not meet their care needs. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and a right leg above the knee amputation, required substantial assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as toileting, showering, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. Despite this, the resident was discharged without ensuring that the necessary in-home supportive services (IHSS) were in place, leading to the resident living in an unsafe environment. Interviews and record reviews revealed that the Social Service Director (SSD) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not confirm the availability of IHSS before the resident's discharge. The SSD relied on the resident's self-assessment and the room and board representative's (RBR) understanding that IHSS would be provided, but did not verify this information. The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated a need for substantial assistance, yet the discharge plan did not adequately address these needs, resulting in the resident being unable to care for themselves and eventually requiring hospitalization. The facility's policy and procedure for preparing a resident for discharge were not followed, as the post-discharge plan was not adequately developed or confirmed. The SSD did not document discussions with the RBR regarding the resident's functional abilities and the room and board's capacity to provide care. The lack of documentation and confirmation of IHSS services contributed to the unsafe discharge, as the resident was left without the necessary support to manage their ADLs independently.
Failure to Provide Inventory of Personal Belongings
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that an inventory of personal belongings sheet was completed and a copy was provided to a resident upon admission. This deficiency was identified for one of the three sampled residents, who was admitted with a diagnosis that included anxiety. The review of the resident's Admission Record indicated that the Inventory of Personal Effects sheet, dated shortly after admission, lacked the resident's signature on the 'Certification of Receipt' portion. Furthermore, there was no documented evidence in the resident's closed record, nurse's notes, or admission record that the resident signed the inventory sheet or received a copy upon admission. During a telephone interview, the resident confirmed that an inventory of belongings was not conducted upon admission, and a copy of the inventory sheet was not provided. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the facility could not provide documentation that the resident received a copy of the inventory sheet. The facility's policy and procedure for admitting residents, dated September 2013, required that all personal items be inventoried, recorded, and signed by the resident or a family member, with a copy provided to them. This failure had the potential for the resident's personal belongings to be lost or stolen.
Failure to Protect Residents from Abuse
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to protect two residents from abuse by another resident, who had a known history of verbal aggression and sexual inappropriateness. Resident 3 was verbally threatened and physically assaulted by Resident 1, resulting in physical injury and emotional distress. Despite Resident 1's history of aggression, there was no documented evidence that the resident had been referred or evaluated by a psychiatrist as ordered by the physician. Resident 2 experienced multiple episodes of sexual inappropriateness from Resident 1. The facility's care plan for Resident 2 did not contain any interventions to ensure the resident's safety, despite the resident's report of feeling uncomfortable and dirty due to Resident 1's actions. The facility's staff, including the Assistant Director of Nursing, were aware of Resident 1's behaviors but failed to take adequate measures to protect Resident 2. Interviews with staff and residents revealed that Resident 1 had a history of inappropriate behavior, including making sexual advances towards staff and residents. Despite this, the facility did not implement effective interventions to prevent further incidents. The facility's policy on safety and supervision of residents was not adequately followed, leading to the failure to protect Residents 2 and 3 from abuse.
Failure to Document Admission Weight for Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident when the resident's weight was not measured at admission. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including dysphagia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. A review of the resident's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 10/31/24 indicated an order for an admission weight, which was not documented. During an interview and record review with the Assistant Director of Nursing, Director of Nursing, and Nurse Consultant, it was confirmed that there was no admission weight recorded for the resident, and thus no way to track potential weight loss. Additionally, the facility was unable to provide their policy and procedure for Admission Assessment, which should include documentation of a resident's admission weight, despite requests made on 11/26/24 and 11/27/24.
Failure to Provide Scheduled Showers for Dependent Resident
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident, who was unable to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) independently, received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. The resident, admitted with diagnoses including cerebral infarction and muscle weakness, was dependent on staff for grooming and hygiene care and required assistance from one to two staff members for bathing. The resident's care plan indicated a preference for showers and required bathing at least twice a week. However, a review of the resident's bathing tasks revealed that the resident only received showers on two occasions within a specified period, with no bathing tasks completed for over a week. During an interview and record review, facility staff, including the Assistant Director of Nursing, Director of Nursing, and Nurse Consultant, confirmed the resident's dependency on staff for hygiene needs and acknowledged the failure to provide showers as scheduled. The facility's policy on supporting ADLs emphasized the necessity of providing appropriate care and services for residents unable to carry out ADLs independently.
Medication Storage Deficiency
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure medications were stored in their original containers and in a safe manner for 16 sampled residents. During an observation and interview with a Licensed Nurse (LN) at Medication Cart 1, it was found that there were three 30 mL plastic cups in the top drawer, each containing two or more unlabeled and unidentified items. The LN confirmed that the plastic cups were not labeled and contained various pills, including a pink pill, a red liquid-gel pill, two orange-colored pills, and seven red and white liquid-gel pills. The LN acknowledged that medications should not be removed from their original packaging, citing this as a safety concern. In a subsequent interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), it was confirmed that medications are not to be removed from their original packaging, as this poses a safety hazard. The DON emphasized that the next nurse taking over the medication cart would not know what these pills are, highlighting the potential for incorrect identification and misuse. A review of the facility's policy and procedure on Medication Labeling and Storage indicated that medications and biologicals should be stored in their original packaging, and only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. The policy also states that nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner, and medications may not be transferred between containers.
Food Safety and Sanitation Deficiencies in Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure food was prepared and stored in a safe and sanitary manner for 42 residents. During an inspection, an expired half-gallon of milk, opened salad dressing, and creamer containers without open dates were found in the kitchen refrigerators. Additionally, full egg crates were found without received or expiration dates labeled. The Dietary Manager confirmed these observations and acknowledged that the items should have been labeled and the expired milk discarded. Furthermore, there were no temperature monitoring logs for the resident food freezer section and the dry storage room, which the Dietary Manager confirmed should have been in place. The inspection also revealed that the ice and water dispensers in the dining room were not clean, with white and brown residue observed on the surfaces. The Dietary Manager confirmed the unclean state of the dispensers. Additionally, lids used for covering prepared food on the steam table were stored on top of an unclean oven top, which was observed to have a dusty sticky residue. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the unclean surface and the improper storage of food tray lids. These findings indicate a failure to adhere to the facility's policies and procedures for food safety and sanitation.
Infection Control Deficiencies in LTC Facility
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention and control practices, leading to potential cross-contamination and infection risks. Housekeeping staff were observed dipping contaminated gloves into mop bucket sanitizing solution without changing gloves, which was confirmed by the housekeeper and the infection preventionist as cross-contamination. Additionally, the laundry room lacked a handwashing station, and staff did not use gowns when handling dirty laundry, failed to sanitize equipment after handling dirty laundry, and did not perform hand hygiene after glove removal or between resident room visits. Contaminated clothes hangers were also hung back on the clean linens cart. The facility was unable to provide evidence of timely corrective action following positive legionella tests in the water systems. A review of the facility's water management plan revealed a positive legionella testing report, but no evidence of corrective action or retesting was available. The infection preventionist confirmed that interventions and retesting were expected but not documented. Licensed Nurse 1 and Certified Nursing Assistants 2 and 3 did not perform hand hygiene when going in and out of residents' rooms while passing lunch trays. Additionally, LN 1 did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing wound care for a resident with spina bifida and paraplegia, who had nephrostomy tubes and a sacral wound. The infection preventionist confirmed that staff should have worn gowns during high-contact care activities, as indicated by the Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy.
Failure to Maintain Resident's Right to Personal Possessions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a resident's right to retain and use personal possessions, specifically a cell phone, was maintained. The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage and hemiplegia, reported that their cell phone was taken away after they used it to call 911 due to unresponsive nursing staff at night. The resident was unaware of the current location of the cell phone. Interviews with the Social Services Director (SSD) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that the resident was admitted with a cell phone and chargers, but the SSD admitted to not following up on the whereabouts of the phone after it was reportedly taken by firefighters. The facility's policies and procedures, which were reviewed, indicate that residents are allowed to retain personal possessions and that any complaints of misappropriation should be promptly investigated. However, the SSD and the Director of Nursing (DON) both acknowledged that they did not know the current location of the resident's cell phone, and no documentation was found regarding the outcome or location of the phone. The facility's failure to investigate and document the incident violated the resident's rights as outlined in their policies and procedures.
Failure to Report and Investigate Abuse Allegation
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of abuse involving a resident, identified as Resident 21, who reported an incident of sexual and physical abuse to a Licensed Nurse (LN). Resident 21, who was admitted with diagnoses including intracerebral hemorrhage and hemiplegia, expressed feeling unsafe and neglected within the facility. The resident reported to LN 4 that two CNAs were involved in the alleged abuse, which resulted in a bruise on the resident's hand. Despite being a mandated reporter, LN 4 did not take appropriate action to report the sexual abuse allegation, considering it a non-emergency situation. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of understanding and execution of the facility's abuse reporting protocol. CNA 4 indicated she would report incidents to a nurse or supervisor but was unsure about the availability of an abuse binder. LN 2 stated she would notify the DON and ADM, check the policy for abuse reporting, and inform the state authorities, but was unaware of the location of the abuse binder. The DON and ADM were not informed of the incident and were unaware of the abuse allegation until the surveyor's review. The facility's policy requires all reports of abuse to be immediately reported to the administrator and relevant authorities, with thorough investigations conducted by management. However, the policy was not followed in this case, as the ADM, who is the abuse coordinator, was not notified, and no investigation was initiated. The failure to adhere to the policy resulted in the incident not being reported or investigated, leaving Resident 21 feeling unsafe and unsupported.
Resident Served Meals in Polystyrene Containers Without Justification
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to provide an environment that supported the quality of life for one resident, identified as Resident 21, by serving meals in polystyrene containers with plastic utensils. This was observed during a visit to Resident 21's room, where the resident expressed dissatisfaction and a lack of understanding as to why meals were served in this manner. The resident felt neglected and expressed feelings of hopelessness, indicating a negative impact on their self-worth and well-being. Upon review of Resident 21's records, it was confirmed by both the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Dietary Manager (DM) that there were no physician orders or dietary instructions specifying the use of polystyrene containers and plastic utensils for this resident. The DON acknowledged that this practice was a dignity issue, potentially making the resident feel singled out. The facility's policy on Resident Rights, which emphasizes the right to a dignified existence and participation in care planning, was not adhered to in this instance.
Absence of Secured Handrails in Facility Corridors
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that the corridors in Unit A and Unit B had firmly secured handrails, as required by the California Code of Regulations. This deficiency was identified through observations, interviews, and record reviews. During an observation, a resident with severely impaired cognition and difficulty walking was seen using a walker in the Unit A corridor, which lacked secured handrails. The resident confirmed the absence of handrails and expressed that having them would enhance safety by providing support for balance. Further observations revealed that two residents were seen navigating the Unit B corridor, which also lacked secured handrails. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed that the handrails had been removed over three weeks prior for painting and repairs, with no clear timeline for reinstallation. The Director of Nursing (DON) acknowledged that the handrails had been absent for over a month and admitted to not having a specific date for their return. Additionally, the facility did not have a policy or procedure in place regarding handrails. The absence of handrails in the facility's corridors posed a potential risk of increased falls and injuries for residents using these areas. The DON, who started working at the facility after the handrails were removed, agreed that the lack of handrails heightened the risk of falls and injuries. The facility's failure to comply with the regulation requiring firmly secured handrails in corridors was evident, as confirmed by the observations and interviews conducted during the survey.
Inaccessible Call Lights for Residents
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that call lights were within reach and easily accessible for two residents, placing them at risk of not being able to ask staff for assistance. Resident 2, who has dementia, a history of falling, and glaucoma, and Resident 4, who has dementia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and hypertension, were observed to have their call lights bundled up and placed in a black basket above the bedside dresser, out of their reach. During an interview, a Certified Nurse Aide confirmed the call lights were out of reach and stated that they usually place the call lights within reach so that residents feel safe and can call for assistance. The Administrator also confirmed that staff are expected to always place the call lights within reach of the residents. The facility's policy and procedure on answering call lights indicated that call lights should be accessible to residents when in bed.
What surveyors are citing around you — mapped
All 10 risk areas, ranked with evidence
Repeat citations, what's rising near you, and quality measures — ranked so department heads know exactly where to look first.
Illustrative
What surveyors actually found near you
We read the 482 citations issued within 25 miles in the last 12 months — including the 2 immediate-jeopardy cases — and tell you exactly what happened, in plain English, matched to your record.
Resident with a documented fall history left unattended on the patio; found on the ground with a hip fracture.
Walk-in cooler logs missing for 12 days; expired supplements in the medication room fridge.
Illustrative
A prioritized, do-first checklist
Every risk area becomes concrete audit steps drawn from real citations at facilities like yours — run them this week, before your window opens.
Illustrative
Risk indicators are statistical estimates from public CMS data — not predictions, findings, or compliance advice.
Nursing homes near Sacramento
How nearby facilities compare on the same public inspection record.
| Facility | Distance | Overall rating | Citations, 12 mo | Serious (J–L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-town Oaks Post-acute | 1.6 mi | — | 25 | 0 |
| River Bend Nursing Center | 2.2 mi | — | 2 | 0 |
| Mckinley Park Care Center | 2.2 mi | — | 30 | 0 |
| Saylor Lane Healthcare Center | 2.3 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
| University Post-acute Rehab | 2.5 mi | — | 0 | 0 |
Every risk area ranked, a do-first checklist, and your local survey patterns
Built specifically for Pioneer House.
100% money-back within 48 hours.
Trusted data, never guesswork. Every citation, penalty, rating and Plan of Correction on this page is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 2026) and official state health department websites.